动物青贮饲料添加剂的研究进展

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20191000731

中国农学通报 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (27): 158-164.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20191000731

所属专题：畜牧兽医

• 畜牧·动物医学·蚕·蜂 • 上一篇

动物青贮饲料添加剂的研究进展

孙茜¹^,²(), 徐圣君²(), 曾贤桂¹, 张焕祯³, 白志辉²

¹深圳地大水务工程有限公司,深圳 518000
²中国科学院生态环境研究中心环境生物技术重点实验室,北京 100085
³中国地质大学（北京）水资源与环境学院,北京 100083

收稿日期:2019-10-25 修回日期:2019-11-15 出版日期:2020-09-25 发布日期:2020-09-23
通讯作者: 徐圣君
作者简介:孙茜,女,1989年出生,黑龙江哈尔滨人,博士研究生,主要从事污染废弃物资源化研究。通信地址:100085 北京市海淀区双清路18号,Tel:010-62849155,E-mail: sqatcau@126.com。
基金资助:
国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项“国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项:东江高度集约开发区域水质风险控制与水生态功能恢复技术集成及综合示范”(2015ZX07206-006);国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项“国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项:东江高度集约开发区域水质风险控制与水生态功能恢复技术集成及综合示范”(2015ZX07203-007);深圳治水提质科技专项“基于地表Ⅲ类标准新一代高效节能污水处理关键技术研发”(JSGG20171012143231779)

Animal Silage Additives: Research Progress

Sun Qian¹^,²(), Xu Shengjun²(), Zeng Xiangui¹, Zhang Huanzhen³, Bai Zhihui²

¹Shenzhen Dida Water Engineering Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Guangdong 518000
²Key Laboratory of Environmental Biotechnology, Research Center for Eco-environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085
³School of Water Sources and Environment, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083

Received:2019-10-25 Revised:2019-11-15 Online:2020-09-25 Published:2020-09-23
Contact: Xu Shengjun

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

青贮饲料是最经典的长期保存饲料的方法之一。为了更好地研究青贮添加剂,根据它们对青贮饲料保存的影响,分为以下4种类型:（1）发酵刺激剂;（2）发酵抑制剂;（3）好氧腐败抑制剂;（4）营养和吸收剂。本文对目前国内外青贮饲料添加剂的研究情况进行了分析归纳,对其在青贮饲料发酵、好氧稳定性以及牲畜的摄入与利用等方面的影响进行了探讨,旨在希望可以为改善青贮饲料发酵特性,提高饲料营养价值,动物生产等方面提供帮助。

关键词: 青贮饲料, 青贮添加剂, 青贮菌剂, 有氧稳定性, 动物生产

Abstract:

Silage is one of the most classical methods for long-term preservation of forage. According to the effects of the silage additives on silage conservation, four types can be generally classified as the following: (1) fermentation stimulators; (2) fermentation inhibitors; (3) aerobic spoilage inhibitors; (4) nutrition and absorbent. This review summarized and analyzed the research on silage additives published around the world, and discussed the effects of silage additives on silage fermentation, aerobic stability, and livestock intake and utilization, aiming to improve silage fermentation, nutrition value and animal productivity.

Key words: silage, silage additives, silage inoculants, aerobic stability, animal productivity

中图分类号:

S816.7

孙茜, 徐圣君, 曾贤桂, 张焕祯, 白志辉. 动物青贮饲料添加剂的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(27): 158-164.

Sun Qian, Xu Shengjun, Zeng Xiangui, Zhang Huanzhen, Bai Zhihui. Animal Silage Additives: Research Progress[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(27): 158-164.

参考文献 50

[1]	白杰, 李德芳, 陈安国, 等. 添加蔗糖和甲酸对红麻青贮饲料品质的影响[J]. 中国麻业科学, 2016,38(5):212-221.
[2]	Weiss K, Kroschewski B, Auerbach H, et al. Effects of air exposure, temperature and additives on fermentation characteristics, yeast count, aerobic stability and volatile organic compounds in corn silage.[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2016,99(10):8053-8069. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10323 URL pmid: 27497899
[3]	Queiroz O C, Arriola K G, Daniel J L, et al. Effects of 8 chemical and bacterial additives on the quality of corn silage[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2013,96(9):5836-5843. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-6691 URL pmid: 23810597
[4]	Seppala A, Heikkila T, Maki M, et al. Effects of additives on the fermentation and aerobic stability of grass silages and total mixed rations[J]. Grass and Forage Science, 2016,71(3):458-471.
[5]	Konig W, Lamminen M, Weiss K, et al. The effect of additives on the quality of white lupin-wheat silage assessed by fermentation pattern and qPCR quantification of clostridia[J]. Grass and Forage Science, 2017,72(4):757-771.
[6]	Knický M, Sporndly R. Sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate and sodium nitrite as silage additives[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2009,89(15):2659-2667.
[7]	Knicky M, Sporndly R. The ensiling capability of a mixture of sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate, and sodium nitrite[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2011,94(2):824-831. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3364 URL pmid: 21257051
[8]	Howard C J, Kumar A, Malkina I L, et al. Reactive organic gas emissions from livestock feed contribute significantly to ozone production in central California[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010,44(7):2309-2314. doi: 10.1021/es902864u URL pmid: 20192169
[9]	Oladosu Y, Rafii M Y, Abdullah N, et al. Fermentation Quality and Additives: A Case of Rice Straw Silage[J]. BioMed Research International, 2016: 7985167-7985167. doi: 10.1155/2016/7985167 URL pmid: 27429981
[10]	Randa S Y, Lekitoo M N, Iyai D A, et al. Nutritive Value and the Quality of Ensiled Napier Grass (Pennisetum Purpureum Schum.) and Banana (Musa Acuminata) Peelings[J]. Animal production, 2018,19(2):101-110.
[11]	Winters A L, Fychan A R, Jones R, et al. Effect of formic acid and a bacterial inoculant on the amino acid composition of grass silage and on animal performance[J]. Grass and Forage Science, 2001,56(2):181-192.
[12]	Nielsen M V, Nadeau E, Markussen B, et al. Relationship between energy intake and chewing index of diets fed to pregnant ewes[J]. Small Ruminant Research, 2015: 108-116.
[13]	Lynch J P, Baah J, Beauchemin K A, et al. Conservation, fiber digestibility, and nutritive value of corn harvested at 2 cutting heights and ensiled with fibrolytic enzymes, either alone or with a ferulic acid esterase-producing inoculant[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2015,98(2):1214-1224. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8768 URL pmid: 25483202
[14]	Addah W, Baah J, Mcallister T A, et al. Effects of an exogenous enzyme-containing inoculant on fermentation characteristics of barley silage and on growth performance of feedlot steers[J]. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 2016,96(1):1-10.
[15]	Young K M, Lim J M, Der Bedrosian M C, et al. Effect of exogenous protease enzymes on the fermentation and nutritive value of corn silage1[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2012,95(11):6687-6694. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5628 URL pmid: 22981573
[16]	Windle M C, Walker N, Kung L, et al. Effects of an exogenous protease on the fermentation and nutritive value of corn silage harvested at different dry matter contents and ensiled for various lengths of time.[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2014,97(5):3053-3060. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7586 URL pmid: 24630660
[17]	Hoffman P C, Esser N M, Shaver R D, et al. Influence of ensiling time and inoculation on alteration of the starch-protein matrix in high-moisture corn[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2011,94(5):2465-2474. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3562 URL pmid: 21524538
[18]	Ferraretto L F, Taysom K, Taysom D M, et al. Relationships between dry matter content, ensiling, ammonia-nitrogen, and ruminal in vitro starch digestibility in high-moisture corn samples[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2014,97(5):3221-3227. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7680 URL pmid: 24582445
