配施有机替代肥及缓控肥对稻田土壤肥力的影响

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0764

中国农学通报 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (25): 77-83.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2022-0764

• 资源·环境·生态·土壤·气象 • 上一篇下一篇

配施有机替代肥及缓控肥对稻田土壤肥力的影响

刘小婷¹(), 王京文²(), 杨文叶²(), 张奇春¹

¹ 浙江大学环境与资源学院/污染环境修复与生态健康教育部重点实验室，杭州 310058
² 杭州市农业技术推广中心，杭州 310020

收稿日期:2022-09-02 修回日期:2023-03-03 出版日期:2023-09-05 发布日期:2023-08-28
通讯作者: 王京文，女，1974年出生，山东淄博人，正高级农艺师，研究生，研究方向：土肥技术研究与推广。通信地址：310020 浙江省杭州市杭海路768号杭州农业大楼一号楼，Tel：0571-86781290，E-mail：178321449@qq.com。杨文叶，男，1980年出生，浙江绍兴人，高级农艺师，硕士研究生，研究方向：土壤肥料。通信地址：310017 杭州市上城区杭海路768号杭州农业大楼一号楼，Tel：0571-86925572，E-mail：ywy64061687@hz.cn。
作者简介:
刘小婷，女，1998年出生，四川内江人，硕士研究生，研究方向：土壤微生物。通信地址：310030 浙江大学紫金港校区农生环C座1320，E-mail：22014159@zju.edu.cn。
基金资助:
浙江省自然科学基金项目“红壤性稻田土壤厌氧氨氧化耦合铁还原的微生物驱动机制研究”(LZ21C030002); 国家自然科学基金项目“稻田厌氧氨氧化的适应性调节机制及其对土壤氮气产生的调控作用研究”(41877044)

Effects of Combined Application of Organic Substituting Fertilizer and Slow Controlled Fertilizer on Soil Fertility in Paddy Field

LIU Xiaoting¹(), WANG Jingwen²(), YANG Wenye²(), ZHANG Qichun¹

¹ College of Environmental & Resource Science, Zhejiang University/ Key Laboratory of Environment Remediation and Ecological Health, Ministry of Education, Hangzhou 310058
² Hangzhou Agricultural Technology Extension Center, Hangzhou 310020

Received:2022-09-02 Revised:2023-03-03 Online:2023-09-05 Published:2023-08-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探究配施有机替代肥、缓控肥对土壤理化性质、酶活性、微生物量及水稻产量的影响，通过田间水稻试验，设计空白对照(CK₁)、配方施肥(CK₂)、配施有机替代肥(C₁)、洋丰包膜缓控肥替代(C₂)、津大螯合缓控肥替代(C₃)、万里神农有机缓控肥替代(C₄)、心连心缓控肥替代(C₅)、烟台龙灯缓控肥替代(C₆) 8个施肥处理，通过对化学性质测定，结合土壤酶活性及微生物量等指标分析，评价不同肥料与配方肥结合对稻田土壤的培肥效果。结果表明，经过2年连续施肥，与CK₁处理相比所有施肥处理的土壤有机质、碱解氮、速效磷、速效钾含量、酶活性及微生物量均有不同程度提高，不同施肥处理水稻产量显著高出CK₁处理19.07%~46.58%。主成分分析与聚类分析表明，不同施肥处理下土壤肥力由高到低为配施有机替代肥>心连心缓控肥替代>津大螯合缓控肥替代>万里神农有机缓控肥替代>洋丰包膜缓控肥替代>烟台龙灯缓控肥替代>配方施肥>空白对照。配施有机替代肥和缓控肥后，土壤肥力较空白对照和配方施肥处理有所提高，其中配施有机替代肥处理对土壤肥力提升效果最好。因此，配施有机替代肥在肥料减施、增加作物产量和提高土壤肥力方面作用显著，本研究结果可为配方肥的优化提供参考。

