中国农学通报 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (26): 24-31.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0477
收稿日期:
2021-05-07
修回日期:
2021-07-10
出版日期:
2021-09-15
发布日期:
2021-09-30
作者简介:
袁静,女,1995年出生,山东济南人,硕士研究生,研究方向:植物分子遗传。通信地址:311300 浙江省杭州市临安区武肃街666号 浙江农林大学林业与生物技术学院,Tel:0571-63743621,E-mail: 基金资助:
Received:
2021-05-07
Revised:
2021-07-10
Online:
2021-09-15
Published:
2021-09-30
摘要:
叶片是植物重要的营养器官,叶片的形成模式和发育涉及激素信号和转录因子间复杂遗传网络的调控。叶缘锯齿的产生是植物对不同环境长期适应的结果,对植物应对高温、干旱等逆境胁迫及响应光周期都有十分重要的作用。为了更清晰地认识植物叶缘锯齿的发育过程,本研究对植物叶缘锯齿形成过程中重要的调控因子及其调控机制进行了分类和总结。叶缘锯齿的发育受生长素、细胞分裂素、赤霉素等植物激素,NAM/CUC、TCP、SPL等转录因子,KNOX基因家族及其他调节因子的调控,并在单叶和复叶植物中表现出明显不同的调控模式。植物叶缘锯齿发育仍有很多未知的调控因子,因此,未来一个重要的研究方向就是要继续挖掘和鉴定更多参与植物叶缘锯齿发育的调控因子,并进一步解析其作用的分子机制,从而为今后通过调控叶形为其他作物性状改良提供理论依据。
中图分类号:
袁静, 周冰莹. 植物叶缘锯齿发育调控的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(26): 24-31.
Yuan Jing, Zhou Bingying. The Regulation of Leaf Margin Serration Development in Plants: A Review[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(26): 24-31.
[1] | 柯锦秀, 陈多, 郭延平. 植物叶缘形态的发育调控机理[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(9):74-83. |
[2] |
Wilson T P, Canny M J, Mccully M E. Leaf teeth, transpiration and the retrieval of apoplastic solutes in balsam poplar[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 2010, 83(2):225-232.
doi: 10.1111/ppl.1991.83.issue-2 URL |
[3] |
Vogel S. Leaves in the lowest and highest winds: temperature, force and shape[J]. The New Phytologist, 2009, 183(1):13-26.
doi: 10.1111/nph.2009.183.issue-1 URL |
[4] |
Peppe D J, Royer D L, Cariglino B, et al. Sensitivity of leaf size and shape to climate: global patterns and paleoclimatic applications[J]. The New Phytologist, 2011, 190(3):724-739.
doi: 10.1111/nph.2011.190.issue-3 URL |
[5] |
Semchenko M, Zobel K. The role of leaf lobation in elongation responses to shade in the rosette-forming forb Serratula tinctoria (Asteraceae)[J]. Annals of Botany, 2007, 100(1):83-90.
pmid: 17495981 |
[6] |
Higuchi Y, Kawakita A. Leaf shape deters plant processing by an herbivorous weevil[J]. Nature Plants, 2019, 5(9):959-964.
doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0505-x pmid: 31477889 |
[7] | 陈玉新. 基于局部特征的植物叶缘分类研究[D]. 杭州:浙江农林大学, 2014. |
[8] |
Tsukaya H. Leaf shape: genetic controls and environmental factors[J]. The International Journal of Developmental Biology, 2005, 49(5-6):547-555.
doi: 10.1387/ijdb.041921ht URL |
[9] |
Hay A, Barkoulas M, Tsiantis M. ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 and auxin activities converge to repress BREVIPEDICELLUS expression and promote leaf development in Arabidopsis[J]. Development, 2006, 133(20):3955-3961.
doi: 10.1242/dev.02545 URL |
[10] |
Scarpella E, Marcos D, Friml J, et al. Control of leaf vascular patterning by polar auxin transport[J]. Genes and Development, 2006, 20(8):1015-1027.
pmid: 16618807 |
[11] |
Kasprzewska A, Carter R, Swarup R, et al. Auxin influx importers modulate serration along the leaf margin[J]. The Plant Journal, 2015, 83(4):705-718.
doi: 10.1111/tpj.12921 pmid: 26111009 |
[12] |
Zhang J, Chen R, Xiao J, et al. A single-base deletion mutation in SlIAA9 gene causes tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) entire mutant[J]. Journal of Plant Research, 2007, 120(6):671-678.
doi: 10.1007/s10265-007-0109-9 URL |
[13] |
Koenig D, Bayer E, Kang J, et al. Auxin patterns Solanum lycopersicum leaf morphogenesis[J]. Development, 2009, 136(17):2997-3006.
doi: 10.1242/dev.033811 URL |
[14] | Tang Y, Zhao C Y. Arabidopsis type II phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase PI4Kγ5 regulates auxin biosynjournal and leaf margin development through interacting with membrane-bound transcription factor ANAC078[J]. PLoS Genetics, 2016, 12(8):e1006252. |
[15] |
Shani E, Ben-Gera H, Shleizer-Burko S, et al. Cytokinin regulates compound leaf development in tomato[J]. The Plant Cell, 2010, 22(10):3206-3217.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.078253 URL |
[16] |
Efroni I, Han S K, Kim H J, et al. Regulation of leaf maturation by chromatin-mediated modulation of cytokinin responses[J]. Developmental Cell, 2013, 24(4):438-445.
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.01.019 pmid: 23449474 |
[17] |
Hedden P. Gibberellin metabolism and its regulation[J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2001, 20(4):317-318.
doi: 10.1007/s003440010039 URL |
[18] |
Jasinski S, Tattersall A, Piazza P, et al. PROCERA encodes a DELLA protein that mediates control of dissected leaf form in tomato[J]. The Plant Journal, 2008, 56(4):603-612.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03628.x pmid: 18643984 |
[19] |
Yanai O, Shani E, Russ D, et al. Gibberellin partly mediates LANCEOLATE activity in tomato[J]. The Plant Journal, 2011, 68(4):571-582.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04716.x URL |
[20] |
Fleishon S, Shani E, Ori N, et al. Negative reciprocal interactions between gibberellin and cytokinin in tomato[J]. The New Phytologist, 2011, 190(3):609-617.
doi: 10.1111/nph.2011.190.issue-3 URL |
[21] |
Hay A, Kaur H, Phillips A, et al. The gibberellin pathway mediates KNOTTED1-type homeobox function in plants with different body plans[J]. Current Biology, 2002, 12(18):1557-1565.
doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01125-9 URL |
[22] |
Vroemen C W, Mordhorst A P, Albrecht C, et al. The CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON3 gene is required for boundary and shoot meristem formation in Arabidopsis[J]. The Plant Cell, 2003, 15(7):1563-1577.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.012203 URL |
[23] |
Laufs P, Peaucelle A, Morin H, et al. MicroRNA regulation of the CUC genes is required for boundary size control in Arabidopsis meristems[J]. Development, 2004, 131(17):4311-4322.
doi: 10.1242/dev.01320 URL |
[24] |
Nikovics K, Blein T, Peaucelle A, et al. The balance between the MIR164A and CUC2 genes controls leaf margin serration in Arabidopsis[J]. The Plant Cell, 2006, 18(11):2929-2945.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.045617 URL |
[25] |
Hasson A, Plessis A, Blein T, et al. Evolution and diverse roles of the CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON genes in Arabidopsis leaf development[J]. The Plant Cell, 2011, 23(1):54-68.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.081448 pmid: 21258003 |
[26] |
Blein T, Pulido A, Vialette-Guiraud A, et al. A conserved molecular framework for compound leaf development[J]. Science, 2008, 322(5909):1835-1839.
doi: 10.1126/science.1166168 URL |
[27] |
Berger Y, Harpaz-Saad S, Brand A, et al. The NAC-domain transcription factor GOBLET specifies leaflet boundaries in compound tomato leaves[J]. Development, 2009, 136(5):823-832.
