基于FY-3的黑龙江省水稻关键发育期识别

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-1832

中国农学通报 ›› 2014, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (9): 55-60.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-1832

所属专题：水稻

基于FY-3的黑龙江省水稻关键发育期识别

于成龙刘丹张志国

收稿日期:2013-07-04 修回日期:2013-09-02 出版日期:2014-03-25 发布日期:2014-03-25
基金资助:
中国气象局公益性行业（气象）科研专项经费项目 “东北寒地水稻低温冷害动态监测预警关键技术研究” (GYHY201306074)。

Detecting Major Growth Stages of Paddy Rice Based on FY-3 Data in Heilongjiang Province

Received:2013-07-04 Revised:2013-09-02 Online:2014-03-25 Published:2014-03-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 水稻发育期信息对水稻长势监测、田间管理、品质及产量估算等均具有重要意义。为了探索一种高效、实用性强、适合黑龙江省水稻种植特点的水稻发育期识别及监测方法，基于风云三号气象卫星250 m分辨率数据，利用水稻生长发育期的EVI变化特征，对水稻的返青期、分蘖期、抽穗期和成熟期进行识别，并把遥感识别结果与地面观测站资料进行对比，结果表明：水稻关键发育期遥感识别的准确率在80%以上，其中抽穗期的准确率最高，分蘖期的准确率最低，发育期遥感识别的结果与地面观测结果相比，各发育期均有提前和延后的判识点。研究结果可为水稻长势遥感监测提供方法参考。

关键词: 抽样技术, 抽样技术

Abstract: As an important factor during crop growing period, phenology of paddy rice is widely used in growing monitoring, field management, quality and output forecasting. In order to explore an efficient, practical and suitable method, based on 250 m data of FY-3 meteorological satellite and EVI change characteristics, the stages of recovering, tillering, heading, and mature were obtained according to their characteristics, and then compared with the ground observation data. The results showed that the recognition ratio reached above 80%, where the ratios of heading stage and tillering stage were respectively the highest and lowest. Each growth stage had the advanced or delayed identification point. This study could provide some reference for growing monitoring of paddy rice.

于成龙刘丹张志国. 基于FY-3的黑龙江省水稻关键发育期识别[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(9): 55-60.

