氮沉降对植物生长的影响研究进展

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16110061

中国农学通报 ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (29): 42-48.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16110061

氮沉降对植物生长的影响研究进展

毛晋花¹,邢亚娟¹,马宏宇²,王庆贵¹

(¹黑龙江大学农业资源与环境学院,哈尔滨 150080；²长白山科学研究院,吉林二道白河 133613）

收稿日期:2016-11-14 修回日期:2017-09-22 接受日期:2016-12-23 出版日期:2017-10-24 发布日期:2017-10-24
通讯作者: 毛晋花
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“大兴安岭北方森林细根动态和形态特征对氮沉降的响应”(41575137)，“大兴安岭北方森林生态系统对N沉降增加的响应”(31370494)，“小兴安岭阔叶红松林生态系统对N沉降增加的响应”(31170421)，“气候变化背景下小兴安岭阔叶红松林土壤碳汇变化机理”(31070406)；黑龙江省自然科学基金重点项目“黑龙江省寒温带针叶林生态系统碳循环对模拟N沉降的响应”(ZD201406)；长白山科学研究院开放基金项目“长白山阔叶红松林生态系统细根动态和形态特征对氮沉降的响应”(2016001)；黑龙江省科研机构创新能力提升专项计划“抗寒速生用材树种新种质创制及培育技术研究”(YC2014D005)。

Research Progress of Nitrogen Deposition Effect on Plant Growth

Mao Jinhua¹, Xing Yajuan¹, Ma Hongyu², Wang Qinggui¹

(¹College of Agricultural Resource and Environment, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080; ²Changbaishan Academy of Science, Erdaobaihe Jilin 133613)

Received:2016-11-14 Revised:2017-09-22 Accepted:2016-12-23 Online:2017-10-24 Published:2017-10-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探索全球氮沉降加剧背景下植物生长所受的影响，笔者归纳了森林植物不同生长指标对氮沉降响应的国内外文献数据。在既有研究成果的基础上，详细总结了氮沉降对植物地上部形态（株高、基径）、光合生理（光合色素含量、净光合速率）、可溶性糖含量、地上及地下生物量分配比例、根系形态结构（根长、根直径和根系生物量）以及叶片中氮：磷等指标的影响，并对上述变化做了合理的分析。笔者指出氮沉降加剧在一定程度上对植物的各生长指标都有明显的促进作用，但当氮沉降很严重时，植物的生长就会受到限制。笔者发现目前关于氮沉降对植物生长影响的试验中，很多都是短期模拟试验，而且大多数试验都是有关现象的研究而非原理的探索。笔者认为在今后的研究中应该将模拟时间进一步延长，并对造成响应变化的机理进行探索，以期更好的为进一步研究氮沉降增加对森林植物生长状况的影响提供参考依据。

关键词: 标准化降水指数(SPI), 标准化降水指数(SPI), 干旱, 西藏

Abstract: In order to explore the impact of plant growth under the background of increasing global nitrogen (N) deposition, the author summarized the literature data of different growth indices of forest plant to N deposition in this paper. On the basis of previous research results, the author detailedly summarized the effects of N deposition on the plant morphology above the ground (plant height, the stem base diameter), Photosynthetic physiology (content of photosynthetic pigments, net photosynthetic rate), soluble sugar content, biomass allocation proportion between aboveground and underground, root morphology structure (length, diameter and biomass of root system) and stoichiometric ratio between N and P in the leaf, then we made a reasonable analysis about the above changes. It is pointed out that the increase of N deposition obviously promote every plant growth index to some extent, however, the growth of plants will be restrained when the N deposition was pretty serious. The author found that many current N deposition simulation experiments were short-term and most of them paid more attention to the study of phenomena rather than the mechanism. It is suggested that the duration of simulation experiments should be further extended and the mechanism of changes should be explored in order to provide a great reference for further study on the effect of N deposition on the growth of forest plant.

中图分类号:

X171.1

毛晋花,邢亚娟,马宏宇,王庆贵. 氮沉降对植物生长的影响研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(29): 42-48.

Mao Jinhua,Xing Yajuan,Ma Hongyu and Wang Qinggui. Research Progress of Nitrogen Deposition Effect on Plant Growth[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(29): 42-48.

参考文献

[1] Streets D G, Bond T C, Carmichael G R, et al. An inventory of gaseous and primary aerosol emissions in Asia in the year 2000[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2003,108(D21).
[2] Rao S, Chirkov V, Dentener F, et al. Environmental modeling and methods for estimation of the global health impacts of air pollution[J]. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 2012,17(6):613-622.
[3] Qu Y, An J, He Y, et al. An overview of emissions of SO₂ and NO_x and the long-range transport of oxidized sulfur and nitrogen pollutants in East Asia[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2016,44:13-25.
[4] Liu X, Zhang Y, Han W, et al. Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China[J]. Nature, 2013, 494(7438):459-462.
[5] Phoenix G K, Emmett B A, Britton A J, et al. Impacts of atmospheric nitrogen deposition: responses of multiple plant and soil parameters across contrasting ecosystems in long-term field experiments[J]. Global Change Biology, 2012,18(4):1197-1215.
[6] De Schrijver A, De Frenne P, Ampoorter E, et al. Cumulative nitrogen input drives species loss in terrestrial ecosystems[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2011,20(6): 803-816.
[7] Liu X, Duan L, Mo J, et al. Nitrogen deposition and its ecological impact in China: an overview[J]. Environmental pollution, 2011,159(10):2251-2264.
[8] Velthof G, Barot S, Bloem J, et al. Nitrogen as a threat to European soil quality[M].European Nitrogen Assessment. Cambridge University Press, 2011:495-512.
[9] Andersson F, Fagerstr?m T, Nilsson S I. Forest ecosystem responses to acid deposition-hydrogen ion budget and nitrogen/tree growth model approaches[M].Effects of acid precipitation on terrestrial ecosystems. Springer US, 1980:319-334.
[10] Duprè C, Stevens C J, Ranke T, et al. Changes in species richness and composition in European acidic grasslands over the past 70 years: the contribution of cumulative atmospheric nitrogen deposition[J]. Global Change Biology, 2010,16(1):344-357.
[11] Berger T W, Glatzel G. Response of Quercus petraea seedlings to nitrogen fertilization [J].Forest Ecology and Management,2001,149(1):1-14.
[12] Galloway J N, Aber J D, Erisman J W, et al. The nitrogen cascade[J]. Bioscience, 2003,53(4):341-356.
[13] Schulze E D. Air pollution and forest decline in a spruce (Picea abies) forest[J]. Science (Washington), 1989, 244(4906):776-783.
[14] Tamm C O. Nitrogen in Terrestrial: Questions of Productivity, Vegetational Changes, and Ecosystem Stability[M].Berlin:Springer-Verlag,1991.16
[15] 李化山,汪金松,法蕾,等.模拟氮沉降对油松幼苗生长的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2013,19(5):774-780.
[16] 肖迪,王晓洁,张凯,等.模拟氮沉降对五角枫幼苗生长的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2015,37(10):50-57.
[17] 黄玉梓,樊后保,李燕燕,等.氮沉降对杉木人工林生长及林下植被碳库的影响[J].生态环境学报,2009,18(4):1407-1412.
[18] Ceccon E, Sánchez S, Campo J. Tree seedling dynamics in two abandoned tropical dry forests of differing successional status in Yucatán, Mexico: a field experiment with N and P fertilization[J]. Plant Ecology, 2004,170(2):277-285.
[19] Denslow J S, Vitousek P M, Schultz J C. Bioassays of nutrient limitation in a tropical rain forest soil[J]. Oecologia, 1987,74(3):370-376.
[20] Wang A Y, Wang M, Yang D, et al. Responses of hydraulics at the whole-plant level to simulated nitrogen deposition of different levels in Fraxinus mandshurica[J]. Tree physiology, 2016, 00, 1–11 doi:10.1093/treephys/tpw048.
[21] Mo J, Li D, Gundersen P. Seedling growth response of two tropical tree species to nitrogen deposition in southern China[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2008,127(4):275-283.
[22] 李红梅.模拟氮沉降对墨西哥柏幼苗的影响[D].南京:南京林业大学,2013.
[23] 辛月,尚博,陈兴玲,等.氮沉降对臭氧胁迫下青杨光合特性和生物量的影响[J].环境科学学报,2016,37(9):3642-3649.
[24] Zhang T, Yang S, Guo R, et al. Warming and Nitrogen Addition Alter Photosynthetic Pigments, Sugars and Nutrients in a Temperate Meadow Ecosystem[J]. PloS one, 2016,11(5):e0155375.
[25] 张蕊,王艺,金国庆,等.氮沉降模拟对不同种源木荷幼苗叶片生理及光合特性的影响[J].林业科学研究,2013,2(2):207-213.
[26] 蒋思思,魏丽萍,杨松,等.不同种源油松幼苗的光合色素和非结构性碳水化合物对模拟氮沉降的短期响应[J].生态学报,2015,35(21):7061-7070.
[27] Wang G L. Carbon allocation of Chinese pine seedlings along a nitrogen addition gradient[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2014,334:114-121.
[28] 王晓荣,潘磊,庞宏东,等.模拟氮沉降对亚热带栎属树种幼苗生长-生物量累积及光合特性的影响[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2016,36(1):78-85.
[29] Zhao C, Liu Q. Growth and photosynthetic responses of two coniferous species to experimental warming and nitrogen fertilization[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2008,39(1):1-11.
[30] Han F, Yue X, Shi S, et al. Physiological characteristics in cold resistance of several alpine plants in Qinghai--Tibet Plateau[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2004,25(12):2502-2509.
[31] Geiger M, Haake V, Ludewig F, et al. The nitrate and ammonium nitrate supply have a major influence on the response of photosynthesis, carbon metabolism, nitrogen metabolism and growth to elevated carbon dioxide in tobacco[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 1999,22(10):1177-1199.
[32] Zhang T, Yang S, Guo R, et al. Warming and Nitrogen Addition Alter Photosynthetic Pigments, Sugars and Nutrients in a Temperate Meadow Ecosystem[J]. PloS one, 2016,11(5):e0155375.
[33] Yang Y, Guo J, Wang G, et al. Effects of drought and nitrogen addition on photosynthetic characteristics and resource allocation of Abies fabri seedlings in eastern Tibetan Plateau[J]. New Forests, 2012,43(4):505-518.
[34] Bardgett R D, Wardle D A. Aboveground-belowground linkages: biotic interactions, ecosystem processes, and global change[M]. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010.
[35] 刘洋,张健,陈亚梅,等.氮磷添加对巨桉幼苗生物量分配和C：N：P化学计量特征的影响[J].植物生态学报,2013,37(10):933-941.
[36] Wilson J B. A review of evidence on the control of shoot: root ratio, in relation to models[J]. Annals of Botany, 1988, 61(4):433-449.
[37] 李明月,王健,王振兴,等.模拟氮沉降条件下木荷幼苗光合特性、生物量与C:N:P分配格局[J].生态学报,2013,33(5):1569-1577.
[38] Gordon C, Woodin S J, Alexander I J, et al. Effects of increased temperature, drought and nitrogen supply on two upland perennials of contrasting functional type: Calluna vulgaris and Pteridium aquilinum[J]. New Phytologist, 1999,142(2):243-258.
[39] Pregitzer K S, De J L, Burton A J, et al. Fine root architecture of nine North American trees[J]. Ecological Monographs, 2002,72(2):293-309.
[40] Kou L, Guo D, Yang H, et al. Growth, morphological traits and mycorrhizal colonization of fine roots respond differently to nitrogen addition in a slash pine plantation in subtropical China[J]. Plant and Soil, 2015, 391(1-2): 207-218.
[41] 周晓兵,张元明.干旱半干旱区氮沉降生态效应研究进展[J].生态学报,2009,29(7):3836-3845.
[42] Wang G, Fahey T J, Xue S. Root morphology and architecture respond to N addition in Pinus tabuliformis, west China[J]. Oecologia, 2013, 171(2): 583-590.
[43] 李红梅,万福绪,李杰,等.墨西哥柏幼苗生长和光合生理对氮沉降的响应[J].林业科技开发,2014, 28(1):73-77.
[44] Taylor B N, Strand A E, Cooper E R, et al. Root length, biomass, tissue chemistry and mycorrhizal colonization following 14 years of CO₂ enrichment and 6 years of N fertilization in a warm temperate forest[J]. Tree physiology, 2014,00:1-11 doi:10.1093/treephys/tpu058.
[45] 于立忠,丁国泉,史建伟,等.施肥对日本落叶松人工林细根直径、根长、比根长的影响[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(5):957-962.
[46] 徐钰,许凯,于水强,等.不同林龄杨树细根生物量分配及其对氮沉降的响应[J].生态学杂志,2014,33(3):583-591.
[47] 闫国永,王晓春,邢亚娟,等.兴安落叶松细根解剖结构和化学组分对N沉降的响应[J].北京林业大学学报,2016,38(4):36-43.
[48] Son Y, Hwang J H. Fine root biomass, production and turnover in a fertilized Larix leptolepis plantation in central Korea[J]. Ecological research, 2003, 18(3): 339-346.
[49] 吴楚,王政权,范志强.氮素形态处理下水曲柳幼苗养分吸收利用与生长及养分分配与生物量分配的关系[J].生态学报,2005,25(6):1282-1290.
[50] 李琛琛,刘宁,郭晋平,等.氮沉降对华北落叶松叶特性和林下土壤特性的短期影响[J].生态环境学报,2014(12):1924-1932.
[51] Lehto T, M?lk?nen E. Effects of liming and boron fertilization on boron uptake of Picea abies[J]. Plant and Soil, 1994, 163(1): 55-64.
[52] Hermans C, Hammond J P, White P J, et al. How do plants respond to nutrient shortage by biomass allocation?[J]. Trends in plant science, 2006, 11(12): 610-617.
[53] Lee K H, Jose S B. Soil respiration,fine root production,and microbial biomass in cotton wood and loblolly pine plantations a long a nitrogen Fertilization gradient[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2003,185(3):263-273.
[54] Vitousek P M, Turner D R, Kitayama K. Foliar nutrients during long—term soil development in Hawaiian montane rain forest[J]. Ecology, 1995,76(3):712-720.
[55] Koerselman W, Meuleman A F M. The vegetation N: P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation[J]. Journal of applied Ecology, 1996:1441-1450.
[56] Wang M, Moore T R. Carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium stoichiometry in an ombrotrophic peatland reflects plant functional type[J]. Ecosystems, 2014,17(4):673-684.
[57] Yuan Z Y, Chen H Y H. Negative effects of fertilization on plant nutrient resorption[J]. Ecology, 2015,96(2):373-380.
[58] 李银,曾曙才,黄文娟.模拟氮沉降对鼎湖山森林土壤酸性磷酸单酯酶活性和有效磷含量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(3):631-636.