[19]	荣辉, 余成群, 陈杰, 等. 添加绿汁发酵液、乳酸菌制剂和葡萄糖对象草青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2013,22(3):108-115.
[20]	苗芳, 张凡凡, 唐开婷, 等. 同/异质型乳酸菌添加对全株玉米青贮发酵特性、营养品质及有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2017,26(9):167-175.
[21]	侯美玲, 格根图, 孙林, 等. 甲酸、纤维素酶、乳酸菌剂对典型草原天然牧草青贮品质的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2015,27(9):2977-2986.
[22]	Weinberg Z G, Muck R E. New trends and opportunities in the development and use of inoculants for silage[J]. Fems Microbiology Reviews, 1996,19(1):53-68.
[23]	Oliveira A S, Weinberg Z G, Ogunade I M, et al. Meta-analysis of effects of inoculation with homofermentative and facultative heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria on silage fermentation, aerobic stability, and the performance of dairy cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2017,100(6):4587-4603. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11815 URL pmid: 28342607
[24]	Gandra J R, Oliveira E R, Gandra E R D S, et al. Inoculation of Lactobacillus buchneri alone or with Bacillus subtilis and total losses, aerobic stability, and microbiological quality of sunflower silage[J]. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 2016,45(1):609-614.
[25]	Rabelo C H S, Basso F C, Lara E C, et al. Effects of Lactobacillus buchneri as a silage inoculant and as a probiotic on feed intake, apparent digestibility and ruminal fermentation and microbiology in wethers fed low-dry-matter whole-crop maize silage[J]. Grass & Forage Science, 2017. URL pmid: 26300574
[26]	塔娜, 魏日华, 德庆哈拉, 等. 对禾草源同型发酵和/或异型发酵乳酸菌发酵无芒雀麦青贮有氧稳定性的评价[J]. 动物营养学报, 2017,29(4):1301-1311.
[27]	Mangwe M C, Rangubhet K T, Mlambo V, et al. Effects of Lactobacillus formosensis S215T and Lactobacillus buchneri on quality and in vitro ruminal biological activity of condensed tannins in sweet potato vines silage[J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2016,121(5):1242. URL pmid: 27541959
[28]	Nkosi B D, Vadlani P V, Brijwani K, et al. Effects of bacterial inoculants and an enzyme on the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of ensiled whole-crop sweet sorghum[J]. South African Journal of Animal Science, 2012,42(3):232-240.
[29]	Adesogan A T, Salawu M B, Ross A B, et al. Effect of Lactobacillus buchneri, Lactobacillus fermentum, Leuconostoc mesenteroides inoculants, or a Chemical Additive on the Fermentation, Aerobic Stability, and Nutritive Value of Crimped Wheat Grains[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2003,86(5):1789-1796. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73764-3 URL pmid: 12778589
[30]	Rodrigues P H, Pinedo L A, Marino C T, et al. Effects of microbial inoculants and by-product from amino acids production on fermentation, chemical composition and aerobic stability of corn silage[J]. Archivos De Zootecnia, 2015,64(246):131-138.
[31]	Konca Y, Beyzi S B, Ayasan T, et al. The Effects of Freezing and Supplementation of Molasses and Inoculants on Chemical and Nutritional Composition of Sunflower Silage[J]. Asian-australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2016,29(7):965-970. doi: 10.5713/ajas.15.0993 URL pmid: 26954197
[32]	Schmidt R J, Kung L. The effects of Lactobacillus buchneri with or without a homolactic bacterium on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silages made at different locations[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2010,93(4):1616-1624. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2555 URL pmid: 20338439
[33]	Der Bedrosian M C, Nestor K E, Kung L, et al. The effects of hybrid, maturity, and length of storage on the composition and nutritive value of corn silage[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2012,95(9):5115-5126. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4833 URL pmid: 22916917
[34]	Arriola K G, Kim S C, Adesogan A T, et al. Effect of applying inoculants with heterolactic or homolactic and heterolactic bacteria on the fermentation and quality of corn silage[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2011,94(3):1511-1516. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3807 URL pmid: 21338815
[35]	Gallo A, Bernardes T F, Copani G, et al. Effect of inoculation with Lactobacillus buchneri LB1819 and Lactococcus lactis O224 on fermentation and mycotoxin production in maize silage compacted at different densities[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2018: 36-45.
