不同处理方式对蜜蜂采集大豆花粉的影响

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15090050

中国农学通报 ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 9-14.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15090050

所属专题：油料作物

不同处理方式对蜜蜂采集大豆花粉的影响

马卫华,申晋山,武文卿,宋怀磊,宋卓琴,张旭凤,邵有全

(山西省农科院园艺研究所,太原 030031）

收稿日期:2015-09-11 修回日期:2015-12-23 接受日期:2015-10-22 出版日期:2016-01-28 发布日期:2016-01-28
通讯作者: 邵有全
基金资助:
国家公益性行业（农业）专项“蜜蜂授粉增产技术集成与示范”(201203080)；国家农业技术体系专项资金“现代农业产业技术体系（蜜蜂）建设”(CARS-45-KXJ5)；山西省科技攻关项目“蜜蜂授粉在杂交大豆制种中的应用”(20130311006-5)；山西省农业科学院科技攻关项目“诱导蜜蜂采集技术及其在大豆杂交的应用”(2013gg43)。

Effects of Different Treatments on Honeybee Gathering Soybean Pollen

Ma Weihua, Shen Jinshan, Wu Wenqing, Song Huailei, Song Zhuoqin, Zhang Xufeng, Shao Youquan

(Institute of Horticulture, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Taiyuan 030031)

Received:2015-09-11 Revised:2015-12-23 Accepted:2015-10-22 Online:2016-01-28 Published:2016-01-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为增加蜜蜂访问大豆花的积极性，提高杂交大豆的结荚率，利用巢内悬挂幼虫信息素和饲喂8-Br-cGMP、豆花糖浆处理蜂群，对照组为饲喂糖浆(1:1)的蜂群。采用收集花粉、摄像观察和荧光定量的方法，对3种处理蜂群的花粉重量、采集蜂数量和Amfor和Ammvl的mRNA相对表达量进行比较。采用浓度梯度筛选出的400 LEqu幼虫信息素和0.5 mg/L 8-Br-cGMP、豆花糖浆处理蜂群，对照组大豆花粉重量百分比为3.05%，3个处理组分别为10.42%、8.53%和5.99%，400 LEqu、0.5 mg/L 8-Br-cGMP与对照组之间存在显著差异(P<0.05)。采集大豆花粉的蜜蜂数量百分比，对照组为55.09%，3个处理组均高于对照组，处理组之间均不存在显著差异(P>0.05)。3种处理方式均可以提高蜜蜂采集大豆花粉的积极性，提高采粉蜂的数量，增加了访问大豆花的机率。

关键词: 玉米, 玉米, 设施栽培, 性状表达

Abstract: To increase the visiting enthusiasm of honeybee to soybean flowers and improve the podding rate of hybrid soybean, hanging brood pheromone, feeding 8-Br-cGMP and soy flower syrup in nest were used to treat bee colony, the control group was feeding syrup (1:1). By gathering pollen, video observation and quantitative real-time PCR, soybean pollen weight percentage, bee percentage of collecting soybean pollen and relative quantitative expression of Amfor and Ammvl mRNA of the three methods were compared. The results showed that the concentration of 400 LEqu brood pheromone and 0.5 mg/L 8-Br-cGMP was selected, and soy flower syrup was used to deal with the colony. The soybean pollen weight percentage of the control group was 3.05%, and that of the three treatments was respectively 10.42%, 8.53% and 5.99%. 400 LEqu and 0.5 mg/L 8-Br-cGMP were significantly different from the control group (P < 0.05). Honeybees proportions on soybean flowers among foraging pollen honeybees of the control group was 55.09%, and those of the three treatments were higher than that. There was no significant difference between the treatment groups and control group (P > 0.05). The three kinds of treatments can improve the visiting enthusiasm of the honeybees to soybean flowers and the number of honeybee who collect the soybean pollen, thus increase the visiting probability on soybean flowers.

中图分类号:

S897

马卫华,申晋山,武文卿,宋怀磊,宋卓琴,张旭凤,邵有全. 不同处理方式对蜜蜂采集大豆花粉的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(2): 9-14.

Ma Weihua,Shen Jinshan,Wu Wenqing,Song Huailei,Song Zhuoqin,Zhang Xufeng and Shao Youquan. Effects of Different Treatments on Honeybee Gathering Soybean Pollen[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(2): 9-14.

参考文献

[1] 杨桂华,李建平,李茂海.三种传粉昆虫在网室内对大豆不育系传粉行为研究初报[A].当代昆虫学研究-中国昆虫学会成立60周年纪念大会暨学术讨论会论文集[C].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2004.
[2] 赵丽梅,孙寰,马春森,等.大豆昆虫传粉研究初探[J].大豆科学,1999(1):73-76.
[3] 谢甫绨.大豆雄性不育及杂种优势利用研究进展[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2008,39(2):131-136.
[4] 孙寰,张井勇,王玉民,等.木豆,苜蓿和大豆3种豆科作物杂种优势利用概述[J].中国农业科学,2009, 42(5):1528-1539.
[5] Robacker D C, Flottum R K, Sammataro D, et al. Effects of climatic and edaphic factors on soybean flowers and on the subsequent attractiveness of the plants to honey bees[J].Field Crops Research,1983,6:267-278.
[6] Koelling P D, Kenworthy W J, Caron D M. Pollination of male- sterile soybean in caged plots [J]. Crop Science, 1981, 21:551-559.
[7] 历延芳,赵丽梅.蜜蜂为杂交大豆授粉技术研究获得创新性成果[J].中国蜂业,2014, 65(2):13.
[8] Robinson G E. Genomics and integrative analyses of division of labor in honeybee colonies [J]. American Naturalist, 2002, 160: S160-S172.
[9] Ben-shahar Y, Dudek N L. Phenotypicde constraction reveals involvement of manganese transporter malvolio in honey bee division of labor [J]. Journal of Experiment al Biology, 2004, 207: 3281-3288.
[10] Heylen K, Gobin B, Billen J, et al. Amfor expression in the honeybee brain: a trigger mechanism for nurse–forager transition [J].Journal of Insect Physiology, 2008, 54:1400-1403.
[11] Toth A L, Robinson G E. Evo-devo and the evolution of social behavior: brain gene expression analyses in social insects [J].Cold?Spring?Harbor symposia on quantitative?biology, 2009, 74: 419-426.
[12] 孟娇,马卫华,赵慧婷,等.中华蜜蜂Malvolio基因 Acmvl 的克隆及组织表达分析[J].昆虫学报, 2015, 58(7): 721-730.
[13] Scharlaken B, Graaf D C, Goossens K, et al. Reference gene selection for insect expression studies using quantitative real-time PCR: The head of the honeybee, Apis mellifera, after a bacterial challenge [J]. Journal of Insect Science, 2008, 8:1-10.
[14] Pakiw T. Brood pheromone regulates foraging activity of honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) [J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2004, 97(3): 748-751.
[15] 张晗译.幼虫信息素对西方蜜蜂采集行为的影响[J].中国蜂业,2008,59(9):49.
[16] 丁桂玲译. 幼虫信息素与蜜蜂的采集行为[J].中国蜂业,2011,62(10):48.
[17] Alaux C, Le Conte Y, Adams H A, et al. Regulation of brain gene expression in honey bees by brood pheromone [J].Genes, Brain and Behavior ,2009,8: 309-319.
[18] Le Conte Y, Mohammedi A, Robinson G E. Primer effects of a brood pheromone on worker honeybee behavioral development[J].Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 2001, 268: 163-168.
[19] Robinson G E. Genomics and integrative analyses of division of labor in honeybee colonies [J]. American Naturalist, 2002, 160: S160-S172.
[20] Ben-Shahar Y, Robichon A, Sokolowski M B, et al. Influence of gene action across different time scales on behavior [J]. Science, 2002, 296:741-744.

不同处理方式对蜜蜂采集大豆花粉的影响

Effects of Different Treatments on Honeybee Gathering Soybean Pollen

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	王绍新, 王宝宝, 李中建, 许洛, 冯健英. 中国鲜食玉米的研究脉络和趋势探析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(1): 8-15.
[2]	纪坤, 王彬, 赵博文, 薛浩, 吴建民, 朱晓建, 王依欣, 赵海军, 韩赞平. 不同玉米种质材料植株与穗粒性状的灰色关联度分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 27-32.
[3]	付焱焱, 李云峰, 韩冬, 马树庆. 吉林省粮食主产区玉米生长季水分盈亏及其对产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(7): 99-105.
[4]	胡艺璇, 田胜尼, 方超, 胡卫明, 奚晓宇, 吕梦冉. 不同追肥类型对大棚内外紫薯光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(6): 31-36.
[5]	张洪芬, 杨丽杰, 赵玉娟, 张峰. 陇东2020年“强凉夏”气候特征及对农业影响分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(5): 117-123.
[6]	李锐, 尚霄, 尚春树, 常利芳, 闫蕾, 白建荣. SSR荧光检测解析224份山西玉米自交系的遗传结构与遗传关系[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(5): 9-16.
[7]	周忠文, 张谋草, 刘英, 柳东慧, 张红妮, 张俊林, 韩博. 气象要素对陇东塬区春玉米灌浆速度影响分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(5): 94-98.
[8]	王辉, 陆鑫海, 杜美芳, 张琪. 1960—2019年海河平原地区夏玉米生长季高温特征分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(4): 62-68.
[9]	孙彦铭, 黄少辉, 刘克桐, 杨云马, 杨军芳, 邢素丽, 贾良良. 土壤肥力差异对冀中南山前平原与低平原夏玉米产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(35): 35-42.
[10]	胡雪纯, 解文艳, 马晓楠, 周怀平, 杨振兴, 刘志平. 长期秸秆还田对旱地玉米土壤有机碳及碳库管理指数的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(34): 8-13.
[11]	蒋菊芳, 杨华, 胡文青, 魏育国. 持续高温干旱胁迫对春玉米生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(32): 63-68.
[12]	宋英博, 王囡囡, 张洪权, 樊伟民, 李于, 孟凡祥, 李灿东, 陈庆山. Excel VBA数组法在玉米自交系测配试验列表设计中的应用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(32): 106-110.
[13]	番华彩, 曾莉, 李卫雁, 丁云秀, 郭志祥, 李舒, 徐胜涛, 郑泗军, 王永斌. 香蕉细菌性软腐病防控药剂筛选及田间应用效果评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(31): 113-118.
[14]	蒋锋, 闫艳, 麦嘉埼, 梁日朗, 周捷成, 李坪遥, 刘鹏飞. 甜玉米品质性状的主基因+多基因遗传分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(30): 14-20.
[15]	张慧敏, 鲍广灵, 周晓天, 高琳琳, 胡宏祥, 马友华. 严格管控类耕地特定农作物重金属安全性评估[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(3): 52-58.