欢迎访问《中国农学通报》,

中国农学通报 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (26): 159-164.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20190800583

所属专题: 现代农业发展与乡村振兴

• 三农研究 • 上一篇    

现代都市农业发展水平评价研究

张静怡1(), 马佳2()   

  1. 1上海海洋大学经济管理学院,上海 201306
    2上海农业科学院农业科技信息研究所,上海 201400
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-29 修回日期:2019-10-24 出版日期:2020-09-15 发布日期:2020-09-14
  • 通讯作者: 马佳
  • 作者简介:张静怡,女,1995年出生,江苏南京人,硕士,研究方向为数据分析与挖掘。通信地址:201306 上海市浦东新区沪城环路999号 上海海洋大学,E-mail:792577364@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    上海哲社课题(2017BGL020);上海市软科学研究重点项目“上海都市农业众创空间发展模式及对策研究”(17692105600)

Development Level Evaluation of Modern Urban Agriculture

Zhang Jingyi1(), Ma Jia2()   

  1. 1Shanghai Ocean University, School of Economics and Management, Shanghai 201306
    2Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology Information, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201400
  • Received:2019-08-29 Revised:2019-10-24 Online:2020-09-15 Published:2020-09-14
  • Contact: Ma Jia

摘要:

本文采用文献研究法,从评价指标选取原则、评价指标内涵、评价方法3个方面对国内都市现代农业发展水平评价体系文献进行梳理,发现国内都市现代农业发展水平评价体系渐趋完善,评价方法丰富。但还存在着一些问题如:指标内涵的确定主观性太强;文化指标、都市农业观光等功能性指标的研究较少;评价指标权重的确定太过主观能动性;研究对象较单一等。提出了未来应当继续从以下几个方面开展研究:(1)在确定指标时,应当选择典型性的指标,并且以因子分析法为主,使指标更加科学化、合理化;(2)重视文化、都市观光等新兴指标的研究,并与社会、经济、社会发展指标相融合、关联,展现都市农业的多功能特征;(3)在对指标权重进行赋值时,为了避免主观性,多采用数学建模的方式;(4)丰富研究对象,开展不同对象之间的比较研究(包括横向和纵向发展水平比较)。研究为科学评估现代都市农业发展水平、构建现代都市农业发展水平评价体系提供了借鉴。

关键词: 都市农业, 评价指标体系, 研究综述

Abstract:

This paper uses the literature research method to sort out the domestic urban modern agricultural development level evaluation system from three aspects: evaluation index selection principle, evaluation index connotation and evaluation method. It is found that the domestic urban modern agricultural development level evaluation system is gradually perfected and the evaluation methods are rich. However, there are still some problems such as the determination of the connotation of indicators is too subjective; the research on functional indicators such as cultural indicators and urban agricultural tourism is less; the determination of the weight of evaluation indicators is too subjective; and the research objects are relatively simple. It is proposed that the future research should be carried out from the following aspects: (1)selecting typical indicators and focusing on factor analysis to make indicators more scientific and rational; (2)attaching importance to emerging indicators like culture and urban tourism, and integrating them with social, economic, and social development indicators to show the multi-functional characteristics of urban agriculture; (3)taking more mathematical construction model approaches to avoid subjective initiative in the assignment of index weights; (4)enriching the research subjects and conducting comparative studies between different subjects (including horizontal and vertical development levels). The study could provide certain references for the scientific evaluation of modern urban agriculture development level and the construction of a modern urban agricultural development level evaluation system.

Key words: urban agriculture, evaluation index system, review

中图分类号: