 
 中国农学通报 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (10): 133-139.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb19010126
所属专题: 烟草种植与生产
收稿日期:2019-01-25
									
				
											修回日期:2019-04-24
									
				
									
				
											出版日期:2020-04-05
									
				
											发布日期:2020-03-19
									
			基金资助:
        
               		Xin Liang( ), Haipeng Zhao, Xia Sun, Yanan Xu, Zhifei Jia, Ming Xue(
), Haipeng Zhao, Xia Sun, Yanan Xu, Zhifei Jia, Ming Xue( )
)
			  
			
			
			
                
        
    
Received:2019-01-25
									
				
											Revised:2019-04-24
									
				
									
				
											Online:2020-04-05
									
				
											Published:2020-03-19
									
			摘要:
采用直尺测量和烘箱烘干及分光光度法测定B烟粉虱为害后西葫芦、瓠瓜、丝瓜的生长指标及叶绿素含量,比较葫芦科不同种类寄主植物被B烟粉虱为害后在生长发育方面的差异,探讨B烟粉虱对寄主植物生长影响差异的机制。结果表明,B烟粉虱为害对3种葫芦科寄主生长有明显的不利影响,与各自无虫对照植株相比,西葫芦株高、茎粗、叶面积和单位面积干重均显著降低。与对照植株相比,西葫芦受害30天后,株高、茎粗和叶面积的抑制率分别为35.08%、4.38%和20.73%;单位面积干重较对照降低了31.86%。受害的丝瓜与对照植株相比仅株高明显降低,抑制率为31.47%;而茎粗、叶面积、单位面积干重均没有明显降低。瓠瓜受害30天后,株高和节间距与对照相比显著增加,株高抑制率为-28.69%,节间距抑制率为-42.63%,但茎粗和单位面积干重较对照显著降低。生化测定结果发现,B烟粉虱危害后,3种寄主植物叶片叶绿素含量均显著下降,其中以西葫芦最为显著,与对照相比,叶绿素a含量降低了68.22%,叶绿素b含量降低了64.63%。
中图分类号:
梁鑫, 赵海朋, 孙夏, 徐亚楠, 贾志飞, 薛明. B烟粉虱危害对葫芦科3种寄主植物生长发育的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(10): 133-139.
Xin Liang, Haipeng Zhao, Xia Sun, Yanan Xu, Zhifei Jia, Ming Xue. Effect of Bemisia tabaci B Infestation on Growth of Three Cucurbitaceae Host Plants[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(10): 133-139.
| 寄主 | 处理 | 株高/cm | 30 d抑制率/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 d | 10 d | 20 d | 30 d | |||
| 瓠子 | CK | 6.03±0.58a | 25.22±3.02b | 64.19±6.55b | 113.54±4.78b | -28.69±1.84 | 
| T | 6.02±0.47a | 37.98±3.20a | 86.18±4.43a | 143.67±5.38a | ||
| 西葫芦 | CK | 7.49±0.20a | 11.04±0.36a | 13.53±0.33a | 16.35±0.36a | 35.08±1.96 | 
| T | 7.30±0.23a | 10.73±0.45a | 12.22±0.36b | 13.10±0.43b | ||
| 丝瓜 | CK | 13.08±0.29a | 31.93±1.22a | 45.14±1.23a | 60.36±2.58a | 31.47±0.81 | 
| T | 13.84±0.34a | 28.99±1.10a | 39.29±1.05b | 46.09±1.37b | ||
| 寄主 | 处理 | 株高/cm | 30 d抑制率/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 d | 10 d | 20 d | 30 d | |||
| 瓠子 | CK | 6.03±0.58a | 25.22±3.02b | 64.19±6.55b | 113.54±4.78b | -28.69±1.84 | 
| T | 6.02±0.47a | 37.98±3.20a | 86.18±4.43a | 143.67±5.38a | ||
| 西葫芦 | CK | 7.49±0.20a | 11.04±0.36a | 13.53±0.33a | 16.35±0.36a | 35.08±1.96 | 
| T | 7.30±0.23a | 10.73±0.45a | 12.22±0.36b | 13.10±0.43b | ||
| 丝瓜 | CK | 13.08±0.29a | 31.93±1.22a | 45.14±1.23a | 60.36±2.58a | 31.47±0.81 | 
| T | 13.84±0.34a | 28.99±1.10a | 39.29±1.05b | 46.09±1.37b | ||
| 寄主 | 处理 | 茎粗/cm | 30 d抑制率/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 d | 10 d | 20 d | 30 d | |||
| 瓠子 | CK | 0.469±0.010a | 0.583±0.016a | 0.615±0.014a | 0.654±0.014a | 40.83±1.88 | 