关键词: 有机替代肥, 缓控肥, 土壤肥力, 主成分分析, 聚类分析

Abstract:

To explore the effects of organic alternative fertilizer and slow controlled fertilizer on soil physical and chemical properties, enzyme activity, microbial biomass and rice yield, the field experiment consisting of eight treatments were conducted: control (CK₁), formula fertilization (CK₂), organic alternative fertilizer (C₁), Yangfeng coated slow controlled fertilizer (C₂), Jinda chelated slow controlled fertilizer (C₃), Wanli Shennong organic slow controlled fertilizer (C₄), Xinlianxin slow controlled fertilizer (C₅) and Yantai Longdeng slow controlled fertilizer (C₆). The effects of different fertilizers combined with formulated fertilizers on paddy soil fertility were evaluated through chemical properties, soil enzyme activity and microbial biomass analysis. The results showed that the contents of soil organic matter, alkali hydrolysable nitrogen, available phosphorus, available potassium, enzyme activity and microbial biomass of C₁-C₆ treatments were increased compared with CK₁ treatment after two years of continuous fertilization. The rice yields of C₁-C₆ treatments were significantly higher (19.07%-46.58%) than that of CK₁ treatment. The principal component analysis and cluster analysis showed that the highest soil fertility was found in C₁ treatment, followed by C₅, C₃, C₄, C₂, C₆, CK₂, CK₁ treatment. The soil fertility of organic substitute fertilizer treatment and slow controlled fertilizer treatment was higher than that of control and formula fertilization treatments, and the soil fertility of organic alternative fertilizer treatment was the highest. The organic fertilizer plays a significant role in reducing fertilizer application, increasing crop yield and improving soil fertility. And the results of this study can provide a reference for the optimization of formula fertilizer.

Key words: organic substituting fertilizer, slow controlled fertilizer, soil fertility, principal component analysis, cluster analysis

刘小婷, 王京文, 杨文叶, 张奇春. 配施有机替代肥及缓控肥对稻田土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(25): 77-83.

LIU Xiaoting, WANG Jingwen, YANG Wenye, ZHANG Qichun. Effects of Combined Application of Organic Substituting Fertilizer and Slow Controlled Fertilizer on Soil Fertility in Paddy Field[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(25): 77-83.