氮沉降对植物生长的影响研究进展

Research Progress of Nitrogen Deposition Effect on Plant Growth

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	贾也纯, 陈润仪, 贺泽霖, 倪洪涛. 甜菜抗非生物胁迫研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 33-40.
[2]	王强强, 杨自辉, 郭树江, 张剑挥, 王多泽. 灌水量对民勤干旱沙区骏枣生长和产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 71-74.
[3]	谷书杰, 钱禛锋, 娄永明, 沈庆庆, 普凤雅, 曾丹, 马豪, 何丽莲, 李富生. 接种内生菌对干旱胁迫下甘蔗的生理影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(6): 42-47.
[4]	次旺顿珠, 杜军, 次旺, 平措桑旦. 1981—2020年西藏“一江两河”主要农区负积温的时空变化特征[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(5): 99-105.
[5]	格桑顿珠. 西藏昌都市洛隆县土壤养分状况分析及肥力综合评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(35): 30-34.
[6]	李云峰, 姚志平, 付焱焱, 韩冬, 马树庆. 基于有效雨量亏缺的吉林省玉米各级干旱发生频率地域变化[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(35): 62-69.
[7]	蒋菊芳, 杨华, 胡文青, 魏育国. 持续高温干旱胁迫对春玉米生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(32): 63-68.
[8]	王硕, 贾潇倩, 何璐, 李浩然, 王红光, 何建宁, 李东晓, 房琴, 李瑞奇. 作物对干旱胁迫的响应机制及提高作物抗旱能力的调控措施研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(29): 31-44.
[9]	石杨, 尹希龙, 李王胜, 兴旺. PEG模拟干旱胁迫对耐旱型与干旱敏感型甜菜种质形态指标的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(29): 45-51.
[10]	任三学, 齐月, 田晓丽, 赵花荣. 冬小麦灌浆期光合参数及产量对土壤高湿和干旱变化的响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(29): 96-102.
[11]	李王胜, 王雪倩, 尹希龙, 石杨, 兴旺. 甜菜苗期抗旱性鉴定及指标筛选[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(21): 17-23.
[12]	银珊珊, 周国彦, 顾博文, 武春成, 闫立英, 谢洋. 褪黑素引发对干旱胁迫下黄瓜幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(19): 30-36.
[13]	杨涛, 拥嘎. 覆膜栽培对西藏春油菜生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(18): 52-56.
[14]	孙锡鹏, 李琪, 乔云发, 胡正华, 张徐莹, 刘园园. 增温及干旱对海伦地区大豆生长发育的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(15): 27-33.
[15]	张瑞玖, 马恢, 籍立杰, 任德志, 李双东, 张耀辉, 王莉红. 干旱胁迫对马铃薯品种生长及生理生化指标的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(15): 34-39.