稻田土壤微生物固碳途径的研究进展

doi:10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0646

中国农学通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (18): 77-85.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0646

• 资源·环境·生态·土壤·气象 • 上一篇下一篇

稻田土壤微生物固碳途径的研究进展

张宗洋(), 刘春光()

黑龙江大学生命科学学院/农业微生物技术教育部工程研究中心/黑龙江省寒地生态修复与资源利用重点实验室/黑龙江省普通高校微生物重点实验室，哈尔滨 150080

收稿日期:2025-08-05 修回日期:2025-12-11 出版日期:2026-09-25 发布日期:2026-09-24
通讯作者:
刘春光，女，1982年出生，黑龙江哈尔滨人，高级实验师，博士，主要从事长残效除草剂的微生物降解与土壤修复方面的研究。通信地址：150080 黑龙江省哈尔滨市南岗区学府路74号，Tel：0451-86608586，E-mail：2005013@hlju.edu.cn。
作者简介:
张宗洋，男，2001年出生，山东聊城人，硕士研究生，主要从事长残效除草剂的微生物降解与土壤修复方面的研究。通信地址：150080 黑龙江省哈尔滨市南岗区学府路74号，Tel：0451-86608586，E-mail：2241764@s.hlju.edu.cn。
基金资助:
黑龙江省高校基本科研业务费黑龙江大学专项资金项目(2025-KYYWF-ZR0370)

Research Progress on Carbon Sequestration Pathway of Paddy Soil Microorganisms

ZHANG Zongyang(), LIU Chunguang()

Engineering Research Center of Agricultural Microbiology Technology, Ministry of Education/ Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ecological Restoration and Resource Utilization for Cold Region/ Key Laboratory of Microbiology, College of Heilongjiang Province/ School of Life Sciences, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080

Received:2025-08-05 Revised:2025-12-11 Published:2026-09-25 Online:2026-09-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

全球变暖不断加剧，由土壤排入大气层的温室气体如甲烷(CH₄)、二氧化碳(CO₂)、一氧化二氮(N₂O)等浓度持续攀升，使得控制温室气体排放的重要性愈发凸显。稻田土壤作为温室气体重要源和汇，在全球碳、氮循环中具有关键作用，因此，稻田土壤固碳减排的研究受到了广泛关注。为应对全球变暖下温室气体排放控制需求，本综述旨在明确稻田土壤在碳氮循环中的关键作用，并为其固碳减排提供参考。本文归纳了温室气体的分类、成因及其在全球变暖中的危害，总结了稻田土壤固碳微生物的研究现状，涵盖了微生物固定CO₂、氧化CH₄及甲烷氧化微生物与反硝化代谢耦合等方面，还分析了该领域现有研究的成果与不足。指出当前研究存在的主要问题：（1）稻田土壤固碳微生物的群落特征、固碳潜力及关键影响因素的研究不够深入；（2）在气候变化等新背景下，土壤微生物的固碳响应机制尚不明确；（3）农业生产措施对土壤固碳微生物的影响机制研究需进一步加强。

关键词: 稻田土壤, 全球变暖, 固碳, 碳氮耦合, 土壤微生物

Abstract:

Global warming is intensifying, and the concentrations of greenhouse gases released from soils into the atmosphere, such as methane (CH₄), carbon dioxide (CO₂), and nitrous oxide (N₂O), are increasing, making the control of greenhouse gas emissions more important. Paddy soil, as a significant source and sink of greenhouse gases, plays a crucial role in the global carbon and nitrogen cycles; consequently, research on carbon sequestration and emission reduction in paddy soils has attracted widespread attention. To address the demand for greenhouse gas emission control under global warming and to clarify the key role of paddy-field soil in carbon and nitrogen cycling while providing references for its carbon sequestration and emission reduction, this review summarizes the classifications, mechanisms, and hazards of greenhouse gases associated with global warming, outlines the current status of research on carbon sequestration-related microbiology in paddy soils (including microbial fixation of CO₂, oxidation of CH₄, methane-oxidizing microorganisms, and their coupling with denitrification metabolism), and analyzes the achievements and gaps in the field. The main issues in current research are identified: (1) investigations into the community characteristics, sequestration potential, and driving factors of carbon-sequestering microorganisms in paddy soil are not sufficiently in-depth; (2) under new contexts such as climate change, the mechanisms by which soil microbiota respond to carbon sequestration remain unclear; (3) the effects of human agricultural practices on soil carbon-sequestering microorganisms require further investigation.

Key words: paddy soil, global warming, carbon sequestration, carbon-nitrogen coupling, soil microorganism

中图分类号:

S-1农业科学技术现状与发展

张宗洋, 刘春光. 稻田土壤微生物固碳途径的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2026, 42(18): 77-85.

ZHANG Zongyang, LIU Chunguang. Research Progress on Carbon Sequestration Pathway of Paddy Soil Microorganisms[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(18): 77-85.

图/表 11

参考文献 70

[1]	NSABIYEZE A, MA R Q, LI J, et al. Tackling climate change in agriculture: a global evaluation of the effectiveness of carbon emission reduction policies[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2024, 468:142973. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142973 URL
[2]	GANGOPADHYAY S, BANERJEE R, BATABYAL S, et al. Carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas emissions for different rice cultivation practices[J]. Sustainable production and consumption, 2022, 34:90-104. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2022.09.001 URL
[3]	FILONCHYK M, PETERSON P M, ZHANG L, et al. Greenhouse gases emissions and global climate change: Examining the influence of CO₂, CH₄, and N₂O[J]. The science of the total environment, 2024, 935:173359. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173359 URL
[4]	潘晓滨. 论温室气体的科学特征与法律属性[J]. 资源节约与环保, 2017(6):116-118.
[5]	MUHAMMAD R U H, ASHFAQ A, AHSAN R, et al. Impact of climate change on agricultural production; Issues, challenges, and opportunities in Asia[J]. Frontiers in plant science, 2022, 13:925548.
[6]	LOGAN C A. A review of ocean acidification and america’s response[J]. Bioscience, 2024, 10:819-828.
[7]	DIARMID C, TARA N, CHRISTIAN S, et al. Climate change and health: three grand challenges[J]. Nature medicine, 2023, 29(7):1631-1638. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02438-w
[8]	QIN Z, HUANG Y, ZHUANG Q. Soil organic carbon sequestration potential of cropland in China[J]. Global biogeochemical cycles, 2013, 27(3):711-722. doi: 10.1002/gbc.v27.3 URL
[9]	TANG H, LIU Y, LI X, et al. Carbon sequestration of cropland and paddy soils in China: Potential, driving factors, and mechanisms[J]. Greenhouse gases: science and technology, 2019, 9(5):872-885.
[10]	CHEN X B, HU Y J, XIA Y H, et al. Contrasting pathways of carbon sequestration in paddy and upland soils[J]. Global change biology, 2021, 27(11):2478-2490. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15595 pmid: 33713528
[11]	王晓萌, 孙羽, 王麒, 等. 稻田温室气体排放与减排研究进展[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2018(7):6.
[12]	DU X J, HU H, WANG T H, et al. Long-term rice cultivation increases contributions of plant and microbial-derived carbon to soil organic carbonin saline-sodic soils[J]. The science of the total environment, 2023, 904:166713. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166713 URL
[13]	祝贞科, 肖谋良, 魏亮, 等. 稻田土壤固碳关键过程的生物地球化学机制及其碳中和对策[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2022, 30(4):592-602.
[14]	AMELUNG W, BOSSIO D, VRIES W D, et al. Towards a global-scale soil climate mitigation strategy[J]. Nature communications, 2020, 11(1):5427. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18887-7 pmid: 33110065
[15]	QI J Y, YAO X B, LU J, et al. A 40% paddy surface soil organic carbon increase after 5-year no-tillage is linked with shifts in soil bacterial composition and functions[J]. Science of the total environment, 2023, 859(P2):160206. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160206 URL
