作物耐盐育种前沿技术研究进展

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0503

中国农学通报 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (21): 18-26.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0503

• 生物育种前沿共性技术 • 上一篇下一篇

作物耐盐育种前沿技术研究进展

公丹¹^,²(), 胡媚茹¹^,², 林云², 刘金洋², 吴然然², 闫强², 陈景斌², 薛晨晨², 袁娜², 吴燕², 袁星星¹^,²(), 陈新¹^,²()

¹ 南京农业大学生命科学学院，南京 210014
² 江苏省农业科学院经济作物研究所，南京 210014

收稿日期:2025-06-17 修回日期:2025-07-11 出版日期:2025-07-25 发布日期:2025-08-05
通讯作者:
袁星星，女，1984年出生，江苏东台人，研究员，博士，研究方向：食用豆抗病虫新基因挖掘和新种质创制研究。通信地址：210014 江苏省南京市玄武区孝陵卫钟灵街50号，江苏省农业科学院经济作物研究所，Tel：025-84390366，E-mail：yxx@jaas.ac.cn；
陈新，男，1970年出生，江苏建湖人，研究员，博士，研究方向：豆类作物新品种选育与配套栽培技术研究。通信地址：210014 江苏省南京市玄武区孝陵卫钟灵街50号，江苏省农业科学院，E-mail：cx@jaas.ac.cn。
作者简介:
公丹，女，1992年出生，甘肃张掖人，博士研究生，研究方向：作物遗传育种。通信地址：210014 江苏省南京市玄武区孝陵卫钟灵街50号，江苏省农业科学院经济作物研究所，E-mail：gongdan0129@126.com。
基金资助:
国家食用豆产业技术体系(CARS08-15)

Research Progress on Advanced Technologies for Crop Salt Tolerance Breeding

GONG Dan¹^,²(), HU Meiru¹^,², LIN Yun², LIU Jinyang², WU Ranran², YAN Qiang², CHEN Jingbin², XUE Chenchen², YUAN Na², WU Yan², YUAN Xingxing¹^,²(), CHEN Xin¹^,²()

¹ College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210014
² Institute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014

Received:2025-06-17 Revised:2025-07-11 Published:2025-07-25 Online:2025-08-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

土壤盐渍化对全球粮食安全和生态环境构成严重威胁，培育耐盐作物品种，提升作物耐盐性能够有效应对盐渍化胁迫甚至开发盐碱地利用。本文基于植物耐盐分子机制的解析，聚焦作物耐盐育种前沿技术，系统阐述多组学联合分析、基因编辑、根际促生菌、表观遗传修饰等技术原理及其在作物耐盐育种中的应用成果，这些前沿技术为作物耐盐育种注入强大动力，通过技术融合与创新，有望快速精准培育耐盐作物新品种，推动盐碱地农业高效可持续发展。

关键词: 作物耐盐, 分子育种技术, 多组学联合分析, 基因编辑, 根际促生菌, 表观遗传修饰

Abstract:

Soil salinization poses a severe threat to global food security and ecological environments. Cultivating salt-tolerant crop varieties and enhancing crop salt tolerance can effectively address salinization stress and utilize saline-alkali lands. We elucidate the molecular mechanisms of plant salt tolerance and focus on the cutting-edge technologies in crop salt tolerance breeding, systematically elaborating on the principles and application achievements of technologies such as multi-omics integrated analysis, gene editing, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and epigenetic modifications in crop salt tolerance breeding. These advanced technologies provide guidance for crop salt tolerance breeding. Through technological integration and innovation, it may be hold the potential to rapidly and precisely develop new salt-tolerant crop varieties, thereby promoting efficient and sustainable agricultural development in saline-alkali lands.

Key words: crop tolerance, molecular breeding technology, multi-omics integrated analysis, gene editing, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, epigenetic modification

公丹, 胡媚茹, 林云, 刘金洋, 吴然然, 闫强, 陈景斌, 薛晨晨, 袁娜, 吴燕, 袁星星, 陈新. 作物耐盐育种前沿技术研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(21): 18-26.

