
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 11-19.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0342
Previous Articles Next Articles
LYU Guangde(
), SUN Yingying, MU Qiuhuan, XU Jiali, YAN Limei, XU Huiyuan, YIN Xundong, CHEN Yongjun, QIAN Zhaoguo(
)
Received:2024-05-24
Revised:2025-06-15
Online:2026-02-15
Published:2026-02-09
LYU Guangde, SUN Yingying, MU Qiuhuan, XU Jiali, YAN Limei, XU Huiyuan, YIN Xundong, CHEN Yongjun, QIAN Zhaoguo. Identification of N and P Use Efficiency at Maturity of New Wheat Varieties[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 11-19.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2024-0342
| 处理 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 碱解氮 | 有效磷 | 速效钾 | 碱解氮 | 有效磷 | 速效钾 | 碱解氮 | 有效磷 | 速效钾 | |||
| CK | 55.22 | 10.53 | 58.63 | 54.34 | 10.21 | 58.00 | 54.89 | 10.52 | 57.46 | ||
| LN | 45.67 | 10.39 | 64.16 | 46.54 | 11.40 | 64.00 | 45.62 | 11.53 | 63.44 | ||
| LP | 51.31 | 8.94 | 59.94 | 49.96 | 9.40 | 60.00 | 51.56 | 8.86 | 61.23 | ||
| 处理 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 碱解氮 | 有效磷 | 速效钾 | 碱解氮 | 有效磷 | 速效钾 | 碱解氮 | 有效磷 | 速效钾 | |||
| CK | 55.22 | 10.53 | 58.63 | 54.34 | 10.21 | 58.00 | 54.89 | 10.52 | 57.46 | ||
| LN | 45.67 | 10.39 | 64.16 | 46.54 | 11.40 | 64.00 | 45.62 | 11.53 | 63.44 | ||
| LP | 51.31 | 8.94 | 59.94 | 49.96 | 9.40 | 60.00 | 51.56 | 8.86 | 61.23 | ||
| 编号 | 品种 | 编号 | 品种 | 编号 | 品种 | 编号 | 品种 | 编号 | 品种 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 伟隆136 | 10 | 新麦38 | 19 | 石优17 | 28 | 济麦5198 | 37 | 轮选49 |
| 2 | 伟隆169 | 11 | 新麦45 | 20 | 岱麦366 | 29 | 山农1695 | 38 | 农大753 |
| 3 | 中麦578 | 12 | 华麦158 | 21 | 济麦229 | 30 | 济麦0435 | 39 | 济麦5022 |
| 4 | 中麦255 | 13 | 济麦336 | 22 | 科农2009 | 31 | 鲁研1403 | 40 | 金海2119 |
| 5 | 丰德存麦5号 | 14 | 艾麦24 | 23 | 冀麦765 | 32 | 济麦55 | 41 | 农大761 |
| 6 | 丰德存麦21 | 15 | 谷神麦19 | 24 | 徽研66 | 33 | 山农48 | 42 | 中麦29 |
| 7 | 藁优2018 | 16 | 石优20 | 25 | 鲁研951 | 34 | 山农44 | ||
| 8 | 新麦26 | 17 | 郑麦366 | 26 | 博信281 | 35 | 中麦9088 | ||
| 9 | 新麦28 | 18 | 西农979 | 27 | 济麦38 | 36 | 圣麦918 |
| 编号 | 品种 | 编号 | 品种 | 编号 | 品种 | 编号 | 品种 | 编号 | 品种 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 伟隆136 | 10 | 新麦38 | 19 | 石优17 | 28 | 济麦5198 | 37 | 轮选49 |
| 2 | 伟隆169 | 11 | 新麦45 | 20 | 岱麦366 | 29 | 山农1695 | 38 | 农大753 |
| 3 | 中麦578 | 12 | 华麦158 | 21 | 济麦229 | 30 | 济麦0435 | 39 | 济麦5022 |
| 4 | 中麦255 | 13 | 济麦336 | 22 | 科农2009 | 31 | 鲁研1403 | 40 | 金海2119 |
| 5 | 丰德存麦5号 | 14 | 艾麦24 | 23 | 冀麦765 | 32 | 济麦55 | 41 | 农大761 |
| 6 | 丰德存麦21 | 15 | 谷神麦19 | 24 | 徽研66 | 33 | 山农48 | 42 | 中麦29 |
| 7 | 藁优2018 | 16 | 石优20 | 25 | 鲁研951 | 34 | 山农44 | ||
| 8 | 新麦26 | 17 | 郑麦366 | 26 | 博信281 | 35 | 中麦9088 | ||
| 9 | 新麦28 | 18 | 西农979 | 27 | 济麦38 | 36 | 圣麦918 |
| 编号 | 品种/系 | CK | LN(低氮施用) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 比对照材料增产率/% | 氮素利用效率(NUI) | |||
| 对照品种 | 济麦22 | 9540.45 | 8229.30 | |||
| 1 | 伟隆136 | 10377.53 | 8748.43 | 6.31 | 1.174 | |
| 2 | 伟隆169 | 9802.12 | 7845.47 | -4.66 | 0.804 | |
| 3 | 中麦578 | 10161.57 | 9278.90 | 12.75 | 1.518 | |
| 4 | 中麦255 | 9215.13 | 7641.11 | -7.15 | 0.770 | |
| 5 | 丰德存麦5号 | 9532.54 | 8900.61 | 8.16 | 1.370 | |
| 6 | 丰德存麦21 | 9465.87 | 7710.68 | -6.30 | 0.777 | |
| 7 | 藁优2018 | 9162.95 | 7123.68 | -13.44 | 0.585 | |
| 8 | 新麦26 | 8371.59 | 7881.70 | -4.22 | 0.959 | |
| 9 | 新麦28 | 8357.10 | 8649.87 | 5.11 | 1.393 | |
| 10 | 新麦38 | 9832.56 | 8862.93 | 7.70 | 1.305 | |
| 11 | 新麦45 | 8075.92 | 7809.23 | -5.10 | 0.958 | |
| 12 | 华麦158 | 8855.68 | 7088.89 | -13.86 | 0.593 | |
| 13 | 济麦336 | 9126.71 | 7793.29 | -5.30 | 0.841 | |
| 14 | 艾麦24 | 9725.31 | 9107.87 | 10.68 | 1.472 | |
| 15 | 谷神麦19 | 9883.29 | 8383.19 | 1.87 | 1.040 | |
| 16 | 石优20 | 10209.40 | 8159.98 | -0.84 | 0.903 | |
| 17 | 郑麦366 | 7774.45 | 7041.06 | -14.44 | 0.658 | |
| 18 | 西农979 | 9503.55 | 7062.80 | -14.17 | 0.545 | |
| 19 | 石优17 | 8844.09 | 7964.32 | -3.22 | 0.946 | |
| 20 | 岱麦366 | 10374.63 | 8267.24 | 0.46 | 0.937 | |
| 21 | 济麦229 | 9349.92 | 8525.22 | 3.60 | 1.175 | |
| 22 | 科农2009 | 10223.89 | 9165.85 | 11.38 | 1.436 | |
| 编号 | 品种/系 | CK | LN(低氮施用) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 比对照材料增产率/% | 氮素利用效率(NUI) | |||
| 对照品种 | 济麦22 | 9540.45 | 8229.30 | |||
| 1 | 伟隆136 | 10377.53 | 8748.43 | 6.31 | 1.174 | |
| 2 | 伟隆169 | 9802.12 | 7845.47 | -4.66 | 0.804 | |
| 3 | 中麦578 | 10161.57 | 9278.90 | 12.75 | 1.518 | |
| 4 | 中麦255 | 9215.13 | 7641.11 | -7.15 | 0.770 | |
| 5 | 丰德存麦5号 | 9532.54 | 8900.61 | 8.16 | 1.370 | |
| 6 | 丰德存麦21 | 9465.87 | 7710.68 | -6.30 | 0.777 | |
| 7 | 藁优2018 | 9162.95 | 7123.68 | -13.44 | 0.585 | |
| 8 | 新麦26 | 8371.59 | 7881.70 | -4.22 | 0.959 | |
| 9 | 新麦28 | 8357.10 | 8649.87 | 5.11 | 1.393 | |
| 10 | 新麦38 | 9832.56 | 8862.93 | 7.70 | 1.305 | |
| 11 | 新麦45 | 8075.92 | 7809.23 | -5.10 | 0.958 | |
| 12 | 华麦158 | 8855.68 | 7088.89 | -13.86 | 0.593 | |
| 13 | 济麦336 | 9126.71 | 7793.29 | -5.30 | 0.841 | |
| 14 | 艾麦24 | 9725.31 | 9107.87 | 10.68 | 1.472 | |
| 15 | 谷神麦19 | 9883.29 | 8383.19 | 1.87 | 1.040 | |
| 16 | 石优20 | 10209.40 | 8159.98 | -0.84 | 0.903 | |
| 17 | 郑麦366 | 7774.45 | 7041.06 | -14.44 | 0.658 | |
| 18 | 西农979 | 9503.55 | 7062.80 | -14.17 | 0.545 | |
| 19 | 石优17 | 8844.09 | 7964.32 | -3.22 | 0.946 | |
| 20 | 岱麦366 | 10374.63 | 8267.24 | 0.46 | 0.937 | |
| 21 | 济麦229 | 9349.92 | 8525.22 | 3.60 | 1.175 | |
| 22 | 科农2009 | 10223.89 | 9165.85 | 11.38 | 1.436 | |
| 编号 | 品种/系 | CK | LN(低氮施用) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 比对照材料增产率/% | 氮素利用效率(NUI) | |||
| 对照品种 | 济麦22 | 8638.50 | 6883.35 | |||
| 1 | 伟隆136 | 9119.18 | 6923.66 | 0.59 | 0.970 | |
| 2 | 伟隆169 | 8378.40 | 7027.87 | 2.10 | 1.120 | |
| 3 | 中麦578 | 10131.71 | 7922.57 | 15.10 | 1.496 | |
| 4 | 中麦255 | 8620.30 | 5781.56 | -16.01 | 0.499 | |
| 5 | 丰德存麦5号 | 9746.03 | 7841.55 | 13.92 | 1.493 | |
| 6 | 丰德存麦21 | 8172.45 | 6611.32 | -3.95 | 0.900 | |
| 7 | 藁优2018 | 10271.14 | 7144.69 | 3.80 | 0.976 | |
