有机肥施用对烟草光合特性的影响

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16030041

中国农学通报 ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (28): 47-51.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16030041

所属专题：烟草种植与生产

有机肥施用对烟草光合特性的影响

杨德廉¹,李祥英²,赵文超²,管恩森¹,田海东¹,王大海¹,高凯¹,刘振宇²

(¹山东潍坊烟草有限公司,山东潍坊 261205；²山东农业大学植物保护学院,山东泰安 271018）

收稿日期:2016-03-04 修回日期:2016-03-31 接受日期:2016-04-21 出版日期:2016-10-11 发布日期:2016-10-11
通讯作者: 刘振宇
基金资助:
山东潍坊烟草有限公司重点科研项目“有机肥对烟田土壤改良效果评价”(WY2015-2)。

Influence of Organic Fertilizers on Photosynthesis of Tobacco

Yang Delian¹, Li Xiangying², Zhao Wenchao², Guan Ensen¹, Tian Haidong¹, Wang Dahai¹, Gao Kai¹, Liu Zhenyu²

(¹Weifang Tobacco Company of Shandong Province, Weifang Shandong 261205;²College of Plant Protection Institute, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian Shandong 271018)

Received:2016-03-04 Revised:2016-03-31 Accepted:2016-04-21 Online:2016-10-11 Published:2016-10-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究烟田施用有机肥对烟草生长特性的影响，笔者以5种不同类型有机肥和常规化肥为处理，测定了烟草叶片光合作用的差异。研究发现：在测量时间点，施用发酵豆饼的烟草叶片净光合速率(Pn)、水分利用效率(WUE)、瞬时光能利用率(SUE)、瞬时羧化速率值(CUE)均高于其它处理，分别为23.97 μmol/(m²·s)、8.5302、0.1354 mol/(m²·s)和0.0145；而施用烟草秸秆处理的多项指标值均低于其它处理，其中净光合速率只有施用化肥处理的80.00%，是施用发酵豆饼处理的72.55%；以畜禽粪便为主要成分的两种复合有机肥、发酵牛粪对烟草气孔导度、水分利用率影响有差异，其它指标差异不显著。可见，不同肥料施用对烟草的光合特性的影响存在明显差异，除烟草秸秆有机肥外，其他有机肥施用均能保证烟草有良好的光合和蒸腾作用，反映出有机肥除了提供肥分外，还可能存在改土效果。该研究对长期连作和大量化肥施用的烟田土壤改良，具有可能的重要意义。

关键词: 暴雨, 暴雨, 物理量, 对比分析

Abstract: In order to explore the influence of organic fertilizer application on tobacco growth, treatments of five types of organic fertilizers and one conventional chemical fertilizer were conducted, and the difference of photosynthesis of tobacco was analyzed. The results showed that at the testing time, the net photosynthetic rate (Pn), water use efficiency (WUE), transient light energy utilization efficiency (SUE) and transient carboxylation rate (CUE) of fermented bean cake treatment were higher than that of other treatments, the value of the above indexes was 23.97 μmol/(m²·s), 8.5302, 0.1354 mol/(m²·s) and 0.0145, respectively. However, all the indexes of tobacco straw treatment were lower than that of other treatments, whose Pn was only 80.00% of that of the chemical fertilizer treatment and 72.55% of that of bean cake fertilizer treatment. There were differences of stomatal conductance (Gs) and WUE between the two organic fertilizer treatments of livestock waste and the fermented cow dung, and the difference of other indexes was not significant. In conclusion, there were significantly different influences of fertilizers on tobacco photosynthesis, all the organic fertilizers could keep fine photosynthesis and transpiration except the treatment of tobacco straw. The results implied that organic fertilizers not only provided nutriment, but also had the effect of soil improvement. This study has certain significance to soil improvement in tobacco field with long term continuous cropping and large amount of chemical fertilizer application.

杨德廉,李祥英,赵文超,管恩森,田海东,田海东、王大海,王大海,高凯,刘振宇. 有机肥施用对烟草光合特性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(28): 47-51.

Yang Delian,Li Xiangying,Zhao Wenchao,Guan Ensen,Tian Haidong,,Wang Dahai,Gao Kai and Liu Zhenyu. Influence of Organic Fertilizers on Photosynthesis of Tobacco[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(28): 47-51.

参考文献

[1] 张继光,申国明,张久权,等.烟草连作障碍研究进展[J].中国烟草科学,2011,32(3):95-98.
[2] 危跃,彭海峰,屠乃美,等.烟草肥效调控研究进展[J].作物研究,2008,22(05):480-485.
[3] Maguire R O, Sims J T. Observations on leaching and subsurface transport of phosphorus on the Delmarva Peninsula[C].USA: International Phosphorus Transfer Workshop,2001:20-26.
[4] Alwyn W, Gunnar B, Katarina H. The effects of 55 years of different inorganic fertilizer regimes on soil properties and microbial community composition[J].Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2013,67:41-46.
[5] Kaiser M, Eller rock R H. Functional characterization of soil organic matter fractions different in solubility originating from a long-term field experiment[J].Gendarme,2005,127(2-4):196-206.
[6] 刘睿,王正银,朱洪霞.中国有机肥料研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2007,23(01):310-313.
[7] Liu E, Teclemariam S G, Yan C, et al. Long - term effects of no- tillage management practice on soil organic carbon and its fractions in the northern China[J].Geoderma,2014,213:379-384.
[8] Blanco-Canqui H, Lal R. Soil structure and organic carbon relationships following 10 years of wheat straw management in no-till[J].Soil &.Tillage Research,2007.95(1-2):240-254.
[9] 韩晓日,郑国砥,刘晓燕,等.有机肥与化肥配合施用土壤微生物量氮动态、来源和供氮特征[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(4):765-772.
[10] Kaiser M, Ellerbrock R H. Functional characterization of soil organic matter fractions different in solubility originating from a long-term field experiment[J].Geoderma,2005,127(2-4):196-206.
[11] Blake L, Goulding K W T, Mott C J B, et al. Changes in soil chemistry accompanying acidification over more than 100 years under woodland and grass at Roth Amsted Experimental Station UK[J].European Journal of Soil Science,1999,50:401-412.
[12] 刘雪琴,仝瑞建,石孝均,等.不同品种有机肥对烤烟产量和品质的影响[J].中国农学通报,2013,29(25):151-155.
[13] 彭志良,黄元炯,刘顺国,等.不同有机肥对烟田土壤微生物以及烟叶品质和产量的影响[J].中国烟草学报,2009(02):41-45.
[14] 王立刚,李维炯,邱建军,等.生物有机肥对作物生长、土壤肥力及产量的效应研究[J].土壤肥料,2004(5):12-16.
[15] 符云鹏,温玉转,王德华,等.不同肥料配施对香料烟燃烧性及质量的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2011,32(3):66-71.
[16] Hui J A, Ye Q S. Effects of elevated CO₂ concentration on photosynthesis, growth and development of the bromeliad guzmania[J].Journal of Plant Ecology,2008,32(2):424-430.
[17] 刘彦中,纪鹏,陈宗瑜.UV-B辐射滤减处理对烤烟光合特性的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2011,32(3):41-45.
[18] 郭丽琢,张福锁,李春俭.打顶对烟草生长、钾素吸收及其分配的影响[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(7):819-822.
[19] 金云峰,王莎莎,张建波,等.生长温度对不同生育期烟草叶片光合作用及质体色素代谢的影响[J].中国农学通报,2015,31(22):57-74.
[20] 叶胜兰,徐福利,王渭玲,等.不同有机肥对黄土丘陵区梨枣生长、光合特性及果实品质的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2013,19(2):370-378.
[21] Paunescu A D. The influence of the mixed and organic fertilization on the soil biology yield and quality of Oriental tobacco[J].CORESTA,1997(2):86.
[22] 王晓娟,贾志宽,梁连友,等.不同有机肥量对旱地玉米光合特性和产量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(2):419-425.
[23] 杨云高,王树林,刘国,等.生物有机肥对烤烟产质量及土壤改良的影响[J].中国烟草科学,2012,33(4):70-74.
[24] 王铎,晋艳,杨焕文,等.有机肥对烤烟部分生理指标的影响[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(6):131-135.

有机肥施用对烟草光合特性的影响

Influence of Organic Fertilizers on Photosynthesis of Tobacco

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

[1]	崔雅楠, 杨臻, 乔璐, 许玉艳, 韩刚, 程波, 穆迎春. 中国与主要贸易国水产品中渔用抗菌药残留限量标准和管理措施对比分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(36): 155-164.
[2]	高雷, 高春香, 杨玉辉. 内蒙古兴安盟基于激光测距的作物冠层高度研究现状[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(22): 139-142.
[3]	吴婧婧, 周晓玲, 董桂清, 陆春霞, 梁贵秋, 陈枝, 陆飞, 毛洪斌, 石韡韬. 3种不同广西家蚕品种幼虫培养蚕虫草的对比分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(8): 105-110.
[4]	张树民, 吴海英, 陈聪, 王坤, 吴彩霞, 顾沛澍. 不同高度冷空气侵入登陆台风暴雨过程对比分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(17): 108-117.
[5]	缪明榕, 王辉, 吴锐涛, 丁伟, 赵成诚. 称重式降水传感器与翻斗雨量传感器测雨性能对比分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(14): 142-147.
[6]	欧徽宁, 黎馨, 周渭. 2018年6月12日广西暴雨预报失误分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(10): 122-126.
[7]	赵全宁,张调风,段丽君,时兴合. 青藏高原东部强降温过程阈值的探讨及其气候特征[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(7): 110-116.
[8]	王萍,李秀芬,杨晓强,纪仰慧,王晾晾,季生太,姜丽霞. 生长季降水对黑龙江省水稻生产的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(6): 62-69.
[9]	陈良正. 云南高原特色现代农业产业经济分析研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(30): 155-164.
[10]	杨昭明,李万志,冯晓莉,余迪. 气候变暖背景下青海汛期暴雨洪涝及次生灾害风险评估[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(3): 131-138.
[11]	张峰,路亚奇,刘翔,赵玉娟. 黄土高原地带连续性暴雨特征分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(29): 123-128.
[12]	韩晓. 台风“海棠”减弱后影响潍坊的暴雨特征分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(19): 107-111.
[13]	张维胜. 翻斗式雨量传感器不同高度降水量数据对比分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(18): 80-84.
[14]	陈伟斌,翟舒楠,韩慎友. 基于集合敏感性方法的台风“山竹”暴雨预报分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(18): 85-94.
[15]	刘春生,徐永清,刘赫男,王波,魏磊. 黑龙江省夏季降雨量及暴雨时空分布特征研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(13): 107-111.