| [1] |
HANSEN P A, MOCQUOT G. Lactobacillus acidophilus (Moro) comb. nov.[J]. International journal of systematic bacteriology, 1970, 20(3):325-327.
doi: 10.1099/00207713-20-3-325
URL
|
| [2] |
YAN F, LI N, SHI J, et al. Lactobacillus acidophilus alleviates type 2 diabetes by regulating hepatic glucose, lipid metabolism and gut microbiota in mice[J]. Food &function, 2019, 10(9):5804-5815.
|
| [3] |
XING T, BIAN X, MA C, et al. In vitro evaluation of probiotic properties of Lactobacillus acidophilus AD125 and antagonism against Escherichia coli O157:H7 adhesion to Caco-2 cell[J]. Food &function, 2023, 14(5):2472-2480.
|
| [4] |
GAO H, LI X, CHEN X, et al. The functional roles of Lactobacillus acidophilus in different physiological and pathological processes[J]. Journal of microbiology and biotechnology, 2022, 32(10):1226-1233.
doi: 10.4014/jmb.2205.05041
URL
|
| [5] |
ALTERMANN E, RUSSELL W M, AZCARATE-PERIL M A, et al. Complete genome sequence of the probiotic lactic acid bacterium Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM[J]. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 2005, 102(11):3906-3912.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409188102
URL
|
| [6] |
AZCARATE-PERIL M A, ALTERMANN E, HOOVER-FITZULA R L, et al. Identification and inactivation of genetic loci involved with Lactobacillus acidophilus acid tolerance[J]. Applied and environmental microbiology, 2004, 70(9):5315-5322.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.9.5315-5322.2004
URL
|
| [7] |
张媛媛, 赵梦迪, 李悦垚, 等. 犬源嗜酸乳杆菌GLA09分离鉴定及其益生特性和安全性研究[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2025, 61(4):339-347.
|
| [8] |
LAN R, KOO J, KIM I. Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal microbial and noxious gas emission in weaning pigs[J]. Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2017, 97(4):1310-1315.
doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2017.97.issue-4
URL
|
| [9] |
DE CESARE A, SALA C, CASTELLANI G, et al. Effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus D2/CSL (CECT 4529) supplementation in drinking water on chicken crop and caeca microbiome[J]. PloS one, 2020, 15(1):e0228338.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228338
URL
|
| [10] |
SUNU P, SUNARTI D, MAHFUDZ L D, et al. Effect of synbiotic from Allium sativum and Lactobacillus acidophilus on hematological indices, antioxidative status and intestinal ecology of broiler chicken[J]. Journal of the saudi society of agricultural sciences, 2021, 20(2):103-110.
doi: 10.1016/j.jssas.2020.12.005
URL
|
| [11] |
DE CESARE A, SIRRI F, MANFREDA G, et al. Effect of dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus acidophilus D2/CSL (CECT 4529) on caecum microbioma and productive performance in broiler chickens[J]. Plos one, 2017, 12(5):e0176309.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176309
URL
|
| [12] |
FORTE C, MANUALI E, ABBATE Y, et al. Dietary Lactobacillus acidophilus positively influences growth performance, gut morphology, and gut microbiology in rurally reared chickens[J]. Poultry science, 2018, 97(3):930-936.
doi: 10.3382/ps/pex396
URL
|
| [13] |
MINELLI E B, BENINI A. Relationship between number of bacteria and their probiotic effects[J]. Microbial ecology in health and disease, 2008, 20(4):180-183.
doi: 10.1080/08910600802408095
URL
|
| [14] |
OUWEHAND A C. A review of dose-responses of probiotics in human studies[J]. Beneficial microbes, 2017, 8(2):143-151.
doi: 10.3920/BM2016.0140
pmid: 28008787
|
| [15] |
ELAM N A, GLEGHORN J F, RIVERA J D, et al. Effects of live cultures of Lactobacillus acidophilus (strains NP45 and NP51) and Propionibacterium freudenreichii on performance, carcass, and intestinal characteristics, and Escherichia coli strain O157 shedding of finishing beef steers[J]. Journal of animal science, 2003, 81(11): 2686-2698.