[36]	Mohammadzadeh H, Khorvash M, Ghorbani G R, et al. Ensiling corn silage with different levels of a multi-species lactic acid bacteria inoculant[J]. Animal Production Science, 2014,54(2):165-171.
[37]	付薇, 陈伟, 韩永芬, 等. 添加不同乳酸菌对玉米秸秆青贮有氧稳定性影响的研究[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2019(09):45-49.
[38]	Wang Y, Chen X Y, Wang C, et al. The bacterial community and fermentation quality of mulberry (Morus alba) leaf silage with or without Lactobacillus casei and sucrose[J]. Bioresource technology, 2019,293. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122105 URL pmid: 31514116
[39]	Ferreira D D, Lana R D, Zanine A D, et al. Silage fermentation and chemical composition of elephant grass inoculated with rumen strains of Streptococcus bovis[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2013,183(1):22-28.
[40]	Filya I, Sucu E, Karabulut A, et al. The effect of Propionibacterium acidipropionici, with or without Lactobacillus plantarum, on the fermentation and aerobic stability of wheat, sorghum and maize silages[J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2004,97(4):818-826. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02367.x URL pmid: 15357732
[41]	Lara E C, Basso F C, Assis F B, et al. Changes in the nutritive value and aerobic stability of corn silages inoculated with Bacillus subtilis alone or combined with Lactobacillus plantarum[J]. Animal Production Science, 2016,56(11):1867-1874. doi: 10.1071/AN14686 URL
[42]	Xu S, Yang J, Qi M, et al. 272 Impact of adding Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactobacillus buchneri on fermentation, aerobic stability, nutritive value, and microbial communities in corn silage.[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2017: 135-135. URL pmid: 18906228
[43]	赵士萍, 周敏, 蒋林树. 青贮饲料添加剂的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016,32(20):6-10.
[44]	Liu C, Lai Y J, Xiao-Nan L U. Effect of lactic acid bacteria inoculants on alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) silage quality: assessment of degradation (in situ) and gas production (in vitro)[J].Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016, 15(12): 2834-2841. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61424-7 URL
[45]	Zielińska K, Fabiszewska A, Stefańska I. Different aspects of Lactobacillus inoculants on the improvement of quality and safety of alfalfa silage[J]. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 2015,75(3):298-306.
[46]	Arasu M V, Jung M W, Da H K, et al. Enhancing Nutritional Quality of Silage by Fermentation with Lactobacillus plantarum[J]. Indian Journal of Microbiology, 2014,54(4):396-402. doi: 10.1007/s12088-014-0473-9 URL pmid: 25320437
[47]	Braman W L, Kurtz J E, Bryan K A. Effect of fermented corn silage density and bacterial inoculants on corn silage pH and fermentation end products[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2016,94(supplement1):27.
[48]	Gollop N, Zakin V, Weinberg Z G. Antibacterial activity of lactic acid bacteria included in inoculants for silage and in silages treated with these inoculants[J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2005,98(3):662-666. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02504.x URL pmid: 15715869
[49]	Sucu E, Çifci, Esra Aydoğan, Sucu E, et al. Effects of lines and inoculants on nutritive value and production costs of triticale silages[J]. R.bras.zootec, 2016,45(7).
[50]	Jatkauskas J, Vrotniakiene V, Lanckriet A. The effect of different types of inoculants on the characteristics of alfalfa, ryegrass and red clover/ryegrass/timothy silage[J]. Zemdirbyste-agriculture, 2015,102(1):95-102.

动物青贮饲料添加剂的研究进展

Animal Silage Additives: Research Progress

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 50

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	郭志祥,曾莉,何成兴,刘建勇,番华彩,白亭亭,杨佩文,孔令明. 香蕉茎叶青贮饲料对肉牛育肥效能研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(8): 97-101.
[2]	孙茜,张旭坡,徐圣君,邵红,白志辉. 添加不同乳酸菌菌剂对绿狐尾藻青贮品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(4): 131-136.
[3]	赵士萍,周敏,蒋林树. 青贮饲料添加剂的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(20): 6-10.
[4]	何玮徐远东黄勇富. 不同添加剂对重庆地区高山地区玉米秸秆青贮品质影响研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(5): 9-13.
[5]	余汝华,莫放,赵丽华,张晓明,陈瑶. 不同玉米品种青贮饲料营养成分比较分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(8): 17-17.
[6]	余汝华,莫放,赵丽华,张晓明,王维谦,马红,赵建营. 刈割时间对青贮玉米秸秆饲料营养成分的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2006, 22(6): 10-10.