doi: 10.1242/dev.031625 pmid: 19176589 |
[28] |
Busch A, Zachgo S. Flower symmetry evolution: towards understanding the abominable mystery of angiosperm radiation[J]. Bioessays, 2009, 31(11):1181-1190.
doi: 10.1002/bies.v31:11 URL |
[29] | Wang Z, Cui D, Hu Y. CIN-like TCP transcription factors: the key regulators of plant development and immunity[J]. Progress in Biochemistry and Biophysics, 2017, 44(3):215-223. |
[30] |
Palatnik J F, Allen E, Wu X, et al. Control of leaf morphogenesis by microRNAs[J]. Nature, 2003, 425(6955):257-263.
doi: 10.1038/nature01958 URL |
[31] |
Martin-Trillo M, Cubas P. TCP genes: a family snapshot ten years later[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2010, 15(1):31-39.
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.11.003 URL |
[32] |
Bresso E G, Chorostecki U, Rodriguez R E, et al. Spatial control of gene expression by miR319-regulated TCP transcription factors in leaf development[J]. Plant Physiology, 2018, 176(2):1694-1708.
doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00823 URL |
[33] |
Nath U, Crawford B C, Carpenter R, et al. Genetic control of surface curvature[J]. Science, 2003, 299(5611):1404-1407.
doi: 10.1126/science.1079354 URL |
[34] |
Ori N, Cohen A R, Etzioni A, et al. Regulation of LANCEOLATE by miR319 is required for compound-leaf development in tomato[J]. Nature Genetics, 2007, 39(6):787-791.
doi: 10.1038/ng2036 URL |
[35] |
Burko Y, Shleizer-Burko S, Yanai O, et al. A role for APETALA1/FRUITFULL transcription factors in tomato leaf development[J]. The Plant Cell, 2013, 25(6):2070-2083.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.113035 URL |
[36] |
Tao Q, Guo D, Wei B, et al. The TIE1 transcriptional repressor links TCP transcription factors with TOPLESS/TOPLESS-RELATED corepressors and modulates leaf development in Arabidopsis[J]. The Plant Cell, 2013, 25(2):421-437.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.109223 URL |
[37] |
Zhang J, Wei B, Yuan R, et al. The Arabidopsis RING-type E3 ligase TEAR1 controls leaf development by targeting the TIE1 transcriptional repressor for degradation[J]. The Plant Cell, 2017, 29(2):243-259.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00771 URL |
[38] |
Koyama T, Furutani M, Tasaka M, et al. TCP transcription factors control the morphology of shoot lateral organs via negative regulation of the expression of boundary-specific genes in Arabidopsis[J]. The Plant Cell, 2007, 19(2):473-484.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.044792 URL |
[39] |
Koyama T, Mitsuda N, Seki M, et al. TCP transcription factors regulate the activities of ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 and miR164, as well as the auxin response, during differentiation of leaves in Arabidopsis[J]. The Plant Cell, 2010, 22(11):3574-3588.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.075598 URL |
[40] |
Rubio-Somoza I, Zhou C M, Confraria A, et al. Temporal control of leaf complexity by miRNA-regulated licensing of protein complexes[J]. Current Biology, 2014, 24(22):2714-2719.
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.058 pmid: 25448000 |
[41] |
Wu G, Park M Y, Conway S R, et al. The sequential action of miR156 and miR172 regulates developmental timing in Arabidopsis[J]. Cell, 2009, 138(4):750-759.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.031 URL |
[42] |
Hay A, Tsiantis M. KNOX genes: versatile regulators of plant development and diversity[J]. Development, 2010, 137(19):3153-3165.
doi: 10.1242/dev.030049 URL |
[43] |
Hake S, Smith H M, Holtan H, et al. The role of KNOX genes in plant development[J]. Annual review of cell and developmental biology, 2004, 20:125-151.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.031803.093824 URL |
[44] | 马燕. 水稻OsAS2基因的分离及其在拟南芥和水稻中的功能分析[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2007. |
[45] |
Hay A, Jackson D, Ori N, et al. Analysis of the competence to respond to KNOTTED1 activity in Arabidopsis leaves using a steroid induction system[J]. Plant Physiology, 2003, 131(4):1671-1680.
doi: 10.1104/pp.102.017434 URL |
[46] |
Piazza P, Bailey C D, Cartolano M, et al. Arabidopsis thaliana leaf form evolved via loss of KNOX expression in leaves in association with a selective sweep[J]. Current Biology, 2010, 20(24):2223-2228.
