氮沉降对细根动态和形态特征的影响研究进展

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15100039

中国农学通报 ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (15): 79-85.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15100039

氮沉降对细根动态和形态特征的影响研究进展

闫国永,邢亚娟,王晓春,韩士杰,王庆贵

黑龙江大学农业资源与环境学院,黑龙江大学农业资源与环境学院,东北林业大学林学院,中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所,黑龙江大学农业资源与环境学院

收稿日期:2015-10-12 修回日期:2015-11-10 接受日期:2015-11-24 出版日期:2016-06-01 发布日期:2016-06-01
通讯作者: 王庆贵
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“大兴安岭北方森林细根动态和形态特征对氮沉降的响应”(41575137)，“大兴安岭北方森林生态系统对N沉降增加的响应”(31370494)，“小兴安岭阔叶红松林生态系统对N沉降增加的响应”(31170421)，“气候变化背景下小兴安岭阔叶红松林土壤碳汇变化机理”(31070406)；科技部基础性工作专项A类项目“东北森林国家级保护区植物群落和土壤生物调查”(2014FY110600)；黑龙江省自然科学基金重点项目“黑龙江省寒温带针叶林生态系统碳循环对模拟N沉降的响应”(ZD201406)。

Research Progress of Nitrogen Deposition Effect on Fine Root Dynamic and Morphological Characteristics

Received:2015-10-12 Revised:2015-11-10 Accepted:2015-11-24 Online:2016-06-01 Published:2016-06-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 旨在总结前人研究经验以及过去研究的不足，指出未来N沉降对于细根影响研究的发展方向。基于前人研究的成果，总结了N沉降是如何影响细根动态和形态特征，进而又如何影响生态系统C循环。详细分析了全球N沉降现状，表明N沉降呈逐年加重的趋势；分析了细根动态（细根周转和呼吸）和形态特征（根长、直径、生物量、化学组分）对N沉降的响应。既有研究提供了很多N沉降影响细根动态和形态特征的证据，这些证据对于未来开展细根综合研究具有重要借鉴意义。

关键词: 黑土地, 黑土地, 水土保持, 效益评价

Abstract: The purpose of this review is to summarize previous researches and limitation of the past research, and point out the research direction of N deposition effect on fine root. Based on previous research results, this paper summarized the N deposition effect on the fine root dynamic and morphological characteristics, and ecosystem C cycle. With detailed analysis of the current situation of global N deposition, the authors found an increasing trend of N deposition year by year. The responses of fine root dynamic (fine root turnover and respiration) and morphological characteristics (fine root length, diameter, biomass, tissue chemistry) to the N deposition were analyzed. These studies provided certain evidence about N deposition effect on fine root dynamic and morphological characteristics, and had significance to future comprehensive research on fine root.

闫国永,邢亚娟,王晓春,韩士杰,王庆贵. 氮沉降对细根动态和形态特征的影响研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(15): 79-85.

