燕麦镰孢菌侵染对不同抗性青稞叶片及根系生理指标的影响

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18080016

中国农学通报 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (32): 101-107.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb18080016

所属专题：生物技术；小麦；农业生态

燕麦镰孢菌侵染对不同抗性青稞叶片及根系生理指标的影响

漆永红

甘肃省农业科学院植物保护研究所

收稿日期:2018-08-03 修回日期:2019-05-16 接受日期:2019-05-22 出版日期:2019-11-19 发布日期:2019-11-19
通讯作者: 漆永红
基金资助:
国家公益性行业专项“作物根腐病综合治理技术方案”(201503112)；嘉峪关市科技计划“嘉峪关市设施蔬菜根腐病综合治理技术研究与应用”(18-20)；甘肃省农业科学院科研条件建设及成果转化项目(2017GAAS73)。

Fusarium avenaceum Infection: Effects on Physiological Indexes of Leaves and Roots of Naked Barley with Different Resistance

Received:2018-08-03 Revised:2019-05-16 Accepted:2019-05-22 Online:2019-11-19 Published:2019-11-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以抗病青稞品种NQK-01-03和感病青稞品种甘青2号为材料,在室内盆栽条件下,采用苗期人工接种法来测定抗感青稞品种内部及品种之间受燕麦镰孢菌侵染后引起的植株叶片和根系Pro、可溶性糖、可溶性蛋白和MDA含量的动态变化规律。结果表明,NQK-01-03病叶Pro含量高于健叶,可溶性糖、可溶性蛋白和MDA含量低于健叶；病根Pro、可溶性蛋白和MDA含量高于健根,可溶性糖含量低于健根；甘青2号病叶和病根Pro、MDA含量高于健叶和健根,可溶性糖、可溶性蛋白含量低于健叶和健根。受燕麦镰孢菌侵染,感病青稞甘青2号和抗病青稞NQK-01-03之间病健叶和病健根生理变化结果表明,感病青稞甘青2号病叶Pro含量高于抗病青稞NQK-01-03,可溶性糖、可溶性蛋白和MDA含量低于抗病青稞NQK-01-03；而感病青稞甘青2号病根Pro、MDA含量高于抗病青稞NQK-01-03,可溶性糖、可溶性蛋白含量低于抗病青稞NQK-01-03。本试验得出,Pro含量高低与青稞品种抗病性呈负相关,而可溶性蛋白含量高低与品种抗病性成呈正相关。该结果为明确燕麦镰孢菌侵染对青稞叶片和根系生理机制提供理论依据。

关键词: “一带一路”战略, “一带一路”战略, 中俄, 农产品贸易, 贸易潜力

Abstract: In order to determine the effect of Fusarium avenaceum infection on naked barley leaves and roots physiological characteristics, Pro, soluble sugar, soluble protein and MDA contentand were tested in pot culture condition with an inoculation method. The results showed that the content of Pro in diseased leaves of resistant NQK-01-03 were higher than those in healthy ones, while soluble sugar, soluble protein and MDA in diseased leaves were lower than healthy ones. And the content of Pro, soluble protein and MDA in diseased roots of resistant NQK-01-03 were higher than those in healthy ones, while soluble sugar in diseased roots were lower than healthy ones. Meanwhile, the content of Pro and MDA in diseased leaves and roots of susceptible GanQing Ⅱ were higher than those in healthy ones, while soluble sugar and soluble protein in diseased leaves and roots were lower than healthy ones. At the same time, the content of Pro in diseased leaves of susceptible GanQing Ⅱ were higher than those in healthy ones of resistant NQK-01-03, while soluble sugar, soluble protein and MDA in diseased leaves of susceptible GanQing Ⅱ were lower than healthy ones of resistant NQK-01-03. And the content of Pro, MDA in diseased roots of susceptible GanQing Ⅱ were higher than those in healthy ones of resistant NQK-01-03, while soluble sugar and soluble protein in diseased roots of susceptible GanQing Ⅱ were lower than healthy ones of resistant NQK-01-03. There was a negative correlation between the content of Pro and resistance, and a positive correlation was found between soluble protein and resistance. This study provided theoretical basis on physiological mechanism of F. avenaceum infection naked barley leaves and roots.

中图分类号:

S432.45

漆永红. 燕麦镰孢菌侵染对不同抗性青稞叶片及根系生理指标的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(32): 101-107.

参考文献

[1]冯西博, 王建林, 钟志明,等. 青藏高原青稞赖氨酸含量空间分布及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 核农学报, 2017, 31(7): 1388-1396.
[2] 李雪萍. 青藏高原青稞根腐类病害及其对根际土壤微生态的影响[D]. 兰州：甘肃农业大学,2017.
[3] Armas R D, Santiago R, Legaz M E, et al. Levels of phenolic compounds and enzyme activity can be used to screen for resistance sugarcane to smut (Ustilago scitaminea)[J]. Australasian Plant Pathology, 2007, 36(1): 32-38.
[4] 刘佳,张匀华,孟庆林,等. 菌核病菌毒素对向日葵叶片生理生化的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2015, 37( 5) : 719-723.
[5]李丹,吐尔迪.吐尼亚孜,王丽丽,等. 棉花抗黄萎病性与叶片保护酶含量和丙二醛含量的关系[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2014, 37(2):131-136.
[6]欧秀玲,耿雅文,李凤,等. 棉花黄萎病病原菌诱导侵染对转基因抗病棉花生理性状的影响[J]. 生物技术通讯, 2013, 6:94-98.
[7]赵秀娟,唐鑫,程蛟文,等. 酶含量、丙二醛含量变化与苦瓜抗枯萎病的关系[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2013, 34(3):372-377.
[8]张笑宇,于肖夏,琚亮亮,等. 黑痣病菌毒素对马铃薯幼苗生理生化抗性相关物质的诱导[J]. 植物保护学报, 2013, 40(1):51-55.
[9] 隋永超,冷暖,姜赫男,等. 乙烯利对干旱胁迫下草地早熟禾生理指标的影响[J]. 草业科学,2018, 35(4): 822-828.
[10] 邹琦．植物生理生化实验指导[M]．北京: 高等教育出版社, l995．
[11]唐启义,冯明光.实用统计分析及其DPS数据处理系统[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002.
[12] Molinari H B C, Maryr C J, Filho J C B,et al. Osmotic adjustment in transgenic citrus rootstock Carrizo citrange(Citrussinensis Osb. x Poncims trifoliate L.Raf.) overproducing proline[J]. Plant Science, 2004, 167(6): 1375-1381.
[13] Ohto M, Onai K, Furukawa Y, Aoki E, Araki T. Effects of sugar on vegetative development and floral transition in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiology, 2001, 127(1): 252- 261.
[14] 周博如,李永镐,刘太国,等．不同抗性的大豆品种接种大豆细菌性疫病菌后可溶性蛋白、总糖含量变化的研究[J]．大豆科学,2000,19(2)：111-114.
[15]吴晓丽,田晓莉,王郁铨,等. 花椰菜幼苗抗黑腐病的生理机制研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2006, 26(3): 484-489.
[16]李赤,于莉,刘付东标,等. 富贵竹中可溶性糖、蛋白质含量与细菌性茎腐病的关系[J]. 吉林农业大学学报,2007,29( 6) : 620-622.
[17]李伯凌,霍本君,朱寿松,等. 木薯叶片组织结构及生理生化特征与其抗细菌性枯萎病的关系[J]. 热带生物学报,2017,8(3) : 292-300.
[18]杨瑞平,刘长命,莫言玲,等. 两个甜瓜材料对白粉病的抗性差异及其生理生化机制研究[J]. 园艺学报,2016,43(4) : 724-734.
[19]罗玉明,张晓燕,华春. 大麦黄花叶病抗性机理的初步研究[J]. 南京师大学报(自然科学版) ,2000,(4):93-96.
[20]史俊卿,张浩,于红威,等．立枯丝核菌毒素对人参防御酶含量及丙二醛含量的影响[J]．湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2010,36(4)：434-436.
[21]樊堂群,迟玉成,谢宏峰,等．不同抗性花生感染网斑病菌的酶含量及丙二醛含量变化[J]．花生学报,2009,38 (4)：31-34.
[22]王建明,张作刚,郭春绒,等．枯萎病菌对西瓜不同抗感品种丙二醛含量及某些保护酶含量的影响[J]．植物病理学报,2001,31(2)：152-156.
[23]房保海,张广民,迟长凤,等. 烟草低头黑病菌毒素对烟草丙二醛含量和某些防御酶的动态影响[J]．植物病理学报,2004,34(1)：27-31.

燕麦镰孢菌侵染对不同抗性青稞叶片及根系生理指标的影响

Fusarium avenaceum Infection: Effects on Physiological Indexes of Leaves and Roots of Naked Barley with Different Resistance

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	李婷婷,梁丹辉. 中国与泰国农产品贸易竞争性和互补性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(1): 159-164.
[2]	孙育新. “一带一路”背景下中俄农产品产业内贸易增长潜力分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(26): 181-187.
[3]	蒋颖. 直航对两岸农产品贸易发展的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25(15): 0-.