欢迎访问《中国农学通报》，
中国农学通报

中国农学通报 ›› 2014, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (25): 142-147.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2014-0404

• 林学 园艺 园林 • 上一篇    下一篇

澳洲坚果叶面积测定方法比较

柳觐 倪书邦 宫丽丹 孔广红 贺熙勇   

  • 收稿日期:2014-02-21 修回日期:2014-03-26 出版日期:2014-09-05 发布日期:2014-09-05
  • 基金资助:
    云南省应用基础研究计划面上项目“澳洲坚果突变体新种质的创制”;云南省科研院所技术开发专项“澳洲坚果丰产栽培关键技术研究与示范”;云南省热带作物科技创新体系建设专项资金课题 “澳洲坚果品种选育与丰产栽培技术研究”;云南农垦重点科技项目“澳洲坚果激素促脱高效采收方式示范推广”

Comparison of Leaf Area Determination Method of Macadamia spp.

  • Received:2014-02-21 Revised:2014-03-26 Online:2014-09-05 Published:2014-09-05

PDF (PC)

517

摘要： 为确定不同品种澳洲坚果叶面积测定的最佳方法，找出系数回归法测量澳洲坚果叶面积的最佳参数，对3种叶面积测量方法进行比较，对不同叶片参数与叶面积间的关系进行回归分析。结果表明，同一品种经方格法、画纸称重法、图像处理法测定的叶面积均无显著性差异，3种方法测定结果的相关系数都在0.999以上，说明3种方法均可作为澳洲坚果叶面积测定的可靠方法；不同品种的各叶片参数与叶面积间的回归系数并不相同，在利用系数回归法测量澳洲坚果叶面积时，叶长宽积是最能反映实际叶面积的叶片参数。本研究可为澳洲坚果的生理研究和生产实践提供重要参考。

关键词: 农资流通领域, 农资流通领域

Abstract: In order to find out the best method and regression parameter for leaf area determination of Macadamia spp., three kinds of leaf area measurement methods were compared, the relationship between different leaf parameters and leaf area were regressively analyzed. The results showed that there was no significant difference among the leaf area values measured by three different methods of the same variety, the correlation coefficient of leaf area values measured by three determination methods was more than 0.999, all the three leaf area measurement methods, including criss- cross method, cut- weight method and scanning method, could be used as a reliable method of Macadamia spp. leaf area determination. The regression coefficient of different leaf parameters and leaf area of different varieties were different, the product of leaf length and width was the best parameter which could reflect the actual leaf area of Macadamia spp.. The study provided an important reference for physiological research and production practice of Macadamia spp..