欢迎访问《中国农学通报》,

中国农学通报 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (16): 86-90.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0587

所属专题: 生物技术 园艺 农业生态

• 资源·环境·生态·土壤 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同施肥处理对芹菜农田土壤理化性状及产量的影响

仁增草1(), 武均1(), 彭敏2, 宋雪峰2, 王月胜2, 蔡立群1   

  1. 1甘肃农业大学资源与环境学院,兰州 730070
    2元泰丰(包头)生物科技有限公司,内蒙古包头 014000
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-04 修回日期:2022-04-06 出版日期:2022-06-05 发布日期:2022-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 武均
  • 作者简介:仁增草,女,1998年出生,甘肃甘南人,硕士研究生,研究方向:土壤学。通信地址:730030甘肃省兰州市安宁区营门村1号 甘肃农业大学资源与环境学院,E-mail: 1455917986@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    校企合作项目“新型有机肥对甘肃省典型农作物的影响”(XZ20190917);公招博士科研启动基金(GAU-KYQD-2018-39);甘肃省自然科学基金(20JR10RA543)

Effects of Different Fertilization Treatments on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties and Yield of Celery

REN Zengcao1(), WU Jun1(), PENG Min2, SONG Xuefeng2, WANG Yuesheng2, CAI Liqun1   

  1. 1College of Resources and Environment Sciences, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070
    2Yuantaifeng (Baotou) Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Baotou, Inner Mongolia 014000
  • Received:2021-06-04 Revised:2022-04-06 Online:2022-06-05 Published:2022-06-09
  • Contact: WU Jun

摘要:

为探究不同施肥处理对芹菜农田土壤理化性状及产量的影响,以‘文图拉’芹菜为供试作物,设置单施化肥(T)、有机肥配施化肥(YTF1/2)和全量有机肥(YTF)3个处理。结果表明,在不同施肥处理下芹菜农田土壤的理化性质和芹菜产量发生了变化,其中变化最为明显的土壤指标有土壤容重、孔隙度、饱和导水率、碱解氮和有效磷。2019年,YTF处理较T处理显著降低土壤容重13.16%,增加土壤孔隙度10.72%,提升饱和导水率20.73%。YTF1/2处理较T处理显著提升土壤碱解氮和有效磷含量15.8%和19.6%。2020年,YTF处理较T处理显著降低土壤容重10.71%,增加土壤孔隙度8.23%,提升饱和导水率17.76%。YTF1/2处理较T处理显著提升土壤碱解氮和有效磷含量16.18%和12.91%。与T处理相比,YTF1/2和YTF处理均能提高芹菜产量。2019年,YTF1/2处理芹菜产量最高,为97984 kg/hm2,与T和YTF处理相比分别提升产量2.65%和22.83%。2020年,YTF1/2处理芹菜产量最高,为93750 kg/hm2,与T和YTF处理相比分别提升产量25%和13.64%。总体来看,有机肥配施化肥效果最优,可在试验开展地区芹菜种植中推广应用。

关键词: 芹菜, 有机肥, 化肥减量, 产量, 土壤理化性状

Abstract:

To explore the effects of different fertilization treatments on soil physical and chemical properties and yield of celery, the study used ‘Ventula’ celery as the test material, and conducted three treatments: single application of chemical fertilizer (T), organic fertilizer combined with chemical fertilizer (YTF1/2) and total organic fertilizer (YTF). The results showed that different fertilization treatments had changed the soil physical and chemical properties and celery yield, and the most obvious changes were found on soil bulk density, porosity, saturated water conductivity, alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen and available phosphorus. In 2019, compared with T treatment, YTF treatment significantly reduced soil bulk density by 13.16%, increased soil porosity and saturated water conductivity by 10.72% and 20.73%, respectively. Compared with T treatment, the content of soil alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen and available phosphorus in YTF1/2 treatment were significantly increased by 15.8% and 19.6%, respectively. In 2020, compared with T treatment, YTF treatment significantly reduced soil bulk density by 10.71%, increased soil porosity by 8.23% and soil saturated water conductivity by 17.76%. Compared with T treatment, YTF1/2 treatment significantly increased the content of soil alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen and available phosphorus by 16.18% and 12.91%, respectively. Compared with T treatment, both YTF1/2 treatment and YTF treatment increased celery yield. In 2019, the celery yield of YTF1/2 treatment was the highest, which was 97984 kg/hm2, 2.65% and 22.83% higher than that of T treatment and YTF treatment, respectively. In 2020, the celery yield of YTF1/2 treatment was the highest, which was 93750 kg/hm2 and increased by 25% and 13.64% compared with that of T treatment and YTF treatment, respectively. In general, organic fertilizer combined with chemical fertilizer had the best effect, and could be popularized in local celery cultivation.

Key words: celery, organic fertilizer, chemical fertilizer reduction, yield, soil physical and chemical properties

中图分类号: