欢迎访问《中国农学通报》,

中国农学通报 ›› 2009, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (7): 166-170.

• 资源 环境 生态 土壤 气象 • 上一篇    下一篇

控(缓)释性复合肥在旱地春播高粱上的应用效应及对土壤有效氮的影响

曹昌林,董良利,宋旭东,吕慧卿,郝志萍   

  • 收稿日期:2008-12-31 修回日期:2009-01-21 出版日期:2009-04-05 发布日期:2009-04-05

Application Effects of Controlled-release( Slow-release )and Compound Fertilizer in Drought Spring Sorghum and Effects on Available Nitrogen in the Different Soil Layers

, , , ,   

  • Received:2008-12-31 Revised:2009-01-21 Online:2009-04-05 Published:2009-04-05

摘要: 摘要:为了探索寻求旱地高粱最佳施肥途径,追求最大的水肥利用率,以尽量减少对环境的污染,本研究特设了两种类型的肥料、两种施肥方式的比较研究。并分析了不同处理下,土壤碱解氮的变化情况,运用随机区组设计的方法进行了比较试验。结果表明:不同类型的肥料在不同的施肥方式下结果是有明显差异的。1、缓释性复合肥SRCF与普通复合肥CCF相比,在总养分含量相同的条件下,产量提高27.69%~28.71%,氮素农学利用率提高40.24%~42.05%,表观利用率提高4.18%~5.26%,生理利用率提高34.58%~34.95%;2、春施肥SAF与秋施肥AAF相比,产量、氮素利用率等均差异不显著。3、0~60cm土层内的碱解氮含量,在苗期表现为普通复合肥CCF高于缓释性复合肥SRCF,而进入拔节期后,情况则相反。随着生育期的推进,土壤碱解氮逐渐降低,而春施肥SAF与秋施肥AAF两种方式相比,土壤碱解氮的高峰出现的土壤深层不同,前者,碱解氮高峰出现在0-20cm土层,后者,碱解氮高峰出现在20-40cm土层中。4、在苗期,0-60cm土层中碱解氮含量,两种类型的肥料差异很明显,拔节期后,差异不太明显。5、各时期0-100cm土层中,碱解氮主要存在于0-60cm土层中,60cm是养分最低点,60cm以下碱解氮又有所回升。

Abstract: Abstract: The study was designed two types of fertilizers and two ways of fertilizations for comparative research, and analyzed the variations of available N in the different treatments using randomized blocks design, in order to finding the best way of fertilization, the maximum water and nitrogen utilization and decreasing the environmental pollution. The result showed that, there were significant variations between the different fertilizers and the different fertilizations, respectively. 1 Compared SRCF (Slow-release and compound fertilizer) with CCF (general compound fertilizer) at the same total nutrient content, the yield and the N agronomic efficiency, the N apparent efficiency, the N physiological efficiency increased by 27.69%~28.71%, 40.24%~42.05%, 4.18%~5.26%, 34.58%~34.95%, respectively; 2 Compared SAF(Spring application fertilizer) with AAF(Autumn application fertilizer),there was no significant variation in yield, N efficiency ,etc. 3 In 0-60cm soil layer, the available N content of CCF was higher than that of SRCF in seedling stage, but the jointing stage was in contrast. The available N of soil was decreased with the plant growing, and the peak of available N appeared 0-20cm soil layer by SAF, but 20-40cm soil layer appeared by AAF. 4 The available N content of two types of fertilizers had significant variation in 0-60cm soil layer in seedling stage, but after jointing stage, it was no significant variation. 5 The available N mainly existed in 0-60cm soil layer, and the lowest point was in 60cm soil layer. Below the 60cm soil layer, it was rebounded.

中图分类号: