欢迎访问《农学学报》,

农学学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (6): 112-115.

• 三农问题研究 农村产业结构 • 上一篇    下一篇

财政分权、亲贫式支出与减贫

刘力华 周虎 侯圣清   

  • 收稿日期:2014-02-21 修回日期:2014-04-13 出版日期:2014-06-20 发布日期:2014-06-20

Fiscal Decentralization, Pro-poor Spending and Poverty ReductionLiu Lihua1, Li He2, Hou Shengqing1

  • Received:2014-02-21 Revised:2014-04-13 Online:2014-06-20 Published:2014-06-20

摘要: 本文应用22个省份、自治区、直辖市的面板数据,(目的)分析财政分权、亲贫式支出与减贫的关系。(结果)得到财政分权不利于减贫的结果,(结论)因为在中国的政治体制和官员制度使得地方为赢得经济增长的“赛跑”而不断增加基础建设类生产性投资,相对减少有利于减贫的服务性公共投资,也即本文所论述的亲贫式支出。亲贫式支出与财政集中结合起来对减贫的作用才能更加明显,因为如果财政分权程度高,亲贫式支出虽然绝对值增加,但是相对值仍下降,会进一步增加贫富差距,不利于社会公平与减贫。财政分权程度对于亲贫式支出减贫的作用存在一个临界值,财政分权程度小于该值,亲贫式支出减贫作用明显;财政分权程度超过该值,亲贫式支出不利于减贫。

关键词: 半枫荷, 半枫荷, 超高效液相色谱-四级杆飞行时间质谱, 有机酸, 天然多酚类物质,

Abstract: In this paper, 22 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the panel data (purpose)analyzed the relationship between fiscal decentralization, pro-poor spending and poverty reduction. (Result) We got a result that fiscal decentralization was not conducive to poverty reduction results (conclusion) because in the Chinese political system environment, fiscal decentralization would lead to local governments in pursuit of economic growth and increased investment in productive infrastructure category, that was discussed in this paper pro-poor expenditures. Pro-poor expenditures combined with centralized financial impact on poverty can be more obvious, because if a high degree of fiscal decentralization, although the absolute value of the pro-poor expenditures increased, it would still down in relative value. It further increased the gap between rich and poor and was not conducive to social equity and poverty reduction.