doi: 10.2527/2003.81112686x
URL
|
| [16] |
WATKINS B A, MILLER B F, NEIL D H. In vivo Inhibitory effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus against pathogenic Escherichia coli in gnotobiotic chicks[J]. Poultry science, 1982, 61(7):1298-1308.
doi: 10.3382/ps.0611298
URL
|
| [17] |
LI Z, WANG W, LIU D, et al. Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus on the growth performance and intestinal health of broilers challenged with Clostridium perfringens[J]. Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2018, 9(1):25.
doi: 10.1186/s40104-018-0243-3
|
| [18] |
QIAO J, LI H, WANG Z, et al. Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus dietary supplementation on the performance, intestinal barrier function, rectal microflora and serum immune function in weaned piglets challenged with Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide[J]. Antonie van leeuwenhoek, 2015, 107(4):883-891.
doi: 10.1007/s10482-015-0380-z
URL
|
| [19] |
LAN R X, KOO J M, KIM I H. Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus supplementation in different energy and nutrient density diets on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, fecal microbiota shedding, and fecal noxious gas emission in weaning pigs[J]. Animal feed science and technology, 2016, 219: 181-188.
doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.06.018
URL
|
| [20] |
MONIKA M, TYAGI J S, SONALE N, et al. Evaluating the efficacy of Lactobacillus acidophilus derived postbiotics on growth metrics, health, and gut integrity in broiler chickens[J]. Scientific reports, 2024, 14(1):24768.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74078-0
|
| [21] |
WU Y, SHAO Y, SONG B, et al. Effects of Bacillus coagulans supplementation on the growth performance and gut health of broiler chickens with Clostridium perfringens-induced necrotic enteritis[J]. Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2018, 9(1):9.
doi: 10.1186/s40104-017-0220-2
|
| [22] |
WU Z, YANG K, ZHANG A, et al. Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus on the growth performance, immune response, and intestinal barrier function of broiler chickens challenged with Escherichia coli O157[J]. Poultry science, 2021, 100(9):101323.
doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101323
URL
|
| [23] |
DAR A H, SINGH S K, RAHMAN J U, et al. The effects of probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus and/or prebiotic mannan oligosaccharides on growth performance, nutrient utilization, blood metabolites, faecal bacteria, and economics of crossbred calves[J]. Iranian journal of veterinary research, 2022, 23(4):322-330.
|
| [24] |
MANSILLA F I, MIRANDA M H, UEZEN J D, et al. Effect of probiotic lactobacilli supplementation on growth parameters, blood profile, productive performance, and fecal microbiology in feedlot cattle[J]. Research in veterinary science, 2023, 155:76-87.
doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2023.01.003
pmid: 36652843
|
| [25] |
YANG Y J, CHUANG C C, YANG H B, et al. Lactobacillus acidophilus ameliorates H. pylori-induced gastric inflammation by inactivating the Smad7 and NFκB pathways[J]. BMC microbiology, 2012, 12:38.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-38
|
| [26] |
ALAQIL A A, ABBAS A O, EL-BELTAGI H S, et al. Dietary supplementation of probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus modulates cholesterol levels, immune response, and productive performance of laying hens[J]. Animals, 2020, 10(9):1588.
doi: 10.3390/ani10091588
URL
|
| [27] |
XIA M, LI C, WU D, et al. Benefits of heat-killed Lactobacillus acidophilus on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, antioxidant status, immunity, and cecal microbiota of rabbits[J]. Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024, 11:1361908.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1361908
URL
|
| [28] |
MESHKIBAF S, FRITZ J, GOTTSCHALK M, et al. Preferential production of G-CSF by a protein-like Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 secretory factor through activating TLR2-dependent signaling events without activation of JNKs[J]. BMC microbiology, 2015, 15:238.
doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0578-2
pmid: 26502905
|
| [29] |
LI H, ZHANG L, CHEN L, et al. Lactobacillus acidophilus alleviates the inflammatory response to enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88 via inhibition of the NF-κB and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways in piglets[J]. BMC microbiology, 2016, 16:273.
doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0862-9
URL
|
| [30] |
JUNAID M, LU H, DIN A U, et al. Deciphering microbiome, transcriptome, and metabolic interactions in the presence of probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus against Salmonella typhimurium in a murine model[J]. Antibiotics, 2024, 13(4):352.
doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13040352
URL
|
| [31] |
BALLARD S T, HUNTER J H, TAYLOR A E. Regulation of tight-junction permeability during nutrient absorption across the intestinal epithelium[J]. Annual review of nutrition, 1995, 15(1):35-55.
doi: 10.1146/nutr.1995.15.issue-1
URL
|
| [32] |
SCHNEEBERGER E E, LYNCH R D. The tight junction: a multifunctional complex[J]. American journal of physiology-cell physiology, 2004, 286(6):1213-1228.
pmid: 15151915
|
| [33] |
CHEN J, WANG P, LIU C, et al. Effects of compound feed additive on growth performance and intestinal microbiota of broilers[J]. Poultry science, 2023, 102(1):102302.
doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.102302
URL
|
| [34] |
FENG Y, WU X, HU D, et al. Comparison of the effects of feeding compound probiotics and antibiotics on growth performance, gut microbiota, and small intestine morphology in yellow-feather broilers[J]. Microorganisms, 2023, 11(9):2308.
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11092308
URL
|
| [35] |
LIU X, MA Z, WANG Y, et al. Compound probiotics can improve intestinal health by affecting the gut microbiota of broilers[J]. Journal of animal science, 2023, 101:1-12.
|
| [36] |
AGUSTONO B, WARSITO S H, YUNITA M N, et al. Influence of microbiota inoculum as a substitute for antibiotic growth promoter during the initial laying phase on productivity performance, egg quality, and the morphology of reproductive organs in laying hens[J]. Veterinary world, 2023, 12:1461-1467.
|
| [37] |
POORBAGHI S L, GHEISARI H, DADRAS H, et al. Effects of simple and microencapsulated Lactobacillus acidophilus with or without inulin on the broiler meat quality infected by avian influenza virus (H9N2)[J]. Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2016, 8(4):221-228.
doi: 10.1007/s12602-016-9224-z
URL
|
| [38] |
SANTILLO A, ANNICCHIARICO G, CAROPRESE M, et al. Probiotics in milk replacer influence lamb immune function and meat quality[J]. Animal, 2012, 6(2):339-345.
doi: 10.1017/S1751731111001571
pmid: 22436193
|
| [39] |
YUANITA I, SILITONGA L, SUTHAMA N. Evaluation of health status in broilers fed with a mixture of Dayak onion extract and Lactobacillus acidophilus[J]. Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research, 2023, 10(2):269.
doi: 10.5455/javar.
URL
|
| [40] |
AGARWAL N, KAMRA D N, CHAUDHARY L C, et al. Microbial status and rumen enzyme profile of crossbred calves fed on different microbial feed additives[J]. Letters in applied microbiology, 2002, 34(5):329-336.
doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2002.01092.x
pmid: 11967054
|
| [41] |
NEVES N O D S, DE DEA LINDNER J, STOCKHAUSEN L, et al. Fermentation of plant-based feeds with Lactobacillus acidophilus improves the survival and intestinal health of juvenile nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) reared in a biofloc system[J]. Animals, 2024, 14(2):332.
doi: 10.3390/ani14020332
URL
|
| [42] |
PÉREZ-VELASCO R, GÓMEZ-GIL B, et al. Nutritional attributes and microbial metagenomic profile during solid-state fermentation of soybean meal inoculated with Lactobacillus acidophilus under non-sterile conditions[J]. Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2024, 104(13):8219-8229.