图/表 10

参考文献 30

[1]	SMITH K A, JACKSON D R, WITHERS P. Nutrient losses by surface run-off following the application of organic manures to arable land. 1. Nitrogen[J]. Environmental pollution, 2001, 112(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(00)00098-1 URL
[2]	段永惠, 张乃明, 张玉娟. 施肥对农田氮磷污染物径流输出的影响研究[J]. 土壤, 2005, 37(1):48-51.
[3]	王家宝, 邬刚, 袁嫚嫚, 等. 不同施氮量及施氮方式对水稻田氨挥发及氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(5):10-17.
[4]	万年鑫, 黄强, 郑顺林, 等. 硝化/脲酶抑制剂对秋马铃薯植株及土壤氮素利用的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021,(1):83-89.
[5]	崔磊, 李东坡, 武志杰, 等. 不同硝化抑制剂对红壤氮素硝化作用及玉米产量和氮素利用率的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11):3953-3960. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.022
[6]	王娟娟, 朱紫娟, 钱晓晴, 等. 减施化肥与不同有机肥配施对稻季土壤细菌群落结构的影响[J]. 土壤, 2021, 53(5):983-990.
[7]	LI J, LI Y T, YANG X D, et al. Microbial community structure and functional metabolic diversity are associated with organic carbon availability in an agricultural soil[J]. Journal of integrative agriculture, 2015, 14(12):2500-2511. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61229-1
[8]	安祥瑞, 江尚焘, 李焕苓, 等. 减施化肥配施有机肥对荔枝生长,产量品质及肥料利用率的影响[J]. 土壤, 2021, 53(6):1174-1184.
[9]	KHAN M A, KIM K W, MINGZHI W, et al. Nutrient-impregnated charcoal: an environmentally friendly slow-release fertilizer[J]. The environmentalist, 2008, 28(3):231-235. doi: 10.1007/s10669-007-9133-5 URL
[10]	张玉凤, 沈玉文, 王江涛, 等. 缓控释掺混尿素对章丘大葱—小麦产量,效益及土壤氮素的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(2):231-238.
[11]	DONG D, WANG C, VAN ZWIETEN L, et al. An effective biochar-based slow-release fertilizer for reducing nitrogen loss in paddy fields[J]. Journal of soils and sediments, 2020, 20(8):3027-3040. doi: 10.1007/s11368-019-02401-8
[12]	赵其国, 孙波. 土壤质量与持续环境:I.土壤质量的定义及评价方法[J]. 土壤, 1997, 29(3):113-120.
[13]	GIL-SOTRES F, TRASAR-CEPEDA C, LEIRÓS M C, et al. Different approaches to evaluating soil quality using biochemical properties[J]. Soil biology and biochemistry, 2005, 37(5):877-887. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.10.003 URL
[14]	WANG L H, FU Q. Soil quality assessment of vegetation restoration after a large forest fire in Daxing’anling, northeast China[J]. Canadian journal of soil science, 2020, 100(2):162-174.
[15]	TIAN X Q, LI Z, WANG Y F, et al. Evaluation on soil fertility quality under biochar combined with nitrogen reduction[J]. Scientific reports, 2021, 11(1):13972. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93391-6
[16]	ABDEL-FATTAH M, MOHAMED E S, WAGDI E, et al. Quantitative evaluation of soil quality using principal component analysis: The case study of El-Fayoum Depression Egypt[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(4):1824. doi: 10.3390/su13041824 URL
[17]	赵兰坡, 姜岩. 土壤磷酸酶活性测定方法的探讨[J]. 土壤通报, 1986(3):138-141.
[18]	关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京: 农业出版社,1986.
[19]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析(3版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[20]	韩小美, 黄则月, 程飞, 等. 望天树人工林根际土壤理化性质及微生物群落特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(10):3365-3375. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202010.019
[21]	冯克云, 王宁, 南宏宇, 等. 水分亏缺下化肥减量配施有机肥对棉花光合特性与产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(1):125-137. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.04077
[22]	张华艳, 牛灵安, 郝晋珉, 等. 秸秆还田配施缓控释肥对土壤养分和作物产量的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2018, 49(1):140-149.
[23]	ZHOU J, GUAN D, ZHOU B, et al. Influence of 34-years of fertilization on bacterial communities in an intensively cultivated black soil in northeast China[J]. Soil biology and biochemistry, 2015, 90:42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.07.005 URL
[24]	邹湘, 易博, 张奇春, 等. 长期施肥对稻田土壤微生物群落结构及氮循环功能微生物数量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(12):2158-2167.
[25]	金树权, 陈若霞, 汪峰, 等. 不同氮肥运筹模式对稻田田面水氮浓度和水稻产量的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(1):242-248.
[26]	WANG Y, FU F, LI J, et al. Effects of seaweed fertilizer on the growth of Malus hupehensis Rehd. seedlings, soil enzyme activities and fungal communities under replant condition[J]. European journal of soil biology, 2016, 75:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2016.04.003 URL
[27]	YI B, ZHANG Q C, GU C, et al. Effects of different fertilization regimes on nitrogen and phosphorus losses by surface runoff and bacterial community in a vegetable soil[J]. Journal of soils and sediments, 2018, 18(11):3186-3196. doi: 10.1007/s11368-018-1991-6
[28]	ZHAO J, NI T, LI J, et al. Effects of organic-inorganic compound fertilizer with reduced chemical fertilizer application on crop yields, soil biological activity and bacterial community structure in a rice-wheat cropping system[J]. Applied soil ecology, 2016, 99:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.11.006 URL
[29]	ZHAI Z, HU Q, CHEN J, et al. Effects of combined application of organic fertilizer and microbial agents on tobacco soil and tobacco agronomic traits[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental science, 2020, 594:012023. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/594/1/012023
[30]	ADEGBIDI H G, BRIGGS R D, VOLK T A, et al. Effect of organic amendments and slow-release nitrogen fertilizer on willow biomass production and soil chemical characteristics[J]. Biomass and bioenergy, 2003, 25(4):389-398. doi: 10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00038-2 URL

