文峪河上游3种典型河岸林土壤理化性质研究

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2014-1152

中国农学通报 ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (16): 207-211.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2014-1152

• 资源环境生态土壤气象 • 上一篇下一篇

文峪河上游3种典型河岸林土壤理化性质研究

杨三红,郭晋平,王建让,张芸香,白晋华,郭跃东

(山西农业大学林学院,山西太谷 030801）

收稿日期:2014-04-21 修回日期:2015-02-28 接受日期:2015-03-24 出版日期:2015-07-27 发布日期:2015-07-27
通讯作者: 杨三红
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(30970480)；教育部高等学校博士点基金(200801130002

Study on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties of Three Typical

Riparian Forests of Wenyu River Upstream

Yang Sanhong, Guo Jinping, Wang Jianrang, Zhang Yunxiang, Bai Jinhua, Guo Yuedong(Forestry College of Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu Shanxi 030801)

Received:2014-04-21 Revised:2015-02-28 Accepted:2015-03-24 Online:2015-07-27 Published:2015-07-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了研究文峪河上游3种典型河岸林土壤理化性质之间的差异，对河岸林土壤的pH、容重、总孔隙度、毛管孔隙度和毛管持水量进行了测定分析。结果表明：土壤理化性质在不同类型河岸林之间的差异达到极显著水平；3种典型河岸林土壤pH和容重表现为：华北落叶松河岸林>杨桦河岸林>云杉河岸林，总孔隙度、毛管孔隙度和毛管持水量表现为：云杉河岸林>杨桦河岸林>华北落叶松河岸林；3种典型河岸林土壤pH随土壤深度增加而增大，距离河流越近总孔隙度越小，其他方面无显著规律。

关键词: 兰新铁路第二双线, 兰新铁路第二双线

Abstract: In order to study the differences of the soil physical and chemical properties among three kinds of typical riparian forests of Wenyu River upstream, some parameters, such as soil pH, bulk density, total porosity, capillary porosity and capillary water capacity, were measured and analyzed. The results showed that the differences of the soil physical and chemical properties were very significant among different types of riparian forest; the soil pH and bulk densities of three kinds of riparian forestry had an order as: larch riparian forest>birch riparian forest>spruce riparian forest; the soil total porosity, capillary porosity and capillary water capacity had an order as: spruce riparian forest>birch riparian forest>larch riparian forest; the soil pH of three kinds of riparian forest increased with the soil depth, and soil total porosity decreased with the distance getting close to the river, no other apparent regularity was detected on soil properties.

杨三红,郭晋平,王建让,张芸香,白晋华,郭跃东. 文峪河上游3种典型河岸林土壤理化性质研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(16): 207-211.

参考文献

[1] 陈吉泉.河岸植被特征及其在生态系统和景观中的作用[J].应用生态学报,1996,7(4):439-448.
[2] Ashley A W, Wayne D E. A practical scientific app roach to riparian vegetation rehabilitation in Australia[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2003,68(4):329-341.
[3] 李冬林,韩丽,阮宏华,等.秦淮河河岸带土壤理化性质分析[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2008,32(4):17-23.
[4] 杨春璐,马溪平,李法云,等.海城河河岸带土壤理化性质分析[J].生态科学,2010,29(3):262-267.
[5] 陈伏生,曾德慧,何兴元.森林土壤氮素的转化与循环[J].生态学杂志,2004,23(5):126-133.
[6] 田树新.不同河岸带土壤水分-物理性质分析[J].中国林副特产,2007,87(2):28-30.
[7] 王庆成,于红丽,姚琴,等.河岸带对陆地水体氮素输入的节流转化作用[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(11):2611-2617.
[8] 郦威,卢振兰,孔维静,等.太子河河岸带土壤理化性质特征及其与环境因子的关系[J].生态科学,2013,32(1):90-97.
[9] 吉久昌,郭跃东,郭晋平,等.文峪河上游河岸林群落类型及其生态适应性[J].生态学报,2009,29(3):1587-1595.
[10] 郭跃东,郭晋平,张芸香,等.文峪河上游河岸林群落环境梯度格局和演替过程[J].生态学报,2010,30(15):4046-4055.
[11] 高润梅,郭晋平,郭跃东,等.文峪河上游河岸林的群落结构与多样性特征[J].林业科学研究,2011,24(1):74-81.
[12] 张芸香,张晋明,郭晋平.文峪河上游河岸林凋落物及其分解过程研究[J].林业科学研究,2011,24(5):634-640.
[13] 李素新,张芸香,郭晋平.文峪河上游河岸林与相邻高地林土壤属性比较分析[J].山西林业科技,2012,41(2):5-9.
[14] 樊兰英,郭晋平,张芸香,等.山地河岸林土壤对硝态氮和铵态氮的截留及影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2011,02:134-137
[15] Lyon J, Gross. N M. Patterns of plant diversity and plant-environmental relationships across three riparian corridors[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2005,204:267-278.
[16] Van Pelt R, O’Keefe T C, Latterell J J, et al. Riparian forest stand development along the queets river in Olympic National Park, Washington[J].Ecological Monographs,2006.76(2):277-298.
[17] Naiman R J. Riparia ecology, Conservation, and management of Streamside Communities[M].Elsevier Academic Press,2005:159-173.
[18] 白晋华,胡振华,郭晋平.华北山地次生林典型森林类型枯落物及土壤水文效应研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,02:84-89.
[19] 张芸香,白晋华,郭晋平.基于景观格局定量分析的流域治理——以文峪河流域为例[J].山地学报,2005,01:80-88.
[20] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤理化分析[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1978.

文峪河上游3种典型河岸林土壤理化性质研究

Study on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties of Three Typical

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们