林木营养理论与营养诊断技术研究进展

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-1027

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

营养诊断是林木管理和科学施肥的重要依据，也是评价肥效及指导施肥的关键技术。本文概述了林木营养理论研究进展，梳理总结了国内外营养诊断技术研究状况和进展，着重分析评述了外观诊断法、田间试验、土壤分析法、植物组织分析法、植物无损检测等营养诊断方法的特点及其局限性，为科学开展林木养分管理提供技术支撑，最后指出了中国林木营养诊断发展中的问题，展望了今后营养理论和诊断技术研究方向和应用前景。

关键词: 营养理论, 营养诊断, 养分管理

Abstract:

Nutrition diagnosis is an important basis for forest tree management and scientific fertilization, and also the key technique to evaluate fertilizer efficiency and guide fertilization. This paper summarized the research progress of forest tree nutrition theory, and the research status and progress of nutrition diagnosis techniques at home and abroad. It emphatically analyzed the characteristics and constraints of nutrition diagnosis methods such as appearance diagnosis, field experiment, soil analysis, plant tissue analysis and plant nondestructive testing, to provide technical support for the scientific development of forest tree nutrient management. At last, the paper pointed out the problems in the development of forest tree nutrition diagnosis in China, and discussed the research direction and application prospect of forest tree nutrition theory and diagnosis techniques.

Key words: nutrition theory, nutrition diagnosis, nutrient management

闫彩霞, 吴中能, 刘俊龙, 苗婷婷, 曹志华, 孙慧. 林木营养理论与营养诊断技术研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(35): 35-40.

YAN Caixia, WU Zhongneng, LIU Junlong, MIAO Tingting, CAO Zhihua, SUN Hui. Research Progress of Forest Tree Nutrition Theory and Nutrition Diagnosis Techniques[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(35): 35-40.

参考文献 69

[1]	赵霞, 徐大平, 杨曾奖, 等. 养分胁迫对降香黄檀幼苗生长及叶片养分状况的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(6):1503-1508.
[2]	FOX THOMAS R, LEE A H, ALBAUGH T J, et al. Tree nutrition and forest fertilization of pine plantations in the southern united states[J]. Southern journal of applied forestry, 2007, 31(1):5-11. doi: 10.1093/sjaf/31.1.5 URL
[3]	谷加存, 楚旭, 王政权. 水曲柳人工林直径生长与培育技术[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2010, 38(9):7-9.
[4]	SEVEL LISBETH, NORDLAREN THOMAS, INGERSLEV MORTEN, et al. Fertilization of SRC willow, I: Biomass production response[J]. Bio energy research, 2014, 7(1):319-328.
[5]	胡建文. 白桦人工幼龄林精准施肥技术研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2020.
[6]	宋丽娟, 叶万军, 郑妍妍, 等. 作物氮素无损快速营养诊断研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2017, 23(6):19-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2017.06.004
[7]	陈琳. 西南桦苗期营养诊断与氮素施肥[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2010.
[8]	LIEBIG J. DIE organische chemie in ihrer anwendung auf agrikultur und physiolgie[M]. Brunswick, Germany: verlag viehweg,1840.
[9]	LIEBIG J. Chemistry in its applications to agriculture and physiology, Third edition, Taylor and Walton, London: Biodiversity heritage library, 1843.
[10]	左海军, 马履一, 王梓, 等. 林木营养诊断与林地施肥研究综述[J]. 西南林学院学报, 2010, 30(6):78-82.
[11]	MITSCHERLICH E A. The law of the minimum and the law of diminishing soil productivity[M]. German: landwirtschafliche jahrbuecher, 1909.
[12]	MACY P. The quantitative mineral nutrient requirements of plants[J]. Plant physiology, 1936, 11(4):749-764. doi: 10.1104/pp.11.4.749 pmid: 16653383
[13]	ARNON D I, STOUT P R. Molybdenum as an essential element for higher plants.[J]. Plant physiology, 1939, 14(3):599-602. doi: 10.1104/pp.14.3.599 pmid: 16653589
[14]	SHEAR C B, CRANE H L, MYERS A T. Nutrient element balance[J]. Soil science, 1954, 77(4):405-414.
[15]	ARNON D I, STOUT P R. The essentiality of certain elements in minute quantity for plants with special reference to copper.[J] Plant physiology, 1939, 14(2):371-375. doi: 10.1104/pp.14.2.371 pmid: 16653564
[16]	KENWORTHY A L. Leaf Analysis as an Aid in Fertilizing Orchards[M]. Madison, America: soil science society of America incorporated,1973.
[17]	ULRICH A, Hills F J. Principles and practices of plant analysis[M]. Madison, America: soil science society of America incorporated,1967.
[18]	CHAPMAN. Diagnostic criteria for plants and soils[J]. Soil science, 1966, 102(4):287.
[19]	PRJANISHINKOV D N. 李庆逵,译. 农业化学中册[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社,1956.
[20]	INGESTAD T. A definition of optimum nutrient requirements in birch seedlings[J]. Physiologia plantarum, 1970, 23(2):1127-1138. doi: 10.1111/ppl.1970.23.issue-6 URL
[21]	INGESTAD T, LUND A B. Theory and techniques for steady state mineral nutrition and growth of plants[J]. Scandinavian journal of forest research, 1986, 1(1-4):439-453. doi: 10.1080/02827588609382436 URL
[22]	MONTAÑÉS L, HERAS L, ABADÍA J, et al. Plant analysis interpretation based on a new index: deviation from optimum percentage (DOP)[J]. Journal of plant nutrition, 1993, 16(7):1289-1308. doi: 10.1080/01904169309364613 URL
[23]	IMO M, TIMMER V R. Vector diagnosis of nutrient dynamics in mesquite seedlings[J]. Forest science, 1997, 43(2):268-273.
[24]	TAIZ L, ZEIGER R E. Plant Physiology. Third edition[M]. Sinauer associates inc. publishers, Massachusetts, 2002.
[25]	BEAUFILS E R. Diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS)[M]. South Africa: natal university press,1972.
[26]	WALWORTH J L, SUMMER M E, ISAAC R A, et al. Preliminary DRIS norms for alfalfa in the Southeastern United States and a comparison with midwestern norms[J]. Agronomy journal, 1986, 78(6):1046-1052. doi: 10.2134/agronj1986.00021962007800060022x URL
[27]	HALLMARK W B, BEVERLY R B, MORRIS J H F, et al. Continued modification of the M-DRIS for soybean[J]. Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 1990, 21(13-16):1313-1328. doi: 10.1080/00103629009368307 URL
[28]	PARENT L E, DAFIR M. A theoretical concept of compositional nutrient diagnosis[J]. Journal of the American society for horticultural science, 1992, 117(2):239-242. doi: 10.21273/JASHS.117.2.239 URL
[29]	TIMMER V R AND STONE E L. Comparative foliar analysis of young balsam fir fertilized with nitrogen, phosphorus,potassium, and lime[J]. Soil science of America journal, 1978, 42(1):125-130. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200010027x URL
[30]	TMMER V R. Interpretation of seedling analysis and visual symptoms. Mineral nutrition of conifer seedlings[M]. Boca Raton, America: chemical rubber company press, 1991.
[31]	RAFAEL Z, RAFAEL S. Foliar nutrient status and nutritional relationships of young Pinusradiata D. Don plantations in northwest Spain[J]. Forest ecology and management, 2003, 174(1):167-176. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00027-0 URL
