欢迎访问《中国农学通报》,

中国农学通报 ›› 2014, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 151-155.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-2288

• 农学 农业基础科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

鄂西南山区土壤酸化趋势研究——以恩施州宣恩县为例

佀国涵 王瑞 袁家富 谭军 徐大兵 彭五星 赵书军   

  • 收稿日期:2013-08-28 修回日期:2013-09-16 出版日期:2014-04-25 发布日期:2014-04-25
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省烟草专卖局重点科研项目;湖北省农业科技创新中心资助项目

Tendency of Soil Acidification in Southwestern Mountainous Region of Hubei Province——A Case Study of Xuan’en County

  • Received:2013-08-28 Revised:2013-09-16 Online:2014-04-25 Published:2014-04-25

摘要: 为了摸清鄂西南山区土壤的酸化程度以及空间分布,以鄂西南山区具有代表性的区域——恩施州宣恩县作为研究对象,通过将第二次全国土壤普查与最近的测土配方施肥项目的土壤pH值进行对比分析。结果表明,在过去的30年间,宣恩县的耕地土壤的平均pH值降低了0.97个单位,其中pH值<5.0的强酸性土壤的面积增加了53.0个百分点;宣恩县耕地土壤pH值空间分布变化不大,但其耕地土壤的pH值均出现不同程度的下降,其中以椿木营乡的下降幅度最大,晓关乡的下降幅度最低;在宣恩县不同类型土壤中,以棕壤、砾质岩山地黄棕壤和石英质山地黄棕壤的pH值降幅较大,而以石灰岩山地黄棕壤的pH值降幅最低。近10年间宣恩县植烟土壤的pH值年平均下降速率较前20年间增加了2.75倍;土壤pH值与土壤中磷素的含量呈极显著负相关,可见酸性磷肥的大量施用可能是导致该区域土壤酸化的主要因素之一。

关键词: 决定系数分析, 决定系数分析

Abstract: In order to find out the degree and spatial distribution of soil acidification in southwestern mountainous region of Hubei Province. The author took Xuan’en County of Enshi City as a typical region to analyze the change tendency of soil pH value by comparison of pH data that came from the second national soil survey and the project of soil testing and fertilizer recommendations. The result showed that: the average arable soil pH value of Xuan’en County was reduced by 0.97 units, and the areas of strong acid soil (pH<5.0) were increased by 53.0% in past 30 years. The spatial distribution of soil pH in Xuan’en County had less change, but the pH of arable soil all declined in varying degree, the falling range of soil pH was the most in Chunmuying Village, and the least in Xiaoguan Village. The pH all decreased to various degrees among the soil types in Xuan’en County. Brown soil, psephite mountain yellow brown soil and quartzose mountain yellow brown soil had a large decrement of pH value, and limestone mountain yellow brown soil had a small decrement of pH value. The annual pH decreasing rate of tobacco plantation soil in recent 10 years was 2.75 times than the previous 20 years. Soil pH value was extremely significant negative with the total P and available P, and it might be one of the main factors of soil acidification to use a large number of acid phosphate fertilization in this area.