基于VOSviewer的叶际微生物研究现状可视化分析

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0663

中国农学通报 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 142-150.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0663

基于VOSviewer的叶际微生物研究现状可视化分析

吴松¹(), 周甜², 杨立宾²^,³(), 江云兵², 潘虹², 刘永志³, 杜君³

1.黑龙江省科学技术情报研究院，哈尔滨 150028
2.黑龙江省科学院自然与生态研究所，哈尔滨 150040
3.黑龙江呼中国家级自然保护区，黑龙江呼中 165038

收稿日期:2022-08-19 修回日期:2022-09-25 出版日期:2023-01-05 发布日期:2022-12-27
通讯作者: 杨立宾
作者简介:吴松，女，1982年出生，黑龙江哈尔滨人，副研究员，博士在读，主要从事科技情报研究工作。通信地址：150028 哈尔滨市松北区创新三路600号黑龙江省科学技术情报研究院，Tel：0451-51920677，E-mail：wusong0927@126.com。
基金资助:
黑龙江省重点研发指导类项目“基于大数据分析的技术创新方向研判研究”(GZ20210094);黑龙江省省属科研院所科研业务费项目“叶际微生物驱动的落叶松枯落叶的分解研究”(CZKYF2021-2-C011)

VOSviewer-Based Visual Analysis on Research Status of Phyllosphere Microorganisms

WU Song¹(), ZHOU Tian², YANG Libin²^,³(), JIANG Yunbing², PAN Hong², LIU Yongzhi³, DU Jun³

1. Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin 150028
2. Institute of Natural Resources and Ecology, Heilongjiang Academy of Sciences, Harbin 150040
3. Heilongjiang Huzhong National Nature Reserve, Huzhong, Heilongjiang 165038

Received:2022-08-19 Revised:2022-09-25 Online:2023-01-05 Published:2022-12-27
Contact: YANG Libin

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过对国内外叶际微生物研究领域的分析和比较，明确叶际微生物的研究现状和热点，为该领域的进一步研究提供参考。采用文献计量学分析方法，利用可视化分析工具VOSviewer对中国知网收录的114篇文献和Web of Science核心合集数据库收录的521篇文献进行相关分析。叶际微生物相关研究领域的年发文量总体呈现上升趋势，且年平均英文文献数量总体高于中文文献数量，美国、中国和德国的发文量居于前列。其中中国和澳大利亚的合作最为紧密，美国与其他国家的合作最多。研究机构中中国科学院发文量最多，并且与其他研究机构的合作较多。该领域中白志辉(Bai Z H)的发文量最多，且各作者所在团队内部合作较为密切；虽然英文文献中白志辉和金德才(Jin D C)所在团队间有紧密合作，但从整体上看，无论是在中文文献中还是在英文文献中各团队间仍缺乏合作。关于叶际微生物，CNKI和WOS中的文献均对其群落结构和多样性展开了研究，中文文献目前只倾向于探究叶际微生物在植物病害、生物防治和重金属污染方面的作用，但整体研究尚浅，而英文文献则更为广泛且深入地探讨了微生物与植物、微生物和环境之间的关系。研究结果表明，目前关于叶际微生物的研究尚处于起步阶段，叶际微生物群落结构和多样性是该阶段的研究热点和研究方向。

关键词: 叶际微生物, VOSviewer, 文献计量学, 研究现状, CNKI, WOS

Abstract:

Through the analysis and comparison of domestic and foreign research fields of phyllosphere microorganisms, the research status and hotspots of phyllosphere microorganisms were clarified, and the reference for further research in this field was provided. This paper adopted bibliometric analysis method and the visual analysis tool VOSviewer to conduct correlation analysis on 114 literature included in CNKI and 521 literature included in the Web of Science core collection database. The annual publication volume in the field of phyllosphere microorganisms generally showed an upward trend, and the annual average number of English articles was higher than that of Chinese articles, with the United States, China and Germany ranking at the forefront. Among them, China and Australia cooperated most closely, and the United States collaborated most with other countries. Among research institutions, the Chinese Academy of Sciences published the most papers and cooperated more with other research institutions. Bai Zhihui (Bai Z H) published the most papers in this field, and the teams of the authors cooperated closely. Although there was close cooperation between the teams of Bai ZhiHui and Jin Decai (Jin D C) in the English literature, on the whole, there was still a lack of cooperation between the teams in both Chinese and English literature. As for phyllosphere microorganisms, studies have been carried out on their community structure and diversity, and related papers can be found in CNKI and WOS. At present, the Chinese literature only tends to explore the role of phyllosphere microorganisms in plant diseases, biological control and heavy metal pollution, while the English literature is more extensive and in-depth in discussing the interaction of phyllosphere microorganisms with plants, microorganisms and environment. In summary, the research on phyllosphere microorganisms is in its infancy, and the community structures and diversity of phyllosphere microorganism communities are the research hotspots and directions in this stage.

Key words: phyllosphere microorganisms, VOSviewer, bibliometrics, research status, CNKI, WOS

中图分类号:

S718.5，G353.1

吴松, 周甜, 杨立宾, 江云兵, 潘虹, 刘永志, 杜君. 基于VOSviewer的叶际微生物研究现状可视化分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(1): 142-150.

WU Song, ZHOU Tian, YANG Libin, JIANG Yunbing, PAN Hong, LIU Yongzhi, DU Jun. VOSviewer-Based Visual Analysis on Research Status of Phyllosphere Microorganisms[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(1): 142-150.

图/表 9

参考文献 53

[1]	杨宽, 王慧玲, 叶坤浩, 等. 叶际微生物及与植物互作的研究进展[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2021, 36(1):155-164.
[2]	MEYER K M, LEVEAU J H J. Microbiology of the phyllosphere: A playground for testing ecological concepts[J]. Oecologia, 2012, 168(3):621-629. doi: 10.1007/s00442-011-2138-2 pmid: 21983641
[3]	ANDREWS J H, HARRIS R F. The ecology and biogeography of microorganisms on plant surfaces[J]. Annual review of phytopathol, 2000, 38(1):145-180. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.38.1.145 URL
[4]	LINDOW S E, BRANDL M T. Microbiology of the phyllosphere[J]. Applied and environmental microbiology, 2003, 69(4):1875-1883. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.4.1875-1883.2003 pmid: 12676659
[5]	KADIVAR H, STAPLETON A E. Ultraviolet radiation alters maize phyllosphere bacterial diversity[J]. Microbial ecology, 2003, 45(4):353-361. pmid: 12704563
[6]	COPELAND J K, YUAN L J, LAYEGHIFARD M, et al. Seasonal community succession of the phyllosphere microbiome[J]. Molecular plant-microbe interactions, 2015, 28(3):274-285. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-10-14-0331-FI pmid: 25679538
[7]	FINKEL O M, BURCH A Y, LINDOW S E, et al. Geographical location determines the population structure in phyllosphere microbial communities of a salt-excreting desert tree[J]. Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011, 77(21):7647-7655. doi: 10.1128/AEM.05565-11 pmid: 21926212
[8]	GAO X N, SUN H, LIU R, et al. The impact of sugarcane brown rust and host resistance on the phyllosphere bacterial community[J]. Sugar Tech, 2022, 24(5):1420-1429. doi: 10.1007/s12355-021-01088-x URL
[9]	李慧娟. 青岛市3种植物叶表面颗粒物微形态及叶际细菌群落结构研究[D]. 青岛: 青岛理工大学, 2021.
[10]	WAGI S, AHMED A. Phyllospheric plant growth promoting bacteria[J]. Journal of bacteriology & mycology, 2017, 5:215-216.
[11]	SALEEM M, MECKES N, PERVAIZ Z H, et al. Microbial interactions in the phyllosphere increase plant performance under herbivore biotic stress[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2017, 8:41. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00041 pmid: 28163703
[12]	张俊, 张华, 常畅, 等. 基于文献计量的凋落物研究现状及热点分析[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(6):2166-2173.
[13]	赵飞, 艾春艳, 游越, 等. 基于文献计量开展高校科研评估的探索与思考——以北京大学科研竞争力评估为例[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2014, 32(1):97-101.
[14]	王敏, 万长秀, 田苓华, 等. 基于CiteSpace的我国运动想象疗法的可视化分析[J]. 中国医药导报, 2020, 17(18):28-32.
[15]	高懋芳, 邱建军, 刘三超, 等. 基于文献计量的农业面源污染研究发展态势分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(6):1140-1150.
[16]	汪小飞, 张家伟, 刘铁宁, 等. 小麦抗倒伏研究动态追踪——基于WoS和CNKI数据库的文献计量分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(5):132-142.
[17]	王堽, 路正禹, 郝王森, 等. 甜菜研究现状的CiteSpace计量分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(13):147-152.
[18]	李嘉慧. 基于文献计量学的国内外茶叶农药残留研究综述[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(10):148-157.
[19]	王敏, 张志强. 知识发现研究文献定量分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2008(4):29-31,61.
[20]	杨永军. 基于Web of Science土壤微生物多样性领域文献计量分析[J]. 防护林科技, 2021(4):66-68,71.
