欢迎访问《中国农学通报》,

中国农学通报 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (23): 135-141.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18080083

• 食品 营养 检测 安全 • 上一篇    下一篇

食品标识国内外法规标准比较研究

张倩   

  1. 国家食品质量安全监督检验中心
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-21 修回日期:2019-07-19 接受日期:2019-01-10 出版日期:2019-08-13 发布日期:2019-08-13
  • 通讯作者: 张倩
  • 基金资助:
    非基金

Domestic and International Regulations on Food Labeling: A Comparative Study

  • Received:2018-08-21 Revised:2019-07-19 Accepted:2019-01-10 Online:2019-08-13 Published:2019-08-13

摘要: 食品标识作为记录食品综合信息的载体,是食品内在信息最直观的体现,也是食品安全管理的主要内容。各个国家/组织在食品标识管理中都制定了严格的法规标准,且存在异同点。本文通过收集、整理国内外现行食品标识法规标准,对比分析中国与CAC、欧盟、美国和澳新食品标识法规标准的差异,包括食品标识内容以及主要差异的比较,为完善我国食品标识法规标准提供有价值的参考。

关键词: 类胰岛素生长因子, 类胰岛素生长因子, 胎牛血清, 体外成熟, 体细胞核移植, 胚胎培养

Abstract: Food labeling information is divided into mandatory labeling information and recommended labeling information, which offer an important basis for consumers to choose food and management departments to supervise food. This paper analyzes the differences of food labeling regulations, especially the food labeling specifications between China and the Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC), the European Union (EU), the USA, Australia and New Zealand. It is concluded that the range of pre-packaged foods in China is relatively small, and the labeling items such as the allergens, edible method and the production batch number are recommendatory. The labeling of ingredients presented in the nanometers is mandatory in the EU. Besides, the expressions of the shelf life, country of origin or place of provenance, irradiated food and GM food labeling are slightly different among various countries. The study provides constructive suggestions on improving the food labeling regulations and related management regulations in China.