中国农学通报 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (21): 111-118.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0093
所属专题: 生物技术
收稿日期:
2021-01-26
修回日期:
2021-04-13
出版日期:
2021-07-25
发布日期:
2021-07-29
通讯作者:
段海燕,姜恭好
作者简介:
陆美光,女,1996年出生,黑龙江大庆人,在读硕士研究生,研究方向:作物遗传育种。通信地址:150080 黑龙江省哈尔滨市南岗区学府路74号 黑龙江大学现代农业与生态环境学院,Tel:0451-86609487,E-mail: 基金资助:
Lu Meiguang1(), Duan Haiyan1(), Jiang Gonghao2()
Received:
2021-01-26
Revised:
2021-04-13
Online:
2021-07-25
Published:
2021-07-29
Contact:
Duan Haiyan,Jiang Gonghao
摘要:
全基因组关联分析(GWAS)是应用单核苷酸多态性(Single Nucleotide Polymorphism,SNP)在全基因组水平上发现影响复杂性状的基因变异的一种手段。为了加强GWAS在亚麻育种中的应用,本文归纳了GWAS的优势及分析流程,列举了近年来国内外利用GWAS定位到的亚麻产量及品质相关性状的标记位点和候选基因,总结了亚麻白粉病的研究现状及其他作物在GWAS的相关研究,并提出GWAS在亚麻育种和抗病的未来发展趋势,为亚麻GWAS研究提供理论基础。
中图分类号:
陆美光, 段海燕, 姜恭好. 亚麻全基因组关联分析的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(21): 111-118.
Lu Meiguang, Duan Haiyan, Jiang Gonghao. Flax Genome Association Analysis: A Review[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(21): 111-118.
类别 | 性状 | 材料数量 | 标记 | 获得的标记位点或候选基因 | 参考文献 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量相关性状 | PH | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold9:516785等 | [ | ||||||
390 | SSR | Lu943、Lu316 | [ | ||||||||
224 | SLAF | UGT、PL、Lus10016125等 | [ | ||||||||
TSW | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold261:57823等 | [ | |||||||
390 | SSR | Lu2164、Lu2555等 | [ | ||||||||
224 | SLAF | PHO1 | [ | ||||||||
BN | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold31:1694349等 | [ | |||||||
390 | SSR | Lu2067a | [ | ||||||||
224 | SLAF | GRAS、XTH等 | [ | ||||||||
CN | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold462:594151 | [ | |||||||
224 | SLAF | Contig1437、LU0019C12等 | [ | ||||||||
FL | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold123:1933585等 | [ | |||||||
SPC | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold312:72968等 | [ | |||||||
SWP | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold31:960134等 | [ | |||||||
品质相关性状 | LIN | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold86:981127等 | [ | ||||||
390 | SSR | c729-s156_Lu3262等 | [ | ||||||||
224 | SLAF | scaffold127_813924等 | [ | ||||||||
260 | SNP | Lus10038321等 | [ | ||||||||
LIO | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold123:2041205 | [ | |||||||
200 | SNP | scaffold263:18997188等 | [ | ||||||||
390 | SSR | c729-s156_Lu3262等 | [ | ||||||||
224 | SLAF | Lus10017450 | [ | ||||||||
224 | SLAF | scaffold234_21551等 | [ | ||||||||
260 | SNP | Lus10038321等 | [ | ||||||||
OIL | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold196:551524等 | [ | |||||||
390 | SSR | c31-s67_Lu181 | [ | ||||||||
260 | SNP | Lus10039906等 | [ | ||||||||
STE | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold132:133025等 | [ | |||||||
390 | SSR | c175-s1216_Lu146 | [ | ||||||||
224 | SLAF | scaffold906_578513等 | [ | ||||||||
260 | SNP | Lus10011877等 | [ | ||||||||
OLE | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold199:241878等 | [ | |||||||
200 | SNP | scaffold183:24857444等 | [ | ||||||||
260 | SNP | Lus10006637等 | [ | ||||||||
PAL | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold175:581966等 | [ | |||||||
224 | SLAF | Lus10022606 | [ | ||||||||
224 | SLAF | scaffold947_339645等 | [ | ||||||||
260 | SNP | Lus10028925等 | [ | ||||||||
IOD | 390 | SSR | c46-s505_Lu2102 | [ | |||||||
260 | SNP | Lus10036184等 | [ | ||||||||
胁迫 | PR | 370 | Lu4-17204590、Lu8-18251174等 | [ | |||||||
其他 | 花色 | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold701:840107等 | [ | ||||||
花冠形状 | scaffold811:44136等 | ||||||||||
花药色 | scaffold910:31728 | ||||||||||
叶色 | scaffold211:69126 | ||||||||||
叶形 | scaffold67:579267等 | ||||||||||
MC | 200 | SNP | Lu5-3808878等 | [ | |||||||
HC | Lu7-6577527等 | ||||||||||
木酚素 | 269 | SNP | Lus10038550等 | [ |
类别 | 性状 | 材料数量 | 标记 | 获得的标记位点或候选基因 | 参考文献 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
产量相关性状 | PH | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold9:516785等 | [ | ||||||
390 | SSR | Lu943、Lu316 | [ | ||||||||
224 | SLAF | UGT、PL、Lus10016125等 | [ | ||||||||
TSW | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold261:57823等 | [ | |||||||
390 | SSR | Lu2164、Lu2555等 | [ | ||||||||
224 | SLAF | PHO1 | [ | ||||||||
BN | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold31:1694349等 | [ | |||||||
390 | SSR | Lu2067a | [ | ||||||||
224 | SLAF | GRAS、XTH等 | [ | ||||||||
CN | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold462:594151 | [ | |||||||
224 | SLAF | Contig1437、LU0019C12等 | [ | ||||||||
FL | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold123:1933585等 | [ | |||||||
SPC | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold312:72968等 | [ | |||||||
SWP | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold31:960134等 | [ | |||||||
品质相关性状 | LIN | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold86:981127等 | [ | ||||||
390 | SSR | c729-s156_Lu3262等 | [ | ||||||||
224 | SLAF | scaffold127_813924等 | [ | ||||||||
260 | SNP | Lus10038321等 | [ | ||||||||
LIO | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold123:2041205 | [ | |||||||
200 | SNP | scaffold263:18997188等 | [ | ||||||||
390 | SSR | c729-s156_Lu3262等 | [ | ||||||||
224 | SLAF | Lus10017450 | [ | ||||||||
224 | SLAF | scaffold234_21551等 | [ | ||||||||
260 | SNP | Lus10038321等 | [ | ||||||||
OIL | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold196:551524等 | [ | |||||||
390 | SSR | c31-s67_Lu181 | [ | ||||||||
260 | SNP | Lus10039906等 | [ | ||||||||
STE | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold132:133025等 | [ | |||||||
390 | SSR | c175-s1216_Lu146 | [ | ||||||||
224 | SLAF | scaffold906_578513等 | [ | ||||||||
260 | SNP | Lus10011877等 | [ | ||||||||
OLE | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold199:241878等 | [ | |||||||
200 | SNP | scaffold183:24857444等 | [ | ||||||||
260 | SNP | Lus10006637等 | [ | ||||||||
PAL | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold175:581966等 | [ | |||||||
224 | SLAF | Lus10022606 | [ | ||||||||
224 | SLAF | scaffold947_339645等 | [ | ||||||||
260 | SNP | Lus10028925等 | [ | ||||||||
IOD | 390 | SSR | c46-s505_Lu2102 | [ | |||||||
260 | SNP | Lus10036184等 | [ | ||||||||
胁迫 | PR | 370 | Lu4-17204590、Lu8-18251174等 | [ | |||||||
其他 | 花色 | 269 | SRAP、SNP | scaffold701:840107等 | [ | ||||||
花冠形状 | scaffold811:44136等 | ||||||||||
花药色 | scaffold910:31728 | ||||||||||
叶色 | scaffold211:69126 | ||||||||||
叶形 | scaffold67:579267等 | ||||||||||
MC | 200 | SNP | Lu5-3808878等 | [ | |||||||
HC | Lu7-6577527等 | ||||||||||