处理	基肥	分蘖肥		穗肥（配方肥）	总施肥量
处理	基肥	尿素	氯化钾	穗肥（配方肥）	总计	纯N	P₂O₅	K₂O
CK₁	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
CK₂	配方肥30 (20:8:12)	15	12.5	10	30.4	14.9	3.2	12.3
C₁	配方肥15 (20:8:12)，商品有机肥1000	8.85	10.0	8	19.2	8.6	1.84	8.76
C₂	缓控肥30 (26:10:12)	6.75	5.67	10	24.9	12.9	4.0	8.0
C₃	缓控肥30 (27:13:10)	6.1	5.2	10	24.9	12.9	3.8	8.2
C₄	有机缓控肥50 (15:4:6)	7.4	8.3	10	24.9	12.9	2.8	9.2
C₅	缓控肥30 (20:7:18)	10.65	4.17	10	24.9	12.9	3.8	8.2
C₆	缓控肥30 (22:8:15)	10.65	4.2	10	24.9	13.5	3.2	8.2

处理	基肥	分蘖肥		穗肥（配方肥）	总施肥量
处理	基肥	尿素	氯化钾	穗肥（配方肥）	总计	纯N	P₂O₅	K₂O
CK₁	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
CK₂	配方肥30 (20:8:12)	15	12.5	10	30.4	14.9	3.2	12.3
C₁	配方肥15 (20:8:12)，商品有机肥1000	8.85	10.0	8	19.2	8.6	1.84	8.76
C₂	缓控肥30 (26:10:12)	6.75	5.67	10	24.9	12.9	4.0	8.0
C₃	缓控肥30 (27:13:10)	6.1	5.2	10	24.9	12.9	3.8	8.2
C₄	有机缓控肥50 (15:4:6)	7.4	8.3	10	24.9	12.9	2.8	9.2
C₅	缓控肥30 (20:7:18)	10.65	4.17	10	24.9	12.9	3.8	8.2
C₆	缓控肥30 (22:8:15)	10.65	4.2	10	24.9	13.5	3.2	8.2

处理	pH	有机质/(g/kg)	碱解氮/(mg/kg)	速效磷/(mg/kg)	速效钾/(mg/kg)	缓效钾/(mg/kg)	铵态氮/(mg/kg)
CK₁	5.68±0.28a	20.75±1.04c	158.8±7.94e	2.60±0.13f	28.98±1.45e	458.04±22.90b	56.73±5.47bc
CK₂	5.46±0.27ab	22.64±1.13c	169.1±8.45de	16.22±0.81d	32.28±11.61de	466.16±23.31b	67.72±0.80ab
C₁	5.28±0.26ab	28.65±1.43b	247.1±12.36ab	28.33±1.42b	36.12±1.81c	452.31±22.62b	72.45±6.69a
C₂	5.09±0.25b	31.66±1.58a	194.3±9.71c	35.66±1.78a	43.06±2.15b	517.87±25.89a	35.95±3.85de
C₃	5.22±0.26ab	30.16±1.51ab	240.8±12.04b	26.89±1.34ab	41.16±2.06b	467.16±23.36b	24.60±4.76e
C₄	5.10±0.26ab	30.91±1.55ab	186.6±9.33cd	26.00±1.30c	34.06±1.70cd	432.92±21.65b	58.81±6.15ab
C₅	5.22±0.26ab	30.85±1.54ab	263.2±13.16a	11.30±0.57b	32.28±1.61de	440.45±22.02b	44.29±6.35cd
C₆	5.13±0.26ab	32.51±1.63a	182.0±9.10cd	16.24±0.81d	46.99±2.35a	451.05±22.55b	9.56±0.44f