| 8 | 新麦26 | 7030.19 | 6231.88 | -9.46 | 0.826 | |
| 9 | 新麦28 | 10047.21 | 7651.11 | 11.15 | 1.312 | |
| 10 | 新麦38 | 9304.55 | 7538.92 | 9.52 | 1.336 | |
| 11 | 新麦45 | 7179.04 | 6317.83 | -8.22 | 0.854 | |
| 12 | 华麦158 | 9303.25 | 6520.16 | -5.28 | 0.748 | |
| 13 | 济麦336 | 9366.30 | 7502.11 | 8.99 | 1.301 | |
| 14 | 艾麦24 | 12155.76 | 6984.25 | 1.47 | 0.753 | |
| 15 | 谷神麦19 | 10889.44 | 7062.80 | 2.61 | 0.879 | |
| 16 | 石优20 | 12659.28 | 7861.12 | 14.20 | 1.161 | |
| 17 | 郑麦366 | 7974.32 | 6643.21 | -3.49 | 0.940 | |
| 18 | 西农979 | 8066.64 | 5977.66 | -13.16 | 0.609 | |
| 19 | 石优17 | 9346.00 | 7049.33 | 2.41 | 1.017 | |
| 20 | 岱麦366 | 9418.18 | 7323.26 | 6.39 | 1.175 | |
| 21 | 济麦229 | 9593.12 | 7121.65 | 3.46 | 1.032 | |
| 22 | 科农2009 | 8099.11 | 6359.86 | -7.61 | 0.777 | |
| 编号 | 品种/系 | CK | LN(低氮施用) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 比对照材料增产率/% | 氮素利用效率(NUI) | |||
| 对照品种 | 济麦22 | 8638.50 | 6883.35 | |||
| 1 | 伟隆136 | 9119.18 | 6923.66 | 0.59 | 0.970 | |
| 2 | 伟隆169 | 8378.40 | 7027.87 | 2.10 | 1.120 | |
| 3 | 中麦578 | 10131.71 | 7922.57 | 15.10 | 1.496 | |
| 4 | 中麦255 | 8620.30 | 5781.56 | -16.01 | 0.499 | |
| 5 | 丰德存麦5号 | 9746.03 | 7841.55 | 13.92 | 1.493 | |
| 6 | 丰德存麦21 | 8172.45 | 6611.32 | -3.95 | 0.900 | |
| 7 | 藁优2018 | 10271.14 | 7144.69 | 3.80 | 0.976 | |
| 8 | 新麦26 | 7030.19 | 6231.88 | -9.46 | 0.826 | |
| 9 | 新麦28 | 10047.21 | 7651.11 | 11.15 | 1.312 | |
| 10 | 新麦38 | 9304.55 | 7538.92 | 9.52 | 1.336 | |
| 11 | 新麦45 | 7179.04 | 6317.83 | -8.22 | 0.854 | |
| 12 | 华麦158 | 9303.25 | 6520.16 | -5.28 | 0.748 | |
| 13 | 济麦336 | 9366.30 | 7502.11 | 8.99 | 1.301 | |
| 14 | 艾麦24 | 12155.76 | 6984.25 | 1.47 | 0.753 | |
| 15 | 谷神麦19 | 10889.44 | 7062.80 | 2.61 | 0.879 | |
| 16 | 石优20 | 12659.28 | 7861.12 | 14.20 | 1.161 | |
| 17 | 郑麦366 | 7974.32 | 6643.21 | -3.49 | 0.940 | |
| 18 | 西农979 | 8066.64 | 5977.66 | -13.16 | 0.609 | |
| 19 | 石优17 | 9346.00 | 7049.33 | 2.41 | 1.017 | |
| 20 | 岱麦366 | 9418.18 | 7323.26 | 6.39 | 1.175 | |
| 21 | 济麦229 | 9593.12 | 7121.65 | 3.46 | 1.032 | |
| 22 | 科农2009 | 8099.11 | 6359.86 | -7.61 | 0.777 | |
| 编号 | 品种/系 | CK | LN(低氮施用) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 比对照材料增产率/% | 氮素利用效率(NUI) | |||
| 对照品种 | 济麦22 | 7717.50 | 6713.10 | |||
| 23 | 冀麦765 | 7606.47 | 6843.82 | 1.95 | 1.096 | |
| 24 | 徽研66 | 9033.21 | 4371.52 | -34.88 | 0.154 | |
| 25 | 鲁研951 | 8603.62 | 5209.54 | -22.40 | 0.325 | |
| 26 | 博信281 | 5964.65 | 5079.09 | -24.34 | 0.424 | |
| 27 | 济麦38 | 6091.90 | 4663.71 | -30.53 | 0.295 | |
| 28 | 济麦5198 | 8634.05 | 6409.31 | -4.53 | 0.743 | |
| 29 | 山农1695 | 6232.78 | 4666.32 | -30.49 | 0.289 | |
| 30 | 济麦0435 | 8816.38 | 5117.94 | -23.76 | 0.296 | |
| 31 | 鲁研1403 | 7326.16 | 4821.98 | -28.17 | 0.280 | |
| 32 | 济麦55 | 7945.90 | 7434.86 | 10.75 | 1.461 | |
| 33 | 山农48 | 7685.89 | 6516.56 | -2.93 | 0.892 | |
| 34 | 山农44 | 5499.12 | 3980.49 | -40.71 | 0.173 | |
| 35 | 中麦9088 | 9895.86 | 7065.28 | 5.25 | 0.957 | |
| 36 | 圣麦918 | 8618.98 | 7227.90 | 7.67 | 1.203 | |
| 37 | 轮选49 | 8793.48 | 6320.61 | -5.85 | 0.690 | |
| 38 | 农大753 | 8895.81 | 6546.41 | -2.48 | 0.785 | |
| 39 | 济麦5022 | 10387.48 | 6360.03 | -5.26 | 0.599 | |
| 40 | 金海2119 | 8977.55 | 6351.91 | -5.38 | 0.689 | |
| 41 | 农大761 | 10398.20 | 6206.69 | -7.54 | 0.542 | |
| 42 | 中麦29 | 8587.68 | 4230.36 | -36.98 | 0.142 | |
| 编号 | 品种/系 | CK | LN(低氮施用) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 比对照材料增产率/% | 氮素利用效率(NUI) | |||
| 对照品种 | 济麦22 | 7717.50 | 6713.10 | |||
| 23 | 冀麦765 | 7606.47 | 6843.82 | 1.95 | 1.096 | |
| 24 | 徽研66 | 9033.21 | 4371.52 | -34.88 | 0.154 | |
| 25 | 鲁研951 | 8603.62 | 5209.54 | -22.40 | 0.325 | |
| 26 | 博信281 | 5964.65 | 5079.09 | -24.34 | 0.424 | |
| 27 | 济麦38 | 6091.90 | 4663.71 | -30.53 | 0.295 | |
| 28 | 济麦5198 | 8634.05 | 6409.31 | -4.53 | 0.743 | |
| 29 | 山农1695 | 6232.78 | 4666.32 | -30.49 | 0.289 | |
| 30 | 济麦0435 | 8816.38 | 5117.94 | -23.76 | 0.296 | |
| 31 | 鲁研1403 | 7326.16 | 4821.98 | -28.17 | 0.280 | |
| 32 | 济麦55 | 7945.90 | 7434.86 | 10.75 | 1.461 | |
| 33 | 山农48 | 7685.89 | 6516.56 | -2.93 | 0.892 | |
| 34 | 山农44 | 5499.12 | 3980.49 | -40.71 | 0.173 | |
| 35 | 中麦9088 | 9895.86 | 7065.28 | 5.25 | 0.957 | |
| 36 | 圣麦918 | 8618.98 | 7227.90 | 7.67 | 1.203 | |
| 37 | 轮选49 | 8793.48 | 6320.61 | -5.85 | 0.690 | |
| 38 | 农大753 | 8895.81 | 6546.41 | -2.48 | 0.785 | |
| 39 | 济麦5022 | 10387.48 | 6360.03 | -5.26 | 0.599 | |
| 40 | 金海2119 | 8977.55 | 6351.91 | -5.38 | 0.689 | |
| 41 | 农大761 | 10398.20 | 6206.69 | -7.54 | 0.542 | |
| 42 | 中麦29 | 8587.68 | 4230.36 | -36.98 | 0.142 | |
| 编号 | 品种/系 | CK | LP(低磷施用) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 比对照材料增产率/% | 磷素利用效率(PUI) | |||
| 对照品种 | 济麦22 | 9540.45 | 8926.65 | |||
| 1 | 伟隆136 | 10377.53 | 9045.55 | 1.33 | 0.969 | |
| 2 | 伟隆169 | 9802.12 | 9256.72 | 3.70 | 1.125 | |
| 3 | 中麦578 | 10161.57 | 9449.93 | 5.86 | 1.179 | |
| 4 | 中麦255 | 9215.13 | 7878.80 | -11.74 | 0.628 | |
| 5 | 丰德存麦5号 | 9532.54 | 8352.75 | -6.43 | 0.767 | |
| 6 | 丰德存麦21 | 9465.87 | 8767.27 | -1.79 | 0.938 | |
| 7 | 藁优2018 | 9162.95 | 8275.93 | -7.29 | 0.769 | |
| 8 | 新麦26 | 8371.59 | 8106.35 | -9.19 | 0.775 | |
| 9 | 新麦28 | 8357.10 | 8352.75 | -6.43 | 0.875 | |
| 10 | 新麦38 | 9832.56 | 9310.79 | 4.30 | 1.148 | |
| 11 | 新麦45 | 8075.92 | 7954.17 | -10.89 | 0.745 | |
| 12 | 华麦158 | 8855.68 | 8606.39 | -3.59 | 0.931 | |
| 13 | 济麦336 | 9126.71 | 8548.41 | -4.24 | 0.879 | |
| 14 | 艾麦24 | 9725.31 | 9276.00 | 3.91 | 1.144 | |
| 15 | 谷神麦19 | 9883.29 | 9670.23 | 8.33 | 1.329 | |
| 16 | 石优20 | 10209.40 | 9832.56 | 10.15 | 1.376 | |
| 17 | 郑麦366 | 7774.45 | 7113.53 | -20.31 | 0.495 | |
| 18 | 西农979 | 9503.55 | 8229.55 | -7.81 | 0.725 | |
| 19 | 石优17 | 8844.09 | 8503.48 | -4.74 | 0.888 | |
| 20 | 岱麦366 | 10374.63 | 9128.16 | 2.26 | 1.005 | |
| 21 | 济麦229 | 9349.92 | 8613.64 | -3.51 | 0.885 | |
| 22 | 科农2009 | 10223.89 | 9207.88 | 3.15 | 1.056 | |
