基于有效雨量亏缺的吉林省玉米各级干旱发生频率地域变化

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-1006

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

吉林省玉米生长季少雨干旱严重影响高产稳产。为了减轻干旱灾害影响，需弄清玉米生长季干旱发生的气象指标及其发生频率，明确各地干旱的气候风险。本文研究基于玉米生长阶段有效雨量盈亏指标和1961—2019年吉林省47个气象站的逐日降水量等数据，分析各地玉米不同生长阶段发生轻、中、重、特旱的频率，以及发生连续干旱的频率。结果表明：吉林省玉米生长季干旱划分为前期（4月21日—6月10日）、中期（6月11日—7月31日）和后期（8月1日—9月20日）干旱，玉米生长前期有效雨量较需水量亏缺28%、40%、55%左右和62%以上，中、后期亏缺32%、46%、60%左右和67%以上依次发生轻、中、重和特旱，严重和特重干旱玉米单产损失10%和15%以上。吉林省玉米干旱发生较频繁，且地理差异较大，西部干旱频繁且严重，东南部干旱较少且偏轻。各地玉米生长前期干旱频率最大，其次是后期，中期干旱频率较小。西部前、中、后期干旱频率在80%、50%和65%左右，重、特旱多发，发生2个阶段以上连续干旱的频率为25%左右；中部和东北部前、中、后期干旱频率在50%、25%和35%左右，以中旱为主，连旱频率在10%左右；东南部前、中、后期干旱频率均值在25%、10%和15%左右，以轻旱为主，连旱频率小于5%。干旱发生与否取决于农田水分亏缺，主要取决于生长阶段有效雨量和需水量。

关键词: 水分亏缺率, 干旱时段, 分级干旱, 发生率, 地域变化, 吉林省

Abstract:

Drought and limited rainfall seriously affect high and stable yield of maize in the growing season in Jilin Province. To alleviate serious impact caused by drought, it is necessary to figure out the meteorological index and occurrence frequency of drought in maize growing season, and clarify the risk of drought in various parts of the province. Based on the index of rainfall deficit rate and the daily precipitation data of 47 meteorological stations in Jilin Province from 1961 to 2019, the occurrence frequency of light, medium, heavy and extreme drought in different maize growing periods, and the occurrence frequency of successive drought were analyzed. The results showed that the drought of maize growing season in Jilin Province was divided into three stages: the early stage (April 21 to June 10), the middle stage (June 11 to July 31) and the late stage (August 1 to September 20). Compared with water demand, when the effective rainfall deficit was about 28%, 40%, 55% and more than 62% in the early stage of maize growth, and the effective rainfall deficit was about 32%, 46%, 60% and more than 67% in the middle and late stages, there were light, medium, heavy and extreme drought, and the loss of maize yield per unit area was more than 10% and 15% respectively under heavy drought and extreme drought. The occurrence of drought in maize growing season was frequent, and had a geographical difference. It was more frequent and serious in the western part of the province, while it was less frequent and much lighter in the southeastern part. The drought frequency was the maximum in the early growing stage and lower in the late stage. The frequency was the lowest in the middle stage. The frequency of drought was about 80%, 50% and 65% in the early, middle and late stages in western part of the province, and about 25% of the drought was for successive stages. The frequency of drought was about 50%, 25% and 35% in the early, middle and late stages in the central and northeastern parts, mainly medium drought, and about 10% of the drought was for successive stages. The average frequency of drought was about 25%, 10% and 15% in the early, middle and late stages in southeastern part, mainly light drought, and less than 5% of the drought was for successive stages. The occurrence of drought was related to the water deficit in farmland, and mainly depended on the effective rainfall and water demand in maize growing season.

Key words: water deficit rate, drought period, classified drought, occurrence frequency, regional change, Jilin Province

中图分类号:

P49，S513

李云峰, 姚志平, 付焱焱, 韩冬, 马树庆. 基于有效雨量亏缺的吉林省玉米各级干旱发生频率地域变化[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(35): 62-69.

