生物有机肥对水稻土壤酶活性及微生物群落结构的影响

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18040010

中国农学通报 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (27): 106-113.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18040010

所属专题：生物技术；水稻

• 资源环境生态土壤气象 • 上一篇下一篇

生物有机肥对水稻土壤酶活性及微生物群落结构的影响

贺文员¹, 宋清晖², 杨尚霖¹, 宋福强¹

1.黑龙江省寒地生态修复与资源利用重点实验室;2.黑龙江省庆东阳光农业生物科技股份有限公司

收稿日期:2018-04-03 修回日期:2019-09-04 接受日期:2018-06-22 出版日期:2019-09-24 发布日期:2019-09-24
通讯作者: 宋福强
基金资助:
黑龙江省自然基金团队项目“黑龙江省农业面源污染微生物调控技术研究”（TD2019C002）；哈尔滨市留学回国创业人才项目“新型绿色农用产品-AM菌剂研发与应用”(2017RALXJ008)；国家自然科学基金面上项目“沙枣丛枝菌根(AM)耐盐胁迫响应机制的研究”(31570635)。

Biological Fertilizer: Effects on Enzyme Activity and Microbial Community Structure in Rice Soil

Received:2018-04-03 Revised:2019-09-04 Accepted:2018-06-22 Online:2019-09-24 Published:2019-09-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的]为了探究施加生物有机肥(QD)之后水稻土壤酶活和微生物群落结构的变化,[方法]分别采用3,5-二硝基水杨酸比色法、磷酸苯二钠比色法、苯酚钠-次氯酸钠比色法、高锰酸钾滴定法测定土壤中的蔗糖酶、磷酸酶、脲酶、过氧化氢酶活性；基于Illumina HiSeq 测序平台对土壤微生物基因组进行测序。[结果]表明：与CK相比,QD显著提高了土壤中脲酶和磷酸酶的活性(p<0.05),而对蔗糖酶和过氧化氢酶活性影响不显著(p>0.05)；在土壤基因组测序结果中变形菌门(Proteobacteria)、子囊菌门(Ascomycota)分别是细菌和真菌中的优势物种,α-多样性分析显示QD使用前后真菌的多样性显著减少,细菌并没有明显变化。[结论]本研究结果在一定程度上为利用生物有机肥对农田土壤改良和农业的可持续发展提供了理论依据。

关键词: 四纹豆象, 四纹豆象, 胚胎发育, 形态结构

Abstract: To explore the responses of soil enzyme activities and microbial community structure in rice soil to biological fertilizer (QD) application, 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid colorimetric method, phenylbiphenyl phosphate colorimetric method, sodium phenol-sodium hypochlorite colorimetric method and potassium permanganate titration were used to determine the activities of sucrase, phosphatase, urease and catalase in the soil. The soil genome was sequenced based on the Illumina HiSeq sequencing platform. The results showed that compared with CK, QD application significantly enhanced the activities of urease and phosphatase in soil (P<0.05), but the activities of catalase and invertase did not change significantly (P>0.05). After soil genome sequencing, Proteobacteria and Ascomycota were the dominant phylum in bacteria and fungi, respectively. The α-diversity of fungi significantly decreased after QD application, yet the α- diversity of bacteria did not change significantly. To a certain extent, the results provide a theoretical basis for the use of biological fertilizers and field soil management.

贺文员,宋清晖,杨尚霖,宋福强. 生物有机肥对水稻土壤酶活性及微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(27): 106-113.

参考文献

[1]付小猛, 毛加梅, 沈正松, 等. 中国生物有机肥的发展现状与趋势[J].湖北农业科学,2017,56(03):401-404.
[2]苏建党. 探讨过量施用化肥的危害及应对措施[J]. 农业与技术, 2016, 36(06): 49.
[3] Xia G-L, Bi J, Zhang P, et al. Effect of a new bio-organic fertilizer ontomato growth and soil activity quality. Chinese Journal of Soil Science , 2007, 38( 3) : 519－522.
[4]Ni Z-H, Ma G-R. Effect of bioactivated organo-inorgano-mixed fertilizer on growth of cabbage and soil biological activity. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2002, 33 ( 3) : 212 － 215 .
[5]Han X-L, Zhang N-W, Jia J-F. Effects of biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer on yield，quality of tomato and soil. Soils and Fertilizers, 2005 ( 3) : 50－53.
[6]孙建, 刘苗, 李立军, 等. 不同施肥处理对土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2010, 25(04): 221-225.
[7] Vinale F, Marra R, Lorito M, et al. Trichoderma-plant pathogen interactions [J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2008, 40(2):1-10.
[8]李松鹏, 崔琳琳, 程家森, 等. 两株哈茨木霉菌株防治水稻纹枯病及促进水稻生长的潜力研究[J/OL]. 植物病理学报: 1-14[2018-01-24].
[9]徐文, 黄媛媛, 黄亚丽, 等. 木霉-植物互作机制的研究进展[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2017,33(03):408-414.
[10]李世贵, 吕天晓, 顾金刚, 等. 土壤微生物分子生态学研究方法[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2008(06):1-4+14.
[11]关松萌. 土壤酶及其研究[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1986: 255-258.
[12]张智猛, 慈敦伟, 张冠初, 等. 山东地区盐碱土花生种子际土壤微生物群落结构的研究[J]. 微生物学报, 2017, 57(4):582-596.
[13]Degnan P H, Ochman H. Illumina-based analysis of microbial community diversity[J]. The ISME Journal, 2012, 6(1):183-194.
[14]CAPORASO J G, LAUBER C L, WALTERS W A, et al. Ulter-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms[J]. The ISME Journal 2012, 6(8):1621-1624.
[15]Caporaso J G, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data[J].Nature Methods, 2010, 7(5):335-336
[16]Edgar R C, Haas B J, Clemente J C, et al. UCHIIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection[J].Bioinformatics, 2011, 27(16):2194-2200
[17]Edgar RC. UPARSE:highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads[J]. Nature Methods,2013, 10(10):996-998
[18]Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project:improved data processing and web-based tools[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2013, 41: 590-596
[19]关松荫, 郑洪元. 土壤酶及其研究法[M ] 北京: 中国农业出版社, 19 8 6.
[20]Gu J, Li S-X, Qin Q-J, et al. Changes of some hydrolase activities during agricultural waste materials composting in high temperature and static state. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2005, 21( 5) : 32-35 .
[21]桓明辉, 李杨, 刘晓辉,等.秸秆生物菌肥对保护地土壤微生物和土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2013, 45(01):107-109+116.
[22]Marcote I, Hernández T, Garcíndez T, et al. Influence of one or two successive annual applications of organic fertilizers on the enzyme activities of a soil under barley cultivation. Bioresource Technology, 2001, 79: 147 －154
[23]荆瑞勇, 王丽艳, 郭永霞. 生物有机肥对盆栽小白菜土壤酶活性和微生物数量的影响[J].水土保持研究, 2015, 22(02): 79-83+89.
[24]宋以玲, 于建, 肖承泽, 等. 生物菌水溶肥对土壤微生物、土壤酶活性及萝卜产量和品质的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2017, 49(11):74-81.
[25]Shukla SK, Yadav RL, Suman A, et al. Improving rhizospheric environment and sugarcane ratoon yield through bio-agents amended farm yard manure in udic ustochrept soil [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2008, 99: 158-168.
[26]Vo?í?ková J, Baldrian P. Fungal community on decomposing leaf litter undergoes rapid successional changes [J]. The ISME Journal, 2013, 7: 477-486.
[27]张风革, 霍云倩, 孙艺, 等. 连续施用生物有机肥对草地生物量及土壤微生物区系的影响[J/OL]. 南京农业大学学报, 2018(02):1-11.
[28]Chen L H, Huang X Q, Zhang F G, et al. Application of Trichoderma harzianum SQR-T037 bio-organic fertiliser significantly controls Fusarium wilt and affects the microbial communities of continuously cropped soil of cucumber [J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2012, 92:2465-2470.
[29]Luo J, Ran W, Hu J, et al. Application of bio-organic fertilizer significantly affected fungal diversity of soils [J]. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 2010, 74 (6): 2039-2048.
[30]Zhang FG, Zhu Z, Yang XM, et al. Trichoderma harzianum T-E5 significantly affects cucumber root exudates and fungal community in the cucumber rhizosphere [J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2013, 72: 41-48.
[31]张量, 张敬泽. 渐绿木霉抑菌物质的分离纯化及其对植物病原菌的抑制作用[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(05):882-888.
[32]朱兆香, 庄文颖. 木霉属研究概况[J]. 菌物学报, 2014, 33(06):1136-1153.
[33]王麟, 谭春明, 于刚, 等. 嗜杀酵母的生物学特性及其应用[J]. 天津农学院学报, 2017, 24(01):83-87+92.
[34]王祥红, 贾仁洁, 李静, 等. 嗜杀酵母的生物学功能及其应用[J]. 生物技术通报, 2013(04):33-38.
[35]李明春, 姜恒, 侯文强, 等. 酵母菌对重金属离子吸附的研究[J]. 菌物系统, 1998(04):80-86.

生物有机肥对水稻土壤酶活性及微生物群落结构的影响

Biological Fertilizer: Effects on Enzyme Activity and Microbial Community Structure in Rice Soil

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	王诗雅, 冯乃杰, 项洪涛, 冯胜杰, 郑殿峰. 水分胁迫对大豆生长与产量的影响及应对措施[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(27): 41-45.
[2]	魏敏, 罗龙欣, 杨平华, 严庆海, 刘颖. 微肥对核技术合成保水剂性能的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(24): 54-58.
[3]	王利华, 张英萍, 凌晨, 邹桂伟, 梁宏伟. 中华鳖胚胎发育与胚胎分期[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(19): 152-158.
[4]	丁丽智, 邢亚娟, 闫国永, 王庆贵. 北方森林细根对大气N沉降增加和温度升高的响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(11): 63-73.
[5]	高翔,郝志萍,吕慧卿,刘璋. 荞麦抗倒性研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(13): 6-11.
[6]	印春融,游馨,唐涛,俞泉,曹旭,胡军和. 母源效应复合物调控胞质网格形成的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(26): 112-116.
[7]	张潇月,欧碧波,肖铁光. 检疫性害虫四纹豆象的胚胎发育研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(17): 61-66.
[8]	赵璞,李梦,及增发,贾银锁,马春红. 植物干旱响应生理对策研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(15): 86-92.
[9]	王玉涛,戴志刚,郭丽君,张秀英,阿布都热合曼吐尔逊. 新疆野生盘羊头骨骨孔形态解剖[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(8): 1-5.
[10]	明庆磊程超. 雄性赤拟谷盗性斑的位置和形态结构观察[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(1): 302-306.
[11]	朴学娇,郑雪莹,曹玉桃,张帆,翟春东,刘云海,倪和民,郭勇. 影响绵羊胞质内单精子注射结果相应因素的分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(32): 34-38.
[12]	王海霞刘文哲. UV-B辐射增强对喜树叶片色素含量和形态结构的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(5): 209-213.
[13]	朱延姝冯辉. 弱光对苗期番茄功能叶片生长角度和形态结构的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(19): 211-215.
[14]	苏磊赵传志王兴军毕玉平. 花生AhLEA18蛋白基因的克隆与表达分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(17): 47-50.
[15]	谭茵茵董文轩王玉霞. 不同倍性山楂资源的胚胎发育特性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(13): 36-40.