欢迎访问《中国农学通报》,

中国农学通报 ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 75-83.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17030095

所属专题: 资源与环境

• 资源 环境 生态 土壤 气象 • 上一篇    下一篇

陕西省资源环境承载力时空差异分析

王艳,刘引鸽   

  1. 宝鸡文理学院地理与环境学院2015级研究生班,宝鸡文理学院地理与环境学院
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-15 修回日期:2017-05-25 接受日期:2017-06-12 出版日期:2018-02-26 发布日期:2018-02-26
  • 通讯作者: 刘引鸽
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目“近200 年来渭河流域气候变化水文效应特征与机制研究”(41771048);国家社会科学基金项目“西北地区能源开 发利用生态效应综合测评与安全调控研究”(15XZZ012);陕西省重点实验室项目“渭河流域灾害生态风险变化模式及适应研究”(13JS010);宝鸡文理 学院重点项目“气候变化背景下区域环境变化模拟及响应研究”(ZK16061)。

The Spatial-temporal Difference Analysis of Resources and Environment Carrying Capacity in Shaanxi Province

  • Received:2017-03-15 Revised:2017-05-25 Accepted:2017-06-12 Online:2018-02-26 Published:2018-02-26

摘要: 利用陕西省资源、环境及社会经济数据,采用主成分分析方法建立了陕西省资源环境承载力评价指标体系,并提取了四个资源环境承载力主成分即资源供给、环境质量、社会经济和基础设施。通过ArcGIS 自然断点分级将承载力分为五个等级,即高承载地区、较高承载地区、中等承载地区、较低承载地区和低承载地区,分析了陕西资源环境承载力的时空特征。结果表明:综合承载力分布表现为关中高,陕北次之、陕南低的特征;资源供给承载能力关中最高,陕北中等,陕南承载能力最低;环境质量承载能力为渭南、榆林为属高承载力,安康及商洛最低;社会经济承载力陕北高,关中及陕南较低;基础设施承载力为宝鸡和咸阳高,铜川低。陕西省资源环境承载力空间分布不均,整体上各区域承载力表现出微弱的增加趋势,其中陕北地区承载力增加最大。陕西资源环境承载能力的变化与能源利用、耕地面积、工业废气排放量、人均GDP等因素密切相关。这些研究为区域经济和生态环境均衡发展规划提供了依据。

关键词: 西瓜, 西瓜, 新品种, SSR标记, 种子纯度, 特异性, 指纹图谱

Abstract: Based on the resources, environment and socio-economic data of Shaanxi Province, an evaluation index system of resource and environment carrying capacity was established by principal component analysis method. And four principal components of resource supply, environmental quality, socio- economic and infrastructure were extracted. The carrying capacity was divided into five grades that were high carrying capacity, relatively high carrying capacity, moderate carrying capacity, relatively low carrying capacity and low carrying capacity by ArcGIS natural breakpoint classification, then temporal and spatial characteristics of Shaanxi resources and environment carrying capacity were analyzed. The results showed that comprehensive carrying capacity was high in Guanzhong, followed by that in northern Shaanxi and was low in southern Shaanxi. The highest resource supply carrying capacity level was in Guanzhong, followed by that in northern Shaanxi, and the lowest was in southern Shaanxi. For environmental quality carrying capacity level, Weinan and Yulin had high carrying capacity, while Ankang and Shangluo had the lowest carrying capacity. The socio- economic carrying capacity was relatively low in Guanzhong and southern Shaanxi, and was high in northern Shaanxi. The carrying capacity of infrastructure was relatively high in Baoji and Xianyang, and it was low in Tongchuan. The spatial distribution of resources and environment carrying capacity of Shaanxi Province was uneven. As a whole, the carrying capacity of each region had a slight increase trend, among which northern Shaanxi had the greatest increase. The changes of resources and environment carrying capacity in Shaanxi were closely related to energy utilization, cultivated land area, industrial waste discharge and per capita GDP. The study can provide a basis for balanced development of regional economy and ecological environment.