[16]	XIA L L, LAM SHU KEE, YAN X Y, et al. How does recycling of livestock manure in agroecosystems affect crop productivity, reactive nitrogen losses, and soil carbon balance?[J]. Environmental science & technology, 2017, 51(13):7450-7457. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b06470 URL
[17]	ZHAO Y N, ZHANG Y Q, DU H X, et al. Carbon sequestration and soil microbes in purple paddy soil as affected by long-term fertilization[J]. Toxicological & environmental chemistry, 2015, 97(3-4):473-476.
[18]	RAHMAN F, RAHMAN M M, RAHMAN M G, et al. Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers and rice straw on carbon sequestration and soil fertility under a rice-rice cropping pattern[J]. Carbon management, 2016, 7(1-2):41-53. doi: 10.1080/17583004.2016.1166425 URL
[19]	YU Y X, ZHANG Y X, XIAO M, et al. A meta-analysis of film mulching cultivation effects on soil organic carbon and soil greenhouse gas fluxes[J]. Catena, 2021, 206(2):105483. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105483 URL
[20]	HUANG Q, ZHANG G B, MA J, et al. Dynamic interactions of nitrogen fertilizer and straw application on greenhouse gas emissions and sequestration of soil carbon and nitrogen: A 13-year field study[J]. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 2022, 325:107753. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107753 URL
[21]	张亚茹, 申振涛, 吴小红, 等. 土壤自养固碳微生物研究进展与热点分析[J]. 广西林业科学, 2024, 53(1):124-134.
[22]	郭珺, 樊芳芳, 王立革, 等. 固碳微生物菌株的分离鉴定及其固碳能力测定[J]. 生物技术通报, 2019, 35(1):90-97. doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2018-0544
[23]	彭艳丽, 赵华章, 杨亲正, 等. 微生物及酶固定二氧化碳的研究进展[J]. 化学与生物工程, 2010, 27(7):10-13.
[24]	汪浩, 张芬芳, 陈磊, 等. 基于合成生物学改造蓝细菌的光合碳固定[J]. 生命科学, 2024, 36(10):1250-1259.
[25]	沈洁洁, 辛吉瑀, 徐晓玲. 不放氧光合细菌的光合电子传递和固碳[J]. 生命科学, 2024, 36(9):1185-1204.
[26]	史涵, 王亚楠, 王清照, 等. 典型氢氧化细菌固碳特性种间差异及胞外有机物对固碳过程影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2022, 42(11):455-463.
[27]	王燕, 吴佳鹏, 洪义国. 深海微生物硝化作用驱动的化能自养固碳过程与机制研究进展[J]. 自然杂志, 2016, 38(2):109-115.
[28]	DIEP NGOC PHAM, ANH DUC NGUYEN, EUN YEOL LEE. Outlook on engineering methylotrophs for one-carbon-based industrial biotechnology[J]. Chemical engineering journal, 2022, 449:137769. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.137769 URL
[29]	朱慧, 符波, 鲁帅领, 等. 一株新型同型产乙酸菌Clostridium sp.的自养和异养生长特性[J]. 微生物学通报, 2018, 45(11):11.
[30]	GONG F F, LI Y. Fixing carbon, unnaturally[J]. Science, 2016, 354(6314):830-831. pmid: 27856865
[31]	韩亚西, 张彦龙, 张多英, 等. 自养微生物CO₂固定机理研究进展[J]. 生物技术, 2019, 29(4):391-397.
[32]	JIRI J, HERMANN B, OLAF W. Modeling the Calvin-Benson cycle[J]. BMC systems biology, 2011, 5(1):185. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-5-185 URL
[33]	LIU Q, WEI X M, WU X H, et al. Characteristic of abundances and diversity of carbon dioxide fixation microbes in paddy soils[J]. Environmental science, 2017, 38(2):760-768.
[34]	LI Z W, TONG D, NIE X D, et al. New insight into soil carbon fixation rate: the intensive co-occurrence network of autotrophic bacteria increases the carbon fixation rate in depositional sites[J]. Agriculture, ecosystems and environment, 2021, 320(1):107579. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107579 URL
[35]	胡贵鹏, 宋伟, 高聪, 等. 异养微生物固定CO₂的合成生物学研究进展[J]. 生物工程学报, 2022, 38(4):1339-1350.
[36]	JIAO J Y, FU L, HUA Z S, et al. Insight into the function and evolution of the wood-ljungdahl pathway in actinobacteria[J]. The ISME journal, 2021, 15(10): 3005-3018. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-00935-9 URL
