欢迎访问《中国农学通报》,

中国农学通报 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (16): 115-125.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17060118

• 资源 环境 生态 土壤 气象 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于逐步回归与BP神经网络的日光温室温湿度预测模型对比分析

温永菁,李春,薛庆禹,董朝阳,黎贞发,李秀芬,陈思宁   

  1. 沈阳农业大学,天津市气候中心,天津市气候中心,天津市气候中心,天津市气候中心,沈阳农业大学 农学院,天津市气候中心
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-26 修回日期:2017-08-25 接受日期:2017-08-25 出版日期:2018-06-06 发布日期:2018-06-06
  • 通讯作者: 黎贞发
  • 基金资助:
    天津市农业科技成果转化与推广项目“温室小气候资源高效利用及蔬菜茬口搭配技术集成与应用”(201502150);天津市科委青年基金“日 光温室黄瓜霜霉病监测预警技术研究”(16JCQNJC14900);天津市气象局博士基金“日光温室番茄低温寡照影响评估与风险评价研究”(BSJJ201505)。

Temperature and Humidity Prediction Models in Solar Greenhouse: Comparative Analysis Based on Stepwise Regression and BP Neural Network

  • Received:2017-06-26 Revised:2017-08-25 Accepted:2017-08-25 Online:2018-06-06 Published:2018-06-06

摘要: 为构建较准确的日光温室温湿度预测模型,于2011-2013年冬季(1月、2月、12月)天津市宝坻区开展温室内外环境监测试验,并建立3种天气类型(晴、多云、阴)下3个时段(0-8时、8-17时、17-23时)逐步回归与BP神经网络温室内温湿度预测模型。结果表明:1)温室内气温逐步回归模型9种情况下模拟值与实际值的绝对误差小于3℃的平均准确率Rate(≤3℃)为88%,平均均方根误差(RMSE)为2℃;BP神经网络模型9种情况下模拟值与实际值的绝对误差小于3℃的平均准确率Rate(≤3℃)为94%,平均均方根误差(RMSE)为1.6℃。应用BP神经网络建立的气温预测模型相对更为准确稳定。2) 相对湿度逐步回归模型9种情况下模拟值与实际值的绝对误差小于6%的平均准确率Rate(≤6%)为81%,平均均方根误差(RMSE)为5.7%;BP神经网络模型9种情况下模拟值与实际值的绝对误差小于6%的平均准确率Rate(≤6%)为80%,平均均方根误差(RMSE)为6.7%。两类模型均不适宜预测8-17时日光温室相对湿度,而17-23时与0-8时应用逐步回归建立的湿度预测模型相对更准确稳定。

关键词: 水稻, 水稻, 基因组学, 文献计量学, WOS, SATI3.2

Abstract: To build a more accurate model for predicting temperature and humidity in solar greenhouse. The microclimatic observing experiment was carried out at Baodi District of Tianjin from 2011 to 2013 in winter (January, February and December). The temperature and humidity prediction models in geenhouse by using stepwise regression and BP neural network were established at 3 periods (0:00-8:00, 8:00-17:00, 17:00-23:00) of 3 kinds of weather types (sunny, cloudy, overcast). The results showed that: (1) the average accuracy rate of the absolute error of simulated and actual values less than 3℃ was 88%, and the root-mean-square error (REMS) was 2℃ under 9 conditions in greenhouse by using stepwise regression model of temperature, and the average accuracy rate of the absolute error of simulated and actual values less than 3℃ was 94%, and the root-mean-square error (RMES) was 1.6℃ under 9 conditions in greenhouse by using BP neural network model of temperature; the temperature prediction model established by BP neural network was more accurate and stable; (2) the average accuracy rate of the absolute error of simulated and actual values less than 6% was 81%, and the root-mean-square error (REMS) was 5.7% under 9 conditions in greenhouse by using stepwise regression model of relative humidity, and the average accuracy rate of the absolute error of simulated and actual values less than 6% was 80%, and the root-mean-square error (RMES) was 6.7% under 9 conditions in greenhouse by using BP neural network model of relative humidity. Both 2 models are not suitable for predicting the relative humidity of solar greenhouse at 8:00-17:00, while the humidity prediction model established by stepwise regression at 17:00-23:00 and 0:00-8:00 is more accurate and stable.hour,but the humidity prediction model established by stepwise regression at 17-23 hour and 0-8 hour is more accurate and stable.

中图分类号: