欢迎访问《中国农学通报》,

中国农学通报 ›› 2013, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 97-102.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2012-2841

• 农村产业结构与区域经济 • 上一篇    下一篇

城乡建设用地 “增减挂钩” 制度评价与研究展望

任平 周介铭   

  • 收稿日期:2012-08-16 修回日期:2012-09-23 出版日期:2013-02-15 发布日期:2013-02-15
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目 “国家粮食安全视角下的土地 ‘增减挂钩’ 制度评价与完善研究” 阶段性成果之一(11XJY019)。

The Evolution and Research Tendency in the Institution of Linking the Increase in Land Used for Urban Construction with the Decrease in Land Used for Rural Construction

  • Received:2012-08-16 Revised:2012-09-23 Online:2013-02-15 Published:2013-02-15

摘要: 城乡建设用地“增减挂钩”制度是一项具有创新性的制度设计与安排,其发源于耕地“占补平衡”,宗旨和核心是为了保护耕地。但纵观这几年的试点,人们发现“增减挂钩”制度出现了诸多问题,对“增减挂钩”制度如何进行评价,是暂停、继续还是改进?基于此背景,深入分析了“增减挂钩”制度演进过程,评价了该制度产生的理论和现实基础,并对当前学术界对“增减挂钩”制度态度和观点进行了分类评述;在此基础上,重点研究了该制度问题根源及症结所在,提出了今后研究的重点和难点问题。研究发现:社会各界对“增减挂钩”制度初衷、制度框架、改进方向等问题在认识和行动上没有统一,尤其是制度制定者和执行者之间存在巨大的目标差异,只有从认识论、方法论等层面理清这些问题,才能够使得这一具有创新性的制度设计发挥应有的制度效应。

关键词: Richards方程, Richards方程

Abstract: The institution of linking the increase in land used for urban construction with the decrease in land used for rural construction (LIDL) was a creative design and arrangement which was originated from the thought of cultivated land requisition and compensation balance, setting the farmland preservation as its aim and core. During the national pilot study over these years, the institution exposes many problems and faces the query from various circles of society: should it be paused, carried on or promoted? Basing on this background, this article analyzed the evolution of the strategy deeply and explores the theoretical and realistic basis of its forming. Meanwhile, we mainly study the root and crux of this policy and put forward the proper attitude and view in researching it and the key points and difficulties of its further study, basing on comprehensive review of the attitudes and views on the institution from the governments and academic circles after making the data collected and finished. Only did we know the essence of these problems so clearly that we could have this creative institution taking effect.