[37]	NAVEIRA-PAZOS C, VEIGA M C, KENNES C. Clostridium carboxidivorans and Rhodosporidium toruloides as a platform for the valorization of carbon dioxide to microbial oils[J]. Chemosphere, 2024, 365:143345. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143345 URL
[38]	WEUSTHUIS R A, LAMOT I, VAN DER OOST J, et al. Microbial production of bulk chemicals: development of anaerobic processes[J]. Trends biotechnol, 2011, 29(4):153-158. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.12.007 pmid: 21227520
[39]	DUGAR D, STEPHANOPOULOS G. Relative potential of biosynthetic pathways for biofuels and bio-based products[J]. Nature biotechnology, 2011, 29(12):1074-1078. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2055 pmid: 22158355
[40]	蔡朝阳, 何崭飞, 胡宝兰. 甲烷氧化菌分类及代谢途径研究进展[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 42(3):273-281.
[41]	CAMPH J, ISLAM T, STOTT M B, et al. Environmental, genomic and taxonomic perspectives on methanotrophic Verrucomicrobia[J]. Environmental microbiology reports, 2009, 1(5):293-306. doi: 10.1111/emi4.2009.1.issue-5 URL
[42]	HANSON R S, HANSON T E. Methanotrophic bacteria[J]. Microbiology review, 1996, 60(2):439-471. doi: 10.1128/mr.60.2.439-471.1996 URL
[43]	严程, 梅娟, 赵由才. 好氧甲烷氧化菌及其工程应用进展[J]. 生物工程学报, 2022, 38(4):1322-1338.
[44]	SMYTH G K. edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data[J]. Bioinformatics, 2010, 26(1):139-140. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 pmid: 19910308
[45]	NGUYEN N L, YU W J, YANG H Y, et al. A novel methanotroph in the genus methylomonas that contains a distinct clade of soluble methane monooxygenase[J]. Microbiology, 2017, 55:775-782.
[46]	ESHINIMAEV B T, MEDVEDKOVA K A, KHMELENINA V N, et al. New thermophilic methanotrophs of the genus methylocaldum[J]. Microbiology, 2004, 73:448-456. doi: 10.1023/B:MICI.0000036991.31677.13
[47]	WISE M G, MCARTHUR J V, SHIMKETS L J. Methylosarcina fibrata gen. nov., sp. nov. and Methylosarcina quisquiliarum sp. nov., novel type 1 methanotrophs[J]. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology, 2001, 51(Pt 2):611-621. doi: 10.1099/00207713-51-2-611 URL
[48]	GEYMONAT E, FERRANDO L, TARLERA S E. Methylogaea oryzae gen. nov., sp. nov., a mesophilic methanotroph isolated from a rice paddy field[J]. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology, 2011, 61(11):2568-2572. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.028274-0 URL
[49]	ALEXANDER T T, ANDREA S, EDDA M R, et al. Thermal acclimation of methanotrophs from the genus Methylobacter[J]. The isme journal, 2023, 17(4):502-513. doi: 10.1038/s41396-023-01363-7 URL
[50]	DEUTZMANN J S, HOPPERT M, SCHINK B. Characterization and phylogeny of a novel methanotroph, Methyloglobulus morosus gen. nov. spec. nov[J]. Systematic & applied microbiology, 2014, 37(3):165-169.
[51]	MANCINELLI R L. The regulation of methane oxidation in soil[J]. Annual review of microbiology, 1995, 49(1):581-605. doi: 10.1146/micro.1995.49.issue-1 URL
[52]	LISA Y S, SUKHWAN Y, JEREMY D S, et al. Genome sequence of the obligate methanotroph Methylosinus trichosporium strain OB3b[J]. Journal of bacteriology, 2010, 192(24):6497-6498. doi: 10.1128/JB.01144-10 URL
[53]	RUMAH B L, STEAD C E, STEVENS B H C, et al. Isolation and characterisation of Methylocystis spp. for poly-3-hydroxybutyrate production using waste methane feedstocks[J]. AMB express, 2021, 11(1):10.1186. doi: 10.1186/s13568-020-01169-2
