新山海关杨速生性的主因子分析

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 新山海关杨源于山海关杨实生苗，经几年观察其速生性表现突出且稳定。本试验进一步确定了影响其速生性的主因素。以扦插苗为研究对象，测定了其生长状况，蛋白质、氨基酸、叶绿素、还原糖等基本代谢物的含量以及过氧化物酶、IAA氧化酶、硝酸还原酶活性和根活力等指标。结果表明：新山海关杨与普通山海关杨相比，速生性表现明显，蛋白质、叶绿素含量及过氧化物酶、硝酸还原酶活性差异极显著；还原糖含量、IAA氧化酶活性及根活力差异显著。对以上生理生化指标进行线性相关分析，结果表明各项指标均与植株生长呈线性相关关系，其中普通山海关杨中硝酸还原酶活性与植株生长的相关系数不显著，其余均显著；而新山海关杨中还原糖含量、硝酸还原酶活性与植株生长的相关系数极显著，其余均显著。之后进行通径分析，结果表明山海关杨的主要生长因子是根活力。

关键词: 文冠果, 文冠果, 扦插, 基质

Abstract: The study is about Populus Canadensis Moench cv. ‘shanhaiguanensis’ (the old) and its mutant--new Shanhaiguan poplar variety (the new). The compared items included morphologic characters and physiological and biochemical specialties (content of chlorophyll, reductive sugar and protein, and activity of amine transferase, nitrate reductase, IAA oxidase and peroxidase). The results suggested that there were some obvious differences between two materials: (1) Rooting rate of the new poplar was higher than the old ones, and the total root length was longer than the old. Shoot’s growth rate of the news is also greater than the old in 55th days after cutting; the length of shoots of the new was 12.42cm, but the old only 5.34cm; (2) Both in photosynthesis (photosynthetic pigment content, reduced sugar content) and nitrogen metabolism (protein content, nitrate reductase and amine transferase activity), the new poplar was more excellent than the old; (3) By mathematic analysis, the rooting characteristics was find to be the main factor in all factors affecting plant growth.

中图分类号:

S718.3

宋金耀,刘永军,党晓燕,樊志艳,吕庆光. 新山海关杨速生性的主因子分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2008, 24(7): 384-389.

Song Jinyao, Liu Yongjun, Dang Xiaoyan, Fan Zhiyan, Lu Qingguang. The Main Factors Affecting the Growth of the New Shanhaiguan Poplar (Populus canadensis Moench)[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2008, 24(7): 384-389.

参考文献

[1] 河北省林业厅编.实用工程造林技术[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1990:346-349.
[2] 吕文,张卫东.发展杨树在三北防护林中建设作用的地位[J].林业科技通讯,2000(5):7-9.
[3] 宋金耀,刘永军,王贺山,等.山海关杨一变异株的发现和初步认证[J].华北农学报,2008,23卷增刊（待出版）.
[4] 余迪求,李宝健.花色素苷生物合成的遗传和发育控制[J].植物生理通讯,1997,33(1):71-77.
[5] Muller W A著,黄秀英,劳为德,郑瑞珍,等译.发育生物学[M].高等教育出版社,1988:155-168.
[6] 刘奎英,王有年.园艺植物试验设计与分析[M].中国科学技术出版社,1999:82.
[7] 刘奎英,王有年.园艺植物试验设计与分析[M].中国科学技术出版社,1999:26.
[8] 白宝璋,王景安.植物生理学测试技术[M].中国科学技术出版社,1993:37-38.
[9] 白宝璋,王景安.植物生理学测试技术[M].中国科学技术出版社,1993:76.
[10] 李琳.应用考马斯亮蓝G-250测定植物组织中蛋白质含量的研究[J].植物生理学通讯,1986(5):32-34.
[11] 白宝璋,王景安,赵会杰主编,植物生理学（上册）[M].中国农业出版社,1996:134-155.
[12] 西北农业大学主编,基础生物化学试验指导[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社,1986:76-79.
[13] 孙文全.联苯胺比色法测定果树过氧化物酶活性的研究[J].果树科学,1988(3):105-108.
[14] 张志良.植物生理学试验指导[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1984:59-62.
[15] 沈允刚,施教耐,许大全.动态光合作用[M].北京:科学出版社,1998:54-74.
[16] 王清连,宋金耀,杨晓玲.植物生理生化[M].中国农业科技出版社,1998:134-155.
[17] 潘瑞炽,董愚得.植物生理学（上册）[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1979:56-57.
[18] 高洪兵,戚继中.小青杨叶中硝酸还原酶活力的研究[J].吉林林学院学报,2000,16(2):90-91.
[19] Dixon M, Webb E.C.(戚正武,等译).酶[M].上海科学技术出版社,1964.
[20] Gaspar T, CL Penel, T Thorpe and H Greppin. Peroxidases. A Survey of Their Biochemical and Physiological Roles in Higher Plants[M].Univ. Geneva. Geneva,Switzerland,1982:89-122.
[21] Greppin H, C Penel and T Gaspar. Molecular and Physiological Aspects of Plant Peroxidases[M].University of Geneva,Switzarland,1986:135.
[22] 朱治平,唐锡华.高等植物胚胎的发育生物学研究—转录和翻译抑制剂对水稻胚胎发育和萌发过程中过氧化物酶形成的影响[J].中国科学 1981,(7):880-884.
[23] 汪天,许成林,何云核.黄刺梅插穗生根能力及其机理的探讨[J].安徽农业大学学报,2000,27(3):221-224.
[24] 项殿芳,宋金耀,刘永军,等.脱毒对苹果苗木和砧木的过氧化物酶、硝酸还原酶及蛋白质、氨基酸含量的影响[J].华北农学报,1995,10(2):82-86.
[25] Gaspar T, CL Penel, T Thorpe and H Greppin. Peroxidases. A Survey of Their Biochemical and physiological Roles in Higher Plants[M].Univ. Geneva. Geneva,Switzerland,1982:25-32.