doi: 10.1002/jsfa.v104.13
URL
|
| [43] |
DU T, XIONG S, WANG L, et al. Two-stage fermentation of corn and soybean meal mixture by Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus acidophilus to improve feeding value: optimization, physicochemical property, and microbial community[J]. Food science and biotechnology, 2024, 33(5):1207-1219.
doi: 10.1007/s10068-023-01426-7
|
| [44] |
HUANG J, DAI Y, HUANG T, et al. Comparison of nutritional value, bioactivity, and volatile compounds of soybean meal-corn bran mixed substrates fermented by different microorganisms[J]. Letters in applied microbiology, 2023, 76(2):1-10.
|
| [45] |
SU L W, CHENG Y H, HSIAO F S H, et al. Optimization of mixed solid-state fermentation of soybean meal by Lactobacillus species and Clostridium butyricum[J]. Polish journal of microbiology, 2018, 67(3):297-305.
doi: 10.21307/pjm-2018-035
URL
|
| [46] |
SU X, MENGHE B, ZHANG H, et al. In vitro evaluation of intestinal transport and high-density fermentation of Lactobacillus acidophilus[J]. Metabolites, 2023, 13(10):1077.
doi: 10.3390/metabo13101077
URL
|
| [47] |
MIGUEL M, MAMUAD L, RAMOS S, et al. Effects of using different roughages in the total mixed ration inoculated with or without coculture of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bacillus subtilis on in vitro rumen fermentation and microbial population[J]. Animal bioscience, 2021, 34(4):642-651.
doi: 10.5713/ajas.20.0386
URL
|
| [48] |
HADJ SAADOUN J, CALANI L, CIRLINI M, et al. Effect of fermentation with single and co-culture of lactic acid bacteria on okara: evaluation of bioactive compounds and volatile profiles[J]. Food&function, 2021, 12(7):3033-3043.
|
| [49] |
CORREA V A, PORTILHO A I, DE GASPARI E. Vaccines, adjuvants and key factors for mucosal immune response[J]. Immunology, 2022, 167(2):124-138.
doi: 10.1111/imm.13526
pmid: 35751397
|
| [50] |
GILL H S, RUTHERFURD K J, PRASAD J, et al. Enhancement of natural and acquired immunity by Lactobacillus rhamnosus (HN001), Lactobacillus acidophilus (HN017) and Bifidobacterium lactis (HN019)[J]. British journal of nutrition, 2000, 83(2):167-176.
doi: 10.1017/S0007114500000210
URL
|
| [51] |
URIZA P J, TRAUTMAN C, PALOMINO M M, et al. Development of an antigen delivery platform using Lactobacillus acidophilus decorated with heterologous proteins: a sheep in wolf’s clothing story[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2020, 11:509380.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.509380
URL
|
| [52] |
PERONI D G, MORELLI L. Probiotics as adjuvants in vaccine strategy: is there more room for improvement?[J]. Vaccines, 2021, 9(8):811.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines9080811
URL
|
| [53] |
BRON P A, VAN BAARLEN P, KLEEREBEZEM M. Emerging molecular insights into the interaction between probiotics and the host intestinal mucosa[J]. Nature reviews microbiology, 2012, 10(1): 66-78.
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2690
|
| [54] |
XUE R, TIAN Y, ZHANG Y, et al. Efficacy and immunogenicity of a live L. acidophilus expressing SAD epitope of transmissible gastroenteritis virus as an oral vaccine[J]. Acta virologica, 2019, 63(3):301-308.
doi: 10.4149/av_2019_310
URL
|
| [55] |
ZANG Y, TIAN Y, LI Y, et al. Recombinant Lactobacillus acidophilus expressing S1 and S2 domains of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus could improve the humoral and mucosal immune levels in mice and sows inoculated orally[J]. Veterinary microbiology, 2020, 248:108827.
doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108827
URL
|
| [56] |
NOURI GHARAJALAR S, MIRZAI P, NOFOUZI K, et al. Immune enhancing effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus on Newcastle disease vaccination in chickens[J]. Comparative immunology, microbiology and infectious diseases, 2020, 72: 101520.
doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2020.101520
URL
|