参考文献

[1] Grime J P. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory [J]. American Naturalist, 1977, 111: 1169-1194.
[2] Reich P B, Walters M B, Ellsworth D S. From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1997, 94: 13730-13734.
[3] Robinson D, Hodge A, Fitter A. “Constraints on the form and function of root systems,” in Root Ecology [M]. eds H. de Kroon and E. J. W. Visser (New York: Springer), 2003, 1-31.
[4] Rice C W, Rodd T C, Blair J M, et al. Belowground biology and processes. In Knapp A K, Briggs J M, Hartnett D C, et al. eds. Grassland Dynamics, Long-Term Ecological Research in Tallgrass Prairie [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1998, 244-264.
[5] Bauhus J, Messier C. Soil exploitation strategy of fine roots in different tree species of the southern boreal forest of eastern Canada [J]. Candian Journal of Forest Research. 1999, 29: 260-273.
[6] ?gren GI, Axelsson B, Flower-Ellis J G K, et al. Annual carbon budget for a young Scots pine. In: Persson T (ed) Structure and function of northern coniferous forests-an ecosystem study [J]. Ecology Bulletin, 1980, 32: 307-313.
[7] Grier C C, Vogt K A, Keyes M R, et al. Biomass distribution and above- and below-ground production in young and mature Abies amabiliszone ecosystems of the Washington Cascades [J]. Candian Journal of Forest Research, 1981, 11: 155-167.
[8] Nadelhoffer K J, Raich J W. Fine root production estimates and belowground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems [J]. Ecology, 1992, 73:1139-1147.
[9] Rytter R M. Biomass production and allocation, including fineroot turnover, and annual N uptake in lysimeter-grown basket willows [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2001, 140: 177-192.
[10] Kalyn A L, Van Rees K C J. Contribution of fine roots to ecosystem biomass and net primary production in black spruce, aspen, and jack pine forests in Saskatchewan [J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2006, 140: 236-243.
[11] Newman G S, Arthur M A, Muller R N. Above- and belowground net primary production in a temperate mixed deciduous forest [J]. Ecosystems, 2006, 9: 317-329.
[12] Jackson R B, Mooney H A, Schulze E D. A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1997, 94: 7362-7366.
[13] .Tateno R, Hishi T, Takeda H. Above-and belowground biomass and net primary production in a cool-temperate deciduous forest in relation to topographical changes in soil nitrogen [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2004, 193: 297-306.
[14] Hendrick R L, Pregitzer K S. The dynamics of fine-root length, biomass, and nitrogen content in two northern hardwood ecosystems [J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1993, 23: 2507-2520.
[15] Gill R A, Jackson R B. Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems [J]. New Phytologist, 2000, 147: 13-31.
[16] Norby R J, Jackson R B. Root dynamics and global change: seeking an ecosystem perspective [J]. New Phytologist, 2000, 147:3-12
[17] Pregitzer K S, De Forest J L, Burton A J, et al. Fine root architecture of nine North American trees [J]. Ecological Monographs, 2002, 72: 293-309.
[18] Brunner I, Bakker M R, Bj?rk R G, et al. Fine-root turnover rates of European forests revisited: an analysis of data from sequential coring and ingrowth cores [J]. Plant and Soil, 2013, 362: 357-372.
[19] Silver W L, Miya R K. Global patterns in root decomposition: comparisons of climate and litter quality effects [J]. Oecologia, 2001, 129: 407-419.
[20] Lei P, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Bauhus J. The effect of tree species diversity on fine-root production in a young temperate forest [J]. Oecologia, 2012, 169: 1105-1115.
[21] Fahey T J, Tierney G L, Fitzhugh R D, et al. Soil respiration and soil carbon balance in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem [J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2005, 35: 244-253.
[22] Lambers H, Chapin F S, Pons T L. Plant physiological ecology [M]. 2nd edn. Springer, New York, pp. 2008, 101-149.
[23] Jia S X, Wang Z Q, Li X P, et al. N fertilization affects on soil respiration, microbial biomass and root respiration in Larix gmeliniiand Fraxinus mandshurica plantations in China [J]. Plant and Soil. 2010, 333: 325-336.
[24] Burton A J, Jarvey J C, Jarvi M P, et al. Chronic N deposition alters root respiration-tissue N relationship in northern hardwood forests [J]. Global Change Biology 2012, 18: 258-266.
[25] McCormack L M, Adams T S, Smithwick E A H, et al. Predicting fine root lifespan from plant functional traits in temperate trees [J]. New Phytologist, 2012, 195: 823-831.
[26] Pregitzer K S, Kubiske M E, Yu C K, et al. Relationships among root branch order, carbon, and nitrogen in four temperate species [J]. Oecologia, 1997, 111: 302-308.
[27] Guo D L, Mitchell R J, Hendricks J J. Fine root branch orders respond differentially to carbon source-sink manipulations in a longleaf pine forest [J]. Oecologia, 2004, 140: 450-457.
[28] Guo D L, Mitchell R J, Withington J M, et al, Hendricks J J. Endogenous and exogenous controls of root life span, mortality and nitrogen flux in a long leaf pine forest: root branch order predominates [J]. Journal of Ecology, 2008, 96: 737-745.
[29] Eissenstat D M, Yanai R D. The ecology of root lifespan [J]. Advances in Ecological Research, 1997, 27: 1-60.
[30] Ellsworth D S, Thomas R, Crous K Y, et al. Elevated CO2 affects photosynthetic responses in canopy pine and subcanopy deciduous trees over 10 years: a synthesis from Duke FACE [J]. Global Change Biology, 2012, 18: 223-242.
[31] Vogt K A, Vogt D J, Palmiotto P A, et al. Review of root dynamics in forest ecosystems grouped by climate, climatic forest type and species [J].. Plant and Soil, 1996, 187: 159-219.
[32] Logan J A. Nitrogen oxides in the troposphere: global and regional budgets [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1983, 88: 10785-10807.
[33] Galloway J N, Cowling E B. Reactive nitrogen and the world: 200 years of change [J]. Ambio, 2002, 31: 64-71.
[34] Binkley D, Son Y, Valentine D W. Do forests receive occult inputs of nitrogen? [J]. Ecosystems, 2000, 3(4): 32-331.
[35] Wright R F, Rasmussen L. Introduction to the NITREX and EXMAN projects [J]. Forest Ecology and Management 1998, 101(1-3): 1-7.
[36] 任仁,米丰杰,白乃彬。中国降水化学数据的化学计量学分析[J].北京工业大学学报. 2000, 26(2): 90-95.
[37] Zhou G Y, Yan J H. The influence of region atmospheric precipitation characteristics and its element inputs on the existence and development of Dinghushan forest ecosystems [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2001, 21(12): 2002-2012.
