牛羊乳乳酸发酵过程中流变性变化比较

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2014-2228

中国农学通报 ›› 2014, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (34): 213-217.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2014-2228

所属专题：生物技术；畜牧兽医

牛羊乳乳酸发酵过程中流变性变化比较

田万强^1,2，李林强³，昝林森⁴，辛亚平⁴，刘永峰³，付丽娟³，李啸林²，高轶²

（¹杨凌职业技术学院动物工程分院，陕西杨凌 712100；²西安银桥生物科技有限责任公司，陕西临潼 710600；
³陕西师范大学食品工程与营养科学学院，西安 710062；
⁴西北农林科技大学动物科技学院，陕西杨凌 712100）

收稿日期:2014-08-15 修回日期:2014-12-05 接受日期:2014-11-18 出版日期:2015-03-10 发布日期:2015-03-10
通讯作者: 李林强
基金资助:
陕西省自然科学基金项目“奶牛优质高效快速繁育技术集成与示范推广”(2007C127)；陕西省科学技术发展计划项目“秦川牛良种选育及标准化生产技术示范与推广”(2011K01-09)；国家科技支撑计划项目“西北农区奶牛健康养殖生产技术集成及产业化示范”(2012BAD12B07)。

Comparison of Rheological Properties Changes of Cow Milk and Goat Milk During Lactic Acid Fermentation

Tian Wanqiang^1,2, Li Linqiang³, Zan Linsen⁴, Xin Yaping⁴, Liu Yongfeng³, Fu Lijuan³, Li Xiaolin², Gao Yi²

(¹Animal Engineering Department, Yangling Vovational and Technical College, Yangling Shaanxi 712100;
²Xi'an Yinqiao Biotechnology Limited Liability Company, Lingtong Shaanxi, 710600;
³College of Food Engineering and Nutritional Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710062;
⁴College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling Shaanxi, 712100)

Received:2014-08-15 Revised:2014-12-05 Accepted:2014-11-18 Online:2015-03-10 Published:2015-03-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 探讨牛羊乳乳酸发酵过程中流变特性。对牛羊乳分别发酵6 h，测定其乳酸发酵0、1、3和6 h的剪切粘度、酸度和蛋白质含量。结果表明：牛乳发酵0、1、3和6 h的剪切粘度和蛋白质含量均高于羊乳，而羊乳发酵酸度均高于牛乳。蛋白质是影响牛、羊乳乳酸发酵乳流变性的重要因素。

关键词: RAPD, RAPD

Abstract: The objectives of this study were?to investigate rheological properties of cow milk and goat milk during lactic acid fermentation. Cow milk and goat milk were lactic acid fermented for 6 h respectively. Shearing viscosity, acidity, and protein content were measured at 0, 1, 3 and 6 h respectively. The results showed that shearing viscosity and protein content of cow milk were higher than that of goat milk at 0, 1, 3 and 6 h. But acidity of goat milk were higher than that of cow milk at the same time. Protein is an important affecting factor on rheological properties of cow milk and goat milk.

田万强,李林强,昝林森,辛亚平,刘永峰,付丽娟,李啸林,高轶. 牛羊乳乳酸发酵过程中流变性变化比较[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(34): 213-217.

田万强, 李林强, 昝林森, 辛亚平, 刘永峰, 付丽娟, 李啸林 and 高轶. Comparison of Rheological Properties Changes of Cow Milk and Goat Milk During Lactic Acid Fermentation[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(34): 213-217.

参考文献

[1] 郭晨璐,马龙,武杰,等.浓缩液态食品流变特性研究进展[J].广州化工,2013,22(8):8-9.
[2] 王松松,陈庆森.3种发酵乳制品流变性质的比较与分析[J].食品科学,2011,32(19):7-11.
[3] Karoui R, Laguet A, Dufour E. Fluorescence spectroscopy: A tool for the investigation of cheese melting-correlation with rheological characteristics[J]. Lait, 2003, 83(3):251-264.
[4] Ng E W, Yeung M, Tong P S. Effects of yogurt starter cultures on the survival of Lactobacillus acidophilus[J]. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2011, 145(1): 169-175.
[5] Olson D W, Aryana K J. An excessively high Lactobacillus acidophilus inoculation level in yogurt lowers product quality during storage[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2008, 41(5): 911-918.
[6] Andrade S, Borges N. Effect of fermented milk containing Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium longum on plasma lipids of women with normal or moderately elevated cholesterol [J]. Journal of Dairy Research, 2009, 76: 469-474.
[7] Azcarate-peril M A, Tallon R, Klaenhammer T R. Temporal gene expression and probiotic attributes of Lactobacillus acidophilus during growth in milk[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2009, 92(3): 870-886.
[8] Haenlein G F W. Goat milk in human nutrition [J]. Small Ruminant Research, 51(2): 155-163.
[9] 罗军,曹斌云,姚军虎,等.奶山羊产业发展现状与产业化前景[A]. 2006中国羊业进展——第三届中国羊业发展大会论文集[C].2006,74-78.
[10] 王秀玲,葛武鹏,田毅,等.保加利亚乳杆菌在牛羊乳基质中发酵性能差异的比较[J].中国乳品工业,2012,40(9):15-18.
[11] 刘蒙佳,周强.羊乳与牛乳理化特性比较[J].饮料工业,2010,13(4):11-13.
[12] 沈辉, Sabumukama C, Nzeyimana E, et al. 酸乳发酵凝乳过程中的理化性质和生物活性[J].无锡轻工大学学报.2000,16(5):443-445.
[13] Jumah R Y, Shaker R R, Abu-jdayil B. Effect of milk source on the rheological properties of yogurt during the gelation process [J]. International Journal of Dairy Technology, 2001, 54(3): 89-93.
[14] Farnsworth J P, Li J, Hendricks G M, et al. Effects of transglutaminase treatment on functional properties and probiotic culture survivability of goat milk yogurt [J]. Small Ruminant Research, 2006, 65(1-2): 113-121.
[15] 张少辉,莫蓓红,田雷.搅拌型酸奶生产过程中粘度变化的研究[J].中国乳品工业,2002,31(1):31-36.

牛羊乳乳酸发酵过程中流变性变化比较

Comparison of Rheological Properties Changes of Cow Milk and Goat Milk During Lactic Acid Fermentation

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	李丽辉,胡瑶,李宏告,张跃龙,张勇,吴宏燕. 利用RAPD、ISSR标记分析国兰种质资源遗传多样性的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(29): 42-47.
[2]	赵光磊,张雅奎,吴凌娟,万群芳. 引进国外马铃薯种质资源的遗传多样性分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(15): 21-24.
[3]	陈锦,杨侃侃,王志伟,朱菲莹,秦忠良,贺爱国,梁志怀. 利用RAPD、ISSR标记分析白芨种质资源遗传多样性的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(12): 137-142.
[4]	鄢东海,刘声传,罗显扬,魏杰,陆建良,范方媛. 贵州地方茶树品种资源遗传多样性的RAPD分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(19): 30-34.
[5]	张少平,邱珊莲,张玉灿,赖正锋,郑云云,吴松海. RAPD及SRAP 2种标记对苦瓜‘如玉5号’杂交种纯度的鉴定[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(10): 74-79.
[6]	马丽. 石榴基因组DNA的提取及RAPD引物筛选[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(13): 142-146.
[7]	张玉平. 杨树RAPD标记技术体系的建立与优化[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(13): 20-24.
[8]	杨欢王阳何丽娴张丰收张涛. 碳离子注入向日葵种子的生物学效应研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(6): 175-181.
[9]	林琳江斌吴胜会张世忠. 鸭盲肠杯叶吸虫新种的遗传学初步分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(23): 1-5.
[10]	宋健曹伟平王金耀冯书亮杜立新. 球孢白僵菌不同菌株酯酶同工酶酶谱与RAPD多态性的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(18): 137-141.
[11]	刘锴栋袁长春邱怀娜陈燕黎海利. 粤西龙眼遗传多样性的RAPD分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(31): 191-195.
[12]	陈涛杨祥燕蔡元保王春田. 8份剑麻种质亲缘关系的ISSR和RAPD分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(21): 86-91.
[13]	王永斌赵远玲闫丽娟孟庆勇王广金. 玉米DNA导入水稻变异后代的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(7): 63-68.
[14]	张敏莹. 2个群体秀丽白虾生物学特征及基于RAPD的遗传多样性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(32): 78-82.
[15]	张德利钱敏曾纬陈仕江. 冬虫夏草RAPD反应体系的建立及优化[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(3): 170-173.