欢迎访问《中国农学通报》,

中国农学通报 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (26): 140-145.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17090140

所属专题: 植物保护 水稻

• 植物保护 农药 • 上一篇    下一篇

沈阳地区稻作生产农药使用情况调查与分析

常俊彦,贾晶旭,宋明阳,于晓曼,付鸿超,刘鸣达   

  1. 沈阳农业大学土地与环境学院,东北育才学校高中部,南京农业大学资源与环境科学学院,沈阳农业大学土地与环境学院,沈阳市环境技术评估中心,沈阳农业大学土地与环境学院
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-27 修回日期:2018-08-24 接受日期:2017-11-07 出版日期:2018-09-19 发布日期:2018-09-19
  • 通讯作者: 刘鸣达
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目“化肥农药减施增效的环境效应评价”(2016YFD0201200)。

Investigation and Analysis of the Use of Agricultural Chemicals for Rice Production in Shenyang Area

付鸿超 and 刘鸣达   

  • Received:2017-09-27 Revised:2018-08-24 Accepted:2017-11-07 Online:2018-09-19 Published:2018-09-19

摘要: 针对沈阳地区稻作生产农药使用不明的情况,开展沈阳地区稻作生产农药使用情况调查。以问卷的形式对新民、辽中、苏家屯和法库等4个主要稻作区进行了抽样调查与分析;共调查农户62户,涉及播种面积1.11万hm2。结果显示:沈阳稻作区农药平均使用次数为9.98次,平均使用剂量为15.57 kg/hm2;在调查得到的92 种农药产品中,农药有效成分共41 种,包括除草剂10 种、杀虫剂19 种、杀菌剂12 种;农药使用仍以乳油、可湿性粉剂和悬浮剂等传统剂型为主,传统剂型总占比高达81.62%;低毒农药比例为72.83%,65.27%的杀虫剂为中等毒农药。上述情况与农户自身素质较低、水稻生产成本较高、植保专业化服务较少、优惠补贴政策较少等原因有关;通过一系列的政策调整与制定,可以降低农户的农药使用强度,促进农户对新型农药和生物农药的选择,实现该地区农药减施的目的。

关键词: 菜用大豆, 菜用大豆, 灭蝇胺, 残留消解动态, 安全性评价

Abstract: To clarify the use of agricultural chemicals in rice production in Shenyang, sampling survey and analysis were conducted in four main rice- farming districts of Shenyang,including Xinmin, Liaozhong, Sujiatun and Faku, by questionnaire. A total of 62 farmer households were surveyed, and the investigated areas covered up to 11110 hm2. The results showed that the average use time of agricultural chemicals was 9.98 and the average dosage was 15.57 kg/hm2 during rice production. There were 41 kinds of active ingredients among the 92 surveyed agricultural chemicals, which contained 10 herbicides, 19 pesticides and 12 bactericides. The traditional formulation of agricultural chemicals was used as the primary choice in production process, including emulsifiable concentrates, wettable powders and suspensions, et al. The ratio of traditional agricultural chemicals was up to 81.62% . The ratio of low toxic agricultural chemicals was 72.83% and 65.27% of insecticides were medium toxic agricultural chemicals. The low professional quality of farmers, the high cost of rice production, the few specialized services of plant protection and the less preferential subsidy policies, etc. were the problems in agricultural chemical use. Policy adjustment and formulation in Shenyang could reduce agricultural chemicals use intensity by farmers, promote the use of new agricultural chemicals and biological agricultural chemicals, and achieve the purpose of agricultural chemical reduction.

中图分类号: