结构-多样性指数在八达岭地区森林健康评价中的应用

中国农学通报 ›› 2008, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (8): 156-161.

结构-多样性指数在八达岭地区森林健康评价中的应用

庄健荣,张志翔

收稿日期:2008-04-24 修回日期:2008-05-31 出版日期:2008-08-08 发布日期:2008-08-08

Application of Community Structure-Diversity Index(CSDI)in Forest Health Assessment in Beijing Badaling Area

Zhuang Jianrong, Zhang Zhixiang

Received:2008-04-24 Revised:2008-05-31 Online:2008-08-08 Published:2008-08-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 森林健康评价已经成为当前林业研究的迫切任务。通过对北京市八达岭林场森林健康实验区的16块固定样地进行研究，首次提出结构-多样性指数（Community Structure-Diversity Index，CSDI）模型，制订了群落结构和物种多样性层面上的森林健康评价等级（CSDI数值）：>15.0（健康）；10.1~15.0（亚健康）；6.1~10.0（不健康）；<6.0（极不健康）。结果表明：16块样地中，健康群落共4个（P10、P11、P12、P16）；亚健康群落共5个（P3、P5、P7、P9、P14）；不健康群落共5个（P6、P8、P13、P15）；极不健康群落共3个（P1、P2、P4）。从实际效果来看，结构-多样性指数具有一定的科学性和可操作性，对北京地区森林健康评价具有参考价值。

关键词: 植物病毒, 植物病毒, 基因工程, 转基因植物, 抗性机制

Abstract: Forest health assessment has been the urgent task of forestry research. Community Structure-Diversity Index Model was first put forward through studies of 16 fixed plots in forest health experimental area, Badaling Forest Center, and forest health rating was drawn up on community structure and species diversity level （CSDI）: >15.0(healthy), 10.1~15.0 (sub-healthy), 6.1~10.0(unhealthy), <6.0 (extremely unhealthy). The results showed that, in the 16 plots, there are: 4 healthy communities（P10, P11, P12 and P16）, 5 sub-healthy communities（P3, P5, P7, P9 and P14）, 5 unhealthy communities(P6, P8, P13 and P15), 3 extremely unhealthy communities(P1, P2 and P4). Based on the practical effect, it can be concluded that Community Structure-Diversity Index is scientific, feasible and it can provide references for Beijing forest health assessment.

中图分类号:

S718.55

庄健荣,张志翔. 结构-多样性指数在八达岭地区森林健康评价中的应用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2008, 24(8): 156-161.

Zhuang Jianrong, Zhang Zhixiang. Application of Community Structure-Diversity Index(CSDI)in Forest Health Assessment in Beijing Badaling Area[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2008, 24(8): 156-161.

参考文献

[1] Bertollo P. Assessing ecosystem health in governed landscapers: A framework for developing core indicators. Ecosystem Health,1998,(4):33-51.
[2] Paul A Mistretta. Managing for forest health. Journal of Forestry,2002,100(7):24-27.
[3] 陈高,代力民,姬兰柱,等.森林生态系统健康评估Ⅰ.模式、计算方法和指标体系.应用生态学报,2004,15(10):1743-1749.
[4] 陈高,邓红兵,代力民,等.森林生态系统健康评估Ⅱ.案例实践.应用生态学报,2005,16(1):1-6.
[5] 焦学军.对森林健康和生态监测发展的认识.防护林科技,2003,3:41-42.
[6] 甘敬,张振明,余新晓,等.森林健康监测与评价研究.水土保持研究,2006,13(3):177-180.
[7] 谷建才,陆贵巧,白顺江,等.森林健康评价指标及应用研究.河北农业大学学报,2006,29(2):68-71.
[8] 周择福,王延平,张光灿,等.五台山林区典型人工林群落物种多样性研究.西北植物学报,2005,25(2):321-327.
[9] 黄建辉,高贤明,马克平,等.地带性森林群落物种多样性的比较研究.生态学报,1997,17(6):611-618.
[10] 李瑾,安树青,程小莉,等.生态系统健康评价的研究进展.植物生态学报,2001,25(6):641-647.
[11] Curtis JT, McIntosh RP. An upland forest continuum in the prairie-forest border region of Wisconsin.Ecology,1951,32:476-496.
[12] 陈高,邓红兵,代力民,等.综合构成指数在森林生态系统健康评估中的应用.生态学报,2005,25(7):1725-1733.
[13] 谢晋阳,陈灵芝.暖温带落叶阔叶林的物种多样性特征.生态学报,1994,14(4):337-344.
[14] 吴晓莆,王志恒,崔海亭,等.北京山区栎林的群落结构与物种组成.生物多样性,2004,12(1):155-163.
[15] 谢晋阳,陈灵芝.中国暖温带若干灌丛群落多样性问题的研究.植物生态学报,1997,21(3):197-207.
[16] 臧润国,成克武,李俊清,等.天然林生物多样性保育与恢复.北京:中国科学技术出版社,2005:103-105.
[17] 陈高,代力民,范竹华,等.森林生态系统健康及其评估监测.应用生态学报,2002,13(5):605-610.
[18] 许凯扬,叶万辉.生态系统健康与生物多样性.生态科学,2002,21(3):279-283.
[19] Allen E. Forest health assessment in Canada. Ecosystem Health,2001,7(1):28-34.
[20] S J Zarnoch, W A Bechtold, K W Stolte, et al. Using crown condition variables as indicators of forest health. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2004,34(5):1057-1070.
[21] Costanza R. Toward an operational definition of ecosystem health. Ecosystem Health: New Goals for Environmental Management. Washington, D.C.: Island Press,1992:239-256.