3种生物杀虫剂防治烟草烟粉虱的室内毒力及田间药效试验

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18040006

中国农学通报 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (20): 99-103.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18040006

所属专题：烟草种植与生产

3种生物杀虫剂防治烟草烟粉虱的室内毒力及田间药效试验

张秀霞¹, 毛晓红¹, 高强², 白婷婷¹, 张安盛¹

1.山东省农业科学院植物保护研究所;2.山东临沂烟草有限公司

收稿日期:2018-04-02 修回日期:2019-06-12 接受日期:2018-06-04 出版日期:2019-07-15 发布日期:2019-07-15
通讯作者: 张安盛
基金资助:
山东省现代农业产业技术体系烟草产业创新团队 (SDAIT-25-03)。

Toxicity Test and Field Efficacy of 3 Biological Insecticides to Bemisia tabaci on Tobacco

Received:2018-04-02 Revised:2019-06-12 Accepted:2018-06-04 Online:2019-07-15 Published:2019-07-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了筛选控制烟草烟粉虱的有效药剂,采用3种生物杀虫剂对烟草烟粉虱进行室内毒力测定及田间药效试验。室内毒力测定结果表明,对烟草烟粉虱的毒力顺序为：0.5%依维菌素乳油＞0.5%藜芦碱可溶液剂＞6.0%鱼藤酮微乳剂,其LC50值分别为1.396 mg/L、5.083 mg/L、12.287 mg/L,显著优于对照药剂高效氯氟氰菊酯(LC50值为30.67 mg/L)。田间药效试验结果表明,6.0%鱼藤酮微乳剂、0.5%依维菌素乳油,0.5%藜芦碱可溶液剂稀释2000倍液喷雾处理后,药后3d、7d、14d更正防效对烟草烟粉虱持效性较好,更正防效达70﹪以上。因此,3种生物杀虫剂对烟田未产生药害,烟草植株生长安全,可在生产上进一步推广应用。

关键词: 短时强降水, 短时强降水, 中尺度系统, 不稳定层结, 红外云图TBB

Abstract: To screen effective drugs for controlling tobacco Bemisia tabaci, toxicity test and field efficacy of 3 biological insecticides to B.tabaci were used on tobacco. The toxicity test results showed that the virulence of B.tabaci presented as 0.5% ivermectin EC > 0.5% veratridine Solution > 6% rotenone microemulsion, and the LC50 values of them were 1.396 mg/L, 5.083 mg/L, 12.287 mg/L respectively, which was significantly better than the CK cyhalothrin (LC50 = 30.67 mg/L). Results of field efficacy showed that the adjusted efficiency of 3,7,14 days after treatment of 2000 times of dilution of 6% rotenone microemulsion, 0.5% ivermectin EC, 0.5% veratridine solution were over 70%. Therefore, the 3 biological insecticides have no harmful effects on the tobacco field, and the tobacco plants are safe to grow and can be further promoted and applied in production.

张秀霞,毛晓红,高强,白婷婷,张安盛. 3种生物杀虫剂防治烟草烟粉虱的室内毒力及田间药效试验[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(20): 99-103.