LI Yunfeng, YAO Zhiping, FU Yanyan, HAN Dong, MA Shuqing. Regional Changes of Maize Drought in Jilin Province Based on the Effective Rainfall Deficit[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(35): 62-69.

图/表 7

干旱分期	前期	中期	后期
时间范围	4月21日—6月10日	6月11日—7月31日	8月1日—9月20日
生长阶段	播种至七叶	七叶至开花授粉	灌浆至黄熟
生长进程	播种和幼苗生长	营养、生殖生长并进	籽粒干物质形成

表1. 玉米生长阶段干旱时段划分

等级		前期干旱	中期干旱	后期干旱	单期干旱减产率/%
0	无旱	-20%<FP	-25%<FP	-25%<FP	≤2
1	轻旱	-34%<FP≤-20%	-39%<FP≤-25%	-39%<FP≤-25%	2~4
2	中旱	-48%<FP≤-34%	-53%<FP≤-39%	-53%<FP≤-39%	5~9
3	重旱	-62%<FP≤-48%	-67%<FP≤-53%	-67%<FP≤-53%	10~14
4	特旱	FP≤-62%	FP≤-67%	FP≤-67%	≥15

表2. 玉米干旱的有效雨量亏缺率等级指标体系

图1. 吉林省玉米生长前期(a)、中期(b)和后期(c)干旱总频率分布

图2. 吉林省玉米生长前期轻旱(a)、中旱(b)、重旱(c)和特旱(d)频率分布

图3. 吉林省玉米生长中期轻旱(a)、中旱(b)、重旱(c)和特旱(d)频率分布

图4. 吉林省玉米生长后期轻旱(a)、中旱(b)、重旱(c)和特旱(d)频率分布

图5. 吉林省玉米前中期(a)、中后期(b)、前中后期(c)连旱频率分布

参考文献 34

[1]	蔡菁菁. 东北地区干旱、冷害风险评价[D]. 北京: 中国气象科学研究院, 2013.
[2]	马树庆. 吉林省农业气候研究[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 1996:19-23.
[3]	孙凤华, 杨素英, 陈鹏狮. 东北地区近44年的气候暖干化趋势分析及可能影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2005, 24(7):751-755.
[4]	韩兰英. 气候变暖背景下中国农业干旱灾害致灾因子、风险性特征及其影响机制研究[D]. 甘肃: 兰州大学, 2016.
[5]	谢安, 孙永罡, 白人海. 中国东北近50年干旱发展及对全球变暖的响应[J]. 地理学报, 2003, 58(增):75-82.
[6]	SONG Y, TIAN J, LINDERHOLM H W, et al. The contributions of climate change and production area expansion to drought risk for maize in China over the last four decades[J]. International journal of climatology, 2020:1-12.
[7]	马树庆, 李秀芬. 东北地区玉米干旱业务指标体系及其适用性[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(29):25-31.
[8]	王劲松, 郭江勇, 周跃武, 等. 干旱指标研究的进展与展望[J]. 干早区地理, 2007, 30(1):60-65.
[9]	MCKEE T B, DOESKEN N J, KLEIST J. The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales[J]. American meteorological society, 1993, 17(22):179-183.
[10]	LU E. Determining the start,duration,and strength of flood and drought with daily precipitation: Rationale[J]. Geophysical research letters, 2009, 36:L12707. doi: 10.1029/2009GL038817 URL
[11]	PALMER W C. Meteorological Drought. Research Paper No.45,US Weather bureau, 1965.
[12]	VICENTE S S M, BEGUERIA S, LOPEZ M J I. A mutiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming:The standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index[J]. Journal of climate, 2010, 23(7):1696-1718. doi: 10.1175/2009JCLI2909.1 URL
[13]	江笑薇, 白建军, 刘宪峰. 基于多源信息的综合干旱监测研究进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(3):275-287. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2019.03.0275
[14]	宋艳玲, 王建林, 田靳峰, 等. 气象干旱指数在东北春玉米干旱监测中的改进[J]. 应用气象学报, 2019, 30(1):25-34.
[15]	ANDERSON M C, HAIN C, WARDLOW B, et al. Evaluation of drought indices based on thermal remote sensing of evapotranspiration over the continental United States[J]. Journal of climate, 2011(24):2025-2044.
[16]	王雨晴, 张成福, 李晓鸿, 等. 干旱监测方法对农作物适用性研究综述进展[J]. 绿色科技, 2019(18):17-20.
[17]	麻雪艳. 夏玉米干旱过程及其定量研究[D]. 北京: 中国气象科学研究院, 2013.
[18]	徐英, 李曼华, 李辉, 等. 不同发育期的干旱对华北地区夏玉米生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2017, 33(1):108-112.
[19]	董朝阳, 杨晓光, 杨婕, 等. 中国北方地区春玉米干旱的时间演变特征和空间分布规律[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 6(20):4234-4245.
[20]	张建军, 盛绍学, 王晓东. 安徽省夏玉米生长季干旱时空特征分析[J]. 干旱气象, 2014, 32(2):163-168. doi: 10． 11755/j． issn． 1006 －7639(2014) －02 －0163
[21]	张淑杰, 张玉书, 孙龙彧, 等. 东北地区玉米生育期干旱分布特征及其成因分析[J]. 中国农业气象, 2013, 34(3):350-357.
[22]	吴双, 姜丽霞, 李宇光, 等. 基于自然灾害风险理论的黑龙江省玉米干旱风险评价[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2019, 35(6):139-144.
[23]	GUO Y, WANG R, TONG Z, et al. Dynamic evaluation and regionalization of maize drought vulnerability in the midwest of Jilin Province[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11:4234-4255. doi: 10.3390/su11154234 URL
[24]	ESLAMIAN S, OSTAD A A K, SINGH V P, et al. A review of drought indices[J]. International Journal of constructive research in civil engineering, 2017, 3(4):48-66.
[25]	DANIEL H M, ANDRIES J J. Monitoring droughts in Eswatini:A spatiotemporal variability analysis using the Standard Precipitation Index[J]. Journal of disaster risk studies, 2019, 11(1):a712.
[26]	LESK C, ROWHANI P, RAMANKUTTY N. Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production[J]. Nature, 2016, 529:84-87. doi: 10.1038/nature16467 URL
[27]	SGROI L C, LOVINO M A, BERBERY E H, et al. Characteristics of droughts in Argentina’s core crop region[J]. Hydrology earth system sciences, 2021, 25:2475-2490. doi: 10.5194/hess-25-2475-2021 URL
[28]	李秀芬, 马树庆, 姜丽霞, 等. 两种常用的春玉米干旱等级指标在东北区域的适用性检验[J]. 气象, 2017, 43(11):1420-1430.
[29]	李秀芬, 马树庆, 姜丽霞, 等. 北方春玉米干旱等级 QX/T359-2015,气象出版社, 2015.
[30]	马树庆. 气候变化对东北地区粮食产量影响及适应性对策[J]. 气象学报, 1996, 45(4):484-492.
[31]	马树庆, 郭顺姬, 白雅梅, 等. 东北地区农业气候土壤资源潜力及其开发利用[J]. 地理科学, 1995, 15(3):243-252.
[32]	张耘铨, 刘继龙, 聂堂哲. 基于CROPWAT模型的玉米需水量研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2018, 37(7):66-75.
[33]	吕厚荃, 张玉书, 李茂松, 等. 农业干旱等级 GB/T 32136—2015[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2015.
[34]	陈莉, 方丽娟, 李帅. 东北地区近50年农作物生长季干旱趋势研究[J]. 灾害学, 2010, 25(4):6-9.