[54]	CROMBIE A T, MURRELL J C. Trace-gas metabolic versatility of the facultative methanotroph Methylocella silvestris[J]. Nature, 2014, 510(7503):148. doi: 10.1038/nature13192
[55]	DEDYSH S N, LIESACK W, KHMELENINA V N, et al. Methylocella palustris gen. nov., sp. nov., a new methane-oxidizing acidophilic bacterium from peat bogs, representing a novel subtype of serine-pathway methanotrophs[J]. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology, 2000, 50(3):955-969. doi: 10.1099/00207713-50-3-955 URL
[56]	LINDNER A S, PACHECO A, ALDRICH H C, et al. Methylocystis hirsuta sp. nov. a novel methanotroph isolated from a groundwater aquifer[J]. International journal of systematic & evolutionary microbiology, 2007, 57(8):1891.
[57]	邓永翠, 车荣晓, 吴伊波, 等. 好氧甲烷氧化菌生理生态特征及其在自然湿地中的群落多样性研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(14):4579-4591.
[58]	BUT S Y, EGOROVA S V, KHMELENINA V N, et al. Serine-glyoxylate aminotranferases from methanotrophs using different C1-assimilation pathways[J]. Antonie van leeuwenhoek, 2019, 112(5):741-751. doi: 10.1007/s10482-018-1208-4
[59]	丁阿强, 李朝洋, 李微薇, 等. 厌氧甲烷氧化微生物物质代谢与能量代谢研究进展[J]. 微生物学报, 2022, 62(5):1669-1687.
[60]	LEU A Q, CHEN C, MCILROY S J, et al. Anaerobic methane oxidation coupled to manganese reduction by members of the Methanoperedenaceae[J]. The isme journal, 2020, 14(4):1030-1041. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-0590-x URL
[61]	ZHAO Y, LIU Y, CAO S, et al. Anaerobic oxidation of methane driven by different electron acceptors: a review[J]. The science of the total environment, 2024, 946:174287. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174287 URL
[62]	HERNANDEZ M, VAKSMAA A, HORN M A, et al. Methanotrophs: discoveries, environmental relevance, and a perspective on current and future applications[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2021, 12:678057. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.678057 URL
[63]	OUBOTER T H, MESMAN R, SLEUTELS T, et al. Mechanisms of extracellular electron transfer in anaerobic methanotrophic archaea[J]. Nature communications, 2024, 15(1):1477. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45758-2 pmid: 38368447
[64]	CAI C, LEU A Q, XIE G J, et al. A methanotrophic archaeon couples anaerobic oxidation of methane to Fe(III) reduction[J]. The isme journal, 2018, 12(8):1929-1939. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0109-x URL
[65]	LI Z Y, LI X, TAN B, et al. NC10 bacteria promoted methane oxidation coupled to chlorate reduction[J]. Biodegradation, 2020, 31:319-329. doi: 10.1007/s10532-020-09912-z
[66]	刘若萱, 贺纪正, 张丽梅. 稻田土壤不同水分条件下硝化/反硝化作用及其功能微生物的变化特征[J]. 环境科学, 2014, 35(11):4275-4283.
[67]	SENNETT B L, ROCO A C, LIM N Y N, et al. Determining how oxygen legacy affects trajectories of soil denitrifier community dynamics and N₂O emissions[J]. Nature communications, 2024, 15(1):7298. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51688-w
[68]	周祥玉, 赵云飞, 李东, 等. 微氧条件下以甲烷为碳源的反硝化实验研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2017, 37(5):1704-1710.
[69]	CHEN K H, FENG J, BODELIER, et al. Metabolic coupling between soil aerobic methanotrophs and denitrifiers in rice paddy fields[J]. Nature communications, 2024, 15(1):3471. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47827-y
[70]	LING N, WANG T T, YAKOV K. Rhizosphere bacteriome structure and functions[J]. Nature communications, 2022, 13(1):836. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28448-9 pmid: 35149704

