欢迎访问《中国农学通报》，
中国农学通报

中国农学通报 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (20): 154-157.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2023-0881

• 水产·渔业 • 上一篇    下一篇

‘红福瑞鲤2号’和‘福瑞鲤2号’稻田养殖生长性能对比

廖梦香1(), 杨晓燕2, 薛凌展1, 陈度煌1, 樊海平1(), 张树兴3   

  1. 1 福建省淡水水产研究所，福州 350002
    2 武夷山市水产技术推广站，福建武夷山 354300
    3 武夷山市岚谷乡岚峰稻花鱼养殖农民专业合作社，福建武夷山 354311
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-25 修回日期:2024-03-19 出版日期:2024-07-15 发布日期:2024-07-11
  • 通讯作者:
    樊海平，男，1967年出生，江苏武进人，研究员，硕士，主要从事水产养殖和病害研究。通信地址：350002 福建省福州市鼓楼区西洪路555号 福建省淡水水产研究所，Tel：0591-83732007，E-mail：。
  • 作者简介:

    廖梦香，女，1990年出生，福建顺昌人，助理农艺师，硕士，主要从事水产养殖与遗传育种研究。通信地址：350002 福建省福州市鼓楼区西洪路555号 福建省淡水水产研究所，Tel：0591-83793917，E-mail：。

  • 基金资助:
    国家大宗淡水鱼产业技术体系项目福州综合试验站(CARS-45-41); 2023年度福建省海洋服务与渔业高质量发展专项“稻花鱼预制菜加工关键技术的研究与应用”(FJHY-YYKJ-2023-2-6)

Comparative Analysis for Growth of ‘Red FFRC No.2 Strain Common Carp’ and ‘FFRC No.2 Strain Common Carp’ in Paddy Field Aquaculture

LIAO Mengxiang1(), YANG Xiaoyan2, XUE Lingzhan1, CHEN Duhuang1, FAN Haiping1(), ZHANG Shuxing3   

  1. 1 Freshwater Fisheries Research Institute of Fujian, Fuzhou 350002
    2 Aquatic Technology Extension Station of Wuyishan City, Wuyishan, Fujian 354300
    3 Lanfeng Farmers’ Professional Cooperatives for Paddy Field Fish Breeding of Langu Township, Wuyishan, Fujian 354311
  • Received:2023-12-25 Revised:2024-03-19 Published:2024-07-15 Online:2024-07-11

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

40

摘要：

研究旨在评估‘红福瑞鲤2号’在福建山区稻田养殖的可行性，并与‘福瑞鲤2号’进行比较以确定其潜在的优势。于2023年8—10月，在武夷山市岚谷乡岚峰稻花鱼养殖基地进行了生长性能对比试验。采用同塘比较法对‘红福瑞鲤2号’和‘福瑞鲤2号’在投饵和不投饵稻田养殖模式下进行生长性能对比分析。经过60 d的养殖试验，结果显示，在相同沟凼式稻田养殖条件下，无论投饵与否，‘红福瑞鲤2号’的成活率、体质量绝对增长率、体质量相对增长率、体质量特定生长率和产量均明显低于‘福瑞鲤2号’。投饵养殖模式下‘红福瑞鲤2号’和‘福瑞鲤2号’的体质量绝对增长率、体质量相对增长率、体质量特定生长率、体长绝对增长率、体长相对增长率和体长特定生长率均明显高于不投饵养殖模式；而在不投饵养殖模式下，‘红福瑞鲤2号’终末和初始平均体质量、平均体长均不存在显著差异。综上所述，初步研究结果表明，在当前的武夷山山区稻田养殖条件下，‘红福瑞鲤2号’相较于‘福瑞鲤2号’并没有表现出生长优势。这一发现为该地区稻田养殖鱼类品种的选择提供了试验参考。

关键词: ‘红福瑞鲤2号’, ‘福瑞鲤2号’, 稻田养殖, 生长性能, 福建山区

Abstract:

In order to evaluate the feasibility of the cultivation of ‘red FFRC No.2 strain common carp’ (red FFRC No.2 carp, rFRC) in paddy fields in mountainous areas of Fujian Province and the potential advantages in comparison with ‘FFRC No.2 strain common carp’ (FFRC No.2 carp, FRC), the growth performance comparative test of rFRC and FRC was compared by using the same pond comparison method under the baited and non-baited paddy cultivation mode from August to October 2023 in Lanfeng Paddy Fish Breeding Base, Langu Township, Wuyishan City. The experimental results showed that the survival rate, absolute growth rate of body weight, relative growth rate of body weight, specific growth rate of body weight and yield of rFRC were significantly lower than that of FRC after 60 days of comparative culture in the same ditch style paddy field, no matter feeding or not. The absolute growth rate of body weight, relative growth rate of body weight, specific growth rate of body weight, absolute growth rate of body length, relative growth rate of body length and specific growth rate of body length of rFRC and FRC under feeding aquaculture mode were significantly higher than those of unfeeding aquaculture mode. There was no significant difference between the final and initial average body weight and average body length of rFRC under unfeeding aquaculture mode. The results preliminary showed that under the existing paddy cultivation conditions in Wuyishan mountain area, rFRC had no growth advantages compared with FRC. This finding provided experimental reference for the selection of fish species cultivated in paddy fields in this area.

Key words: ‘red FFRC No.2 strain common carp’, ‘FFRC No.2 strain common carp’, paddy culture, growth performance, Fujian mountainous areas