欢迎访问《中国农学通报》，
中国农学通报

中国农学通报 ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (21): 58-61.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15090081

所属专题： 小麦

• 农学 农业基础科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

小麦K-CMS保持系主要农艺性状的系统聚类分析

蔡健,程士刚,范海燕,范可章,卢良峰,汪海云   

  1. 阜阳师范学院生物与食品工程学院,颍上县润河镇中心学校,阜阳师范学院,阜阳师范学院,河南农业职业学院,阜阳师范学院
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-21 修回日期:2016-04-19 接受日期:2016-04-25 出版日期:2016-07-15 发布日期:2016-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 卢良峰
  • 基金资助:
    小麦；K-CMS；农艺性状；遗传多样性；聚类分析

Cluster Analysis of Main Agronomic Characters of Wheat Maintainer Line for K-type Cytoplasm Male Sterility (CMS)

程士刚,范海燕,范可章,卢良峰 and 汪海云   

  • Received:2015-09-21 Revised:2016-04-19 Accepted:2016-04-25 Online:2016-07-15 Published:2016-07-15

PDF (PC)

353

摘要： 通过对21 个小麦K-CMS保持系品种的农艺性状进行调查，旨在分析这些品种的遗传多样性。以2 年田间试验得到的株高、穗长、小穗数、穗下节长、穗粒草重、穗粒数、穗粒重、旗叶长等农艺性状为依据，计算21 个品种间遗传距离，采用类平均分析法(UPGMA)对供试材料进行聚类分析。结果表明：供试的21 个品种共划分为6 个类群，Ⅰ类为‘大作1 号’、‘国育101’、‘濮麦6311’、‘中育1211’、‘焦麦268’、‘长育918’、‘泛麦526’；Ⅱ类为‘锦科2 号’、‘安农12’；Ⅲ类为‘经科168’；Ⅳ类为‘偃农27’、‘农科668’；Ⅴ类为‘存麦15’、‘上麦1号’、‘聊麦18’、‘囤麦127’、‘科林04177’、‘光泰54’、‘郑麦1290’、‘耕麦787’；Ⅵ类为‘昌麦9 号’。划分结果与系谱分析基本一致，并把系谱来源不清的品种划分到相应的杂种优势群。小麦K-CMS保持系品种形状检测是研究保持系品种间遗传差异的一种方法，可为小麦“三系”选育提供初步的理论依据。

关键词: 土壤碱解氮, 土壤碱解氮, 高光谱, 遗传算法, 偏最小二乘回归

Abstract: The objective was to analyze the genetic diversity of 21 maintainer line varieties for K- type cytoplasm male sterility (CMS) in wheat by investigating their agronomic characters. The plant height, panicle length, per panicle, panicle next section length, ear kernel weight, per panicle grains, per panicle grains weight and flag leaf length were obtained from field experiments in two years. The genetic distances of the 21 varieties were calculated, and the cluster analysis was carried out with unweighted pair- group method arithmetic averages (UPGMA). The results showed that the 21 varieties were classified into six groups. Group I consisted of‘dazuo1’,‘guoyu101’,‘pumai6311’,‘zhongyu1211’,‘jiaomai268’,‘changyu918’,‘fanmai526’; group Ⅱ consisted of‘jinke2’,‘annong12’; group Ⅲ consisted of‘jingke168’; group Ⅳ consisted of‘yannong27’, ‘nongke668’; group Ⅴ consisted of‘cunmai15’,‘shangmai1’,‘liaomai18’,‘tunmai127’,‘kelin04177’, ‘guangtai54’,‘zhengmai1290’,‘gengmai787’; group Ⅵ consisted of‘changmai9’. The results were consistent with the available pedigree data. Moreover, varieties with unknown pedigree were assigned to the established heterotic groups. The shape detection of maintainer line for K-CMS in wheat was a way to study the genetic difference among varieties, and it provided the basis for breeding“three lines”of wheat.