欢迎访问《中国农学通报》,

中国农学通报 ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (20): 271-277.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15010126

所属专题: 现代农业发展与乡村振兴

• 三农研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

重庆农村新型股份合作社发育动因研究——基于重庆 500户农户和 100位基层干部的调查数据

肖 轶   

  1. (重庆工商大学旅游与国土资源学院,重庆 400067)
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-19 修回日期:2015-05-06 接受日期:2015-05-14 出版日期:2015-07-28 发布日期:2015-07-28
  • 通讯作者: 肖轶
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市教委科学技术研究资助项目“重庆农村新型股份合作社发育动因、绩效评价与长效机制研究”(KJ130728);教育部人文社科青年基金项目“三峡库区农户兼业行为及其对农村生态环境的影响评价”(13YJCZH207);国家自然科学基金资助项目“乡村旅游对三峡库区移民农户生计策略及可持续性的影响研究”(41301654);重庆工商大学科研启动经费资助项目“综合国土整治对区域土地可持续利用影响分析——基于重庆市大路镇的实证研究”(2013-56-07);教育部人文社科青年基金项目“重庆地区洪旱灾害综合风险评估及风险管理对策研究”(13YJCZH268)。

Research of Development Motivation of New Type Rural Share Cooperative in Chongqing——Based on Survey Data of 500 Households and 100 Grassroots Cadres

Xiao Yi   

  1. (College of Tourism and Land Resources, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067)
  • Received:2015-01-19 Revised:2015-05-06 Accepted:2015-05-14 Online:2015-07-28 Published:2015-07-28

摘要: 为了探索出适合城乡统筹区域的新农村股份合作社,基于重庆市12个县(市、区)的500户农户和100位基层干部的随机抽样调查数据,从制度经济学的角度研究重庆农村新型股份合作社的发育动因。结果表明:(1)农业经济效益低下,城乡居民收入差距大是合作社制度创新的根本原因;(2)作为农业的最直接生产和经营者的农户,认为通过组建或参与农村新型股份合作社,能够给他们带来较高的并且稳定的收益,因此农户便很容易地自愿组成一个个的初级行动团体,共同追逐更多的外部利润;(3)样本区大多数基层干部认为农村新型股份合作社是促进资源整合、提升农业产业化经营水平、加快新农村建设的有效途径。由此可见,无论是初级行动团体还是次级行动团体都对农村新型股份合作社表现出积极的参与意愿,农村新型股份合作社这种制度创新必将发生。

关键词: 甘薯, 甘薯, 砂姜黑土, 钾肥品种, 肥料运筹

Abstract: In order to explore a new rural cooperative in urban and rural areas, this study researched development motivation of new type rural share cooperative in Chongqing based on random sample survey data of 500 households and 100 grassroots cadres in 12 counties (cities, districts) from the perspective of institutional economics. The results showed that low economic efficiency of agriculture and the income gap between urban and rural residents were the root causes of cooperative system innovation. As the most direct producer and operator of agriculture, farmers thought that they could get high and stable income through the formation of new type rural share cooperative. Thus, farmers tended to form a primary action group to chase more external profits. Most rural grassroots cadres believed that new type rural share cooperative was an effective way to promote the integration of resources, improve the level of agricultural industrial management and speed up the construction of new countryside. Thus, both primary and secondary action group showed the willingness to participate actively, and a new type of rural share cooperative system innovation will come out.