GONG Dan, HU Meiru, LIN Yun, LIU Jinyang, WU Ranran, YAN Qiang, CHEN Jingbin, XUE Chenchen, YUAN Na, WU Yan, YUAN Xingxing, CHEN Xin. Research Progress on Advanced Technologies for Crop Salt Tolerance Breeding[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(21): 18-26.

参考文献 87

[11]	LIANG W, CUI W, MA X, et al. Function of wheat Ta-UnP gene in enhancing salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis and rice[J]. Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 2014, 450(1):794-801.
[12]	EL MOUKHTARI A, CABASSA C, DURAND N, et al. Exogenous proline supply improves growth, antioxidant defense system, and nutrient homeostasis in salt-stressed alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)[J/OL]. Journal of soil science and plant nutrition, https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42729-025-02355-6. 2025-06-15.
[13]	KIEGLE E, MOORE C A, HASELOFF J, et al. Cell-type-specific calcium responses to drought, salt and cold in the Arabidopsis root[J]. The plant journal, 2000, 23(2):267-278.
[14]	QIU Q S, GUO Y, DIETRICH M A, et al. Regulation of SOS1, a plasma membrane Na⁺ /H⁺ exchanger in Arabidopsis thaliana, by SOS2 and SOS3[J]. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 2002, 99(12):8436-8441.
[15]	FAROOQ M, PARK J R, JANG Y H, et al. Rice cultivars under salt stress show differential expression of genes related to the regulation of Na⁺/K⁺ balance[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2021, 12:680131.
[16]	LI J, SHEN L, HAN X, et al. Phosphatidic acid-regulated SOS2 controls sodium and potassium homeostasis in Arabidopsis under salt stress[J]. The embo journal, 2023, 42(8):e112401.
[17]	ZHUANG Y, WEI M, LING C, et al. EGY3 mediates chloroplastic ROS homeostasis and promotes retrograde signaling in response to salt stress in Arabidopsis[J]. Cell reports, 2021, 36(2):109384.
[18]	GUAN Q, TAKANO T, LIU S. Genetic transformation and analysis of rice OsAPx2 gene in Medicago sativa[J]. Plos one, 2012, 7(7):e41233.
[19]	CAI S, CHEN G, WANG Y, et al. Evolutionary conservation of ABA signaling for stomatal closure[J]. Plant physiology, 2017, 174(2):732-747. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01848 pmid: 28232585
[20]	UMEZAWA T, SUGIYAMA N, MIZOGUCHI M, et al. Type 2C protein phosphatases directly regulate abscisic acid-activated protein kinases in Arabidopsis[J]. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 2009, 106(41):17588-17593.
[21]	COLEBROOK E H, THOMAS S G, PHILLIPS A L, et al. The role of gibberellin signalling in plant responses to abiotic stress[J]. Journal of experimental biology, 2014, 217(1):67-75.
[22]	ZHOU J, LI Z, XIAO G, et al. OsCYP71D8L as a key regulator involved in growth and stress response by mediating gibberellins homeostasis in rice[J]. Journal of experimental botany, 2020, 71(3):1160-1170.
[23]	CHEN X, ZHANG X, JIA A, et al. Jasmonate mediates salt-induced nicotine biosynthesis in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)[J]. Plant diversity, 2016, 38(2):118-123.
[24]	QIU Z, GUO J, ZHU A, et al. Exogenous jasmonic acid can enhance tolerance of wheat seedlings to salt stress[J]. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 2014, 104:202-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.03.014 pmid: 24726929
[25]	KUROTANI K, HAYASHI K, HATANAKA S, et al. Elevated levels of CYP94 family gene expression alleviate the jasmonate response and enhance salt tolerance in rice[J]. Plant and cell physiology, 2015, 56(4):779-789.
