欢迎访问《中国农学通报》,

中国农学通报 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (35): 22-25.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18060061

所属专题: 园艺

• 农学 农业基础科学 • 上一篇    下一篇

东北旋耕制度下垄作与平作甜菜产质量差异

王宇光,於丽华,吕春华,耿贵   

  1. 黑龙江省普通高校甜菜遗传育种重点试验室 黑龙江大学,黑龙江省普通高校甜菜遗传育种重点试验室 黑龙江大学,黑龙江大学 生命科学学院,黑龙江省普通高校甜菜遗传育种重点试验室 黑龙江大学
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-13 修回日期:2018-11-21 接受日期:2018-07-24 出版日期:2018-12-16 发布日期:2018-12-16
  • 通讯作者: 耿贵
  • 基金资助:
    国家糖料产业技术体系项目“甜菜种植制度”(CARS-170209);国家自然科学基金“甜菜T510 品系BvBHLH93 转录因子功能及其耐盐调控 机制分析”(31701487);黑龙江省自然科学基金“甜菜510 品系耐旱分子机制初探”(C2016048);黑龙江省普通本科高等学校青年创新人才培养计划 “基于iTRAQ技术探索甜菜不同品系盐胁迫响应蛋白差异性”。

Under Northeast China Rotary Tillage: Yield and Quality Variations of Sugar Beet with Rotary Planting and Flat Planting

  • Received:2018-06-13 Revised:2018-11-21 Accepted:2018-07-24 Online:2018-12-16 Published:2018-12-16

摘要: 为研究东北旋耕制度条件下甜菜平作和垄作对于甜菜产量和质量的影响,2017年以‘H004’为试验材料,采用分区设计的实验方法,在哈尔滨呼兰区多年旋耕地测定了在平作和垄作栽培条件下甜菜的块根产量、绿茎叶产量、含糖率、甜菜地下和地上部位的干物质量比例以及不同耕作条件下不同土层的土壤含水量和容重。研究发现转旋耕条件下平作和垄作甜菜含糖量没有显著差异,但是垄作甜菜块根产量要明显优于平作甜菜,垄作甜菜块根单产达到87.8 t/hm2,而平作甜菜块根单产仅为72.9 t/hm2。此外研究发现平作甜菜地上部分干物质积累较多,如平作甜菜根/地上部干物质比值要显著低于垄作甜菜。同时发现垄作栽培土壤含水量及土壤疏松程度均优于平作,如在20-26 cm土层中垄作土壤的容重和含水量分别为1.38 g/cm3和21.96%,而在20~26 cm平作土壤的容重和含水量仅为1.56 g/cm3和19.35%。本研究表明在东北旋耕制度条件下,垄作栽培更适于甜菜生产,也为下一步研发东北高产高糖甜菜栽培模式鉴定重要基础。

关键词: 磷胁迫, 磷胁迫, 植株生长, 干物质积累, 三七

Abstract: To study the effects of ridge planting and flat planting on yield and quality of sugar beet in the northeast region under the rotary tillage, using beet‘H004’as the experimental material and partitioning methods in 2017, sugar beet root yield, green stem and leaf production, sugar content, ratio of dry matter quality between ground and underground parts of beet, soil water content and soil bulk density were measured in rotary tillage soil of Hulan district of Harbin under the condition of ridge planting and flat planting. It was found that there was no significant difference in sugar content between flat planting and ridge planting beet under rotary tillage conditions, but the yield of ridge planting beet root was higher than that of flat planting beet. The yield of sugar beet root in ridges reached 87.8 t/hm2, while the yield of sugar beet root in flat planting beet root was only 72.9 t/hm2. In addition, the study found that some dry matter of flat beet accumulated more on the ground. For example, ratio of dry matter quality between underground and ground parts of flat planting sugar beet should be significantly lower than that of ridge planting sugar beet. At the same time, it was found that the soil water content and soil loose degree of ridge cultivation were better than those of flat cultivation. For example, in the 20-26 cm soil layer, the soil weight and water content of the ridge soil are 1.38 g/cm3 and 21.96 %, respectively, while the soil weight and water content of the 20-26 cm flat planting soil are only 1.56 g/cm3 and 19.35 %. Our study shows that the cultivation of ridge is more suitable for sugar beet production under the conditions of rotary tillage in northeast China, and it is also playing an important role for the construction of high-yield sugar beet cultivation patterns in northeast China.

中图分类号: