转ScMV-CP基因甘蔗对根际土壤酶活性及微生物的影响

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【研究目的】转ScMV-CP基因甘蔗对根际土壤酶活性和微生物的影响。【方法】利用BIOLOG Ecoplate? 微平板(BIOLOG Inc., USA)结合微生物的平板培养及相关的土壤酶活性分析。【结果】结果表明：转基因甘蔗显著(p<0.05)降低了土壤脱氢酶的活性，提高了土壤的纤维素酶、蛋白酶和脲酶活性(p<0.01)，而对蔗糖酶和磷酸单脂酶没有影响；转基因甘蔗显著增加了根际土壤可培养的细菌和真菌数量（CFUs），但对放线菌影响很小。转基因甘蔗并没有增加土壤中对卡那抗性的微生物数量（CFUs）；BIOLOG Ecoplate研究表明转基因甘蔗稍微提高了根际土壤细菌的代谢活力，细菌多样性分析表明，根际土壤细菌的Simpson指数(D’)、Shannon-Wiener指数(H’)、细菌生理群分布的均匀度、Mclntosh指数(DMc)差异不明显。【结论】转基因甘蔗对根际土壤酶和土壤微生物有一定影响，但没有增加对卡那抗性的微生物数量（CFUs）；BIOLOG实验未发现转基因甘蔗对土壤细菌的多样性有影响。

关键词: 家禽, 家禽, 性别决定, 性别分化

Abstract: 【OBJECTIVE】Study on effects on enzyme activities and microbe in rhizosphere soil of ScMV-CP transgenic sugarcane. 【METHOD】This experiment used BIOLOG Ecoplate and plate cultivation of microorganism associated with related soil enzyme activities analyses under field release of transgenic sugarcane. 【RESULTS】The results showed that the dehydrogenase activity of was lowered significantly(p<0.05), and the cellulose, protease and urease activities were improved remarkably(p<0.01), but there was no difference on sucrase activity and phosphatase activities in rhizosphere soil of ScMV-CP transgenic sugarcane compared with non-transgenic sugarcane. The total number of colony forming units (CFUs) of culturable bacteria and fungi were increased significantly((p<0.01) in transgenic sugarcane rhizosphere soil, but The total number of CFUs of culturable was not effected. No significantly higher CFUs of bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes resistant to kanamycin(Km)were obtained in transgenic sugarcane soil. BIOLOG experiment showed the metabolism activity of soil bacteria was increased lightly, and the soil bacteria diversity indexes such as Simpson index(D’),Shannon-Wiener index(H’), evenness, Mclntosh index(DMc) were not different from each other after inoculating 72h in BIOLOG Ecoplate.【CONCLUSION】There were some effects on soil enzyme activities and CFUs of soil microbe in the rhizosphere soil of ScMV-CP transgenic sugarcane, but no increasement of CFUs of soil microbe resistant to kanamycin(Km)were obtained. And results BIOLOG experiment showed the transgenic sugarcane didn’t change the soil bacteria diversity.

中图分类号:

S154

转ScMV-CP基因甘蔗对根际土壤酶活性及微生物的影响. 转ScMV-CP基因甘蔗对根际土壤酶活性及微生物的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(4): 381-381.

Ruan Miaohong, Xu Yan, Zheng Yao, Yang Chuanyu,Zheng Bixia, Guo Ying, Chen Rukai, Zhuang Muqing. Effects on Enzyme Activities and Microbe in Rhizosphere soil of ScMV-CP transgenic Sugarcane[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007, 23(4): 381-381.

参考文献

[1] NealJ L, R I Larson, T G Atkinson. Changes in rhizosphere populations of selected physiological groups of bacteria related to substitution of specific pairs of chromosomes in spring wheat. Plant Soil,1973,39:209-212.
[2] McGregor A N, Tumer M A. Soil effects of transgenic agriculture: biological processes and ecological consequences. NZ Soil News,2000,48(6):166-169.
[3] Bruinsma M, G A Kowalchuk, J A van Veen. Effects of genetically modified plants on microbial communities and processes in soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 2003,37:329-337.
[4] 王建武,冯远娇,骆世明.转基因作物对土壤生态系统的影响.应用生态学报,2002,13(4):491-494.
[5] Saxena D, Stotzky G. Bacillus thuringiensis(Bt)toxin released from root exudates and biomass of Bt corn has no apparent effect on erathworns, nematodes, protozoa, bacteria, and fungi in soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2001,33:1255-1230.
[6] Oger P, Petit A, Dessaux Y. Genetically engineered plants producing opines alter their biological environment.Nature Biotechnol,1997,15(4):369-372.
[7] Lukow T, Duntleld PF, Liesack W. Use of the T-RFLP technique to assess special and temporal changes in the bacterial community structure within all agricultural soil planted with transgenic and non-transgenic potato plants.FEMS Microbiol Ecol,2000,32:241-247.
[8] 徐晓宇,叶庆富,吴伟祥.转Bt基因“克螟稻”秸秆还田对稻田厌氧微生物种群和酶活性的影响.植物营养与肥料学报,2004,10(1):63-67.
[9] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所微生物室.土壤微生物实验法.北京:科学出版社,1985:40-75.
[10] 关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法.北京:中国农业出版社,1986:264-278.
[11] Hackett C A, Griffiths B S. Statistical analysis of the time-course of Biolog substrate utilization. Journal of Microbiological Methods,1997,30:63-69.
[12] 曹慧,孙辉,杨浩,等.土壤酶活性及其对土壤质量的指示研究进展.应用与环境生物学报,2005,9(1):105-109.
[13] Garcia C, Hernandez T. Biological and biochemical indicators in derelict soils subject to erosion.Soil Bio1＆Biochem,1997,29:171-177.
[14] Choi K H, Dobbs F C. Comparison of two kinds of biolog microplates (GN and ECO)in their ability to distinguish among aquatic microbial communities.Journal of Microbiological Methods,1999,36(3):203-213.
[15] Zak J C,Willig M R, Moorhead D L, et al. Functional diversity of microbial communities a quantitative approach. Soil Biology & Biochemistry,1994,26:1101-1108.
[16] Donegan KK, Palm CJ, Fieland VJ, et al. Change in levels,spicies and DNA fingerprints of soil microorganisms associated with cotton expressing the Bacillus thuringiensis var. Kurstaki endotoxin.Applied soil Ecology,1995,2:111-124.
[17] 沈法富,韩秀兰,范术丽.转Bt基因抗虫棉根际微生物区系和细菌生理群多样性的变化.生态学报,2004,24(3):432-437.
[18] Donegan KK, Schaller DL, Stone JK, et al. Microbial populations,fungal species diversity and plant pathogen levels in field plots of potato plants expressing the Bacillus thuringiensis var. tenbrionls endotoxin. Transgenic Research,1996,5:25-35.
[19] Yutaka Tabei. Environmental risk assessment of transgenic melon in Japan.Plant Biotechology,1999,16(1):65-68.
[20] 王建武,冯远娇.种植Bt玉米对土壤微生物活性和肥力的影响.生态学报,2005,25(5):1213-1220.
[21] 袁红旭,张建中,郭建夫,等.种植转双价抗真菌基因水稻对根际微生物群落及酶活性的影响.土壤学报,2005,42(1):122-126.