| 编号 | 品种/系 | CK | LP(低磷施用) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 比对照材料增产率/% | 磷素利用效率(PUI) | |||
| 对照品种 | 济麦22 | 9540.45 | 8926.65 | |||
| 1 | 伟隆136 | 10377.53 | 9045.55 | 1.33 | 0.969 | |
| 2 | 伟隆169 | 9802.12 | 9256.72 | 3.70 | 1.125 | |
| 3 | 中麦578 | 10161.57 | 9449.93 | 5.86 | 1.179 | |
| 4 | 中麦255 | 9215.13 | 7878.80 | -11.74 | 0.628 | |
| 5 | 丰德存麦5号 | 9532.54 | 8352.75 | -6.43 | 0.767 | |
| 6 | 丰德存麦21 | 9465.87 | 8767.27 | -1.79 | 0.938 | |
| 7 | 藁优2018 | 9162.95 | 8275.93 | -7.29 | 0.769 | |
| 8 | 新麦26 | 8371.59 | 8106.35 | -9.19 | 0.775 | |
| 9 | 新麦28 | 8357.10 | 8352.75 | -6.43 | 0.875 | |
| 10 | 新麦38 | 9832.56 | 9310.79 | 4.30 | 1.148 | |
| 11 | 新麦45 | 8075.92 | 7954.17 | -10.89 | 0.745 | |
| 12 | 华麦158 | 8855.68 | 8606.39 | -3.59 | 0.931 | |
| 13 | 济麦336 | 9126.71 | 8548.41 | -4.24 | 0.879 | |
| 14 | 艾麦24 | 9725.31 | 9276.00 | 3.91 | 1.144 | |
| 15 | 谷神麦19 | 9883.29 | 9670.23 | 8.33 | 1.329 | |
| 16 | 石优20 | 10209.40 | 9832.56 | 10.15 | 1.376 | |
| 17 | 郑麦366 | 7774.45 | 7113.53 | -20.31 | 0.495 | |
| 18 | 西农979 | 9503.55 | 8229.55 | -7.81 | 0.725 | |
| 19 | 石优17 | 8844.09 | 8503.48 | -4.74 | 0.888 | |
| 20 | 岱麦366 | 10374.63 | 9128.16 | 2.26 | 1.005 | |
| 21 | 济麦229 | 9349.92 | 8613.64 | -3.51 | 0.885 | |
| 22 | 科农2009 | 10223.89 | 9207.88 | 3.15 | 1.056 | |
| 编号 | 品种/系 | CK | LP(低磷施用) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 比对照材料增产率/% | 磷素利用效率(PUI) | |||
| 对照品种 | 济麦22 | 8638.50 | 7335.30 | |||
| 1 | 伟隆136 | 9119.18 | 7178.75 | -2.13 | 0.869 | |
| 2 | 伟隆169 | 8378.40 | 7317.89 | -0.24 | 1.021 | |
| 3 | 中麦578 | 10131.71 | 7900.83 | 7.71 | 1.148 | |
| 4 | 中麦255 | 8620.30 | 6815.83 | -7.08 | 0.747 | |
| 5 | 丰德存麦5号 | 9746.03 | 7872.28 | 7.32 | 1.176 | |
| 6 | 丰德存麦21 | 8172.45 | 6848.44 | -6.64 | 0.803 | |
| 7 | 藁优2018 | 10271.14 | 7361.52 | 0.36 | 0.853 | |
| 8 | 新麦26 | 7030.19 | 6513.35 | -11.21 | 0.764 | |
| 9 | 新麦28 | 10047.21 | 7775.03 | 5.99 | 1.085 | |
| 10 | 新麦38 | 9304.55 | 6808.44 | -7.18 | 0.689 | |
| 11 | 新麦45 | 7179.04 | 6698.29 | -8.68 | 0.837 | |
| 12 | 华麦158 | 9303.25 | 8161.00 | 11.26 | 1.423 | |
| 13 | 济麦336 | 9366.30 | 7689.66 | 4.83 | 1.114 | |
| 14 | 艾麦24 | 12155.76 | 7454.14 | 1.62 | 0.758 | |
| 15 | 谷神麦19 | 10889.44 | 7301.37 | -0.46 | 0.779 | |
| 16 | 石优20 | 12659.28 | 7889.09 | 7.55 | 0.913 | |
| 17 | 郑麦366 | 7974.32 | 7186.15 | -2.03 | 0.998 | |
| 18 | 西农979 | 8066.64 | 6534.07 | -10.92 | 0.674 | |
| 19 | 石优17 | 9346.00 | 7193.54 | -1.93 | 0.855 | |
| 20 | 岱麦366 | 9418.18 | 8207.09 | 11.88 | 1.437 | |
| 21 | 济麦229 | 9593.12 | 7747.78 | 5.62 | 1.121 | |
| 22 | 科农2009 | 8099.11 | 6848.44 | -6.64 | 0.810 | |
| 编号 | 品种/系 | CK | LP(低磷施用) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 比对照材料增产率/% | 磷素利用效率(PUI) | |||
| 对照品种 | 济麦22 | 8638.50 | 7335.30 | |||
| 1 | 伟隆136 | 9119.18 | 7178.75 | -2.13 | 0.869 | |
| 2 | 伟隆169 | 8378.40 | 7317.89 | -0.24 | 1.021 | |
| 3 | 中麦578 | 10131.71 | 7900.83 | 7.71 | 1.148 | |
| 4 | 中麦255 | 8620.30 | 6815.83 | -7.08 | 0.747 | |