木酚素 | 269 | SNP | Lus10038550等 | [ |
[1] | 曲志华, 白苇, 张丽丽, 等. 170份亚麻种质资源主要农艺性状分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2019(04):77-83. |
[2] | 陈秀娟, 陈光辉, 高艳, 等. 基因工程改良亚麻品质的研究进展[J]. 北方园艺, 2013(15):201-204. |
[3] | 吴建忠, 黄文功, 康庆华, 等. 亚麻遗传连锁图谱的构建[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(06):1134-1139. |
[4] | 邓欣. 亚麻分子标记的开发及产量相关性状的关联分析[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2013. |
[5] | 吴建忠. 亚麻全基因组DNA的提取及分析[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2011(07):18-19. |
[6] | Zhang J, Yan L, Wang L, et al. Consensus genetic linkage map construction and QTL mapping for plant height-related traits in linseed flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)[J]. BioMed Central Plant Biology, 2018, 18(1):160. |
[7] |
Wu J, Zhao Q, Zhang L, et al. QTL Mapping of Fiber-Related Traits Based on a High-Density Genetic Map in Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018, 9:885
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00885 URL |
[8] | Wu J. Research Status of Molecular Biology in Flax[J]. 东北农业大学学报:英文版, 2016(1期):89-96. |
[9] | 谢冬微, 路颖, 赵德宝, 等. 亚麻NBS类抗病基因家族全基因组分析[J]. 中国麻业科学, 2015, 37(03):113-119+125. |
[10] | Yi L, Gao F, Bateer S, et al. Construction of an SNP-based high-density linkage map for flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) using specific length amplified fragment sequencing (SLAF-seq) technology[J]. PloS one, 2017, 12(12):e0189785-. |
[11] | 王玉富, 郭媛, 汤清明, 等. 亚麻修复重金属污染土壤的研究与应用[J]. 作物研究, 2015, 29(04):443-448. |
[12] | 刘婷婷, 石少侠, 段虎平, 等. 亚麻籽营养成分提取及其功能和应用研究进展[J]. 中国油脂, 2020, 45(03):90-97. |
[13] | 李恒勇, 李大伟, 潘明, 等. 亚麻籽的活性成分和功能应用研究进展[J]. 食品安全导刊, 2014(20):65-67. |
[14] | 翟双双, 李孟孟, 冯佩诗, 等. 四川白鹅、樱桃谷肉鸭对不同产地亚麻饼粕养分利用率的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2016, 28(07):2147-2153. |
[15] | 曹英杰, 杨剑飞, 王宇. 全基因组关联分析在作物育种研究中的应用[J]. 核农学报, 2019, 33(08):1508-1518. |
[16] | Ersoz E, Yu J, Buckler E. Applications of Linkage Disequilibrium and Association Mapping in Crop Plants[M]. Genomics-Assisted Crop Improvement, 2007, 12:97-119. |
[17] |
Pushpendra K, Sachin R, Pawan L. Linkage disequilibrium and association studies in higher plants: Present status and future prospects[J]. Plant Molecular Biology, 2005, 57(4):461-485.
pmid: 15821975 |
[18] |
Wang J, Phillip E, Lee R, et al. Association mapping of iron deficiency chlorosis loci in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) advanced breeding lines[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2008, 116(6):777-787.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-008-0710-x pmid: 18292984 |
[19] | 李廷雨, 黎永力, 甘卓然, 等. 全基因组关联分析在大豆中的研究进展[J]. 大豆科学, 2020, 39(03):479-484. |
[20] |
Sean M, Jason P, Patrick J, et al. Association Mapping: Critical Considerations Shift from Genotyping to Experimental Design[J]. The Plant Cell, 2009, 21(8):2194-2202.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.068437 URL |
[21] | 伊六喜. 胡麻产量和品质相关性状的全基因组关联分析[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2018. |
[22] |
Braulio J, Scott D, Helen B, et al. Genomic regions underlying agronomic traits in linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) as revealed by association mapping[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2014, 56(01):75-87.
doi: 10.1111/jipb.v56.1 URL |
[23] |
Xie D, Dai Z, Yang Z, et al. Genome-Wide Association Study Identifying Candidate Genes Influencing Important Agronomic Traits of Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) Using SLAF-seq[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8:2232.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.02232 URL |
[24] | Xie D, Dai Z, Yang Z, et al. Genomic variations and association study of agronomic traits in flax[J]. BioMed Central Genomics, 2018, 19(1):512. |
[25] | 张喻. CRISPR-Cas9系统对亚麻FAD2基因定点编辑及功能分析[D]. 乌鲁木齐:新疆大学, 2019. |
[26] |
Braulio J, Scott D, Helen B, et al. Association mapping of seed quality traits using the Canadian flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) core collection[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2014, 127(4):881-896.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-014-2264-4 URL |
[27] | Xie D, Dai Z, Yang Z, et al. Combined genome-wide association analysis and transcriptome sequencing to identify candidate genes for flax seed fatty acid metabolism[J]. Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology, 2019, 286:98-107. |
[28] |
Frank M, Xiao J, Li P, et al. Genome-Wide Association Study and Selection Signatures Detect Genomic Regions Associated with Seed Yield and Oil Quality in Flax[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2018, 19(8) :2303.
doi: 10.3390/ijms19082303 URL |
[29] |
He L, Xiao J, Rashid Khalid Y, et al. Genome-Wide Association Studies for Pasmo Resistance in Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.).[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2018, 9:1982.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01982 URL |
[30] |
Braulio J, Cloutier S, Quian R, et al. Genome-Wide Association Analysis of Mucilage and Hull Content in Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) Seeds[J]. International journal of molecular sciences, 2018, 19(10) :2870.
doi: 10.3390/ijms19102870 URL |
[31] |
Chandrawati , Neha S, Rajendra K, et al. Genetic diversity, population structure and association analysis in linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)[J]. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 2017, 23(1):207-219.
doi: 10.1007/s12298-016-0408-5 pmid: 28250596 |
[32] | 伊六喜, 斯钦巴特尔, 冯小慧, 等. 胡麻木酚素含量的全基因组关联分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2020, 18(03):765-771. |
[33] | 杨学. 亚麻病害症状及检索表[J]. 中国麻业, 2002(05):25-29. |
[34] | 王炜, 叶春雷, 陈琛, 等. 亚麻白粉病研究进展[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2019, 41(03):478-484. |
[35] |
Rashid K, Duguid S. Inheritance of resistance to powdery mildew in flax[J]. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 2005, 27(3):404-409.
doi: 10.1080/07060660509507239 URL |
[36] | Singh N, Chauhan Y, Kumar K, et al. Inheritance of powdery mildew resistance in linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)[J]. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 1989, 49(1):421-422. |
[37] | Badwal S. Inheritance of resistance to powdery mildew in linseed[J]. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 1975, 35(3) :432-433. |
[38] |
Parvaneh A, Sylvie C, Scott D, et al. Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci for Powdery Mildew Resistance in Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)[J]. Crop Science, 2013, 53(6):2462-2472.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2013.05.0298 URL |
[39] | 杨学, 赵云, 关凤芝, 等. 亚麻品系9801-1对白粉病的抗性遗传分析[J]. 植物病理学报, 2008(06):656-658. |
[40] | 张倩. 亚麻抗白粉病基因的定位[D]. 哈尔滨:黑龙江大学, 2015. |
[41] | 鲁宏伟. 黄瓜白粉病抗性基因挖掘[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2015. |
[42] | 齐振宇. 甜瓜株型和抗白粉病性状的遗传与全基因组关联分析[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2015. |
[43] | 刘盼娜. 黄瓜茎蔓抗白粉病基因的定位研究[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2016. |
[44] | 白明兴, 陈奋奇, 陆晏天, 等. 玉米主要株型性状与产量的全基因组关联分析[J]. 核农学报, 2020, 34(12):2673-2680. |
[45] | 马娟, 王利锋, 曹言勇, 等. 玉米出籽率全基因组关联分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2021, 22(02):448-454. |
[46] | Zhao X, Luo L, Cao Y, et al. Genome-wide association analysis and QTL mapping reveal the genetic control of cadmium accumulation in maize leaf[J]. BioMed Central Genomics, 2018, 19(1):91. |
[47] |
Ju M, Zhou Z, Mu C, et al. Dissecting the genetic architecture of Fusarium verticillioides seed rot resistance in maize by combining QTL mapping and genome-wide association analysis[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1):1109-1115.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01187-4 URL |
[48] |
Chang F, Guo C, Sun F, et al. Genome-Wide Association Studies for Dynamic Plant Height and Number of Nodes on the Main Stem in Summer Sowing Soybeans[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018, 9:1184.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01184 URL |
[49] |
Fang C, Ma Y, Wu S, et al. Genome-wide association studies dissect the genetic networks underlying agronomical traits in soybean[J]. Genome Biology, 2017, 18(1):161.
doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1289-9 URL |
[50] |
Li Y, Reif J, Hong H, et al. Genome-wide association mapping of QTL underlying seed oil and protein contents of a diverse panel of soybean accessions[J]. Plant Science, 2018, 266:95-101.