[26]	ZHAO Y, DONG W, ZHANG N, et al. A Wheat allene oxide cyclase gene enhances salinity tolerance via jasmonate signaling1[J]. Plant physiology, 2014, 164:1068-1076. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.227595 pmid: 24326670
[27]	CAO W H, LIU J, HE X J, et al. Modulation of ethylene responses affects plant salt-stress responses[J]. Plant physiology, 2007, 143(2):707-719.
[28]	JIANG C, BELFIELD E J, CAO Y, et al. An Arabidopsis soil-salinity-tolerance mutation confers ethylene-mediated enhancement of sodium/potassium homeostasis[J]. The plant cell, 2013, 25(9):3535-3552. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.115659 pmid: 24064768
[29]	孙现军, 姜奇彦, 胡正, 等. 小麦种质资源苗期耐盐性鉴定评价[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(4):1132-1139. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.21021
[30]	SONG M, LU Q, MA H, et al. Quantitative trait loci mapping for salt tolerance-related traits during the germination stage of wheat[J]. Plos one, 2025, 20(4):e0319411.
[31]	李冉, 韩洁楠, 上官小川, 等. 玉米苗期耐盐性鉴定技术研究及耐盐自交系筛选[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2024, 25(11):1882-1894.
[32]	刘倩倩, 李冉, 周婷芳, 等. 211份玉米自交系萌发期耐盐性鉴定[J]. 作物杂志, 2024(4):62-70.
[33]	刘梦红, 李逸, 李红宇, 等. 基于非线性主成分分析的北方粳稻苗期耐盐碱性综合评价[J]. 南方农业学报, 2022, 53(12):3380-3388.
[34]	伊嘉雯, 冯棣, 朱崴, 等. 不同品种水稻发芽阶段耐盐性对比研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(33):10-14. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0091
[35]	刘欣玥, 郭潇阳, 王欣茹, 等. 大豆萌发期耐盐性鉴定方法建立及耐盐大豆资源筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(8):2122-2130. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.44006
[36]	林峰, 赵慧艳, 史飞飞, 等. 大豆种质资源苗期耐盐鉴定及遗传多样性分析[J]. 植物资源遗传学报, 2024, 25(6):945-956.
[37]	雷蕾, 孙世臣, 曹良子, 等. 利用高密度遗传图谱挖掘水稻芽期耐盐QTL[J]. 广东农业科学, 2024, 51(9):18-29.
[38]	REDDY P S, RAMADOSS B R, TAMILSELVAN A, et al. Identification of QTL for seedling stage salinity tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) using selective genotyping[J/OL]. Cereal research communications, https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42976-025-00661-4. 2025-06-14.
[39]	CHEN G, XUAN W, ZHAO P, et al. OsTUB1 confers salt insensitivity by interacting with Kinesin13A to stabilize microtubules and ion transporters in rice[J]. New phytologist, 2022, 235(5):1836-1852.
[40]	YU J, ZHU C, XUAN W, et al. Genome-wide association studies identify OsWRKY53 as a key regulator of salt tolerance in rice[J]. Nature communications, 2023, 14(1):3550. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39167-0 pmid: 37321989
[41]	YU C, WANG M, LI L, et al. TaPUB57 confers drought tolerance, governs grain size and salt sensitivity by ubiquitinating TaEXPB3 in rice[J]. Plant stress, 2025, 16:100877.
[42]	JIA Z, ZENG T, GU L, et al. TaWRKY17 interacts with TaWRKY44 to promote expression of TaDHN7 for salt tolerance in wheat[J]. Plant, cell & environment, 2025, 48(3):1963-1976.
[43]	WANG M, CHENG J, WU J, et al. Variation in TaSPL6-D confers salinity tolerance in bread wheat by activating TaHKT1;5-D while preserving yield-related traits[J]. Nature genetics, 2024, 56(6):1257-1269.
[1]	FAO. Global map of salt- affected soils (GSASmap)[EB/OL]. https://www.fao.org/soils-portal/data-hub/soil-maps-and-databases/global-map-of-salt-affected-soils/en/,2021.
[2]	SMAIL A, TAKEDA S, NICK P. Life and death under salt stress: same players, different timing?[J]. Journal of experimental botany, 2014, 65(12):2963-2979. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru159 pmid: 24755280
[3]	刘小京, 郭凯, 封晓辉, 等. 农业高效利用盐碱地资源探讨[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文版), 2023, 31(3):345-353.
[4]	GONG Z. Plant abiotic stress: New insights into the factors that activate and modulate plant responses[J]. Journal of integrative plant biology, 2021, 63(3):429-430. doi: 10.1111/jipb.13079
[5]	FLOWERS T J, COLMER T D. Plant salt tolerance: adaptations in halophytes[J]. Annals of botany, 2015, 115(3):327-331. pmid: 25844430
[6]	GANIE S A, MOLLA K A, HENRY R J, et al. Advances in understanding salt tolerance in rice[J]. Theoretical and applied genetics, 2019, 132(4):851-870. doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03301-8 pmid: 30759266
[7]	HAMEED A, AHMED M Z, HUSSAIN T, et al. Effects of salinity stress on chloroplast structure and function[J]. Cells, 2021, 10(8):2023.
[8]	LIANG X, LI J, YANG Y, et al. Designing salt stress-resilient crops: current progress and future challenges[J]. Journal of integrative plant biology, 2024, 66(3):303-329. doi: 10.1111/jipb.13599
[9]	XIONG L, ZHU J K. Molecular and genetic aspects of plant responses to osmotic stress[J]. Plant, cell & environment, 2002, 25(2):131-139.
[10]	SHRESTHA A, CUDJOE D K, KAMRUZZAMAN M, et al. Abscisic acid-responsive element binding transcription factors contribute to proline synthesis and stress adaptation in Arabidopsis[J]. Journal of plant physiology, 2021, 261:153414.
[44]	ARSHAD K, WANG Y, HAN S, et al. GWAS on HTP -enabled dynamic traits unravels novel genetic architecture of salt tolerance in soybean[J]. The plant journal, 2025, 122(4):e70177.
[45]	NI X, WANG Y, DAI L, et al. The transcription factor GmbZIP131 enhances soybean salt tolerance by regulating flavonoid biosynthesis[J/OL]. Plant physiology, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiaf092.
[46]	LUO X, WANG B, GAO S, et al. Genome-wide association study dissects the genetic bases of salt tolerance in maize seedlings[J]. Journal of integrative plant biology, 2019, 61(6):658-674. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12797
[47]	LUO M, ZHANG Y, LI J, et al. Molecular dissection of maize seedling salt tolerance using a genome-wide association analysis method[J]. Plant biotechnology journal, 2021, 19(10):1937-1951. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13607 pmid: 33934485
[48]	WEI H, WANG X, ZHANG Z, et al. Uncovering key salt-tolerant regulators through a combined eQTL and GWAS analysis using the super pan-genome in rice[J]. National science review, 2024, 11(4):nwae043.
[49]	DU F, WANG Y, WANG J, et al. The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor gene, OsbHLH38, plays a key role in controlling rice salt tolerance[J]. Journal of integrative plant biology, 2023, 65(8):1859-1873.
[50]	JIN T, SUN Y, SHAN Z, et al. Natural variation in the promoter of GsERD15B affects salt tolerance in soybean[J]. Plant biotechnology journal, 2021, 19(6):1155-1169. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13536 pmid: 33368860
[51]	WU H J, ZHANG Z, WANG J Y, et al. Insights into salt tolerance from the genome of Thellungiella salsuginea[J]. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 2012, 109(30):12219-12224.
[52]	LIU J, ZHANG C, SUN H, et al. A natural variation in SlSCaBP8 promoter contributes to the loss of saline-alkaline tolerance during tomato improvement[J]. Horticulture research, 2024, 11(4):uhae055.
[53]	GUAN R, QU Y, GUO Y, et al. Salinity tolerance in soybean is modulated by natural variation in GmSALT3[J]. The plant journal, 2014, 80(6):937-950. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12695 pmid: 25292417
[54]	QU Y, GUAN R, YU L, et al. Enhanced reactive oxygen detoxification occurs in salt‐stressed soybean roots expressing GmSALT3[J]. Physiologia plantarum, 2022, 174(3):e13709.
[55]	NEFISSI OUERTANI R, ARASAPPAN D, ABID G, et al. Transcriptomic analysis of salt-stress-responsive genes in barley roots and leaves[J]. International journal of molecular sciences, 2021, 22(15):8155.
[56]	LIU Q, KANG J, DU L, et al. Single-cell multiome reveals root hair‐specific responses to salt stress[J]. New phytologist, 2025, 246(6):2634-2651.
[57]	ZHOU X, HUANG J, GAN Y, et al. Transcriptome mechanisms of tomato seedlings induced by low-red to far-red light ratio under calcium nitrate stress[J]. International journal of molecular sciences, 2023, 24(4):3738.
[58]	WANG X, HE Y, WEI H, et al. A clock regulatory module is required for salt tolerance and control of heading date in rice[J]. Plant, cell & environment, 2021, 44(10):3283-3301.
[59]	ZÖRB C, HERBST R, FORREITER C, et al. Short-term effects of salt exposure on the maize chloroplast protein pattern[J]. Proteomics, 2009, 9(17):4209-4220. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200800791 pmid: 19688749
[60]	PENG Z, WANG M, LI F, et al. A proteomic study of the response to salinity and drought stress in an introgression strain of bread wheat[J]. Molecular & cellular proteomics, 2009, 8(12):2676-2686.
[61]	AGHAEI K, EHSANPOUR A A, SHAH A H, et al. Proteome analysis of soybean hypocotyl and root under salt stress[J]. Amino acids, 2009, 36(1):91-98. doi: 10.1007/s00726-008-0036-7 pmid: 18264660
[62]	LI X J, YANG M F, ZHU Y, et al. Proteomic analysis of salt stress responses in rice shoot[J]. Journal of plant biology, 2011, 54(6):384-395.
[63]	NAM M H, HUH S M, KIM K M, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of early salt stress-responsive proteins in roots of SnRK2 transgenic rice[J]. Proteome science, 2012, 10(1):25.
[64]	LIU C, CHANG T, HSU Y, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of early salt stress responsive proteins in roots and leaves of rice[J]. Proteomics, 2014, 14(15):1759-1775.
[65]	SHEN Q, YU J, FU L, et al. Ionomic, metabolomic and proteomic analyses reveal molecular mechanisms of root adaption to salt stress in Tibetan wild barley[J]. Plant physiology and biochemistry, 2018, 123:319-330. doi: S0981-9428(17)30433-3 pmid: 29289898
[66]	SHEN Q, FU L, SU T, et al. Calmodulin HvCaM1 negatively regulates salt tolerance via modulation of HvHKT1s and HvCAMTA4[J]. Plant physiology, 2020, 183(4):1650-1662. doi: 10.1104/pp.20.00196 pmid: 32554472
[67]	SECOMANDI E, DE GREGORIO M A, CASTRO-CEGRÍ A, et al. Biochemical, photosynthetic and metabolomics insights of single and combined effects of salinity, heat, cold and drought in Arabidopsis[J]. Physiologia plantarum, 2025, 177(1):e70062.
[68]	WANG W S, ZHAO X Q, LI M, et al. Complex molecular mechanisms underlying seedling salt tolerance in rice revealed by comparative transcriptome and metabolomic profiling[J]. Journal of experimental botany, 2016, 67(1):405-419.
[69]	SUN Y, ZHOU Y, LONG Q, et al. OsBCAT2, a gene responsible for the degradation of branched-chain amino acids, positively regulates salt tolerance by promoting the synthesis of vitamin B5[J]. New phytologist, 2024, 241(6):2558-2574.
[70]	SANTOSH KUMAR V V, VERMA R K, YADAV S K, et al. CRISPR-Cas9 mediated genome editing of drought and salt tolerance (OsDST) gene in indica mega rice cultivar MTU1010[J]. Physiology and molecular biology of plants, 2020, 26(6):1099-1110.