| 5 | 丰德存麦5号 | 9746.03 | 7872.28 | 7.32 | 1.176 | |
| 6 | 丰德存麦21 | 8172.45 | 6848.44 | -6.64 | 0.803 | |
| 7 | 藁优2018 | 10271.14 | 7361.52 | 0.36 | 0.853 | |
| 8 | 新麦26 | 7030.19 | 6513.35 | -11.21 | 0.764 | |
| 9 | 新麦28 | 10047.21 | 7775.03 | 5.99 | 1.085 | |
| 10 | 新麦38 | 9304.55 | 6808.44 | -7.18 | 0.689 | |
| 11 | 新麦45 | 7179.04 | 6698.29 | -8.68 | 0.837 | |
| 12 | 华麦158 | 9303.25 | 8161.00 | 11.26 | 1.423 | |
| 13 | 济麦336 | 9366.30 | 7689.66 | 4.83 | 1.114 | |
| 14 | 艾麦24 | 12155.76 | 7454.14 | 1.62 | 0.758 | |
| 15 | 谷神麦19 | 10889.44 | 7301.37 | -0.46 | 0.779 | |
| 16 | 石优20 | 12659.28 | 7889.09 | 7.55 | 0.913 | |
| 17 | 郑麦366 | 7974.32 | 7186.15 | -2.03 | 0.998 | |
| 18 | 西农979 | 8066.64 | 6534.07 | -10.92 | 0.674 | |
| 19 | 石优17 | 9346.00 | 7193.54 | -1.93 | 0.855 | |
| 20 | 岱麦366 | 9418.18 | 8207.09 | 11.88 | 1.437 | |
| 21 | 济麦229 | 9593.12 | 7747.78 | 5.62 | 1.121 | |
| 22 | 科农2009 | 8099.11 | 6848.44 | -6.64 | 0.810 | |
| 编号 | 品种/系 | CK | LP(低磷施用) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 比对照材料增产率/% | 磷素利用效率(PUI) | |||
| 对照品种 | 济麦22 | 7717.50 | 7064.55 | |||
| 23 | 冀麦765 | 7606.47 | 6960.93 | -1.47 | 0.956 | |
| 24 | 徽研66 | 9033.21 | 7454.58 | 5.52 | 1.059 | |
| 25 | 鲁研951 | 8603.62 | 7727.92 | 9.39 | 1.284 | |
| 26 | 博信281 | 5964.65 | 5570.42 | -21.15 | 0.500 | |
| 27 | 济麦38 | 6091.90 | 5871.31 | -16.89 | 0.604 | |
| 28 | 济麦5198 | 8634.05 | 6810.49 | -3.60 | 0.772 | |
| 29 | 山农1695 | 6232.78 | 6173.35 | -12.62 | 0.722 | |
| 30 | 济麦0435 | 8816.38 | 6836.86 | -3.22 | 0.768 | |
| 31 | 鲁研1403 | 7326.16 | 7126.73 | 0.88 | 1.091 | |
| 32 | 济麦55 | 7945.90 | 7521.25 | 6.46 | 1.248 | |
| 33 | 山农48 | 7685.89 | 7202.97 | 1.96 | 1.085 | |
| 34 | 山农44 | 5499.12 | 5374.18 | -23.93 | 0.470 | |
| 35 | 中麦9088 | 9895.86 | 8003.88 | 13.30 | 1.285 | |
| 36 | 圣麦918 | 8618.98 | 7545.01 | 6.80 | 1.165 | |
| 37 | 轮选49 | 8793.48 | 7882.71 | 11.58 | 1.360 | |
| 38 | 农大753 | 8895.81 | 7003.54 | -0.86 | 0.838 | |
| 39 | 济麦5022 | 10387.48 | 7216.30 | 2.15 | 0.809 | |
| 40 | 金海2119 | 8977.55 | 7139.78 | 1.06 | 0.897 | |
| 41 | 农大761 | 10398.20 | 7203.84 | 1.97 | 0.802 | |
| 42 | 中麦29 | 8587.68 | 6801.21 | -3.73 | 0.772 | |
| 编号 | 品种/系 | CK | LP(低磷施用) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 产量/(kg/hm2) | 产量/(kg/hm2) | 比对照材料增产率/% | 磷素利用效率(PUI) | |||
| 对照品种 | 济麦22 | 7717.50 | 7064.55 | |||
| 23 | 冀麦765 | 7606.47 | 6960.93 | -1.47 | 0.956 | |
| 24 | 徽研66 | 9033.21 | 7454.58 | 5.52 | 1.059 | |
| 25 | 鲁研951 | 8603.62 | 7727.92 | 9.39 | 1.284 | |
| 26 | 博信281 | 5964.65 | 5570.42 | -21.15 | 0.500 | |
| 27 | 济麦38 | 6091.90 | 5871.31 | -16.89 | 0.604 | |
| 28 | 济麦5198 | 8634.05 | 6810.49 | -3.60 | 0.772 | |
| 29 | 山农1695 | 6232.78 | 6173.35 | -12.62 | 0.722 | |
| 30 | 济麦0435 | 8816.38 | 6836.86 | -3.22 | 0.768 | |
| 31 | 鲁研1403 | 7326.16 | 7126.73 | 0.88 | 1.091 | |
| 32 | 济麦55 | 7945.90 | 7521.25 | 6.46 | 1.248 | |
| 33 | 山农48 | 7685.89 | 7202.97 | 1.96 | 1.085 | |
