豇豆蓟马发生规律及防治药剂筛选的研究

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16060144

中国农学通报 ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (19): 138-142.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16060144

所属专题：园艺

豇豆蓟马发生规律及防治药剂筛选的研究

邱海燕,付步礼,唐良德,陈俊谕,刘奎

(中国热带农业科学院环境与植物保护研究所/海南省热带农业有害生物监测与控制重点实验室,海口 571101）

收稿日期:2016-06-28 修回日期:2017-05-31 接受日期:2016-09-27 出版日期:2017-07-11 发布日期:2017-07-11
通讯作者: 刘奎
基金资助:
公益性行业（农业）科研专项经费项目“南繁区生物安全监测预警及控制关键技术研究与示范”(201403075)。

Occurrence Regularity of Thrips in Cowpea and Evaluation of Insecticides

Qiu Haiyan, Fu Buli, Tang Liangde, Chen Junyu, Liu Kui

(Environment and Plant Protection Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agriculture/Hainan Key Laboratory for Monitoring and Control of Tropical Agricultural Pests, Haikou 571101)

Received:2016-06-28 Revised:2017-05-31 Accepted:2016-09-27 Online:2017-07-11 Published:2017-07-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探明在冬种豇豆的整个生育期内，为害豇豆的蓟马种类及各种蓟马的种群消长情况，于2014—2016年在海南三亚开展了冬种豇豆的蓟马种类和数量的调查。结果表明：为害豇豆的蓟马有4种，即豆大蓟马、花蓟马、棕榈蓟马和黄胸蓟马；其中，豆大蓟马与棕榈蓟马在豇豆的整个生育期内均可为害，花蓟马与黄胸蓟马仅在花期发生。豆大蓟马为豇豆蓟马的优势种，其发生高峰期在豇豆的盛花期；其次是花蓟马，其数量在豇豆生长后期逐渐增加；棕榈蓟马的数量在豇豆花期虽有所增加，但始终维持在较低水平；黄胸蓟马仅偶尔出现，且数量极少。为了解新型杀虫剂对豇豆蓟马的防效，采用喷雾法，开展了豇豆蓟马的田间药效试验。试验结果表明：在参试的5种新型药剂中，乙基多杀菌素和苦参碱对豇豆蓟马具有较好的防效，药后3天防效分别为79.14%和62.14%，高于对照药剂啶虫脒的防效。药后7天，所有参试药剂对豇豆蓟马的防效均不理想，除了乙基多杀菌素，其余药剂防效均小于50%。在参试的药剂中，乙基多杀菌素、苦参碱对豇豆蓟马具有较好的防效，可以与啶虫脒轮换使用，用于豇豆蓟马的田间防治。

关键词: 龙眼, 龙眼, 育种目标性状, 正反交后代, 表现

Abstract: To investigate the thrips species on the cowpea Vigna unguiculata and to explore the population trends of various kinds of thrips throughout the winter growing season of cowpea, the thrips species and number were surveyed weekly from 2014 to 2016 in Sanya, Hainan Province. The investigation indicated that there were four kinds of thrips: Megalurothrips usitatus (Bagnall), Frankliniella intonsa (Trybom), Thrips palmi Karny and Thrips hawaiiensis Morgan attacked cowpea. M. usitatus and T. palmi occured throughout the winter growing season of cowpea crop, when F. intonsa and T. hawaiiensis occurred only in flowering phase. M. usitatus was the dominant thrips species, and its occurrence peak appeared in the full bloom stage. F. intonsa was the second important thrips, and its quantity increased gradually in the later growth stage of cowpea. Though T. palmi increased in the bloom stage, it was still at a low level. T. hawaiiensis occurred occasionally, and was few in number. Field trials were carried out to evaluate the control efficiencies of new insecticides against thrips during the cowpea full bloom stage. The result indicated that spinetoram and matrine showed better control efficiency than acetamiprid (control) on thrips, and the control efficiencies of spinetoram and matrine were 79.14% and 62.14% respectively at 3 days after spraying (d.a.s.). But the control efficiencies of all treatments excepted spinetoram were less than 50% at 7 d.a.s.. These findings suggest that spinetoram and matrine were considered as optimal pesticides among the five new insecticides for managing thrips, which could be used in alternation with acetamiprid to control thrips in cowpea.