处理	pH	有机质/(g/kg)	碱解氮/(mg/kg)	速效磷/(mg/kg)	速效钾/(mg/kg)	缓效钾/(mg/kg)	铵态氮/(mg/kg)
CK₁	5.68±0.28a	20.75±1.04c	158.8±7.94e	2.60±0.13f	28.98±1.45e	458.04±22.90b	56.73±5.47bc
CK₂	5.46±0.27ab	22.64±1.13c	169.1±8.45de	16.22±0.81d	32.28±11.61de	466.16±23.31b	67.72±0.80ab
C₁	5.28±0.26ab	28.65±1.43b	247.1±12.36ab	28.33±1.42b	36.12±1.81c	452.31±22.62b	72.45±6.69a
C₂	5.09±0.25b	31.66±1.58a	194.3±9.71c	35.66±1.78a	43.06±2.15b	517.87±25.89a	35.95±3.85de
C₃	5.22±0.26ab	30.16±1.51ab	240.8±12.04b	26.89±1.34ab	41.16±2.06b	467.16±23.36b	24.60±4.76e
C₄	5.10±0.26ab	30.91±1.55ab	186.6±9.33cd	26.00±1.30c	34.06±1.70cd	432.92±21.65b	58.81±6.15ab
C₅	5.22±0.26ab	30.85±1.54ab	263.2±13.16a	11.30±0.57b	32.28±1.61de	440.45±22.02b	44.29±6.35cd
C₆	5.13±0.26ab	32.51±1.63a	182.0±9.10cd	16.24±0.81d	46.99±2.35a	451.05±22.55b	9.56±0.44f

处理	脲酶/[mg/(g·h)]	蛋白酶/[μg/(g·h)]	磷酸酶/[μg/(g·h)]	脱氢酶/[μg/(g·h)]
CK₁	0.03±0.001d	245.05±12.25e	19.18±0.96cd	12.99±0.65d
CK₂	0.04±0.002d	422.48±21.12d	36.98±1.85a	20.93±1.05b
C₁	0.11±0.006a	904.34±45.22b	34.41±1.72a	25.36±1.27a
C₂	0.02±0.001e	1069.12±53.46a	35.44±1.77a	13.47±0.67d
C₃	0.06±0.003c	1146.42±57.32a	16.88±0.84d	15.91±0.80c
C₄	0.08±0.004b	1092.22±54.61a	20.16±1.01c	20.39±1.02b
C₅	0.07±0.003c	782.88±39.14c	28.05±1.40b	19.68±0.98b
C₆	0.06±0.003c	403.06±20.15d	37.10±1.86a	12.90±0.64d

配施有机替代肥及缓控肥对稻田土壤肥力的影响

Effects of Combined Application of Organic Substituting Fertilizer and Slow Controlled Fertilizer on Soil Fertility in Paddy Field

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

处理	真菌/[×10⁴/(g·土)]	放线菌/[×10⁷/(g·土)]	细菌/[×10⁸/(g·土)]
CK₁	1.07±0.05e	5.45±0.27d	3.89±0.19f
CK₂	2.07±010b	11.12±0.56a	6.21±0.31e
C₁	1.82±0.09c	5.71±0.29d	7.52±0.38d
C₂	1.55±0.08d	8.26±0.41b	8.00±0.40cd
C₃	2.24±0.11b	8.96±0.45b	13.44±0.67a
C₄	2.60±0.13a	7.27±0.36c	8.56±0.43c
C₅	2.64±0.13a	6.00±0.30d	9.61±0.48b
C₆	2.14±0.11b	5.46±0.27d	9.96±0.50b

主成分	特征值	方差贡献率/%	累积方差贡献率/%
PC₁	4.79	34.19	34.19
PC₂	3.03	21.41	55.80
PC₃	2.05	14..62	70.42
PC₄	1.33	9.50	79.92
PC₅	1.12	7.97	87.89