| 34 | 山农44 | 5499.12 | 5374.18 | -23.93 | 0.470 | |
| 35 | 中麦9088 | 9895.86 | 8003.88 | 13.30 | 1.285 | |
| 36 | 圣麦918 | 8618.98 | 7545.01 | 6.80 | 1.165 | |
| 37 | 轮选49 | 8793.48 | 7882.71 | 11.58 | 1.360 | |
| 38 | 农大753 | 8895.81 | 7003.54 | -0.86 | 0.838 | |
| 39 | 济麦5022 | 10387.48 | 7216.30 | 2.15 | 0.809 | |
| 40 | 金海2119 | 8977.55 | 7139.78 | 1.06 | 0.897 | |
| 41 | 农大761 | 10398.20 | 7203.84 | 1.97 | 0.802 | |
| 42 | 中麦29 | 8587.68 | 6801.21 | -3.73 | 0.772 | |
| [1] |
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1679-0 |
| [2] |
丁文成, 何萍, 周卫. 中国新型肥料产业发展战略研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2023, 29(2):201-219.
|
| [3] |
麻坤, 刁钢. 化肥对中国粮食产量变化贡献率的研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(4):1113-1120.
|
| [4] |
doi: 10.1111/nph.1984.97.issue-1 URL |
| [5] |
周卫, 丁文成. 新阶段化肥减量增效战略研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2023, 29(1):1-7.
|
| [6] |
方玉东, 胡业翠, 封志明. 基于GIS技术的中国农田磷素养分收支平衡研究[J]. 资源科学, 2008, 30(5):725-731.
|
| [7] |
靳义荣, 刘金栋, 刘彩云, 等. 普通小麦氮素利用效率相关性状全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3):394-404.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.01024 |
| [8] |
doi: 10.1007/s10681-017-2086-y |
| [9] |
娄梦玉, 薛华龙, 郭彬彬, 等. 施磷水平与冬小麦产量和土壤有效磷含量的关系[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28(9):1582-1593.
|
| [10] |
任开明, 杨文俊, 王犇, 等. 施氮量对稻茬弱筋小麦籽粒氮代谢及灌浆的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2023, 37(3):606-616.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.1000-8551.2023.03.0606 |
| [11] |
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60867-4 URL |
| [12] |
吴萍萍, 王静, 李录, 等. 化肥减施下有机物料对砂姜黑土有机碳组分和养分含量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2022, 36(11):2286-2294.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2022.11.2286 |
| [13] |
徐萍, 杨宪杰, 冯佐龙, 等. 华北平原小麦新型耕作施肥播种方式增产增效研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2022, 30(5):831-841.
|
| [14] |
李言胜, 王萌, 叶全, 等. 测土配肥专家系统及其移动客户端的设计与实现[J]. 青岛农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 35(3):231-235.
|
| [15] |
姚春生, 任婕, 张震, 等. 微喷水肥一体化氮肥管理对冬小麦产量、品质、氮素积累和利用的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2023, 28(3):25-37.
|
| [16] |
袁园园, 朱晓梁, 李彪, 等. 小麦氮、磷高效新品系的鉴定和评价[J]. 中国种业, 2022(8):83-88.
|
| [17] |
徐易如, 赵艳艳, 孙福来, 等. 小麦成熟期产量及钾效率相关性状的全基因组关联分析[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(6):1081-1090.
|
| [18] |
王云凤, 杨茂林, 郑景瑞, 等. 不同小麦品种产量和氮、磷利用效率差异的生理机制[J]. 西北农业学报, 2023, 32(3):337-349.
|
| [19] |
袁园园, 董贝, 曹晓慧, 等. 黄淮麦区小麦成株期磷高效基因型的鉴定和筛选[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2017, 37(1):56-65.
|
| [20] |
王晓婧, 代兴龙, 马鑫, 等. 不同小麦品种产量和氮素吸收利用的差异[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2017, 37(8):1065-1071.
|
| [21] |
吕广德, 陈永军, 尹逊栋, 等. 小麦成熟期N、P养分利用效率鉴定初探[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(30):7-13.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0001 |
| [22] |
罗永露, 隋建枢, 陈天青, 等. 西南片区小麦品种氮高效基因型的筛选[J]. 种子, 2020, 39(11):118-122.
|
| [23] |
罗永露, 隋建枢, 陈天青, 等. 小麦品种低磷胁迫下高效基因型品种的筛选[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2021, 41(5):12-14.
|
| [24] |
柏栋阴, 冯国华, 张会云, 等. 低磷胁迫下磷高效基因型小麦的筛选[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2007, 27(3):407-410.
|
| [25] |
孔凡美, 周秀文, 赵艳艳, 等. 小麦养分效率评价指标和养分高效种质筛选[J]. 山东农业科学, 2021, 53(5):122-127.
|
| [1] | PAN Dongzan, LIAO Yu, SHAO Xiuhong, LI Jiqin, MA Zhuwen, ZOU Mingmin, GAO Sanji, PAN Xiaoying, HUANG Zhenrui. Research Progress on Physiological, Molecular, and Genetic Improvement of Nitrogen Nutrition in Tobacco [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 37-47. |
| [2] | PENG Zicheng, LI Shuaihao, XIE Shirui, YANG Haichang, ZHANG Fenghua, LIU Feng, ZHOU Zhongkai, XU Yunjun. Synergistic Regulatory Effects of Planting Density and Nitrogen Fertilizer Interaction on Soybean Growth and Soil Nutrients in Saline-alkali Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 109-118. |
| [3] | LI Baojun, WEN Guochang, CHEN Jie, CUI Xiaojing, JIA Liangliang, YANG Yunma, YANG Pu, LI Hongtie. Effects of Tillage Methods, Organic Fertilizer and Straw Returning on Wheat Fusarium Head Blight and Crown Rot [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(2): 184-190. |
| [4] | WANG Jun, ZUO Xi, QIU Jingtao, YANG Wuguang, QIAN Chencheng. Differences Analysis of Agronomic Traits and Yield of Different Wheat Varieties Under Late-Sowing Conditions [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(2): 25-31. |
| [5] | LIU Sixi, HUANG Xiangqing, DAI Tingyun, SUN Jiawei, CHEN Huihuan, GAO Tian, TANG Xueqin, YANG Yuping, YAN Hong. Effects of Sowing Date and Seeding Rate on Population Growth and Yield of Winter Wheat in Chengdu Plain Area [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(2): 32-39. |
| [6] | LIU Zheyang, FENG Dianxing, ZOU Liangping, RUAN Mengbin, YU Xiaoling, LI Shuxia, LI Wenbin, ZHAO Pingjuan. Research Progress on Role of Transcription Factor TGA in Nitrogen Absorption, Transport and Assimilation in Plants [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(2): 65-70. |
| [7] | LI Yali, LU Guoliang, WU Zhenghu, GUO Fei, ZHANG Xisheng, LIU An. Effects of Different Amendments on Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Winter Wheat and Soil Nutrients [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(2): 128-132. |
| [8] | WANG Kexiu, TANG Mingxia, CHENG Mingjun, HU Jianjun, LI Bing, LIAO Feifei, LI Huapeng, YANG Wenting, GUO Zhan, CUI Kuoshu. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Nitrogen Fertilizer Type on Growth and Development of Potato and Nitrogen Utilization [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(1): 1-11. |
| [9] | DONG Linlin, YAN Kai, SHENG Xuewen, LU Changying, SHI Linlin, WANG Haihou, WU Zhenggui. Spectral Characteristics of Soil Water-soluble Organic Carbon Affected by Cultivation Methods During Rice Growth Period [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 99-106. |
| [10] | LI Yangyang, CHEN Shuaimin, XU Minghong, CHI Chang, MA Wei, WANG Yinping, SONG Yan, FAN Zuowei, WU Haiyan. Effects of Microbial Product Coupling Urea on Straw Decomposition Rate and Yield of Rice [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 18-24. |
| [11] | TIAN Cuiling, TIAN Jialiang. Effect of Spraying Alginate Enhancing Solution at Different Growth Stages on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Winter Wheat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 25-31. |
| [12] | REN Qingguo, WU Guangjun, LIN Ping, ZHANG Jiyu, ZHANG Xin, ZHANG Yongshan, HAI Tao. Study of Yield and Quality Traits of New Wheat Cultivar ‘Hemai 26’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 32-37. |
| [13] | CHEN Pengjun, ZHANG Jiao, HAN Jijun, MIAO Yuanqing, CUI Shiyou. Effects of Different Exogenous Silicon Fertilizers Application on Yield, Dry Matter and Nutrient Accumulation and Transport of Rice in Tidal Flat [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 8-17. |
| [14] | ZHANG Yuyu, WANG Xiangning, ZENG Xuejiao, GUAN Jie, ZHANG Yi, LI Bing, CAI Yan. Effect of Combining Controlled-release Nitrogen Fertilizer and Urea on Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization of Spring Maize in Eastern Sichuan [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 25-30. |
| [15] | XUE Yuansai, WANG Xijiu, ZOU Shiguo, ZHANG Shoufu, LIU Guangya, HAN Wei, SUN Xian. Effect of Compound Oligosaccharides on Yield of Typical Crops in Shandong Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(8): 50-56. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||