| T | 0.459±0.013a | 0.520±0.014b | 0.536±0.020b | 0.571±0.019b | ||
| 西葫芦 | CK | 0.452±0.013a | 0.545±0.010a | 0.583±0.009a | 0.613±0.008a | 4.38±5.13 | 
| T | 0.419±0.009a | 0.508±0.010a | 0.544±0.011b | 0.565±0.011b | ||
| 丝瓜 | CK | 0.254±0.005a | 0.270±0.005a | 0.277±0.005a | 0.301±0.009a | -32.35±36.39 | 
| T | 0.259±0.005a | 0.272±0.005a | 0.282±0.003a | 0.318±0.017a | ||
| 寄主 | 处理 | 茎粗/cm | 30 d抑制率/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 d | 10 d | 20 d | 30 d | |||
| 瓠子 | CK | 0.469±0.010a | 0.583±0.016a | 0.615±0.014a | 0.654±0.014a | 40.83±1.88 | 
| T | 0.459±0.013a | 0.520±0.014b | 0.536±0.020b | 0.571±0.019b | ||
| 西葫芦 | CK | 0.452±0.013a | 0.545±0.010a | 0.583±0.009a | 0.613±0.008a | 4.38±5.13 | 
| T | 0.419±0.009a | 0.508±0.010a | 0.544±0.011b | 0.565±0.011b | ||
| 丝瓜 | CK | 0.254±0.005a | 0.270±0.005a | 0.277±0.005a | 0.301±0.009a | -32.35±36.39 | 
| T | 0.259±0.005a | 0.272±0.005a | 0.282±0.003a | 0.318±0.017a | ||
| 寄主 | 处理 | 节间距/cm | 30 d抑制率/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 d | 10 d | 20 d | 30 d | |||
| 瓠子 | CK | 0.69±0.14a | 6.42±0.48b | 8.01±0.24b | 8.27±0.18b | -42.63±0.93 | 
| T | 0.58±0.11a | 8.29±0.63a | 11.00±0.16a | 11.43±0.30a | ||
| 西葫芦 | CK | 0.41±0.07a | 1.15±0.11a | 1.68±0.15a | 2.28±0.14a | 41.74±4.41 | 
| T | 0.39±0.05a | 0.75±0.06b | 0.90±0.07b | 1.50±0.14b | ||
| 丝瓜 | CK | 0.36±0.12a | 4.15±0.57a | 7.46±0.50a | 7.94±0.37a | 2.94±1.8 | 
| T | 0.43±0.11a | 4.65±0.59a | 7.64±0.37a | 7.76±0.40a | ||
| 寄主 | 处理 | 节间距/cm | 30 d抑制率/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 d | 10 d | 20 d | 30 d | |||
| 瓠子 | CK | 0.69±0.14a | 6.42±0.48b | 8.01±0.24b | 8.27±0.18b | -42.63±0.93 | 
| T | 0.58±0.11a | 8.29±0.63a | 11.00±0.16a | 11.43±0.30a | ||
| 西葫芦 | CK | 0.41±0.07a | 1.15±0.11a | 1.68±0.15a | 2.28±0.14a | 41.74±4.41 | 
| T | 0.39±0.05a | 0.75±0.06b | 0.90±0.07b | 1.50±0.14b | ||
| 丝瓜 | CK | 0.36±0.12a | 4.15±0.57a | 7.46±0.50a | 7.94±0.37a | 2.94±1.8 | 
| T | 0.43±0.11a | 4.65±0.59a | 7.64±0.37a | 7.76±0.40a | ||
| 寄主 | 处理 | 0 d | 10 d | 20 d | 30 d | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 瓠子 | CK | 4.9±0.2a | 7.8±0.2b | 12.3±0.3b | 18.5±0.4b | 
| T | 5.0±0.1a | 8.9±0.2a | 13.8±0.5a | 22.7±0.6a | |
| 丝瓜 | CK | 4.0±0.2a | 6.2±0.3a | 8.5±0.3a | 11.9±0.6a | 
| T | 4.2±0.2a | 5.5±0.1b | 7.3±0.2b | 10.1±0.3b | |
| 西葫芦 | CK | 3.1±0.1a | 4.2±0.1a | 5.5±0.1a | 7.9±0.2a | 
| T | 2.9±0.1a | 3.8±0.1b | 4.8±0.1b | 6.8±0.2b | 
| 寄主 | 处理 | 0 d | 10 d | 20 d | 30 d | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 瓠子 | CK | 4.9±0.2a | 7.8±0.2b | 12.3±0.3b | 18.5±0.4b | 
| T | 5.0±0.1a | 8.9±0.2a | 13.8±0.5a | 22.7±0.6a | |
| 丝瓜 | CK | 4.0±0.2a | 6.2±0.3a | 8.5±0.3a | 11.9±0.6a | 
| T | 4.2±0.2a | 5.5±0.1b | 7.3±0.2b | 10.1±0.3b | |
| 西葫芦 | CK | 3.1±0.1a | 4.2±0.1a | 5.5±0.1a | 7.9±0.2a | 
| T | 2.9±0.1a | 3.8±0.1b | 4.8±0.1b | 6.8±0.2b | 
| 寄主 | 处理 | 叶面积/cm2 | 30 d抑制率/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 d | 10 d | 20 d | 30 d | |||
| 瓠子 | CK | 5.7±1.3a | 51.4±3.6b | 114.9±2.9b | 135.1±5.6b | -17.31±4.42 | 
| T | 7.8±2.1a | 79.4±5.9a | 134.9±4.6a | 156.2±3.4a | ||
| 西葫芦 | CK | 3.2±0.8a | 44.8±5.0a | 77.6±5.1a | 116.1±5.2a | 20.73±2.18 | 
| T | 3.4±0.6a | 41.9±6.3a | 63.3±2.1b | 92.1±2.6b | ||
| 丝瓜 | CK | 6.7±1.5a | 18.2±2.0a | 28.9±1.6a | 47.2±1.1a | 4.55±3.9 | 
| T | 6.6±1.1a | 14.4±1.8a | 26.1±1.6a | 44.5±1.7a | ||
| 寄主 | 处理 | 叶面积/cm2 | 30 d抑制率/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 d | 10 d | 20 d | 30 d | |||
| 瓠子 | CK | 5.7±1.3a | 51.4±3.6b | 114.9±2.9b | 135.1±5.6b | -17.31±4.42 | 
| T | 7.8±2.1a | 79.4±5.9a | 134.9±4.6a | 156.2±3.4a | ||
| 西葫芦 | CK | 3.2±0.8a | 44.8±5.0a | 77.6±5.1a | 116.1±5.2a | 20.73±2.18 | 
| T | 3.4±0.6a | 41.9±6.3a | 63.3±2.1b | 92.1±2.6b | ||
| 丝瓜 | CK | 6.7±1.5a | 18.2±2.0a | 28.9±1.6a | 47.2±1.1a | 4.55±3.9 | 
| T | 6.6±1.1a | 14.4±1.8a | 26.1±1.6a | 44.5±1.7a | ||
| [1] | 谷艳芳, 丁圣彦, 李婷婷 , 等. 盐胁迫对冬小麦幼苗干物质分配和生理生态特性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2009,29(2):840-845. | 
| [2] | Wood B W, Tedders W L, Thompson J M . Feeding influence of three pecan aphid species on carbon exchange and phloem integrity of seedling pecan foliage[J]. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 1985. | 
| [3] | Cohen A C, Henneberry T J, Chu C C . Geometric relationships between whitefly feeding behavior and vascular bundle arrangements[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata, 1996,78(2):135-142. | 
| [4] | Peterd Musa, Ren S X . Development and reproduction of Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on three bean species[J]. Insect Science, 2010,12(1):25-30. | 
| [5] | Liu B M, Preisse Evan L, Jiao X G , et al. Plant-mediated changes in the feeding behavior of an invasive whitefly[J]. Environmental Entomology, 2013,42(5):980-986. | 
| [6] | Nava-Camberos U, Riley D G, Harris M K . Density-yield relationships and economic injury levels for Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in cantaloupe in Texas[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2001,94(1):180-189. | 
| [7] | Heungyong J, Hyeonghwan K, Yang Ch Y , et al. A tentative economic injury level for greenhouse whitefly on cucumber plants in the protective cultivation[J]. Korean journal of horticultural science and technology, 2009,27(1):81-85. | 
| [8] | Islam Md Touhidul, Ren S X . Effect of sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) infestation on eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) leaf[J]. Journal of Pest Science, 2009,82(3):11-21. | 
| [9] | Mcauslane H J, Chen J, Carle R B , et al. Influence of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) infestation and squash silver leaf disorder on zucchini seedling growth[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2004,97(3):1096-105. | 
| [10] | 胡荣利, 祝树德, 周福才 , 等. 烟粉虱为害对番茄植株生长发育与生理生化的影响[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2014,36(6):660-665. | 
| [11] | 胡海燕, 张玉国, 刘兴军 , 等. B型烟粉虱和温室白粉虱分别为害烟草后对烟草生长特性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017(9):114-119. | 
| [12] | Hanifkhan S, Bullock R C, Stoffella P J , et al. Possible Involvement of Altered Gibberellin Metabolism in the Induction of Tomato Irregular Ripening in Dwarf Cherry Tomato by Silverleaf Whitefly[J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 1997,16(4):245-251. | 
| [13] | Burger Y, Schwartz A, Paris H S . Physiological and anatomical features of the silvering disorder of Cucurbita[J]. Journal of Pomology and Horticultural Science, 1988,63(4):635-640. | 
| [14] | 邹琦 . 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 166-167. | 
| [15] | Smith J P, Schowalter T D . Aphid-induced reduction of shoot and root growth in Douglas-fir seedlings[J]. Ecological Entomology, 2010,26(4):411-416. | 
| [16] | Deboo R F, Dimond J B, Lowe J H . Impact of Pine Leaf Aphid, Pineus pinifoliae (Chermidae) on its Secondary Host, Eastern White Pine[J]. Canadian Entomologist, 1964,96(5):765-772. | 
| [17] | Costa H S, Johnson M W, Ullman D E , et al. Association between Bemisia tabaci density and reduced growth, yellowing and stem blanching of lettuce and kai choy[J]. Plant Disease, 1993,77(10):969-972 | 
| [18] | Palumbo J C, Kerns D L, Engle C E , et al. lmidacloprid Formulation and Soil Placement Effects on Colonization by Sweetpotato Whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae): Head Size and Incidence of Chlorosis in Lettuce[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1996,89(3):735-742. | 
| [19] | Palumbo J C, Coates W E . Air-Assisted Electrostatic Application of Pyrethroid and Endosulfan Mixtures for Sweetpotato Whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) Control and Spray Deposition in Cauliflower[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1996,89:970-980. | 
| [20] | Natwick E T, Palumbo J C, Engle C E . Effects of imidacloprid on colonization of aphids and silverleaf whitefly and growth, yield and phytotoxicity in cauliflower[J]. Southwestern Entomologist, 1996,21(3):283-292. | 
| [21] | Palumbo J C, Sanchez C A . Imidacloprid does not enhance growth and yield of muskmelon in the absence of whitefly[J]. HortScience, 1995,30(5):997-999. | 
| [22] | Naranjo S E, Ellsworth P C, Chu C C , et al. Action thresholds for the management of Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in cotton[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1998,91(6):1415-1426. | 
| [23] | Yokomi R K, Hoelmer K A, Osborne L S . Relationships between the sweetpotato whitefly and the squash silverleaf disorder[J]. Phytopathology, 1990,80(80):895-900. | 