[21]	向立刚, 汪汉成, 郑苹, 等. 一种未知真菌性叶斑病发病烟叶真菌群落分析[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2021, 42(1):40-46.
[22]	刘天波, 滕凯, 周向平, 等. 拮抗菌群对烟草野火病的防治效果及叶际微生物群落多样性的影响[J]. 微生物学通报, 2021, 48(8):2643-2652.
[23]	贾彤, 郭婷艳, 王瑞宏, 等. 铜尾矿白羊草重金属含量对叶际和根际真菌群落的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2020, 41(11):5193-5200.
[24]	周之栋, 徐建华. 公路沿线不同植物叶际微生物群落结构及重金属污染比较[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2021, 49(18):215-221.
[25]	RASTOGI G, SBODIO A, TECH J J, et al. Leaf microbiota in an agroecosystem: spatiotemporal variation in bacterial community composition on field-grown lettuce[J]. The ISME journal, 2012, 6(10):1812-1822. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.32 URL
[26]	PATI B R, CHANDRA A K. Diazotrophic bacterial population and other associated organisms on the phyllosphere of some crop plants[J]. Zentralblatt für mikrobiologie, 1993, 148(6):392-402. doi: 10.1016/S0232-4393(11)80304-5 URL
[27]	ARUN K D, SABARINATHAN K G, GOMATHY M, et al. Mitigation of drought stress in rice crop with plant growth-promoting abiotic stress-tolerant rice phyllosphere bacteria[J]. Journal of basic microbiology, 2020, 60(9):768-786.
[28]	SMEE M R, REAL-RAMIREZ I, ZULUAGA A C, et al. Epiphytic strains of Pseudomonas syringae kill diverse aphid species[J]. Applied and environmental microbiology, 2021, 87(11):e00017-e00021..
[29]	IBEKWE A M, SHOUSE P J, GRIEVE C M. Quantification of survival of Escherichia coli O157: H7 on plants affected by contaminated irrigation water[J]. Engineering in life sciences, 2006, 6(6):566-572. doi: 10.1002/elsc.200620157 URL
[30]	XU N, QU Q, ZHANG Z Y, et al. Effects of residual S-metolachlor in soil on the phyllosphere microbial communities of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)[J]. Science of the total environment, 2020, 748:141342.
[31]	HU H, LI X, WU S, et al. Effects of long-term exposure to oxytetracycline on phytoremediation of swine wastewater via duckweed systems[J]. Journal of hazardous materials, 2021, 414:125508.
[32]	ZENG H, XU H, LIU G, et al. Physiological and metagenomic strategies uncover the rhizosphere bacterial microbiome succession underlying three common environmental stresses in cassava[J]. Journal of hazardous materials, 2021, 411:125143.
[33]	DU Y Y, ZHANG D W, ZHOU D G, et al. The growth of plants and indigenous bacterial community were significantly affected by cadmium contamination in soil-plant system[J]. AMB express, 2021, 11(1):1-13. doi: 10.1186/s13568-020-01157-6 URL
[34]	FRANZETTI A, GANDOLFI I, BESTETTI G, et al. Plant-microorganisms interaction promotes removal of air pollutants in Milan (Italy) urban area[J]. Journal of hazardous materials, 2020, 384:121021.
[35]	IMPERATO V, KOWALKOWSKI L, PORTILLO-ESTRADA M, et al. Characterisation of the Carpinus betulus L. phyllomicrobiome in urban and forest areas[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2019:1110.
[36]	MALITI C M, BASILE D V, CORPE W A. Effects of Methylobacterium spp. strains on rice Oryza sativa L. callus induction, plantlet regeneration, and seedlings growth in vitro[J]. The journal of the torrey botanical society, 2005, 132(2):355-367. doi: 10.3159/1095-5674(2005)132[355:EOMSSO]2.0.CO;2 URL
[37]	ZANG C, LIN Q, XIE J, et al. The biological control of the grapevine downy mildew disease using Ochrobactrum sp.[J]. Plant protection science, 2019, 56(1):52-61. doi: 10.17221/87/2019-PPS URL
[38]	WALLACE J, LAFOREST-LAPOINTE I, KEMBEL S W. Variation in the leaf and root microbiome of sugar maple (Acer saccharum) at an elevational range limit[J]. Peer J, 2018, 6(12):e5293. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5293 URL
[39]	NAYAK S, BEHERA S, DASH P K. Potential of microbial diversity of coastal sand dunes: need for exploration in Odisha Coast of India[J]. The scientific world journal, 2019:1-9.
[40]	BILLAR DE ALMEIDA A, CONCAS J, CAMPOS M D, et al. Endophytic fungi as potential biological control agents against grapevine trunk diseases in Alentejo Region[J]. Biology, 2020, 9(12):420. doi: 10.3390/biology9120420 URL
[41]	WANG H, ZHANG R, DUAN Y, et al. The endophytic strain Trichoderma asperellum 6S-2: An efficient biocontrol agent against apple replant disease in China and a potential plant-growth-promoting fungus[J]. Journal of fungi, 2021, 7(12):1050. doi: 10.3390/jof7121050 URL
[42]	YANG C H, CROWLEY D E, BORNEMAN J, et al. Microbial phyllosphere populations are more complex than previously realized[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001, 98(7):3889-3894. doi: 10.1073/pnas.051633898 URL
[43]	GDANETZ K, NOEL Z, TRAIL F. Influence of plant host and organ, management strategy, and spore traits on microbiome composition[J]. Phytobiomes journal, 2021, 5(2):202-219. doi: 10.1094/PBIOMES-08-19-0045-R URL
[44]	IGUCHI H, SATO I, SAKAKIBARA M, et al. Distribution of methanotrophs in the phyllosphere[J]. Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry, 2012:120281.
[45]	ALI N, SORKHOH N, SALAMAH S, et al. The potential of epiphytic hydrocarbon-utilizing bacteria on legume leaves for attenuation of atmospheric hydrocarbon pollutants[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2012, 93(1):113-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.08.014 pmid: 22054577
[46]	KEMBEL S W, O’CONNOR T K, ARNOLD H K, et al. Relationships between phyllosphere bacterial communities and plant functional traits in a neotropical forest[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014, 111(38):13715-13720. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216057111 URL
[47]	刘利玲, 李会琳, 蒙振思, 等. 青杨雌雄株叶际微生物群落多样性和结构的差异[J]. 微生物学报, 2020, 60(3):556-569.
[48]	WHIPPS J M, HAND P, PINK D, et al. Phyllosphere microbiology with special reference to diversity and plant genotype[J]. Journal of applied microbiology, 2008, 105(6):1744-1755. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03906.x pmid: 19120625
[49]	GOMES T, PEREIRA J A, BENHADI J, et al. Endophytic and epiphytic phyllosphere fungal communities are shaped by different environmental factors in a Mediterranean ecosystem[J]. Microbial ecology, 2018, 76(3):668-679. doi: 10.1007/s00248-018-1161-9 pmid: 29500493
[50]	HARROP B L, MARKS J C, WATWOOD M E. Early bacterial and fungal colonization of leaf litter in Fossil Creek, Arizona[J]. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 2009, 28(2):383-396. doi: 10.1899/08-068.1 URL
[51]	XU W, SHI L, CHAN O, et al. Assessing the effect of litter species on the dynamic of bacterial and fungal communities during leaf decomposition in microcosm by molecular techniques[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(12):e84613.
[52]	TLÁSKAL V, VOŘÍŠKOVÁ J, BALDRIAN P. Bacterial succession on decomposing leaf litter exhibits a specific occurrence pattern of cellulolytic taxa and potential decomposers of fungal mycelia[J]. FEMS microbiology ecology, 2016, 92(11):fiw177. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiw177 URL
[53]	VOŘÍŠKOVÁ J, BALDRIAN P. Fungal community on decomposing leaf litter undergoes rapid successional changes[J]. ISME journal, 2013, 7(3):477-486. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.116 pmid: 23051693

