不同类型植烟土壤养分含量、微生物数量与酶活性的研究

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16090023

中国农学通报 ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (35): 105-110.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16090023

所属专题：生物技术；烟草种植与生产

• 资源环境生态土壤气象 • 上一篇下一篇

不同类型植烟土壤养分含量、微生物数量与酶活性的研究

张耸,李莉,马一琼,常安然,魏登辉,于建军

河南农业大学烟草学院,河南农业大学烟草学院,河南农业大学烟草学院,河南农业大学烟草学院,河南农业大学烟草学院,河南农业大学烟草学院

收稿日期:2016-09-05 修回日期:2016-09-26 接受日期:2016-09-28 出版日期:2016-12-26 发布日期:2016-12-26
通讯作者: 张耸
基金资助:
“国家烟草重大专项浓香型特色优质烟叶开发”(30800160)。

Soil Nutrient Content, Soil Microorganism Amount and Soil Enzyme Activity in Different Types of Tobacco-planting Soil

Received:2016-09-05 Revised:2016-09-26 Accepted:2016-09-28 Online:2016-12-26 Published:2016-12-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 试验调查研究了四川省凉山州会理县的四种土壤类型（红壤土、紫壤土、白砂土和水稻土）的养分含量、微生物数量和土壤酶活性。结果表明：红壤土总体肥力最好，但受土壤pH值偏酸性的影响，细菌数量、速效磷含量和过氧化氢酶活性数值偏低。脲酶和蔗糖酶的活性低于紫壤土。紫壤土总体肥力小于红壤土，pH值呈微碱性，有利于微生物生长，微生物数量最多。较高的土壤肥力、适宜的pH值和最高的微生物量，使得脲酶和蔗糖酶活性最高，过氧化氢酶的活性也高于红壤土。白砂土总体肥力最低，微生物总量也是最低，脲酶和蔗糖酶的活性最低，过氧化氢酶的活性高于红壤土。水稻土的总体肥力小于紫壤土。pH值呈微酸性，细菌数量偏低，放线菌的数量偏低，真菌数量显著增加。

关键词: 胡瓜新小绥螨, 胡瓜新小绥螨, 蚜虫, 玫烟色拟青霉菌, 兼防

Abstract: An experiment was carried out in Huili of Liangshan, Sichuan to investigate and study soil nutrient content, soil microorganism amount and soil enzyme activity of four types of soil (red soil, purple soil, white sandy soil and paddy soil). The results showed that the fertility level of red soil was the best, but affected by soil acidic pH, the amount of bacteria, the content of available phosphorus and soil catalase activity were relatively low. The activity of urease and sucrase were lower than that of purple soil. The fertility level of purple soil was lower than that of red soil, the pH value of purple soil was alkalescent, which was conducive to the growth of microorganism, and it had the highest amount of microorganism. The higher fertility level, suitable pH value and the highest amount of microorganism led to the highest activity of urease and sucrase, also the catalase activity was higher than that of red soil. The fertility level of white sandy soil was the lowest, as well as the total amount of microorganism and the activity of urease and sucrase, but the activity of catalase was higher than that of red soil. The fertility level of paddy soil was lower than that of purple soil. The pH value of paddy soil was subacidity, the quantity of bacteria and actinomyces were relatively low, but the quantity of fungi was significantly high.

张耸,李莉,马一琼,常安然,魏登辉,于建军. 不同类型植烟土壤养分含量、微生物数量与酶活性的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(35): 105-110.

参考文献

[1]李佳,吕鹏辉,张文静,等.易感病烟田中土壤微生物与酶活性变化的研究[J]. 江西农业学报,2016,28(5)：36-39.
[2]Glenn O F,Sivasithamparam K. The effect of soil compaction on the saprophytic growth of Rhizoctonia solani [j]．Plant and Soil,1990,121；282-286．
[3]Otten W,Gilligan C A．Effect of physical conditions on the spatial temporal dynamics of the soil brone fungal pathogen Rhizoctonia solani[J]．New Phytol,1998,138：629-637．
[4]杜伟文,欧阳中万[J]. 湖南林业科技.2005, 32(05):76-04.
[5]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2000.25-200.
[6]李阜棣,喻子牛,何绍江.农业微生物学实验技术[M]．北京:中国农业出版社,1996.
[7]关松荫．土壤酶及其研究法[M]．北京：中国农业出版杜．1986：264-270．
[8]许自成,王林,肖汉乾．湖南烟区土壤pH分布特点及其与土壤养分的关[J]．中国生态农业学报．2008,16(4)：830-834.
[9]刘国顺．烟草栽培学[M]．北京：中国农业出版社,2003．
[10]Bossio D A,Scow K M,Gunapala N,et al. Determinants of soil microbial communi ties：Effects of agricultural management,season,and soil type on phospholipid fat ty acid profiles[J]．Microbial Ecology,1998,36(1)：1-12.
[11]Ritchie J,Schutter M E,Dick R P,et al．Use of length heterogeneity PCR and fatty acid methyl ester profiles to characterize microbial communities in soil[J]．Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2000,66(4):1668-1675.
[12]薛立,陈红跃,谭绍满,等-不同林分土壤养分、微生物与酶活性的研究[J]．土壤学报,2003,40(2)：281-285．
[13]杨超,刘国顺,等.不同植烟土壤微生物数量调查研究[J].中国烟草科学,2007,28(5)：31-36.
[14]Dashti N, Zhang F, Hynes R,et a1．Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria accelerate nodulation and increase nitrogen fixation activity by field grown soybean under short season conditions[J]．Plant And Soil,1998(2)：205．213．
[15]孙翠玲,郭玉文,佟超然.杨树混交林地土壤微生物与酶活性的变异研究.林业科学,1997,33(6):488-496.
[16]许景伟,王卫东,李成. 不同类型黑松混交林土壤微生物、酶及其与土壤养分关系的研究. 北京林业大学学报,2000,22(1):51-55.
[17]郭红祥,刘卫群,姜占省,等. 施用饼肥对烤烟根际微生物的影[J]．河南农业大学学报,2002,36(4)：354-357．
[18]徐晶,陈婉华,等. 三类不同开垦年代的土壤主要微生物类群和土壤酶活性的演变. 土壤肥料,2006.
[19]和文祥,朱铭莪．陕西土壤脲酶活性与土壤肥力关系分析[J].土壤学报,1997,34(4):392-398.
[20]周礼恺．土壤酶活性的总体在评价土壤肥力水平中的作用[J].土壤学报,1983,20(4):413-417.
[21]康雪丽,韩福根,等. 植烟土壤养分和土壤酶活性的典型相关分析[J].河南农业科学,2013,42(7)：52-56.
[22]卢萍,单玉华,杨林章,等．绿肥轮作还田对稻田土壤溶液氮素变化及水稻产量的影响[J]．土壤,2006,38(3):270-275.
[23]李孝勇,等.秸秆还田对作物产量及土壤养分的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2003,31(5)：870-871.
[24]於忠祥,汪维云,沙宗珩. 合肥郊区菜园土土壤酶活性研究. 土壤通报,1996,27(4):179-181.

不同类型植烟土壤养分含量、微生物数量与酶活性的研究

Soil Nutrient Content, Soil Microorganism Amount and Soil Enzyme Activity in Different Types of Tobacco-planting Soil

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	池艳艳, 林少源, 徐淑, 陈炳旭. 唑虫酰胺防治甘蓝田常见害虫应用效果分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(3): 110-115.
[2]	孙斌,张志刚,王素平,窦瑞木. 14种悬浮种衣剂防治玉米地下害虫、蚜虫和茎基腐病的防效评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(24): 128-132.
[3]	朱炫,何建群,杨霞,杨永明,王学明,羊国安,陈晓艳,娄作艺,阿堆,成山,达瓦拉木. 油菜蚜虫田间防治药剂筛选[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(32): 87-91.
[4]	孙莉,张艳璇,赵玲玲,林坚贞,陈霞,季洁. 利用胡瓜新小绥螨携带玫烟色拟青霉菌兼防茄子蚜虫和叶螨[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(20): 91-96.
[5]	丁佩,马海芹,戴德江,王华弟. 70%吡虫啉WDG防治杭白菊蚜虫应用技术研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(17): 95-99.
[6]	刘亚丽马荣金胡丽丽曹辰兴. 无毛黄瓜抗蚜性与挥发性物质的关系[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(22): 270-275.
[7]	韩玉翠吕芃侯升林李素英马雪籍贵苏杜瑞恒刘国庆. 2种蚜虫DNA提取方法的比较与改进研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(16): 272-277.
[8]	刘金文颜秀娟,丛斌. 烟蚜茧蜂畸形细胞对寄主生理代谢的调控[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(9): 368-371.
[9]	赵丕兵谭菊. 青蒿提取液防治田间小麦蚜虫效果初报[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(1): 247-250.
[10]	李鸿怡1,2,李楠1,2,薛晓萍1,2,董保信3,张飒1. 气象条件对山东省小麦蚜虫发生发展的影响分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(2): 221-225.
[11]	李刘杰汪强韩燕来谭金芳. 钾水平对小麦酚类物质、木质素代谢和接种蚜虫群体动态的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25(17): 143-148.
[12]	李越鲲,米海莉,张曦燕,曹有龙,孙伟年. 0.3%苦豆子总碱防治枸杞蚜虫田间药效试验[J]. 中国农学通报, 2006, 22(9): 374-374.
[13]	沈建国,谢荔岩,张正坤,谢联辉,林奇英. 一种植物提取物对CMV、PVYN及其昆虫介体的作用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(5): 341-341.
[14]	李世广,林华峰,杨春材,唐燕平,王萍莉. 合肥市园林植物蚜虫种类调查初报[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(5): 313-313.
[15]	赵晓萌,曾召海. The Research of the Pesticidal Activity on Different Peganum harmala Extractions[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(4): 278-278.