欢迎访问《中国农学通报》,

中国农学通报 ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (18): 159-164.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16070051

所属专题: 现代农业发展与乡村振兴

• 工程 机械 水利 装备 • 上一篇    

新型农业大棚骨架的性能分析

尹素杰,李 军,李海迎,郭 刚   

  1. 青岛理工大学土木工程学院科技楼1014室,青岛理工大学土木工程学院科技楼1014室,青岛理工大学土木工程学院科技楼1014室,青岛理工大学土木工程学院科技楼1014室
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-11 修回日期:2017-06-13 接受日期:2016-09-14 出版日期:2017-06-28 发布日期:2017-06-28
  • 通讯作者: 李 军
  • 基金资助:
    山东省住房和城乡建设厅研究开发项目“装配式无焊孔梁柱节点的力学性能及其设计方法研究”(KY060)。

Performance of a New Framework for Agricultural Greenhouse

李 军, and   

  • Received:2016-07-11 Revised:2017-06-13 Accepted:2016-09-14 Online:2017-06-28 Published:2017-06-28

摘要: 旨在研究复合材料光伏农业大棚的经济性和受力性能,阐明其替代钢结构大棚的可行性。采用数值计算和理论分析的方法从以下三方面对某光伏大棚骨架进行分析:运用有限元软件Midas对某光伏大棚骨架进行的受力性能分析;对光伏大棚最不利节点螺栓的承载力验算;从表面维护和骨架用材两方面进行的经济性分析。[结果]结果表明:复合材料骨架大棚的杆件最大应力为27.5kPa,其柱顶最大位移为9.4mm,满足相似结构的承载力和容许位移要求;最不利节点螺栓的承载力计算结果表明节点强度足够;从每栋复合材料大棚和钢结构大棚的骨架表面维护及用材两方面的经济性分析结果看,前者初期费用较后者多300元,但使用过程中不再需要追加维护费。[结论]从可持续发展的角度看,采用相同骨架的两种材料成本投入相差不大,复合材料更具有环保特点,对农业养殖或种植无不利影响。可以推断,只要结构布置合理,复合材料骨架大棚承载能力绝不输于钢骨架大棚。

关键词: 超高效液相色谱-串联质谱, 超高效液相色谱-串联质谱, 海藻肥, 甘露醇, 甜菜碱

Abstract: The aim is to research the economic performance and mechanical behavior of photovoltaic agricultural greenhouses based on composite materials, and to clarify the practicability of using composite material instead of steel. [Method] In this paper, there are some analyses about the photovoltaic greenhouse framework by using numerical calculation and theoretical analysis from the following three aspects: the Midas FEA for bearing capacity and lateral deformation capacity of the framework of photovoltaic agricultural greenhouses, checking calculation for the bearing capacity of the bolt which at the most unfavorable node of photovoltaic greenhouse, and the analysis of economic performance from two aspects just like the surface maintenance and material consumption of frameworks. [Result]The results show the following. The composites framework the maximum stress of members is about 27.5kPa and the maximum displacement at the top of column is about 9.4mm, then the demand for bearing capacity and allowable displacement of the similar structure are satisfied; the bolt at the most unfavorable node of photovoltaic greenhouse is calculated, and its strength can meet the demand; through the comprehensive analysis from two aspects, namely, the surface maintenance and material consumption of frameworks, in terms of initial cost for each greenhouse, the composites framework is 300RMB more expensive than the steel framework, but in the course of using there is no required additional maintenance fee. [Conclusion] Therefore, from the perspective of sustainable development, the cost investment has not big difference in the case of using the same framework. The composite material is more environmentally and has no adverse effects on agricultural cultivation and planting. It can be concluded that the bearing capacity of the composite frame never lose to the steel frame greenhouses as long as the reasonable structure design.