[32]	GREGOIRE N, FISHER RF. Nutritional diagnoses in loblolly pine (Pinustaeda L. ) established stands using three different approaches[J]. Forest ecology and management, 2004, 203(1):195-208. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.049 URL
[33]	MICHAEL C D, WILLIAM E S. The effect of soil nutrition, soil acidity and drought on northern red oak (Quercusrubra L.) growth and nutrition on Pennsylvania sites with high and low red oak mortality[J]. Forest ecology and management, 2000, 136(1):199-207. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00307-2 URL
[34]	铃木诚, 王林. 用叶绿素计对桑树进行简易营养诊断[J]. 国外农学(蚕业), 1994^,14(1):50-53.
[35]	TESSIER J T, RAYNAL D J. Use of nitrogen to Phosphorus ratios in Plant tissue as an indicator of nutrient limitation and nitrogen saturation[J]. Journal of applied ecology, 2003, 40(3):523-534. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2003.00820.x URL
[36]	GRESS S E, NICHOLS T D, NORTHCRAFT C C, et al. Nutrient limitation in soils exhibiting differing nitrogen availabilities: What lies beyond nitrogen saturation[J]. Ecology, 2007, 88(1):119-130. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[119:NLISED]2.0.CO;2 URL
[37]	CURRAN P J, KUPIEC J A, SMITH G M. Remote sensing the biochemical composition of a slash pine canopy[J]. IEEE transactions on Geo-science and remote sensing, 1997, 35(2):415-420. doi: 10.1109/36.563280 URL
[38]	BARBEDO J. Detection of nutrition deficiencies in plants using proximal images and machine learning: A review[J]. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2019, 162(5):482-492. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2019.04.035 URL
[39]	孔硕, 樊明寿, 秦永林, 等. 磷素营养诊断技术的发展及其在马铃薯生产中的应用前景[J]. 中国马铃薯, 2019, 33(5):309-313.
[40]	贾瑞丰. 红厚壳苗期缺素和施肥试验的研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2011.
[41]	陈杨, 樊明寿, 李斐, 等. 氮素营养诊断技术的发展及其在马铃薯生产中的应用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25(3):66-71.
[42]	武睿, 乐丽红, 朱安繁, 等. 作物营养拍照诊断服务系统设计与开发[J]. 江西农业学报, 2018, 30(8):55-59.
[43]	王艺蓉. 四川攀枝花凯特芒果营养诊断技术研究[D]. 海口: 海南大学, 2016.
[44]	李贻铨. 林木施肥与营养诊断[J]. 林业科学, 1991, 27(4):435-442.
[45]	仲崇禄, REDDELL P. 六种土壤类型上巨桉苗缺素试验[J]. 林业科学研究, 1994, 7(6):704-708.
[46]	冯茂松, 张健, 钟宇. 巨桉短周期工业原料林养分平衡的矢量诊断[J]. 林业科学, 2006, 42(2):56-62.
[47]	RICHARDS B N, BEVEGE D I. Principles and practices of foliar analysis as a basis for crop-logging in pine plantations[J]. Plant & soil, 1972, 36(1-3): 109-119.
[48]	李淑仪, 蓝佩玲, 廖新荣, 等. 2个桉树无性系微量元素叶片营养诊断初探[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2005, 22(1):40-45.
[49]	AERTS R, CHAPIN F S. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: Are-evaluation of processes and patterns[J]. Advance in ecological research, 2000, 30(4):1-67.
[50]	张亚伟. 氮磷施肥下水曲柳人工林生长与营养诊断[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2020.
[51]	朱亚艳, 秦雪, 赵杨, 等. 贵州都匀马尾松种子园针叶DRIS营养诊断分析[J]. 西部林业科学, 2013, 42(6):62-68.
[52]	陆欣远, 韦小丽, 张红艳, 等. 2种不同岩性土壤上施肥后闽楠叶片DRIS营养诊断[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2022, 37(4):143-151.
[53]	张龙. 樟树营养诊断与苗期施肥效应研究[D]. 南昌: 江西农业大学, 2018.
[54]	刘红霞, 张会民, 郭大勇, 等. 豫西地区红富士苹果叶片营养诊断[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(2):457-462.
[55]	姜远茂, 顾曼如, 束怀瑞. 红星苹果的营养诊断[J]. 园艺学报, 1995, 22(3):215-220.
[56]	刘克林, 孙向阳, 王海燕, 等. 三倍体毛白杨叶片营养DRIS诊断[J]. 生态学报. 2009, 29(6):2893-2898.
[57]	赵琼, 曾德慧. 林木生长氮磷限制的诊断方法研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(1):122-128.
[58]	EVANS J R, SEEMANN J R. Differences between wheat genotypes in specific activity of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase and the relationship to photosynthesis[J]. Plant physiology, 1984, 74(4):759-765. doi: 10.1104/pp.74.4.759 pmid: 16663506
[59]	周珺, 林位夫, 王军, 等. 低N胁迫下巴西橡胶实生苗叶片SPAD值、N素营养及农艺性状的变化[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2010, 39(1):29-33,44.
[60]	马文玉. 基于UAV遥感的冬小麦氮素营养诊断[D]. 焦作: 河南理工大学, 2017.
[61]	赵珊. 基于高光谱成像的玉米苗期氮素营养监测的研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2016.
[62]	张培松, 孙毅明, 郭澎涛, 等. 基于数字图像分析技术的橡胶树叶片氮含量预测[J]. 热带作物学报, 2015, 36(12):2120-2124.
[63]	邓莹. 基于叶片颜色特征的毛竹林营养诊断研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江农林大学, 2021.
[64]	陈凯. 基于光谱技术的橡胶树氮素水平无损诊断策略研究[D]. 海口: 海南大学, 2018.
[65]	刘雪峰. 柑橘植株冠层营养及花量、产量的近地遥感估测研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2016.
[66]	全东平. 基于高光谱的柑橘叶片氮磷钾含量检测模型[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2016.
[67]	米国华. 植物营养生物学研究方向探讨[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28(1):150-156.
[68]	翟俊海, 张素芳, 郝璞. 卷积神经网络及其研究进展[J]. 河北大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 37(6):640-651. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1565.2017.06.012
[69]	齐欣. 基于手机图像的冬小麦冠层数字图像氮素营养诊断模型[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2021.