| [24] | 王承香, 薛明, 毕明娟 , 等. B型烟粉虱取食诱导烟草对烟蚜防御反应的时间效应[J]. 昆虫学报, 2010(3):314-322. | 
| [25] | 李华春, 潘云平, 赵志英 . 烟粉虱对青萝卜白心的影响[J]. 内蒙古农业科技, 2007(1): 47, 62. | 
| [26] | 陈根云, 俞冠路, 陈悦 , 等. 光合作用对光和二氧化碳响应的观测方法探讨[J]. 植物生理与分子生物学学报, 2006(6):691-696. | 
| [27] | 李庆亮 . B型烟粉虱为害后烟草的生理响应[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2012. | 
| [28] | 毕明娟, 薛明, 李庆亮 , 等. 取食B型烟粉虱前侵染的烟草对B型烟粉虱和烟蚜体内保护酶和消化酶活性的影响[J]. 昆虫学报, 2010,53(2):139-146. | 
| [29] | 王洪涛, 薛明, 李庆亮 , 等. B型烟粉虱取食诱导的烟草对斜纹夜蛾生长发育和繁殖的影响及机制探讨[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011,44(22):4600-4609. | 
| [30] | Bezemer T M, Jones T H . Plant-Insect Herbivore Interactions in Elevated Atmospheric CO2: Quantitative Analyses and Guild Effects[J]. Oikos, 1998,82(2):212-222. | 
| [31] | Herms D A, Mattson W J . The Dilemma of Plants: To Grow or Defend[J]. Quarterly Review of Biology, 1992,67(3):283-335. | 
| [1] | 董文彩, 刘宪斌, 李红梅, 赵双梅, 包金美, 沈健萍, 梁芳, 鲁美. 不同水平供钙量对木本观赏植物生长发育的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(8): 42-50. | 
| [2] | 蒋菊芳, 杨华, 胡文青, 魏育国. 持续高温干旱胁迫对春玉米生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(32): 63-68. | 
| [3] | 宋钊, 梁栌丹, 黄文茵, 陈潇, 曹健, 何裕志, 张白鸽. 涝渍胁迫下辣椒叶绿素含量与SPAD值相关性模型建立及应用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(25): 30-37. | 
| [4] | 侯俊峰, 陈斌, 包斐, 谭禾平, 韩海亮, 王桂跃, 赵福成. 秸混肥不同处理对‘浙甜19’生长特性和产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(23): 6-14. | 
| [5] | 王研, 李灵芝, 郭文忠, 温江丽, 李银坤, 范凤翠, 武月胜, 李海平. 腐植酸对西葫芦幼苗生长、生理及水分利用率的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(13): 47-53. | 
| [6] | 杨艺炜, 王家哲, 任平, 刘晨, 李明明, 李英梅. 低温胁迫对早春茬番茄生长和产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(10): 32-37. | 
| [7] | 赵光磊, 张雅奎, 吴凌娟, 刁琢, 徐学谱, 梁杰, 董传民. 分期施肥对马铃薯新品种‘兴佳2号’产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(35): 20-24. | 
| [8] | 李军保, 董强, 朱建军, 石玉林, 柴红烨, 俞靓, 付选齐, 万建军. 榆林不同树龄胡杨叶片叶绿素荧光特征比较[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(10): 17-23. | 
| [9] | 康凯丽, 王朴, 金晶, 梁晶. 有机废弃物基质对盆栽茉莉生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(31): 49-53. | 
| [10] | 陈睿, 胡菊, 鲜小林. 高山杜鹃成都平原越夏生长研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(31): 59-64. | 
| [11] | 黄建全, 李博, 郭艳芳. 蚯蚓粪对‘紫甜’葡萄扦插苗生长及根系的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(27): 61-65. | 
| [12] | 张国新, 姚玉涛, 邢春强, 孙叶烁, 丁守鹏, 梁景军. 土壤基质势对盐碱地设施番茄生长及光合指标的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(23): 37-40. | 
| [13] | 奚雪, 赵庚星. 基于无人机多光谱遥感的冬小麦叶绿素含量反演及监测[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(20): 119-126. | 
| [14] | 田永强, 聂国伟, 李凯, 张晓萍, 戴丽蓉. 日光温室甜樱桃叶片叶绿素含量影响因子初探[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(2): 64-67. | 
| [15] | 陈香波, 申瑞雪, 吕秀立, 冯建华, 李圃锦, 张冬梅. 不同基质栽培百子莲生长效应评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(19): 73-79. | 
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
| 全文 |  | |||||
| 摘要 |  | |||||