微生物种类	生理特征	参考文献
Methylococcus capsulatus	球状细菌，不运动，热耐受，并且是专性甲烷营养型的单细胞细菌，除了甲烷这种I型甲烷氧化菌还能利用甲醇来产生能量和生物质，并且具有固氮作用的能力	[44]
Methylomonas methanica	专性甲烷氧化菌，要栖息在含甲烷的自然基质中，例如湖泊、河流、湿地和水饱和的土壤等环境中	[45]
Methylocaldum	中等嗜热，某些菌株的最适生长温度可达50°C	[46]
Methylosarcina	此类细菌只利用甲烷和甲醇作为碳源，在静止期，细胞会增大并形成囊泡	[47]
Methylogaea	中温型的甲烷氧化细菌，最适宜的生长温度通常在30~35°C	[48]
Methylobacter	环境条件如盐度、pH和温度的适应性较强，这使得它们能够在多种生态环境中生存	[49]
Methyloglobulus morosus	这种细菌偏好在较低的氧气浓度下生长，并能够固定氮气，最适温度为25~28°C，且能在中性pH值下生长	[50]

微生物种类	生理特征	参考文献
Methylococcus capsulatus	球状细菌，不运动，热耐受，并且是专性甲烷营养型的单细胞细菌，除了甲烷这种I型甲烷氧化菌还能利用甲醇来产生能量和生物质，并且具有固氮作用的能力	[44]
Methylomonas methanica	专性甲烷氧化菌，要栖息在含甲烷的自然基质中，例如湖泊、河流、湿地和水饱和的土壤等环境中	[45]
Methylocaldum	中等嗜热，某些菌株的最适生长温度可达50°C	[46]
Methylosarcina	此类细菌只利用甲烷和甲醇作为碳源，在静止期，细胞会增大并形成囊泡	[47]
Methylogaea	中温型的甲烷氧化细菌，最适宜的生长温度通常在30~35°C	[48]
Methylobacter	环境条件如盐度、pH和温度的适应性较强，这使得它们能够在多种生态环境中生存	[49]
Methyloglobulus morosus	这种细菌偏好在较低的氧气浓度下生长，并能够固定氮气，最适温度为25~28°C，且能在中性pH值下生长	[50]

微生物种类	生理特征	参考文献
Methylosinus trichosporium	能够利用甲烷作为碳源和能源进行生长	[52]
Methylocystis parvus	该类型的菌株在甲烷氧化时具有明显的细胞形态特征	[53]
Methylocella silvestris	生长速率可能较慢，能够在酸性的土壤中生存	[54]
Methylocella palustris	该菌不但能以甲烷为其生长所需的唯一碳源及能量，而且还可利用诸如醋酸、丙酮酸或苹果酸等多碳物	[55]
Methylocystis hirsuta	菌株在甲烷氧化和生物产品合成中具有潜在的应用前景	[56]
Methylocella tundrae	存在于寒冷、酸性的生境	[57]

微生物种类	生理特征	参考文献
Methylosinus trichosporium	能够利用甲烷作为碳源和能源进行生长	[52]
Methylocystis parvus	该类型的菌株在甲烷氧化时具有明显的细胞形态特征	[53]
Methylocella silvestris	生长速率可能较慢，能够在酸性的土壤中生存	[54]
Methylocella palustris	该菌不但能以甲烷为其生长所需的唯一碳源及能量，而且还可利用诸如醋酸、丙酮酸或苹果酸等多碳物	[55]
Methylocystis hirsuta	菌株在甲烷氧化和生物产品合成中具有潜在的应用前景	[56]
Methylocella tundrae	存在于寒冷、酸性的生境	[57]

类型	生理特征	参考文献
硫酸盐还原型厌氧甲烷氧化菌	在硫酸盐丰富的厌氧环境中通过与硫酸盐还原耦合来氧化甲烷	[59]
硝酸盐/亚硝酸盐依赖型厌氧甲烷氧化菌	在有硝酸盐/亚硝酸盐存在的条件下进行甲烷的厌氧氧化	[59]
锰还原型厌氧甲烷氧化菌	这类菌通过与锰氧化物的还原耦合来氧化甲烷	[60]
铁还原型厌氧甲烷氧化菌	这类菌可以通过与铁的还原耦合来氧化甲烷	[59]
氯酸盐还原型厌氧甲烷氧化菌	在有氯酸盐存在的条件下进行甲烷的厌氧氧化	[65]
NC10门的厌氧甲烷氧化菌	在缺氧条件下通过特定的代谢途径氧化甲烷	[65]

稻田土壤微生物固碳途径的研究进展

Research Progress on Carbon Sequestration Pathway of Paddy Soil Microorganisms

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 70

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

关于本刊

作者中心

审者中心

在线期刊

联系我们

微生物种类	能源	碳源	好氧/厌氧	参考文献
蓝细菌	光能	CO₂	好氧	[24]
光合细菌	光能	CO₂	厌氧	[25]
氢细菌	化能	CO₂	好氧	[26]
硝化细菌	化能	CO₂	好氧	[27]
甲烷菌	化能	CO₂	厌氧	[28]
乙酸菌	化能	CO₂	厌氧	[29]

微生物种类	能源	碳源	好氧/厌氧	参考文献
戊糖丙酸杆菌	葡萄糖	CO₂	厌氧	[35]
放线菌	H₂	CO₂	厌氧	[36]
梭菌	H₂	CO₂	厌氧	[37]

[1]	田琴, 丁新辉, 冯筱, 韩红江, 苟晨阳. 不同植被类型土壤-微生物生物量及其化学计量特征的比较研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2026, 42(9): 40-47.
[2]	周立垚, 刘娟, 刘海礁, 崔亚男, 刘兵, 罗艺龙, 于泷程, 陈亚菲, 许日升, 马腾飞. 生物炭在花生种植中的应用研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2026, 42(7): 15-21.
[3]	杨偲淇, 薛婷婷, 赵欣茹, 郜磊, 曹凌霄, 赵智鹏, 张亮. 酿酒葡萄根围土壤固碳细菌群落结构及固碳微生物筛选[J]. 中国农学通报, 2026, 42(5): 117-127.
[4]	刘贵迎, 彭李亚, 王磊. 踩踏对深圳市公园绿地土壤微生物多样性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2026, 42(4): 156-163.
[5]	杨偲淇, 赵欣茹, 张军翔, 李扬, 张亮, 薛婷婷. 葡萄园土壤有机覆盖条件下土壤微生物群落与土壤代谢研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2026, 42(4): 146-155.
[6]	高莹, 张博, 孙喜军, 周维涛, 张雅, 张捷, 王思怡, 陈海岩. “双碳”背景下西安市设施蔬菜产业固碳减排技术路径分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2026, 42(2): 211-218.
[7]	陈宝珠, 黄继川, 许杨贵, 彭一平, 李珠娴, 梁健仪, 钟文亮, 晏育伟, 涂玉婷. 不同轮作模式对迟菜心种植土壤微生态的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2026, 42(2): 93-102.
[8]	拉巴, 芦俊俊, 尼玛卓嘎, 赛珍, 刘芳. 气候变化背景下拉萨重大生态工程固碳效益综合分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2026, 42(16): 170-180.
[9]	王文丽, 尹晓宁, 靳海波, 马磊, 牛军强, 马明. 微生物菌剂对苹果苗生长和根际土壤微生物群落的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2026, 42(1): 142-152.
[10]	孙广涛, 包桂荣, 邰继承, 萨如拉, 刘乃嘉, 于淼, 李安宁. 玉米花生间作对作物及土壤特性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(5): 7-12.
[11]	王立禹, 杨峰山, 付海燕, 葛志坚, 苑明睿, 刘春光. 植物对土壤微生物介导碳循环的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(5): 63-68.
[12]	黄艳. 农业生态系统固碳特征与潜力预测——以福州市为例[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(35): 71-79.
[13]	聂胜委, 张巧萍, 王建超, 潘秀燕, 王辉, 李金平. 旋耕方式下氮肥不同减施量对冬小麦根际土壤微生物及酶活的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(25): 54-59.
[14]	关诗洋, 王耀, 陈一民, 焦晓光. 冻融循环对农田土壤微生物及酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(23): 101-106.
[15]	唐旭, 田辉, 张浩冉, 柴国华, 吴秀文. 外源L-天门冬氨酸纳米钙对镉污染土壤理化性质及微生物群落分布的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(2): 98-108.