[38] Liu X J, Zhang Y, Han W X, et al. Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China [J]. Nature, 2014, 494: 459-462 (28 February 2013) | doi:10.1038 /nature11917
[39] Zhu F, Yoh M, Gilliam F S, et al. Nutrient Limitation in Three Lowland Tropical Forests in Southern China Receiving High Nitrogen Deposition: Insights from Fine Root Responses to Nutrient Additions [J]. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8(12): e82661
[40] Luke McCormack M, Adams T S, Smithwick E A H, Eissenstat D M. Predicting fine root lifespan from plant functional traits in temperate trees [J]. New Phytologist, 2012, 195: 823-831.
[41] Li M, Gu J C, Zhang Z W, Wang Z Q. Responses of fine root mass, length, production and turnover to soil nitrogen fertilization in Larix gmelinii and Fraxinus mandshurica forests in Northeastern China [J]. Journal of Forest Research, 2010, 15: 194-201.
[42] Verburg P S J, Young A C, Stevenson B A, Glanzmann I, Arnone J A, Marion G M, Holmes C, Nowak R S. Do increased summer precipitation and N deposition alter fine root dynamics in a Mojave Desert ecosystem? [J]. Global Change Biology, 2010, 19: 948-956.
[43] Peek M S. Explaining variation in fine root life span [J]. Progress in Botany, 2007, 68: 382-398
[44] Trumbore S E, Gaudinski J B. The secret lives of roots [J]. Science, 2003, 302: 1344-1345.
[45] Strand A E, Pritchard S G, McCormack M L, et al. Irreconcilable differences: Fine-root life spans and soil carbon persistence [J]. Science, 2008, 319: 456-458.
[46] Gaul D, Hertel D, Leuschner C. Effects of experimental soil frost on the fine-root system of mature Norway spruce [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2008, 171: 690-698.
[47] Poorter H, Nagel O. The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review [J]. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2000, 27: 595-607.
[48] Bloom A J, Chapin F S, Mooney H A. Resource limitation in plants-an economic analogy [J]. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 1985, 16: 363-392.
[49] Burton A J, Pregitzer K S, Hendrick R L. Relationships between fine root dynamics and nitrogen availability in Michigan northern hardwood forests [J]. Oecologia, 2000, 125: 389-399.
[50] 郭大立,范萍萍.关于氮有效性影响细根生产量和周转率的四个假说[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18: 2354-2360.
[51] Smithwick E A H, Eissenstat D M, Lovett G M, et al. Root stress and nitrogen deposition: consequences and research priorities [J]. New Phytologist, 2013, 197: 712-719.
[52] Marschner P. Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants [M]. NewYork, NY: Academic press 2011.
[53] Makita N, Hirano Y, Dannoura M, et al. Fine root morphological traits determine variation in root respiration of Quercus serrata [J]. Tree Physiology, 2009, 29: 579-585.
[54] Burton A J, Melillo J M, Frey S D. Adjustment of forest ecosystem root respiration as temperature warms [J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2008, 50: 1467-1483.
[55] Makita N, Kosugi Y, Dannoura M, et al. Patterns of root respiration rates and morphological traits in 13 tree species in a tropical forest[J] . Tree Physiology, 2012, 32: 303-312.
[56] Franck F, Morales J P, Arancibia-Avendann?o D, et al. Seasonal fluctuations inVitis viniferaroot respiration in the field [J]. New Phytologist, 2011, 192: 939-951.
[57] Benton N, Taylor A E, Strand E R et al. Root length, biomass, tissue chemistry and mycorrhizal colonization following 14 years of CO2 enrichment and 6 years of N fertilization in a warm temperate forest [J]. Tree Physiology, 2014, 00: 1-11 doi: 10. 1093 /treephys/ tpu058.
[58] Will R E, Markewitz D, Hendrick R L，et al. Nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics for 13-year-old loblolly pine stands receiving complete competition control and annual N fertilizer [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006, 227: 155-168.
[59] Haynes B E, Gower S T. Belowground carbon allocation in unfertilized and fertilized red pine plantations in northern Wisconsin [J]. Tree Physiology 1995, 15: 317-325.
[60] Hunt H W, Elliott E T, Detling J K, et al. Responses of a C3and C4 perennial grass to elevated CO2 and climate change [J]. Global Change Biology, 1996, 2: 35-47.
[61] Lu X, Mao Q, Gilliam F S, et al. Nitrogen deposition contributes to soil acidification in tropical ecosystems [J]. Global Change Biology, 2014, 20(1): 3790-801. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12665
[62] Smilauerova M, Smilauer P. Morphological responses of plant roots to heterogeneity of soil resources [J]. New Phytologist, 2002, 154: 703-715.
[63] Richard W, Zobel T B, Kinraide V C. Baligar. Fine root diameters can change in response to changes in nutrient concentrations [J]. Plant and Soil, 2007, 297: 243-254.
[64] Wang Y, Liu J S, He L X, et al. “Responses of Carbon Dynamics to Nitrogen Deposition in Typical Freshwater Wetland of Sanjiang Plain,” [J]. Journal of Chemistry, vol. Article ID 603948, 9 pages, 2014. doi:10.1155/2014/603948
[65] Helmisaari H S, Hallb?cken L. Fine-root biomass and necromass in limed and fertilized Norway spruce (Picea abies (L) Karst) stands [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 1999, 119: 99-110.
[66] Helmisaari H S, Saarsalmi A, Kukkola M. Effects of wood ash and nitrogen fertilization on fine root biomass and soil and foliage nutrients in a Norway spruce stand in Finland [J]. Plant and Soil, 2009, 314: 121-132.
[67] Hodge A. The plastic plant: root responses to heterogeneous supplies of nutrients [J]. New Phytologist, 2004, 162: 9-24.
[68] 蒋琦清,唐建军,陈欣,等. 模拟氮沉降对杂草生长和氮吸收的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(5): .951-955.
[69] Majdi H. Effects of nutrient applications on fine-root dynamics and root/rhizosphere chemistry in a Norway spruce stand [J]. Ph.D. thesis, Dept. Ecology and Environmental Research, Swed. Univ. Agr. Sci. Rep. 1994, 71: 1-83.
[70] Lehto T. Effects of liming and boron fertilization on boron uptake of Picea abies [J]. Plant and Soil, 1994, 163: 55-64.
[71] Zoettl H W, Huettl R F, 1986. Nutrient supply and forest decline in Southwest –Germany [J]. Water Air and Soil Pollution, 31, 449-462.
[72] Bazzaz F A, Miao S L. Successional status, seed size and responses of tree seedlings to CO2, light and nutrients [J]. Ecology, 1993, 74: 104-112.
[73] Chapin III F S，Matson P，Mooney H A. Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology [M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002, 97-119.

氮沉降对细根动态和形态特征的影响研究进展

Research Progress of Nitrogen Deposition Effect on Fine Root Dynamic and Morphological Characteristics

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	马超. 黑龙江省黑土地保护性耕作实施基本情况及问题研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(17): 143-147.
[2]	姜宁, 王斌, 谢永刚. 黑龙江省黑土地质量评价指标体系构建[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(33): 98-104.
[3]	王美玉, 戴长雷, 张凯文, 韩心宇. 区域水土保持水土流失预测分析及实例研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(14): 72-77.
[4]	张米林, 张芳美, 廖钟方, 王恒松. 西南典型喀斯特洼地风景园林规划设计探析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(25): 72-77.
[5]	王晓青,史文娇,孙晓芳,王猛,石晓丽. 高标准农田建设适宜性评价、效益评价及影响因素解析的研究方法综述[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(19): 131-142.
[6]	马楠,徐玉霞,郭炳强,马凯,林巧风,许丁月. 陕北和关中退耕还林工程综合效益评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(20): 70-74.
[7]	李梦娜,刘琳,张永芳,刘蕾,武彦斌. 基于系统动力学的土地整理项目效益后评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(2): 98-106.
[8]	王琦琪,陈印军,李然嫣. 东北黑土地保护评价指标体系研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(2): 42-47.
[9]	孙丽娜,石占胜,宫月. 河北省耕地利用效益评价及其时空分异特征研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(18): 92-98.
[10]	杨红,陶雪娟,杜辉,马佳. 家庭农场效益及评价研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(12): 183-188.
[11]	丁哲利,韩丽娜,曾会才,郑伟,何应对,臧小平. 香蕉茎秆有机肥对大白菜生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(10): 73-78.
[12]	袁有美. 免耕种植水土保持用苎麻木质纤维主要成分分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(31): 242-246.
[13]	李宁宁,赵雨森. 基于DEA的黑土地水土保持综合效益评价研究——以黑龙江省为例[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(34): 178-181.
[14]	游惠明,李建民,黄石德,洪志猛,岳辉. 基于突变级数法的长汀水土保持综合效益评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(28): 34-37.
[15]	于跃张延军宋广伟郭久艳刘琛. 土地整治规划综合效益评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(23): 70-74.