中图分类号:

S435

邱海燕,付步礼,唐良德,陈俊谕,刘奎. 豇豆蓟马发生规律及防治药剂筛选的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(19): 138-142.

Qiu Haiyan,Fu Buli,Tang Liangde,Chen Junyu and Liu Kui. Occurrence Regularity of Thrips in Cowpea and Evaluation of Insecticides[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(19): 138-142.

参考文献

[1] 俞承明.三亚地区冬种豇豆优质高产栽培技术[J].热带农业科技,2013,36(1):37,46.
[2] 孔祥义,肖春雷,刘勇,等.5种药剂对蓟马的室内毒力测定及防治效果研究[J].广东农业科学,2012,39(20):70-72,76.
[3] 唐良德,梁延坡,韩云,等.海南豇豆蓟马发生为害调查及蓝板监测技术研究[J].中国植保导刊,2015,(3):53-57,93.
[4] Ezueh M I. Nature and significance of preflowering damage by thrips to cowpea[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata,1981,29(3):305-312.
[5] Nabirye J, Nampala P, Kyamanywa S, et al. Determination of damage-yield loss relationships and economic injury levels of flower thrips on cowpea in eastern Uganda[J]. Crop Protection,2003,22(7):911-915.
[6] 麦昌青,王硕,袁伟方.三亚市冬季瓜菜豇豆蓟马预测方法和绿色防控技术初探[J].中国植保导刊,2012,32(11):43-45.
[7] 任智斌,王森山.9种颜色诱虫板对牛角花齿蓟马的诱集作用[J].草原与草坪,2007(6):49-50,54.
[8] 王琛,朱文静,符悦冠,等.茶黄蓟马嗜好颜色筛选及监测效果测定[J].环境昆虫学报,2015,37(1):107-115.
[9] 黄鹏,陈汉鑫,姚锦爱,等.香蕉花蓟马对不同颜色的敏感性及色板田间悬挂组合选择[J].中国农学通报,2016,32(1):141-145.
[10] 孙猛,郅军锐,姚加加,等.不同颜色粘虫板对切花月季上西花蓟马诱集效果[J].北方园艺,2010(10):186-188.
[11] 肖春雷,刘勇,吴青君,等.不同药剂对三亚地区豇豆上普通大蓟马的毒力[J].植物保护,2014,40(6):164-166.
[12] 刘奎,唐良德,李鹏,等.几种杀虫剂对豆大蓟马的毒力测定及复配增效作用[J].热带作物学报,2014,35(8):1615-1618.
[13] 唐良德,付步礼,邱海燕,等.豆大蓟马对12种杀虫剂的敏感性测定[J].热带作物学报,2015,36(3):570-574.
[14] 李现玲,宋娜.60 g/L乙基多杀菌素悬浮剂防治豇豆蓟马田间药效试验[J].广西植保,2012,25(3):18-19.
[15] 吴逸远.20%丁硫克百威乳油防治豇豆蓟马田间药效试验初报[J].吉林农业,2013(4):66.
[16] 刘暮莲,黄向荣,马德发,等.几种药剂对豇豆蓟马的田间防效试验[J].广西植保,2015,28(3):19-21.
[17] 陈剑山,李鹏,刘奎,等.3种药剂对豇豆蓟马的田间防效评价[J].中国植保导刊,2015,35(5):66-67.
[18] 付步礼,唐良德,邱海燕,等.黄胸蓟马高效低毒防治新型药剂的筛选[J].果树学报,2016(4):473-481.
[19] 穆常青,杨海霞,谷培云,等.5种植物源农药对西花蓟马的防治效果[J].中国植保导刊,2014(9):50-52.
[20] 杨杰.5种杀虫剂防治设施黄瓜蓟马药效试验[J].西藏农业科技,2015,(1):7-9.
[21] Salifu A B, Singh S R. Evaluation of sampling methods for Megalurothrips sjostedti (Trybom) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on cowpea[J]. Bulletin of entomological research,1987,77(3):451-456.
[22] Kirk William D J. Ecologically seIective coIoured traps[J]. Ecological Entomology,1984,9(1):35-41.
[23] Lewis T. A comparison of water traps, cylindrical sticky traps and suction traps for sampling thysanopteran populations at different levels[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata,1959,2(3):204-215.
[24] 赵成银,何余容,吕利华,等.西花蓟马的寄主、危害及防治措施[J].广东农业科学,2011(5):95-98.
[25] 周卫川,林阳武,翁瑞泉,等.西花蓟马在中国的地理分布和年发生代数预测[J].昆虫知识,2006,43(6):798-801.
[26] 张维球.广东海南岛蓟马种类初志Ⅰ.蓟马亚科Thripinae(缨翅目:蓟马科)[J].华南农学院学报,1982,3(4):48-63.
[27] 夏青,杨文杰,周利娟.意大利蜜蜂与其他昆虫对杀虫剂敏感性比较[J].世界农药,2012,(1):21-25,30.
[28] 邱海燕,刘奎,李鹏,等.豆大蓟马的生物学特性研究[J].热带作物学报,2014,35(12):2437-2441.

豇豆蓟马发生规律及防治药剂筛选的研究

Occurrence Regularity of Thrips in Cowpea and Evaluation of Insecticides

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	刘小英, 吴碧君, 张游南, 黄飞龙, 刘国强. 基于ISSR标记的龙眼种质资源遗传多样性及亲缘关系分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(31): 60-65.
[2]	高慧颖, 姜帆. 龙眼干制前后缓解小鼠疲劳作用的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(11): 106-110.
[3]	贾晓军,兰创业,陈芳,吴杨焕,周进. 不结球白菜组合农艺性状与产量表现[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(13): 58-63.
[4]	韩冬梅,郭栋梁,李建光. 平衡式疏果修剪法对龙眼生长与结果的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(19): 62-70.
[5]	李强,马境,何遂,吉莉,汪志辉,张爽,司云燕. 重庆北碚地区引种嘉宝果的性状表现和气象影响因素分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(24): 95-100.
[6]	郑姗,张小艳,张立杰,谢丽雪,李韬. 40个龙眼品种(品系)DNA指纹图谱构建及遗传关系分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(1): 107-112.
[7]	许玲,魏秀清,章希娟,余东,陈志峰,黄金松,许家辉. 龙眼果实育种目标性状在正反交后代中的表现[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(31): 137-140.
[8]	扶定,王青林,赵万兵,霍二伟,马汉云,沈光辉,全瑞兰. Y58S系列组合产量、品质及抗性的综合表现[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(3): 49-53.
[9]	黄爱萍,谢鸿根,胡文舜,姜帆,郑少泉,杨道富. 1976—2010年福建沿海地区龙眼生产发展态势的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(34): 24-29.
[10]	刘婷婷赵颖红杨珍平高志强杨武德王瑞云潘幸来. ‘舜麦1718’和‘中麦175’在晋中晚熟冬麦区的生育表现[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(15): 56-61.
[11]	胡日生曾中史瑞甫刘志杨全柳戴杏华. 烟草耐冷性的苗期鉴定新方法[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(1): 124-127.
[12]	邱崇洋杨炯超郭和蓉卢小良解新明. 8种狼尾草属植物的生长性状比较分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(6): 97-101.
[13]	杨朗黄立飞姜建军陈恩海. 龙眼园节肢动物群落结构研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(14): 345-349.
[14]	欧世金1,朱建华2,陈昇1,阮经宙3. 龙眼雌花数和坐果率与温度及降雨量的关系[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(1): 149-153.
[15]	陈义挺,赖钟雄,林玉玲,李焕苓,何园,邵巍,蔡英卿. 温度对龙眼体胚发生早期POD活性及同工酶的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25(9): 32-37.