欢迎访问《中国农学通报》,

中国农学通报 ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (8): 252-259.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb14100057

所属专题: 油料作物 园艺

• 农业科技信息 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于模糊综合评价的油菜网络信息可信度研究

王晓乔,廖桂平,王 访,李锦卫,刘瑶   

  1. (湖南农业大学农业信息研究所,长沙 410128)
  • 收稿日期:2014-10-19 修回日期:2014-11-09 接受日期:2014-11-17 出版日期:2015-04-07 发布日期:2015-04-07
  • 通讯作者: 廖桂平
  • 基金资助:
    高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金“水稻叶色-氮营养计算机视觉诊断机理”(20114320110001);湖南省科技重大专项第四专题“油茶产业科技信息化服务平台建设”(2013FJ1006-4);湖南省科技计划项目“基于WSN的土壤硝酸根离子浓度现场感知设备研制”(2014GK3012);湖南省战略性新兴产业科技攻关项目“黄籽高油分油菜品种选育及产业化关键技术研究”(2014GK1008)。

Study of Rapeseed Information Website Trusted Measurement Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation

Wang Xiaoqiao, Liao Guiping, Wang Fang, Li Jinwei, Liu Yao   

  1. (Agricultural Information Institution, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128)
  • Received:2014-10-19 Revised:2014-11-09 Accepted:2014-11-17 Online:2015-04-07 Published:2015-04-07

摘要: 为了给用户提供可信的信息服务,需要对网络信息进行可信度评估,而评价网站可信度的方法是网络信息可信度评估的基础和重要组成部分,旨在探索农业综合型和专业型网站可信度评估的方法。应用模糊综合评价法对提出的网站可信度评估指标体系中的重要指标数据进行了融合,再以涉及油菜信息的网站为试验对象,进行试验数据采集与分析,对43个包含油菜信息的综合型和专业型网站可信度进行了计算和综合排序。试验Ⅰ选取了网站PR值、反向链接数、Alexa排名、页面收录数等4个指标,试验Ⅱ选取了网站PR值、反向链接数、Alexa排名、页面收录数、专业性等5个指标,分别进行模糊综合评价。试验结果表明:从网站综合实力判断网站可信度,农博网、中国农业信息网、一亩田油菜网、中华人民共和国农业部、中国农业科学院网对评评价指标体系Ⅰ反应较好;整体上国家级网站可信度高于地方级网站;网站可信度与当地的信息化和农业水平有一定关系;专业型网站与综合型网站差距较大。从网站综合实力和专业需求两方面判断网站可信度,较好的有农博网、中国农业信息网、中华人民共和国农业部。试验Ⅰ的评测指标适合于综合型网站可信度量,试验Ⅱ的评测指标适合于专业型网站可信度量。该文提出的网站可信度评价模型可为其他网站可信度评估提供参考,其中的指标可根据实际情况来选取以及确定其权重。

关键词: 原核表达, 原核表达

Abstract: To provide reliable information for users needs to evaluate network information credibility, a comprehensive evaluation method of website's credibility is an important part of foundation and a major method of network information credibility evaluation. This paper aimed at exploring evaluation methods of the website's credibility of comprehensive type and professional type in agriculture. This paper presented a web credibility evaluation index system and all indexes were integrated in fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. With some rape information websites being the experimental objects, a collection and analysis of experimental data was made. Methods to evaluate the website's credibility were obtained through calculation and sorting of the credibilities of 43 agricultural comprehensive and professional websites including rape information. In experiment Ⅰ, 4 indicators were selected, such as “PR value of website”, “reverse link number”, “Alexa ranking” and “page index number”. In experiment Ⅱ, 5 indicators were selected, such as “PR value of website”, “reverse link number”, “Alexa ranking”, “page index number” and “professional relation”. Respectively, a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation was made. The experimental results showed that when the website credibility was ordered by website comprehensive strength, the better ones were “www.aweb.com.cn”, “www.agri.gov.cn”, “www.ymt360.com”, “www.moa.gov.cn” and www.caas.net.cn”. The national website credibility was generally higher than the local website’s. The website credibility was related to the local informational and agricultural level. There was a gap between a professional website and a comprehensive website. When the website credibility was ordered by website comprehensive strength and professional needs, better ones were listed as the following: “www.aweb.com.cn”, “www.agri.gov.cn”, “www.moa.gov.cn”. The indexes in experiment Ⅰ proved to be most suitable for measuring the comprehensive website credibility, and those in experiment Ⅱ measuring the professional website credibility. Web credibility evaluation model proposed in this paper could provide reference for all others of this type with indexes and their percentages determined respectively in different actual situations.