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.037 pmid: 21129970 |
[47] |
Byrne M E, Barley R, Curtis M, et al. Asymmetric leaves1 mediates leaf patterning and stem cell function in Arabidopsis[J]. Nature, 2000, 408(6815):967-971.
doi: 10.1038/35050091 URL |
[48] |
Spinelli S V, Martin A P, Viola I L, et al. A mechanistic link between STM and CUC1 during Arabidopsis development[J]. Plant Physiology, 2011, 156(4):1894-1904.
doi: 10.1104/pp.111.177709 pmid: 21685178 |
[49] |
Hay A, Tsiantis M. The genetic basis for differences in leaf form between Arabidopsis thaliana and its wild relative Cardamine hirsute[J]. Nature Genetics, 2006, 38(8):942-947.
doi: 10.1038/ng1835 URL |
[50] |
Shani E, Burko Y, Ben-Yaakov L, et al. Stage-specific regulation of Solanum lycopersicum leaf maturation by class 1 KNOTTED1-LIKE HOMEOBOX proteins[J]. The Plant Cell, 2009, 21(10):3078-3092.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.068148 URL |
[51] | 袁亚钦. SlAS2和SlTKN3调控番茄果实发育的功能研究[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2019. |
[52] |
Kumar R, Kushalappa K, Godt D, et al. The Arabidopsis BEL1-LIKE HOMEODOMAIN proteins SAW1 and SAW2 act redundantly to regulate KNOX expression spatially in leaf margins[J]. The Plant Cell, 2007, 19(9):2719-2735.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.048769 URL |
[53] |
Bar M, Ori N. Compound leaf development in model plant species[J]. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2015, 23:61-69.
doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2014.10.007 URL |
[54] |
Kimura S, Koenig D, Kang J, et al. Natural variation in leaf morphology results from mutation of a novel KNOX gene[J]. Current Biology, 2008, 18(9):672-677.
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.008 URL |
[55] |
Borghi L, Bureau M, Simon R. Arabidopsis JAGGED LATERAL ORGANS is expressed in boundaries and coordinates KNOX and PIN activity[J]. The Plant Cell, 2007, 19(6):1795-1808.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.047159 URL |
[56] |
Bar M, Ori N. Leaf development and morphogenesis[J]. Development, 2014, 141(22):4219-4230.
doi: 10.1242/dev.106195 URL |
[57] |
Champagne C E, Goliber T E, Wojciechowski M F, et al. Compound leaf development and evolution in the legumes[J]. The Plant Cell, 2007, 19(11):3369-3378.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.052886 URL |
[58] |
Ge L, Peng J, Berbel A, et al. Regulation of compound leaf development by PHANTASTICA in Medicago truncatula[J]. Plant Physiology, 2014, 164(1):216-228.
doi: 10.1104/pp.113.229914 URL |
[59] |
Dong Z C, Zhao Z, Liu C W, et al. Floral patterning in Lotus japonicas[J]. Plant Physiology, 2005, 137(4):1272-1282.
doi: 10.1104/pp.104.054288 URL |
[60] |
Lee I, Wolfe D S, Nilsson O, et al. A LEAFY co-regulator encoded by UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS[J]. Current Biology, 1997, 7(2):95-104.
pmid: 9016705 |
[61] |
Taylor S, Hofer J, Murfet I. Stamina pistilloida, the pea ortholog of Fim and UFO, is required for normal development of flowers, inflorescences, and leaves[J]. The Plant Cell, 2001, 13(1):31-46.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.13.1.31 URL |
[62] |
Shpak E D. Diverse roles of ERECTA family genes in plant development[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2013, 55(12):1238-1250.
doi: 10.1111/jipb.12108 URL |
[63] |
Tameshige T, Okamoto S, Tasaka M, et al. Impact of erecta mutation on leaf serration differs between Arabidopsis accessions[J]. Plant Signaling and Behavior, 2016, 11(12):e1261231.
doi: 10.1080/15592324.2016.1261231 URL |
[64] |
Chen M K, Wilson R L, Palme K, et al. ERECTA family genes regulate auxin transport in the shoot apical meristem and forming leaf primordia[J]. Plant Physiology, 2013, 162(4):1978-1991.
doi: 10.1104/pp.113.218198 URL |
[65] |
Tameshige T, Okamoto S, Lee J S, et al. A secreted peptide and its receptors shape the auxin response pattern and leaf margin morphogenesis[J]. Current Biology, 2016, 26(18):2478-2485.
doi: S0960-9822(16)30765-5 pmid: 27593376 |
[66] |
Kim Y S, Kim S G, Park J E, et al. A membrane-bound NAC transcription factor regulates cell division in Arabidopsis[J]. The Plant Cell, 2006, 18(11):3132-3144.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.043018 URL |
[67] |
Ehsan H, Reichheld J P, Roe D J L. TOUSLED kinase activity oscillates during the cell cycle and interacts with chromatin regulators[J]. Plant Physiology, 2004, 134(4):1488-1499.
doi: 10.1104/pp.103.038117 URL |
[68] |
Engelhorn J, Reimer J J, Leuz I, et al. Development-related PcG target in the apex 4 controls leaf margin architecture in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Development, 2012, 139(14):2566-2575.
doi: 10.1242/dev.078618 pmid: 22675210 |
[1] | 关思静, 高静, 徐蓉蓉, 葛甜甜, 王楠, 颜永刚, 张岗, 陈莹, 刘阿萍, 程萌格. 甘草生长素反应因子(ARF)基因家族的鉴定及表达分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(29): 20-27. |
[2] | 司贺龙,刘玉卫,张金林,谷俊涛,刘 莉,李明慧. 生长素和赤霉素对刺果瓜幼苗生长发育的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(27): 65-71. |
[3] | 李晓屿,Ralf Müller-Xing,Shahid Khan,郑玉彩,李玉花,邢 倩. 植物叶缘锯齿发育的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(1): 50-56. |
[4] | 邹锋康,王秋红,周建朝,丁广洲. 生长素调节植物生长发育的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(24): 34-40. |
[5] | 李俊男,燕晓杰,李枢航,张荣沭. 植物的AUX/IAA基因家族研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(15): 89-92. |
[6] | 胡丽丽 马荣金 刘亚丽 曹辰兴. GA3与IAA对‘银杏叶’黄瓜突变体生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(22): 228-231. |
[7] | 于淑惠 闫辉 左曼曼 郎庆雯 樊金会. 毛白杨生长素载体蛋白基因PtAUX1超表达的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(16): 42-46. |
[8] | 王 蓉,阎春霞. 啤酒花组培苗生根移栽培养试验研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25(16): 184-186. |
[9] | 叶梅荣,朱昌华,甘立军,夏 凯. 激素间相互作用对植物茎伸长生长的调控综述[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(4): 228-228. |
[10] | 祁德富,马明呈,李 军. 4种植物生长激素对大果沙棘温室扦插成活率的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(1): 238-238. |
[11] | 郭芳军,韩锦峰,张建忠. 喷施生长素对烤烟酶活性和化学成分的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2006, 22(8): 279-279. |
[12] | 王 蓉,顾建新,何 梅. 葡萄组培苗瓶外生根技术研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2006, 22(11): 75-75. |
[13] | 黄爱缨,王三根. 原位杂交组织化学方法鉴定玉米根尖内源生长素 对根冠特定基因正常表达的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2006, 22(1): 26-26. |
[14] | 刘颖慧,袁进成,抗艳红. 激素调控植物顶端优势的分子生物学进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(3): 86-86. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||