高频关键词	频次	高频关键词	频次
叶际微生物	34	根际微生物	6
叶际	26	叶际细菌	6
高通量测序	18	变性梯度凝胶电泳	6
多样性	13	定殖	5
群落结构	8	解淀粉芽孢杆菌	5
微生物多样性	7	气孔免疫	5
磷脂脂肪酸	7	16s rRNA	5

高频关键词	频次	高频关键词	频次
叶际微生物	34	根际微生物	6
叶际	26	叶际细菌	6
高通量测序	18	变性梯度凝胶电泳	6
多样性	13	定殖	5
群落结构	8	解淀粉芽孢杆菌	5
微生物多样性	7	气孔免疫	5
磷脂脂肪酸	7	16s rRNA	5

基于VOSviewer的叶际微生物研究现状可视化分析

VOSviewer-Based Visual Analysis on Research Status of Phyllosphere Microorganisms

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 53

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

高频关键词	频次	高频关键词	频次
phyllosphere	323	microbial community	80
diversity	175	rhizosphere	74
community	126	bacterial community	66
bacteria	107	biological control	64
microbiome	86	colonization	58
soil	85	identification	58
leaf	82	growth	55
plant	81	ecology	53

[1]	汪小飞, 张家伟, 刘铁宁, 任小龙, 贾志宽, 蔡铁. 小麦抗倒伏研究动态追踪——基于WoS和CNKI数据库的文献计量分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(5): 132-142.
[2]	王爱姣, 叶春蕾, 牛为民, 车发展. 2002—2022年国内外虎杖研究态势的文献计量分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(35): 134-140.
[3]	王琰, 胥美美, 单连慧, 苟欢, 童俞嘉, 安新颖. 基于文献专利计量的重大植物疫情领域态势分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(34): 144-154.
[4]	王洋, 张瑞, 周雨晴, 刘永昊, 刘高生, 戴其根. 基于文献计量的国内水稻耐盐性研究态势分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(31): 147-153.
[5]	吴宇炼, 范慧艳, 汪彦欣, 徐凯逸, 邵承媛. 植物免疫诱抗剂研究文献计量可视化分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(27): 138-146.
[6]	管宏友. 土壤污染防治研究的文献计量分析及可视化表达[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(26): 133-138.
[7]	金涛涛, 赵明, 毛洁莹, 罗天宇, 刘玮, 王琼. 基于CiteSpace的球囊霉素相关土壤蛋白知识图谱分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(24): 100-108.
[8]	陈莹, 吴繁琦, 耿业业, 白钰, 王桂荣, 杨慧婕, 孙志蓉. 基于文献计量学的根瘤固氮对豆科植物影响研究可视化分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(18): 35-43.
[9]	王敏, 段海燕, 姜恭好, 李忠梅. 水稻花药培养技术的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(14): 18-22.
[10]	汤俊超, 吴宜文, 张姚, 曹庆穗, 吴照学, 夏礼如, 鲍恩财. 浅谈“光伏+农业”产业的发展模式[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(11): 144-152.
[11]	吴文彦, 程智超, 李梦莎, 隋心, 曾宪楠. 基于Web of Science的根瘤菌发展研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(9): 109-117.
[12]	王堽, 路正禹, 郝王森, 耿贵. 甜菜研究现状的CiteSpace计量分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(13): 147-152.
[13]	姜璐, 刘洋, 贺慧, 曲莹, 张璐. 褪黑素对叶片衰老影响的研究现状—基于文献计量学的分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(12): 158-164.
[14]	于显枫, 赵记军. CNKI期刊视域下降解地膜研究态势文献计量分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(8): 119-126.
[15]	王晓慧, 隋心, 范晓旭, 宋福强. 印度梨形孢文献计量学研究态势分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(8): 127-133.