欢迎访问《中国农学通报》，
中国农学通报

中国农学通报 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (13): 152-157.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0462

• 植物保护·农药 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同药剂及助剂对番茄潜叶蛾的田间防治效果

王帅宇1(), 王胤1, 付思蕊2, 魏书军3, 陈金翠3, 曹金娟1, 李锦4, 张爱环2(), 李琳1()   

  1. 1 北京市植物保护站，北京 100029
    2 北京农学院生物与资源环境学院，北京 102206
    3 北京市农林科学院植物保护研究所，北京 100097
    4 昌平区植保植检站，北京 102299
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-15 修回日期:2025-01-19 出版日期:2025-05-05 发布日期:2025-05-07
  • 通讯作者:
    张爱环，女，1978年出生，山西孝义人，副教授，博士，主要从事农作物害虫监测与防控工作。通信地址：102206北京市昌平区北农路7号 北京农学院生物与资源环境学院，Tel：010-80799135，E-mail：。
    李琳，女，1979年出生，河南周口人，正高级农艺师，博士，主要从事农作物病虫监测与防控工作。通信地址：100029 北京市西城区北三环中路9号 北京市植物保护站，Tel：010-82078939。E-mail：。
  • 作者简介:

    王帅宇，女，1979年出生，山西长治人，正高级农艺师，博士，主要从事农作物病虫监测与防控工作。通信地址：100029 北京市西城区北三环中路9号 北京市植物保护站，Tel：010-82078939，E-mail：。

  • 基金资助:
    现代农业产业技术体系北京市设施蔬菜创新团队(BAIC01-2024-17)

Field Control Effect of Different Pesticides and Adjuvants on Tuta absoluta

WANG Shuaiyu1(), WANG Yin1, FU Sirui2, WEI Shujun3, CHEN Jincui3, CAO Jinjuan1, LI Jin4, ZHANG Aihuan2(), LI Lin1()   

  1. 1 Beijing Plant Protection Station, Beijing 100029
    2 College of Bioscience and Resource Environment, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 102206
    3 Institute of Plant Protection, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097
    4 Changping Plant Protection and Quarantine Station, Beijing 102299
  • Received:2024-07-15 Revised:2025-01-19 Published:2025-05-05 Online:2025-05-07

RichHTML

1

PDF (PC)

5

摘要： 国内关于药剂对番茄潜叶蛾防效的研究较少且同一药剂的防效也有差异，田间应急防治选药难。本研究采用随机区组法比较9种药剂、4种剂型及2种助剂共19种处理喷雾对番茄潜叶蛾的田间防效。结果表明，药后1、3 d不同药剂防效整体从高到低为30%虫螨·氯苯纳米SE>60 g/L乙基多杀菌素SC>5%溴虫氟苯双酰胺SC>10%虫螨腈SC>5%氯虫苯甲酰胺SC>5%甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐ME>32000 IU/mg苏云金杆G033A WP，5%甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐纳米SE与5%甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐ME防效接近，32000 IU/mg苏云金杆菌PS3 WP与32000 IU/mg苏云金杆菌G033A WP防效接近。药后7 d各药剂对番茄潜叶蛾的防治效果与药后1、3 d趋势基本一致，仅32000 IU/mg苏云金杆菌G033A WP和32000 IU/mg苏云金杆菌PS3 WP防效上升，优于5%甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐纳米SE和5%甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐ME。同一药剂与助剂组合防效从高到低为药剂+非离子醇醚类助剂>药剂+卵磷脂助剂>药剂。除2种有效成分为苏云金杆菌的药剂施药后7 d防效明显高于药后1、3 d外，其他药剂施药后7 d防效较1、3 d低。30%虫螨·氯苯纳米SE及与助剂组合使用防效均高于89.96%，速效性和持效性均最好，60 g/L乙基多杀菌素SC、10%虫螨腈SC、5%溴虫氟苯双酰胺SC对番茄潜叶蛾防效显著优于5%氯虫苯甲酰胺SC；5%氯虫苯甲酰胺SC防效显著优于32000 IU/mg苏云金杆菌G033A WP和32000 IU/mg苏云金杆菌PS3 WP及5%甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐纳米SE和5%甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐ME。30%虫螨·氯苯纳米SE、60 g/L乙基多杀菌素SC、10%虫螨腈SC、5%溴虫氟苯双酰胺SC、5%氯虫苯甲酰胺SC、32000 IU/mg苏云金杆菌G033A WP、32000 IU/mg苏云金杆菌PS3 WP及5%甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐纳米SE和5%甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐ME均可作为防治潜叶蛾的备选药剂，添加助剂可明显提升防效。

关键词: 番茄潜叶蛾, 杀虫剂, 助剂, 剂型, 田间防效, 速效性, 持效性

Abstract:

There are few studies on the effectiveness of pesticides against tomato leaf miner in China, and it is difficult to select pesticide for emergency control in the field due to the differences of control efficacy of the same pesticide. We compared the effect of 9 different pesticdes, 4 formulations and 2 adjuvants in 19 treatments against tomato leaf miner in the field by plant spraying using the random block method. The results at 1, 3 d after the spraying showed that the control effect of different pesticides was 30% chlorfenapyr-chlorantraniliprole nano-SE> 60 g/L spinetoram SC> 5% broflanilide SC> 10% chlorfenapyr SC> 5% chlorantraniliprole SC> 5% emamectin benzoate ME> 32000 IU/mg Bacillus thuringiensis G033A WP. The control effect of 5% emamectin benzoate ME and 5% emamectin benzoate nano-SE is close，the control effect of 32000 IU/mg B. thuringiensis PS3 WP is close to B. thuringiensis G033A WP. The control effect on tomato leaf miner at 7 d was mostly the same as that at 1, 3 d after spraying pesticides, only the control effect of two pesticides of the same active ingredients of B. thuringiensis at 7 d after the spraying were superior to that of two pesticides of the same active ingredients of emamectin benzoate. The overall control effect of the same agent and adjuvants combination, from high to low, was pesticide+ nonionic alcohol ether adjuvants> pesticide+ lecithin adjuvants> pesticide. Except for B. thuringiensis, 7 d post-dose effect of which was significantly higher than that of 1 d and 3 d after spraying, the 7 d effect of other agents showed a decreasing trend compared with that of 1 d and 3 d. The effect of different treatment of 30% chlorfenapyr-chlorantraniliprole nano-SE was all higher than 89.96%, with the best, rapid and persistent efficacy. The effect of 60 g/L spinetoram SC, 5% broflanilide SC, 10% chlorfenapyr SC was significantly better than that of 5% chlorantraniliprole SC, and the effect of 5% chlorantraniliprole SC was significantly better than that of 32000 IU/mg B. thuringiensis G033A WP, 32000 IU/mg B. thuringiensis PS3 WP and 5% emamectin benzoate nano-SE, 5% emamectin benzoate ME on the tomato leaf miner. 30% chlorfenapyr-chlorantraniliprole nano-SE, 60 g/L spinetoram SC, 5% broflanilide SC, 10% chlorfenapyr SC, 5% chlorantraniliprole SC, 5% emamectin benzoate nano-SE, 5% emamectin benzoate ME, 32000 IU/mg B. thuringiensis G033A WP and 32000 IU/mg B. thuringiensis PS3 WP can be used alternatively for the control of tomato leaf miner, and the addition of adjuvants can significantly improve the control effect of pesticides.

Key words: tomato leaf miner, insecticides, adjuvants, formulations, field control effect, rapid efficacy, persistent efficacy