成分	PC₁	PC₂	PC₃	PC₄	PC₅
pH	-0.49	0.00	0.36	0.04	0.76
有机质	0.92	-0.13	-0.11	0.21	0.05
碱解氮	0.66	0.43	0.03	0.04	0.41
速效磷	0.72	-0.12	0.50	-0.05	-0.35
速效钾	0.67	-0.61	-0.01	0.33	0.03
缓效钾	0.13	-0.63	0.66	0.04	0.31
铵态氮	-0.48	0.68	0.50	0.01	-0.17
脲酶	0.43	0.76	-0.10	0.33	0.07
蛋白酶	0.80	0.14	0.25	-0.37	-0.12
磷酸酶	0.07	-0.20	0.43	0.77	-0.18
脱氢酶	0.17	0.85	0.46	0.14	0.00
真菌	0.64	0.41	-0.12	-0.13	0.10
放线菌	0.06	-0.19	0.67	-0.50	-0.07
细菌	0.88	-0.09	-0.21	-0.22	0.22

[1]	吴楚鹏, 盛建东, 胡雨彤, 成志慧, 杨鹏飞. 新疆沙雅县绿洲棉田土壤质量评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(9): 71-78.
[2]	杨明霞, 刁珊, 崔克强, 赵士粤, 任瑞, 何美美, 纪薇. 基于主成分分析的山楂果实贮藏性能研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(7): 135-139.
[3]	贾晓昀, 赵红霞, 朱继杰, 王国印, 李妙, 王士杰. 陆地棉资源主要产量和纤维品质性状的遗传多样性分析研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(6): 35-40.
[4]	陈慧玲, 刘华, 黄国伟, 马林江, 周雄, 张新叶. 湖北16个山桐子野生资源分布区叶片形态多样性分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(5): 63-68.
[5]	阚建鸾, 王晓云, 苏建平, 张永春, 汪吉东, 马洪波, 蔡云彤. 不同氮肥抑制剂对小麦产量、土壤肥力、氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(5): 69-74.
[6]	唐卫东, 魏林源, 康才周, 王多泽, 邱晓娜, 张卫星, 张晓娟. 民勤不同林龄樟子松人工林土壤理化性质[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(4): 93-98.
[7]	李佳欣, 盖伟玲, 孙显旻, 赵昕, 张晓光, 崔德杰. 基于GIS的土壤养分空间分布特征及肥力评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(25): 94-101.
[8]	李斐然, 王永奇. 圈养林麝饲用植物叶主要矿物元素含量特征与综合分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(24): 157-164.
[9]	陈睿, 鲜小林, 李世峰. 14种高山杜鹃夏季生长量的比较研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(22): 65-71.
[10]	袁文彬, 黄浩, 关罗浩, 李超, 王文辉, 谢丹凤, 杨天旭, 王维. 会理烟区烤烟质量特征的区域归类研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(22): 96-103.
[11]	邵雪花, 赖多, 肖维强, 刘传和, 贺涵, 匡石滋. 番石榴遗传多样性的ISSR分析及指纹图谱构建[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(21): 39-47.
[12]	徐涛, 石卫刚, 刘扩龙, 徐晓飞, 范佳雪. 青藏高原西部耕地土壤质量现状评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(21): 75-82.
[13]	周献增, 杨威, 乔仁桂, 原华彬, 张钰芳, 王学君, 李林波, 王菊英, 杨光. 农艺措施对土壤生境与桑树生长的影响研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(20): 60-66.
[14]	姜冰, 王松涛, 孙增兵, 张海瑞, 王建, 刘阳. 基于隶属度函数和主成分分析的耕地土壤肥力评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(2): 22-27.
[15]	张伟, 张阳, 王官, 邵荣峰, 薛丁丁, 常玉卉, 阎昊, 赵威军. 甜高粱饲草品质综合分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(19): 124-130.