水分胁迫下紫花苜蓿根系特征与ABA含量的变化

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16070019

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究通过温室盆栽试验探讨了干旱胁迫对‘三得利’、‘敖汉’和‘中苜1 号’3 个紫花苜蓿品种根系ABA浓度和根系特征的影响。按照田间持水量的100%（对照）、85%（轻度干旱）、70%（中度干旱）和55%（重度干旱）设置4 个梯度的水分胁迫处理，分别对3 个紫花苜蓿品种进行处理，并对根系ABA含量和根系性状进行测量。结果显示：水分胁迫可以显著影响不同生长时期的紫花苜蓿根系ABA的含量。随着处理时间的延长，不同水分胁迫处理的紫花苜蓿根系ABA含量均呈先升高后下降再升高的趋势。在移栽后的第75 天，根系ABA含量达到首个峰值，然后开始下降，到第105 天的时候将至最低，然后开始回升直至处理结束。移栽105 天以后，4 个水分胁迫处理（W1、W2、W3 和W4）紫花苜蓿根系ABA含量分别为44、56.6、64.6、94.4 ng/g FW。同时，不同紫花苜蓿品种根系ABA含量存在差异。移栽105 天以后，‘敖汉’、‘三得利’和‘中苜1 号’根系ABA含量均达到最低，分别为83.2 ng/g FW、61.7 ng/g.FW 和49.9 ng/g FW；之后，根系ABA含量开始回升。与对照相比，重度水分胁迫使根系长度降低了20.92%，使侧根数降低了20.71%，使根鲜重降低了43.79%，使根干重降低了37.96%。重度水分胁迫下植株根冠比是对照的1.9倍，这说明水分胁迫对地上部茎叶的影响要大于地下部的根系。水分胁迫降低了紫花苜蓿根长、侧根数、根鲜重和根干重，增加了紫花苜蓿根冠比，促使根系ABA含量升高。不同紫花苜蓿品种根系ABA含量存在差异。

关键词: 机器识别, 机器识别, 柑橘病虫害, 复杂性测度, 神经网络

Abstract: The effects of drought stress on Abscisic acid (ABA) in roots and root characteristics of three alfalfa varieties‘Suntory’,‘Ohan’ and‘Zhongmu No.1’ were studied by greenhouse pot experiment. The experiment was conducted with three alfalfa varieties, and four gradients of water stress were set up with four filed water capacities, 100% (control, W1), 85% (mild drought, W2), 70% (moderate drought, W3) and 55% (severe drought, W4). And then ABA of the root and the characteristics of root were measured. The results showed that ABA was significantly affected by deficit irrigation treatments during different times of plant ages. With the extension of treatment time, the content of ABA in alfalfa root under different water stress treatments showed a trend of first increasing then decreasing, and increased at last. 75 days after transplanting, the root ABA content reached the peak, and then began to decline. The root ABA content was approaching the minimum on the 105th day, and then began to pick up until the end of the treatment. 105 days after transplanting, the content of ABA of four water stress treatments (W1, W2, W3 and W4) was 44, 56.6, 64.6 and 94.4 ng/g FW, respectively. Moreover the results showed that the content of ABA in different alfalfa roots had differences. 105 days after transplanting, the content of ABA n‘Ohan’,‘ Suntory’and‘Zhongmu No.1’ reached the minimum as 83.2, 61.7 and 49.9 ng/g FW, respectively. And then, the content of ABA began to increase. Compared with the control, the highest water stress (W4) reduced root length by 20.92%, lateral roots by 20.71%, root fresh biomass by 43.79% and root dry biomass by 37.96%. The root to shoot ratio was 1.9 times higher in water stressed plants, showing that water stress in alfalfa plant affected more on shoots than on roots. Water stress reduced the alfalfa root length, lateral root number, root fresh biomass and root dry biomass, increased the alfalfa root to shoot ratio, and prompted the content of ABA. The ABA content of root of different alfalfa varieties had distinguished differences.

中图分类号:

S541

毕舒贻,曹婧,李跃,万里强,李向林. 水分胁迫下紫花苜蓿根系特征与ABA含量的变化[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(33): 119-124.

参考文献

[1] Loss S P, Siddique K H M. Morphological and physiological traits associated with wheat yield increases in Mediterranean environments[J]. Advances in Agronomy, 1994, 52:229-276.
[2] Grando S, Ceccarelli S. Seminal root morphology and coleoptile length in wild (Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum) and cultivated (Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare) barley[J]. Euphytica, 1995, 86:73-80.
[3] Lowlor D W, Cornic G. Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants[J]. Plant Cell Environment, 2002, 25:275-294.
[4] Martínez J P, Ledent J F, Bajji M, et al. Effect of water stress on growth, Na and K accumulation and water use efficiency in relation to osmotic adjustment in two populations of Atriplex halimus L.[J]. Plant Growth Regulator, 2003, 41: 63-73.
[5] Tadina N, Germ M, Kreft I, et al. Effects of water deficit and selenium on common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench.) plants[J]. Photosynthetica, 2007, 45:472-476.
[6] Ren J, Dai W R, Xuan Z Y, et al. The effect of drought and enhanced UV-B radiation on the growth and physiological traits of two contrasting poplar species[J]. Forage Ecology Management, 2007, 239:112-119.
[7] 吴同彦, 冯大领, 白志英, 等. 小麦抗旱机制研究进展[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2009, 27 (5):97-100.
[8] 余玲, 王彦荣, Garnett T, 等. 紫花苜蓿不同品种对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J]. 草业学报, 2006, 15 (3): 75-85.
[9] Morgan J M, Hare R A, Fletcher R J. Genetic variation in osmoregulation in bread and durum wheats and its relationship to grain yield in a range of field environments[J]. Australia Journal of Agriculture Research, 1986, 37:449-457.
[10] Liu F, Christian R, Shahanzari JA, et al. ABA regulated stomata control and photosynthetic water use efficiency of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) during progressive soil drying[J]. Plant Science, 2005, 168:831-836.
[11] Shimazaki Y, Ookawa T, Hirazawa T. The root tip and accelerating region supress elongation of the decelerating region without any effects on cell turgor in primary roots of maize under water stress[J]. Plant Physiology, 2005, 139:458-465.
[12] Nanjo T, Kobayashi M, Yoshiba Y, et al. Biological functions of proline in morphogenesis and osmotolerance revealed in antisense transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Plant Journal, 1999, 18:185-193.
[13] Pritchard J, Wyn Jones R G, Tomos A D. Turgor, growth and rheological gradients of wheat roots following osmotic stress[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1991, 42:1043-1049
[14] Wu Y, Cosgrove D J. Adaptation of roots to low water potentials by changes in cell wall extensibility and cell wall proteins[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2000, 51:1543-1553
[15] Sahnoune M, Adda A, Soualem S, et al. Early water deficit effect on seminal root barley[J]. Comptes Rendus Bilogies, 2004, 327:389-398.
[16] Turner NC. Further progress in crop water relations[J]. Advances in Agronomy, 1997, 58: 293-338.
[17] Liu F, Stützel H. Biomass partitioning, specific leaf area and water use efficiency of vegetable amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) in response to water stress[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2004, 102:15–27.
[18] Casimiro I T, Beeckman N, Graham R, et al. Dissecting Arabidopsis lateral root development [J]. Trends of Plant Science, 2003, 8:165-17.
[19] López-Bucio J, Cruz-Ramírez A, Herrera-Estrella L. The role of nutrient availability in regulating root architecture[J]. Current Opinion of Plant Biology, 2003, 6:280-287
[20] Malamy J E. Intrinsic and environmental response pathways that regulate root system architecture[J]. Plant, Cell Environment, 2005, 28:67-77.
[21] Signora L, De Smet I, Foyer C H, et al. ABA plays a central role in mediating the regulatory effects of nitrate on root branching in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Journal, 2001, 28:655-662.
[22] Sharp R E, LeNoble M E. ABA, ethylene and the control of shoot and root growth under water stress[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2002, 53: 33-37.
[23] Schroeder J I, Allen G J, Hugouvieux V, et al. Guard cell signal transduction[J]. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 2001, 52:627-658.
[24] Pareek A, Sopory S A, Bohner H J, et al. Abiotic stress adaptation in plants[M]. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010. 3373.
[25] Mori I C, Murata Y. ABA signaling in stomatal guard cells: lessons from Commelina and Vicia[J]. Journal of Plant Research, 2011, 124:477-487.
[26] Wang Y, Ying J, Kuzma M, et al. Molecular tailoring of farnesylation for plant drought tolerance and yield protection[J]. Plant Journal, 2005, 43:413-24.
[27] Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2007, 58:221-227.
[28] Dobrev PI, Kaminek M. Fast and efficient separation of cytokinins from auxin and abscisic acid and their purification using mixed-mode solid-phase extraction. Journal of Chromatography A, 2002, 950:21-29.
[29] Albacete A, Ghanem M E, Martinez-Andujar C, et al. Hormonal changes in relation to biomass partitioning and shoot growth impairment in salinized tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2008, 59:4119-4131.
[30] McAdam S A M, Brodribb T J. Fern and lycophyte guard cells do not respond to endogenous abscisic acid[J]. Plant Cell, 2012, 24:1510-1521.
[31] Outlaw WH. Integration of cellular and physiological functions of guard cells[J]. Critical Review of Plant Science, 2003, 22:503-529.
[32]李文娆, 张岁岐, 丁圣彦, 等. 干旱胁迫下紫花苜蓿根系形态变化及与水分利用的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(19): 5140-5150.
[33]丁红, 张智猛, 戴良香, 等. 干旱胁迫对花生根系生长发育和生理特性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(6):1586-1592.
[34] Nativ R, Ephrath J E, Berliner P R, et al. Drought resistance and water use efficiency in Acacia saligna[J]. Australia Journal of Botany, 1999, 47:577–586.
[35] Marron N, Delay D, Petit J M, et al. Physiological traits of two Populus × euramericana clones, Luisa avanzo and dorskamp, during water stress and re watering cycle[J]. Tree Physiology, 2002, 22:849-858.
[36] Nautiyal P C, Ravindra V, Joshi Y C. Dry matter partitioning and water use efficiency under water deficit during various growth stages in groundnut[J]. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2002, 7:135-139.
[37] Sacks M M, Silk W K, Burman P. Effect of water stress on cortical cell division rates within the apical meristem of primary roots of maize[J]. Plant Physiology, 1997, 114:519-527.
[38] Rao R C N, Williams J H, Wadia K D R, et al. Crop growth, water use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination in groundnut genotypes under end season drought conditions[J]. Annual Applied Biology, 1993, 122:357-367.
[39] Manivannan P, Jaleel C A, Kishorekumar A, et al. Drought stress induced changes in the biochemical parameters and photosynthetic pigments of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)[J]. Indian Journal of Applied Pure Biology, 2007, 52:369372.
[40] Nicholas S . Plant resistance to environmental stress[J]. Current Opinion of Biotechnology, 1998, 9:214-219.
[41] Wullschleger S D, Yin T M, DiFazio S P, et al. Phenotypic variation in growth and biomass distribution for two advanced-generation pedigrees of hybrid poplar[J]. Canada Journal of Forrest Research, 2005, 35:1779-1789.
[42]潘晓云, 王永芳, 王根轩, 等. 覆膜栽培下春小麦种群的生长冗余与个体大小不整齐性的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2002, 26(2):177-184.
[43] Morgan J M. Osmoregulation and water stress in higher plants[J]. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 1984, 35:299-319.