参考文献

[1]褚栋,毕玉平,张友军,等．烟粉虱生物型研究进展[J]．生态学报,2005,25(12):3398-3405．
[2]宋晓宇,袁会珠,齐淑华,等．7 种杀虫剂对北京地区烟粉虱成虫毒力的比较研究[J]．农药科学与管理,2007,25(1) : 13-15．
[3] Oliveira MRV, Henneberry T J, Anderson P. History, Current Status and Collaborative Research Projects for Bemisia tabaci [J]. Crop Protection, 2001,20 (9):709-723.
[4]罗晨,张芝利. 烟粉虱 Bemisia tabaci(Gennadius)研究概述[J]. 北京农业科学,2000(S1): 4-13.
[5]Brown J K. Current status of Bemisia tabaci as a plant pest and virus vector in agro ecosystems worldwide[J]. Fao Plant Protection Bulletin,1994,42(1/2):3-32.
[6]万方浩,郑小波,郭建英. 重要农林外来入侵物种的生物学与控制[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2005:69-128.
[7]Boykin L M, Shatters R G, Jr Rosell R C, et al. Global relationships of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera:Aleyrodidae) revealed using Bayesiam analysis of mitochondrial COI DNA sequence [J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2007,44(3): 1306-1319.
[8]李玲玲,薛明,任广伟,等．药剂对B型烟粉虱不同虫态的毒力和对成虫的驱避效应[J]．植物保护学报,2009,36(4):359-365．
[9] Jones C.M,Denholm,K.Gorman. C.Insecticide resistance in Bemisia tabaci biotype Q (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) from China. Crop Prot[J]. Crop Protection,2010, 29(5):429-434.
[10] 沈斌斌,任顺祥,吴建辉,等．几种重要药剂对烟粉虱的毒力测定[J]．江西农业大学学报,2005,27( 5) : 670-673．
[11] Ahmad M,Arif MI, Ahmad Z,et al. Cotton whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) resistance to organophosphate and pyrethroid insecticides in Pakistan[J]. Pest Management Science,2002,58 (2): 203.
[12] Nauen R, Stumpf N, Elbert A. Toxicological and mechanistic studies on neonicotinoid cross-resistance in Q-type Bmesia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyodidae) [J]．Pest Management Science,2002,58 (9 ): 868-875.
[13]Yuan L,Wang S,Zhou J,et al. Status of insecticide resistance and associated mutations in Q-biotype of whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, from eastern China [J]．Crop Protection,2012,31 (1): 67-71.
[14]Roditakis E,Fytrou N,Staurakaki M,et al. Activity of flonicamid on the sweet potato whitely Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) and its natural enemies. Pest Management Science,2014,70 (10): 1460-1467.
[15]Wang S, Zhang Y, Yang X, et al. Resistance Monitoring for Eight Insecticides on the Sweetpotato Whitefly (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in China[J]．Journal of Economic Entomology,2017a,110 (2): 660-666.
[16]Wang W, Wang S, Han G, et al. Lack of cross-resistance between neonicotinoids and sulfoxaflor in field strains of Q-biotype of whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, from eastern China[J]．Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2017b,136: 46-51.
[17]李彩新,张永强,章冰川,等.6种杀虫剂防治烟地烟粉虱试验[J]．植物医生,2015 ,28(3):41-42.
[18]杨艳,樊朋飞,张亚娟,等. 0.5% 藜芦碱可溶液剂防治蔬菜烟粉虱田间药效试验. 上海农业科技,2015:142.
[19]王少丽,张友军,李如美,等. 北京和湖南烟粉虱生物型及其抗药性监测[J]. 应用昆虫学报,2011,48(1): 27-31.
[20]袁林泽,王少丽,陈雪林,等. 江苏Q型烟粉虱抗性监测及其靶标基因克隆[J]. 应用昆虫学报,2011,48(1):48-53.
[21]任学祥,王东,王杰,等.药剂混配对B型烟粉虱药效及烟草安全性评价[J].中国烟草科学, 2011, 32(2): 48-51.
[22]张芝利,罗晨.我国烟粉虱的发生危害和防治对策[J].植物保护,2001, 27(2):25-30.
[23]赵伟. 山东烟田烟粉虱的发生动态及防治技术.中国农业科学院学位论文,2014.

3种生物杀虫剂防治烟草烟粉虱的室内毒力及田间药效试验

Toxicity Test and Field Efficacy of 3 Biological Insecticides to Bemisia tabaci on Tobacco

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	周晋红,赵彩萍,田晓婷. 太原汛期短时强降水时空分布及影响因素[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(17): 90-97.
[2]	纪凡华,韩雪蕾,杨志勇,徐娟,李慧. 鲁西北一次农业致灾暴雨天气成因分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(1): 103-108.
[3]	苏日娜. 包头市一次短时强降水特征分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(31): 112-116.
[4]	文海松,杨辉,王恪,赵卓勋. 多普勒雷达产品在两次短时强降水过程中的对比分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(20): 90-94.
[5]	马素艳. “20130715”呼和浩特短时强降水雷达回波特征分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(5): 131-135.
[6]	李琳,杨青,常泽堃,郭彩萍,瞿中友,王鑫. 一次短时强降水过程的中尺度分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(30): 139-143.
[7]	朱义青. 山东南部一次极强降水的结构演变特征分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(3): 160-169.
[8]	田改萍,宋军芳,卢红华,刘海波,刘强军,赵丹. 2015年5月晋豫强降雹过程的诊断分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(23): 122-127.
[9]	斯琴. 一次强降水过程的干侵入分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(32): 188-193.
[10]	鲁俊,郝莹,陶寅. 短时强降水的高分辨率时空分布特征[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(25): 247-254.
[11]	程玉斌,王正旺,薛博,李菊芬. 山西中南部一次暴雪过程诊断分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(19): 199-205.
[12]	吕志红张鸿全美兰. 2010年7月31日抚顺特强暴雨成因及落区分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(5): 303-308.