参考文献

[1] 于清涛,肖佳雷,龙江雨,等.黑龙江省水稻生产现状及其发展趋势[J].中国种业,2011(7):12-14.
[2] Sherwood B I, Ray D J, Robert J. Remote-sensing of crop yields[J]. Science,1977(196):19-25.
[3] Marta S L, Matthew P R. Stay- green in spring wheat can be determined by spectral reflectance measurements (normalized difference vegetation index) independently from phenology[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany,2012,63(10):3789-3798.
[4] Josep P, Lolanda F. PHENOLOGY: Responses to a Warming World [J]. Science,2001,294(5543):793-795.
[5] Defila C, Clot B. Phytophenological trends in Switzerland[J]. International Journal of Biometeorology,2001(45):203-207.
[6] 侯学会,牛铮,高帅,等.基于 SPOT-VGT NDVI 时间序列的农牧交错带植被物候监测[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(1):142-150.
[7] 李正国,杨鹏,周清波,等.基于时序植被指数的华北地区作物物候期/种植制度的时空格局特征 [J].生态学报,2009,29(11):6216-6226.
[8] 范天锡.风云三号气象卫星的特点和作用[J].气象科技,2002,30(6): 321-327.
[9] 杨军,董超华,卢乃锰,等.中国新一代极轨气象卫星——风云三号[J].气象学报,2009,67(4):501-509.
[10] 龙利民,张萍萍,张宁.2008-07-22襄樊特大暴雨 FY-3A微波资料分析[J].大气科学学报,2010,33(5):569-575.
[11] 朱琳,刘健,张晔萍,等.FY-3A/MERSI数据在中国北方干旱监测中的应用[J].遥感学报,2010,14(5):1004-1016.
[12] Bernstein L S, Adler- Golden S M, Sundberg R L, et al. A new method for atmospheric correction and aerosol property retrieval for VIS- SWIR multi- and hyper spectral imaging sensors: QUAC (Quick Atmospheric Correction[Z]. IGARSS,2005,2005.
[13] 姜秋富,赵朝方.FY-3A/MERSI 数据大气校正对海上溢油检测的改进[J].海洋湖沼通报,2011(4):16-24.
[14] 郝卫平,梅旭荣,蔡学良,等.基于多时相遥感影像的东北三省作物分布信息提取[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(1):201-207.
[15] 徐永明,刘勇洪,吕晶晶.基于 MODIS数据的长江三角洲地区土地覆盖分类[J].地理学报,2007,62(6):640-648.
[16] 彭代亮,黄敬峰,王秀珍.基于 MODIS-EVI区域植被季节变化与气象因子的关系[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(5):985-991.
[17] Zuzana M, Frantisek Z, Jan K. Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) in the management of mountain meadows[J]. Boreal Environment Research,2008,13(5):417-432.
[18] Sun H S, Huang J F, Peng D. Detecting major growth stages of paddy rice using MODIS data[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing,2009, 13(6):1122-1129.
[19] 黄青,唐华俊,周清波,等.东北地区主要作物种植结构遥感提取及长势监测[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(9):218-223.
[20] Sims D A, Vermote E F, Jiang Z, et al. Seasonal and inter- annual variation in view angle effects on MODIS vegetation indices at three forest sites[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment,2011,115(12): 3112-3120.
[21] 李辉霞,刘国华,傅伯杰.基于 NDVI的三江源地区植被生长对气候变化和人类活动的响应研究[J].生态学报,2011,31(19):5495-5504.
[22] 中国气象局.农业气象观测规范[M].北京:气象出版社,1993.
[23] 宋春桥,游松财,柯灵红,等.藏北高原植被物候时空动态变化的遥感监测研究[J].植物生态学报,2011,35(8):853-863.
[24] Fischer A. A model for the seasonal variations of vegetation indices in coarse resolution data and its inversion to extract crop parameters [J]. Remote Sensing of Environment,1994,48(2):220-230.
[25] Zhang X Y, Friedl M A, Schaaf C B, et al. Monitoring vegetation phonology using MODIS[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment,2003 (84):471-475
[26] 那晓东,张树清,李晓峰,等.时间序列在三江平原湿地植被信息提取中的应用[J].湿地科学,2007,5(3):227-236.
[27] Schwartz M D, Reed B C, Michael A. White assessing satellite derived start of season(SOS) measures in the conterminous USA[J]. International Journal of Climatology,2002,22(14):1793-1805.
[28] 孙华生,黄敬峰,彭代亮.利用 MODIS数据识别水稻关键生长发育期[J].遥感学报,2009,13(6):1130-1137.
[29] 刘丹,于成龙,李帅.基于遥感的黑龙江省东部水稻种植信息提取[J].中国农学通报,2013,29(27):30-34.
[30] Cynthia S A W, Robert H W, Kathryn A T. Estimation of Perennial Vegetation Cover Distribution in the Mojave Desert Using MODISEVI Data[J]. GIScience & Remote Sensing,2008,45(2):167-187.

基于FY-3的黑龙江省水稻关键发育期识别

Detecting Major Growth Stages of Paddy Rice Based on FY-3 Data in Heilongjiang Province

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	王茹琳. 猕猴桃溃疡病田间分布型分析－以“徐香”为例[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(4): 88-92.
[2]	王小强,曹馨月,刘虹玲,伍兴隆,蒲德强. 桃蚜在辣椒上的空间分布及抽样技术研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(27): 158-164.
[3]	钟雪明. 水稻大螟为害株空间分布格局与抽样技术[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(17): 80-85.
[4]	阎雄飞,李刚,刘永华,贺英,王敬辉. 枣食芽象甲越冬幼虫空间分布型和抽样技术研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(31): 285-289.
[5]	赵敏王华弟杨廉伟李荣吴传伟张国忠洪美萍. 灰飞虱在玉米田空间分布格局及抽样技术研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(9): 190-194.
[6]	于玮台陈文龙. 碧蛾蜡蝉卵在茶园的空间分布型及抽样技术研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(25): 213-218.
[7]	赵敏王华弟杨廉伟李荣吴传伟张国忠王道泽. 灰飞虱在水稻田空间分布格局及抽样技术研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(15): 180-184.
[8]	赵敏杨廉伟王华弟李荣吴传伟张国忠祝小祥. 玉米粗缩病危害动态及空间格局和抽样技术的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(12): 187-191.
[9]	余继华汪恩国林云彪张敏荣. 早熟柑橘黄龙病空间格局参数特征及其应用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(5): 351-355.
[10]	王会福1,汪恩国2,陈伟强1. 单季稻褐飞虱空间分布格局及其抽样技术[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(12): 270-273.
[11]	朱金良,王华弟,陈跃,徐云,吴降星,蔡国梁. 麦田灰飞虱种群空间分布型及抽样技术探讨[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(8): 382-382.
[12]	王华弟,吕仲贤,陈银方,徐福寿,朱金星. 水稻稻秆潜蝇种群发生动态与持续控制技术研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(6): 483-483.