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.04.013 URL |
[51] |
Zhang J, Wang X, Lu Y, et al. Genome-wide Scan for Seed Composition Provides Insights into Soybean Quality Improvement and the Impacts of Domestication and Breeding[J]. Molecular Plant, 2018, 11(3):460-472.
doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.12.016 URL |
[52] |
Zeng A, Chen P, Korth K, et al. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) of salt tolerance in worldwide soybean germplasm lines[J]. Molecular Breeding, 2017, 37(3):1-14.
doi: 10.1007/s11032-016-0586-4 URL |
[53] | 赵宏亮, 陈凯, 张强, 等. 基于连锁不平衡水稻源库相关性状的关联分析[J]. 核农学报, 2015, 29(04):674-684. |
[54] | Volante A, Desiderio F, Tondelli A, et al. Genome-Wide Analysis of japonica Rice Performance under Limited Water and Permanent Flooding Conditions[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017(8):1862. |
[1] | 孙博, 刘闰, 王占斌, 陈黄欣, 阎肃. 桃叶蓼白粉菌的显微观察及进化关系分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(9): 130-136. |
[2] | 崔燕华, 周婷婷, 沈煜洋, 陈利, 蔺国仓, 杨安沛, 张航, 雷钧杰, 李广阔, 高海峰. 小型植保无人机超低量喷雾对荒漠绿洲麦区小麦白粉病的防治效果[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(27): 147-150. |
[3] | 蔡永占, 王瑞宝, 白涛, 刘有才, 韩小女, 王斌, 华小兵, 李诚, 毛明林, 字文霖. 3株枯草芽孢杆菌对烟草白粉病的防效[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(25): 125-129. |
[4] | 刘明, 唐佳文, 沙爽, 孟剑侠, 程丽, 李冲伟. 基于分子蒸馏技术紫苏油α-亚麻酸纯化效果的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(33): 135-141. |
[5] | 左振兴, 纪军建, 付国庆, 王瑶, 霍阿红, 寇淑君. 基于DUS测试性状的亚麻测试品种遗传多样性分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(24): 48-53. |
[6] | 王月萍, 郭丽琢, 高玉红, 刘亚辉, 苟振宇, 夏张祥. 钾肥和硅肥对油用亚麻茎秆抗倒伏特性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(36): 26-33. |
[7] | 孙雨茜, 倪万潮, 杜平, 崔晓霞, 郭书巧, 蒋璐. 基于简化基因组的甜叶菊分子标记开发[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(27): 111-117. |
[8] | 姜弼天,王琪,张炎,葛菁萍. 亚麻纤维在增强复合材料中的应用与研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(23): 35-39. |
[9] | 朱炫,高贵林,提布,陈晓艳,王学明,羊国安,朱二,石凤旭,赵永祥,周杉,高寿梅. 滇南冬播亚麻氮磷钾肥料效应研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(23): 92-98. |
[10] | 赵文珺,葛蓓孛,刘炳花,施李鸣,麻金金,张克诚. 甲基营养型芽胞杆菌NKG-1对番茄白粉病的 防病促生作用研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(23): 104-109. |
[11] | 庄得凤,李晓丽,程洪森,马 丹,李振涛,徐 宁,马 策. 抗白粉病月季资源的田间筛选[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(25): 138-145. |
[12] | 张 鹏,朱育强,王丽莉,周胜军. 基于机器视觉技术的黄瓜叶片白粉病识别[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(21): 134-137. |
[13] | 徐天才,和桂青,李兆光,赵 菊,苏泽春,薛润光. 不同海拔藜麦的营养成分差异性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(17): 129-133. |
[14] | 李杨,姜恭好,张倩,段海燕. In planta法在亚麻转基因中的应用[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(9): 125-130. |
[15] | 周晓杭,葛菁萍,平文祥. 变性梯度凝胶电泳分析亚麻茎秆菌群多样性[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(6): 102-105. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||