欢迎访问《中国农学通报》，
中国农学通报

中国农学通报 ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 151-157.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16080082

所属专题： 耕地保护

• 三农研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

近郊与远郊农户耕地投入偏好差异研究——基于云南省512户农户调查

阳利永,柳德江,邱 成   

  1. 玉溪师范学院资源环境学院资源规划系,玉溪师范学院资源环境学院,玉溪师范学院资源环境学院
  • 收稿日期:2016-08-18 修回日期:2016-12-12 接受日期:2016-12-13 出版日期:2017-02-04 发布日期:2017-02-04
  • 通讯作者: 阳利永
  • 基金资助:
    云南省教育厅科学研究基金项目“‘城镇上山’背景下云南省耕地利用与流转策略”(2014C119Y)；玉溪师范学院青年骨干教师培养专项。

Farmers’Preference for Investment in Cultivated Land ——Difference Between Suburban and Outer Suburb Villages

  • Received:2016-08-18 Revised:2016-12-12 Accepted:2016-12-13 Online:2017-02-04 Published:2017-02-04

PDF (PC)

477

摘要： 农户对耕地投入的偏好，关系到耕地可持续利用与粮食安全。采用参与式农村评估方法，对云南省5对典型的近、远郊村512农户进行随机问卷调查，定量对比分析近、远郊村农户对耕地投入的偏好差异。结果表明：无论是劳动、机械、资金还是总投入，近郊村户均投入明显低于远郊村而地均投入则高于远郊村，近郊村耕地利用集约度比远郊村高；在耕地投入结构中，近、远郊村劳动投入均占绝大部分，但近郊村农户对劳动投入偏好强于远郊村而对资金投入偏好则弱于远郊村；对于耕地进一步投入意愿，大部分农户基本保持不变，但农户总体倾向于减少劳动力投入而增加资金投入，且远郊村比近郊村更为突出；农户总体趋向增加“好”质量耕地投入而减少“差”质量耕地投入，且远郊村比近郊村更为突出。应尽快采取措施促使农村特别是远郊村耕地顺利流转而扩大耕地流转规模，尽早实现耕地的规模经营与可持续性投入。

关键词: 潜力测算, 潜力测算, 潜力分级, 土地整治, 县域

Abstract: Farmers'' preference for the investment in cultivated land is related to the sustainable utilization of cultivated land and food security. [Method]By using the participatory rural appraisal method, a random questionnaire survey was conducted among 512 farmers of five pairs typical suburban and outer suburb villages in Yunnan Province, and then made a quantitative comparative analysis on the differences in the preference for investment in cultivated land of farmers between suburban and outer suburb villages. [Result]The results show that: whether it was labor, machinery, capital and the total investment, the suburban villages were obviously lower than the outer suburb villages in the average investment for each farmer, but the suburban villages were larger than the outer suburb villages in the average investment for each cultivated land. In the investment structure of cultivated land in the suburban and outer suburb villages, the labor investment occupy the vast majority, and farmers of the suburban villages had stronger preference for labor investment but weaker preference for capital investment than the outer suburb villages, and the use intensity of cultivated land of suburban villages were higher than that of outer suburb villages. For the further willingness of investment in cultivated land, most farmers remained unchanged, but farmers generally tend to reduce the amount of labor investment and increase the capital investment in cultivated land, and the outer suburb villages are more prominent than the suburban villages. Farmers generally tend to reduce investment in good-quality cultivated land and reduce investment in poor-quality cultivated land, and the outer suburb villages are more prominent than the suburban villages. [Conclusion]In order to achieve the scale and sustainable investment of cultivated land as early as possible, measures should be taken as soon as possible to promote the smooth transfer of cultivated land and expand the scale of transfer especially in the outer suburb villages.

中图分类号: