ABA与植物耐盐信号转导途径的研究进展

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2012-1625

中国农学通报 ›› 2013, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (9): 167-171.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2012-1625

ABA与植物耐盐信号转导途径的研究进展

毕影东刘清醒郭长虹郭东林

收稿日期:2012-04-26 修回日期:2012-06-23 出版日期:2013-03-25 发布日期:2013-03-25
基金资助:
国家转基因生物新品种培育重大专项“抗逆转基因大豆新品种培育”(2011ZX08004-002-003)；黑龙江省科技厅留学归国科学基金“大豆抗（耐）草甘膦ssr标记的研究及候选基因的定位”(LC2011C30)；黑龙江省博士后资助项目“太空搭载八倍体小黑麦的选育及诱变效应研究”。

Advances of the ABA and the Salt Stress Tolerance Mechanisms in Plant Signal Transduction Pathways

Received:2012-04-26 Revised:2012-06-23 Online:2013-03-25 Published:2013-03-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 盐胁迫是常见的非生物胁迫因素之一并严重地影响着植物的生长发育。简述了植物在应对盐胁迫时，在胁迫信号的感知、信号的转导和传递、胁迫诱导基因的表达等方面所形成的一系列适应性的分子机制，回顾了近年来对脱落酸信号转导和其受体的研究。分析表明脱落酸受体PYR/PYL/RCAR (pyrabatin resistance/like-pyrabatin resistance/regularly component of ABA receptors)的发现使得ABA的信号转导通路更为清楚，使ABA与植物耐盐胁迫的关系更加明确，认为ABA在植物耐盐信号转导途径中发挥了重要的作用，与经济作物的耐盐性密切相关。

关键词: 品质, 品质

Abstract: High salinity is the most common abiotic stress factor in environment which impacts on the plant growth. This paper reviewed a series of molecular mechanisms of plant response to salt stress. The mechanism included signal perception, signal transduction, transmission and stress-induced gene expression and the studies on ABA signal transduction and ABA receptors in recent years. The analysis showed that the discovery of the ABA PYR/PYL/RCAR (pyrabatin resistance/ like-pyrabatin resistance/regularly component of ABA receptors) made the ABA signal transduction pathway more clearly, the relationship between ABA and salt stress was defined. ABA had play an important role in salt tolerance of plant signal transduction pathways, and closely related to the salt tolerance of economic crops.

毕影东刘清醒郭长虹郭东林. ABA与植物耐盐信号转导途径的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(9): 167-171.

参考文献

[1] Chaves M M, Flexas J C. Pinheiro Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell[J]. Annals of Botany,2009,103(4):551-560.
[2] Munns R, Richard A J, André L?uchli. Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals[J].Experimental Botany, 2006,57(5):1025-1043.
[3] 杨少辉,季静,王罡,等.盐胁迫对植物影响的研究进展[J].分子植物育种,2006,4(3):139-142.
[4] Cutler S R, Rodriguez P L, Finkelstein R R, et al. Abscisic acid: Emergence of a core signaling network[J].Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2010(61):651-679.
[5] Kim T H, Bohmer M, Hu H. Guard cell signal transduction network: Advances in un-derstanding abscisic acid, CO2 and Ca2 + signaling[J].Annu RevPlant Biol,2010(61):561-591.
[6] Seki M, Umezawa T, Urano K, et al, Regulatory metabolic networks in drought stress responses[J].Curr Opin Plant Biol,2007 (10):296-302.
[7] 王增进,张玉先.大豆盐胁迫研究进展[J].黑龙江八一农垦大学学报,2005,17(6):26-25.
[8] 刘琳,曾幼玲,张富春.ABA 与植物的耐盐性[J].植物生理学通讯, 2009,45(2):187-194.
[9] 杨洪兵,邱念伟,陈敏,等.小麦耐盐机理及培育抗盐品种研究进展[J].山东师范大学学报,2001(16):79-82.
[10] 杨艳艳,王庆祥.盐胁迫对不同玉米品种幼苗渗透调节物质的影响[J].作物学报,2012(1):99-101.
[11] Luo Q Y, Yua B J, Liu Y L. Differential sensitivity to chloride and sodium ions in seedlings of Glycine max and G. soja under NaCl stress[J].Plant Physiology,2005,162:1003-1012.
[12] 张和臣,尹伟伦,夏新莉,等.非生物逆境胁迫下植物钙信号转导的分子机制[J].植物学通报,2007,24(1):114-122.
[13] Franciscali W.Y, Wong F.L, Tsai S.N, Tonoplast-located GmCLC1 and GmNHX1 from soybean enhance NaCl tolerance in transgenic bright yellow(BY)-2 cells[J]. Plant Cell Environment,2006,29(6): 1122-1137.
[14] Apse M P, Blumwald E. Na+ transport in plants[J]. FEBS Letters, 2007,581(12):2247-2254.
[15] Zhou S, Zhao K F. Discussion on the problem of salt gland of Glycine soja[J]. J Integr Plant Biol,2003(45):574-580.
[16] 郭宝生,翁跃进.大豆耐盐机理及相关基因分子标记[J].植物学通报, 2004,21(1):113-120.
[17] 於丙军,刘友良.大豆耐盐性研究进展[J].大豆科学,2010,19(2): 154-159.
[18] Nambara E, Kazuyuki K. Opening a new era of ABA research[J]. J Plant Res,2011(124):431-435.
[19] Seo M, Koshiba T, Complex regulation of ABA biosynthesis in plants[J]. Trends Plant Sci,2002(7):41-48.
[20] Nambara E, Marion P A. Abscisic acid biosynthesis and catabolism [J]. Annu Rev Plant Biol,2005(56):165-185.
[21] Agarwal P K, Jha B, Transcription factors in plants and ABA dependent and independent abiotic stress signalling[J]. Biologia Plantarum, 2010,54(2):201-212.
[22] Phang T H, Shao G H, Lam H M. Salt Tolerance in soybean[J]. Joumal of Integrative Plant Biology,2008,v50(10):1196-1212.
[23] Katharine E H, Noriyuki N, Kenichi H, et al. Early abscisic acid signal transduction mechanisms: newly discovered components and newly emerging questions[J]. Genes Dev, 2010,24:1695-1708.
[24] Ma Y, Szostkiewicz I, Korte A, et al. Regulators of PP2C phosphatase activity function as abscisic acid sensors[J].Science, 2009(324):1064-1068.
[25] Park S Y, Fung P, Nishimura N, et al. Abscisic acid inhibits type 2C protein phosphatases via the PYR/PYL family of START proteins [J].Science, 2009(324):1068-1071.
[26] Nishimura N, Sarkeshik A, Nito K,et al. PYR/PYL/RCAR family members are major in-vivo ABI1 protein phosphatase 2C-interacting proteins in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant J, 2010(61): 290-299.
[27] Santiago J, Rodrigues A, Saez A, et al. Modulation of drought resistance by the abscisic acid receptor PYL5 through inhibition of clade A PP2Cs[J].Plant J, 2009(60):575-588.
[28] Iyer L M, Koonin E V, Aravind L. Adaptations of the helix-grip fold for ligand binding and catalysis in the START domain superfamily, Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet, 2001(43):134-44.
[29] Umezawa T, Sugiyama N, Mizoguchi M, et al. Type 2C protein phosphatases directly regulate abscisic acid-activated protein kinases in Arabidopsis[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2009,106: 17588-17593.
[30] Vlad F, Rubio S, Rodrigues A, et al. Protein phosphatases 2C regulate the activation of the Snf1-related kinase OST1 by abscisic acid in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Cell, 2009(21):3170-3184.
[31] Raghavendra A S, Gonugunta V K, Christmann A, et al. ABA perception and signalling[J].Trends Plant Sci, 2011(15):395-401.
[32] Liao Y, Zou H F, Wei W, et al. Soybean GmbZIP44, GmbZIP62 and GmbZIP78 genes function as negative regulator of ABA signaling and confer salt and freezing tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis[J]. Planta, 2008(228):225-240.
[33] Liao Y, Zou, H F, Wang H W, et al. Soybean GmMYB76, GmMYB92 and GmMYB177 genes confer stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis plants[J], Cell Res, 2008(18):1047-1060.
[34] Narusaka, Y, Nakashima K, Shinwari Z K, et al. Interaction between two cis-acting elements, ABRE and DRE in ABA-dependent expression of Arabidopsis rd29A gene in response to dehydration and high-salinity stresses[J]. Plant J, 2003,(34): 137-148.

ABA与植物耐盐信号转导途径的研究进展

Advances of the ABA and the Salt Stress Tolerance Mechanisms in Plant Signal Transduction Pathways

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	周冬冬, 张军, 葛梦婕, 刘忠红, 朱晓欢, 李春燕. 不同氮肥处理对稻茬晚播小麦‘淮麦36’产量、氮素利用率和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(1): 1-7.
[2]	高文瑞, 孙艳军, 韩冰, 费聪, 王显生, 徐刚. 弱光对西瓜果实品质及蔗糖代谢的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(1): 56-61.
[3]	马猛, 王克华, 曲亮, 窦套存, 郭军, 王星果, 胡玉萍, 卢建. 不同品种肉鸡屠宰性能、胸肌肉品质和成分测定及分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 137-142.
[4]	王福玉, 陈贵菊, 孙雷明, 黄玲, 邵敏敏, 赵凯, 杨本洲, 张玉丹, 闫璐, 王霖. 耕作方式与施氮量互作对小麦生长、产量与品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 20-26.
[5]	王一凡, 劳晓璨, 余丽萍, 叶海龙. 水稻‘甬优15’分期播种的气象条件适宜性试验研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(7): 106-109.
[6]	郑碧霞, 戢小梅, 李长林, 龚林忠, 方林川. 不同复合保鲜处理对‘夏黑’果实贮藏效果的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(7): 135-143.
[7]	彭程, 邓林萍, 蒙万聪, 常晓晓, 张增文, 罗贱良, 邱继水, 陆育生. 套袋对柰李果实外观及香气物质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(7): 45-51.
[8]	钮力亚, 王伟伟, 张玉洁, 邹景伟, 王志, 陆莉, 王奉芝, 王伟, 于亮. 小麦品质性状及产量性状对馒头面条评分的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(6): 129-133.
[9]	邵雪花, 赖多, 肖维强, 贺涵, 刘传和, 匡石滋. 不同干燥方法对番石榴果实品质及抗氧化活性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(6): 134-140.
[10]	娄德钊, 涂娜娜, 卢芙萍, 王树昌, 武华周. 冬伐高度对桑叶产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(4): 23-28.
[11]	于亮亮, 孔德胤, 高培德, 包佳婧, 孔鸣川. 华莱士瓜含糖率农业气象指标与气候品质评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(34): 102-106.
[12]	马艳芝, 齐珂佳, 王向东. 干燥方法对‘墨红’玫瑰品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(31): 142-146.
[13]	梅丽, 韩立红, 周继华, 周吉红, 祝宁, 王俊英, 曹彩红, 何秉青. 藜麦菜用品种筛选及刈割可行性初探[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(31): 31-37.
[14]	李政璞, 佟静, 王素娜, 李炎艳, 王丽萍, 梁浩, 武占会. 光周期对植物工厂水芹产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(31): 38-42.
[15]	查倩, 奚晓军, 殷向静, 蒋爱丽. 转色期补光处理对鲜食葡萄‘巨峰’和‘巨玫瑰’果实品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(31): 55-59.