[71]	ZHANG A, LIU Y, WANG F, et al. Enhanced rice salinity tolerance via CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis of the OsRR22 gene[J]. Molecular breeding, 2019, 39(3):47.
[72]	ZHOU J, DENG K, CHENG Y, et al. CRISPR-Cas9 based genome editing reveals new insights into microRNA function and regulation in rice[J/OL]. Frontiers in plant science, http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2017.01598/full. 2025.
[73]	CHEN X, JIANG X, SUN X, et al. Gene editing and overexpression of soybean miR396a reveals its role in salinity tolerance and development[J]. The crop journal, 2024, 12(6):1655-1665.
[74]	ZHANG H, YU F, XIE P, et al. A Gγ protein regulates alkaline sensitivity in crops[J]. Science, 2023, 379(6638):eade8416.
[75]	LUO H, WIN C S, LEE D H, et al. Microbacterium azadirachtae CNUC13 enhances salt tolerance in maize by modulating osmotic and oxidative stress[J]. Biology, 2024, 13(4):244.
[76]	LI P S, KONG W L, WU X Q. Salt tolerance mechanism of the rhizosphere bacterium JZ-GX1 and its effects on tomato seed germination and seedling growth[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2021, 12: 657238.
[77]	ZHENG Y, CAO X, ZHOU Y, et al. Purines enrich root-associated Pseudomonas and improve wild soybean growth under salt stress[J]. Nature communications, 2024, 15(1):3520. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47773-9 pmid: 38664402
[78]	WANG Y, SUN Q, LIU J, et al. Suaeda salsa root-associated microorganisms could effectively improve maize growth and resistance under salt stress[J]. Microbiology spectrum, 2022, 10(4):e01349-22.
[79]	LU L, LIU N, FAN Z, et al. A novel PGPR strain, streptomyces lasalocidi JCM 3373T, alleviates salt stress and shapes root architecture in soybean by secreting indole-3-carboxaldehyde[J]. Plant, cell & environment, 2024, 47(6):1941-1956.
[80]	BYRT C S, XU B, KRISHNAN M, et al. The Na⁺ transporter, TaHKT1;5-D, limits shoot Na⁺ accumulation in bread wheat[J]. The plant journal, 2014, 80(3):516-526.
[81]	KUMAR S, BEENA A S, AWANA M, et al. Salt-induced tissue-specific cytosine methylation downregulates expression of HKT genes in contrasting wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes[J]. DNA and cell biology, 2017, 36(4):283-294.
[82]	ZHENG M, LIN J, LIU X, et al. Histone acetyltransferase TaHAG1 acts as a crucial regulator to strengthen salt tolerance of hexaploid wheat[J]. Plant physiology, 2021, 186(4):1951-1969. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab187 pmid: 33890670
[83]	SHEN Y, NATALIA C E S, AUDONNET L, et al. Over-expression of histone H3K4 demethylase gene JMJ15 enhances salt tolerance in Arabidopsis[J/OL]. Frontiers in plant science, http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2014.00290/abstract. 2025-06-15.
[84]	SHEN Y, CHI Y, LU S, et al. Involvement of JMJ15 in the dynamic change of genome-wide H3K4me3 in response to salt stress[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2022, 13:1009723.
[85]	WANG J, ZHENG L, PENG Y, et al. ZmKTF1 promotes salt tolerance by mediating RNA-directed DNA methylation in maize[J]. New phytologist, 2025, 245(1):200-214.
[86]	WANG L, CAO S, WANG P, et al. DNA hypomethylation in tetraploid rice potentiates stress-responsive gene expression for salt tolerance[J/OL]. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 2021, 118(13), https://pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2023981118, 2025-07-07.
[87]	YIN W, XIAO Y, NIU M, et al. ARGONAUTE2 enhances grain length and salt tolerance by activating BIG GRAIN3 to modulate cytokinin distribution in rice[J]. The plant cell, 2020, 32(7):2292-2306.

作物耐盐育种前沿技术研究进展

Research Progress on Advanced Technologies for Crop Salt Tolerance Breeding

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 87

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	相微微, 王雨司, 彭军, 王建武, 陈花. 2株根际促生菌对水稻营养品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(3): 158-164.
[2]	吴仕凡, 符京燕, 刘禄宏, 罗添, 王睿. 分子育种技术在芸薹属作物遗传改良中的应用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(21): 51-57.
[3]	任文静, 司劲超, 陈立, 杨丽梅, 庄木, 吕红豪, 王勇, 季家磊, 张扬勇. CRISPR基因编辑技术加速蔬菜作物遗传改良[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(24): 107-115.
[4]	杨海峰, 李梦荷, 王雅丽, 董彦琪, 顾国兵, 王泽, 孙玉镯, 申思洋, 张栩. 基于文献计量学的中国2000—2021年CRISPR技术研究态势分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(6): 41-51.
[5]	孟静, 张丽慧, 白变霞, 任嘉红. 一株党参根际促生长菌的促生长特性及其挥发性物质对农作物生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(30): 123-131.
[6]	权莹, 张晓娟, 赵辉, 孙晓敏, 马秀奇. CRISPER/Cas9系统在植物基因组定点修饰及作物遗传育种中的应用研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(26): 9-14.
[7]	邢起铭, 金文杰, 周利斌, 李文建, 刘瑞媛, 马建忠. 植物根际促生菌提高植物耐盐性的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(11): 46-52.
[8]	高忠奎, 蒋菁, 韩柱强, 黄志鹏, 熊发前, 唐秀梅, 吴海宁, 钟瑞春, 刘菁, 唐荣华, 贺梁琼. CRISPR/Cas9系统及其在粮油作物遗传改良中的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(20): 26-34.
[9]	姬彦飞, 董欣欣, 田野, 张杰, 杨洪一. 根际促生菌的生防机理及用作生防制剂的潜能[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(14): 141-149.
[10]	吕俊, 付春, 肖析蒙, 杨瑶君. 植物根际促生菌对大蒜的促生、抗病作用研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(24): 146-153.
[11]	秦瑞英,李娟,李浩,杨亚春,杨剑波,魏鹏程. 基因组编辑技术在作物育种中的应用及监管现状[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(6): 96-100.
[12]	陈建华,陈章玉,李雪梅,张承明,杨光宇,张涛,王小龙,孔光辉,王晋. FTIR技术在烟草基因编辑素材病害初级筛选中的应用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(20): 92-98.
[13]	张建铎,向海英,曾婉俐,张承明,李晶,李雪梅,杨光宇,张涛. 固相萃取离子色谱法快速测定烟草中钾、钠、钙、镁和氨的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(17): 112-116.
[14]	朱海鲸,刘锦旺,李陇平,黄帅,屈雷. MSTN及FGF5基因编辑不改变绒山羊母羊同期发情能力[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(9): 124-126.
[15]	李陇平,杨吉,朱海鲸,黄帅,屈雷. CRISPR/Cas9介导的MSTN/FGF5基因编辑陕北白绒山羊粪便菌群分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(14): 134-139.