
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 177-182.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0169
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHAO Jiatao1(
), GUO Mianyan2, LIU Mengdao1(
), FU Zhengbo1, YU Qi1
Received:2025-03-05
Revised:2025-07-02
Online:2026-02-15
Published:2026-02-09
ZHAO Jiatao, GUO Mianyan, LIU Mengdao, FU Zhengbo, YU Qi. Effects of Planting Density and Cutting Period on Forage Yield and Quality of 'Baopimai 28'[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 177-182.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0169
| 处理 | 分蘖盛期小区产量/kg | 拔节初期小区产量/kg | 乳熟期小区产量/kg | 合计鲜草产量/kg | 折合单产/(t/hm2) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | 平均 | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | 平均 | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | 平均 | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | 平均 | ||
| A1B1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 40.15 | 39.35 | 41.15 | 40.22 | 40.15 | 39.35 | 41.15 | 40.22 | 40.22CD |
| A1B2 | 12.25 | 13.35 | 12.35 | 12.65 | - | - | - | - | 32.20 | 34.50 | 32.00 | 32.90 | 44.45 | 47.85 | 44.35 | 45.55 | 45.55ABb |
| A1B3 | - | - | - | - | 16.5 | 16.7 | 17.1 | 16.77 | 26.55 | 25.65 | 25.85 | 26.02 | 43.05 | 42.35 | 42.95 | 42.78 | 42.78BCc |
| A2B1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 42.65 | 41.70 | 43.50 | 42.62 | 42.65 | 41.70 | 43.50 | 42.62 | 42.62BC |
| A2B2 | 13.35 | 12.85 | 13.7 | 13.30 | - | - | - | - | 34.70 | 33.80 | 36.30 | 34.93 | 48.05 | 46.65 | 50.00 | 48.23 | 48.23Aa |
| A2B3 | - | - | - | - | 17.3 | 17.55 | 16.5 | 17.12 | 33.00 | 29.15 | 28.75 | 30.30 | 50.30 | 46.70 | 45.25 | 47.42 | 47.42Aab |
| A3B1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 43.60 | 42.55 | 43.15 | 43.10 | 43.60 | 42.55 | 43.15 | 43.10 | 43.10BCc |
| A3B2 | 13.5 | 14.4 | 13.25 | 13.72 | - | - | - | - | 35.15 | 34.8 | 35.40 | 35.12 | 48.65 | 49.20 | 48.65 | 48.83 | 48.83Aa |
| A3B3 | - | - | - | - | 18.5 | 18.65 | 18.85 | 18.67 | 28.50 | 29.55 | 28.25 | 28.77 | 47.00 | 48.20 | 47.10 | 47.43 | 47.43Aab |
| 处理 | 分蘖盛期小区产量/kg | 拔节初期小区产量/kg | 乳熟期小区产量/kg | 合计鲜草产量/kg | 折合单产/(t/hm2) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | 平均 | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | 平均 | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | 平均 | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | 平均 | ||
| A1B1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 40.15 | 39.35 | 41.15 | 40.22 | 40.15 | 39.35 | 41.15 | 40.22 | 40.22CD |
| A1B2 | 12.25 | 13.35 | 12.35 | 12.65 | - | - | - | - | 32.20 | 34.50 | 32.00 | 32.90 | 44.45 | 47.85 | 44.35 | 45.55 | 45.55ABb |
| A1B3 | - | - | - | - | 16.5 | 16.7 | 17.1 | 16.77 | 26.55 | 25.65 | 25.85 | 26.02 | 43.05 | 42.35 | 42.95 | 42.78 | 42.78BCc |
| A2B1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 42.65 | 41.70 | 43.50 | 42.62 | 42.65 | 41.70 | 43.50 | 42.62 | 42.62BC |
| A2B2 | 13.35 | 12.85 | 13.7 | 13.30 | - | - | - | - | 34.70 | 33.80 | 36.30 | 34.93 | 48.05 | 46.65 | 50.00 | 48.23 | 48.23Aa |
| A2B3 | - | - | - | - | 17.3 | 17.55 | 16.5 | 17.12 | 33.00 | 29.15 | 28.75 | 30.30 | 50.30 | 46.70 | 45.25 | 47.42 | 47.42Aab |
| A3B1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 43.60 | 42.55 | 43.15 | 43.10 | 43.60 | 42.55 | 43.15 | 43.10 | 43.10BCc |
| A3B2 | 13.5 | 14.4 | 13.25 | 13.72 | - | - | - | - | 35.15 | 34.8 | 35.40 | 35.12 | 48.65 | 49.20 | 48.65 | 48.83 | 48.83Aa |
| A3B3 | - | - | - | - | 18.5 | 18.65 | 18.85 | 18.67 | 28.50 | 29.55 | 28.25 | 28.77 | 47.00 | 48.20 | 47.10 | 47.43 | 47.43Aab |
| A因素间 多重分析 | A1中各组合间 多重分析 | A2中各组合间 多重分析 | A3中各组合间 多重分析 | B因素间 多重分析 | B1中各组合间 多重分析 | B2中各组合间 多重分析 | B3中各组合间 多重分析 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 处理 | 小区 均值/kg | 处理 | 小区 均值/kg | 处理 | 小区 均值/kg | 处理 | 小区 均值/kg | 处理 | 小区 均值/kg | 处理 | 小区 均值/kg | 处理 | 小区 均值/kg | 处理 | 小区 均值/kg |
| A3 | 46.56Aa | B2 | 45.55Aa | B2 | 48.23Aa | B2 | 48.83Aa | B2 | 47.54Aa | A3 | 43.1Aa | A3 | 48.83Aa | A3 | 47.43Aa |
| A2 | 46.09Aa | B3 | 42.78ABb | B3 | 47.42Aa | B3 | 47.43Aa | B3 | 45.88Ab | A2 | 42.62Aab | A2 | 48.23Aa | A2 | 47.42Aa |
| A1 | 42.85Bb | B1 | 40.22Bc | B1 | 42.62Bb | B1 | 43.1Bb | B1 | 41.98Bc | A1 | 40.22Ab | A1 | 45.55Ab | A1 | 42.78Bb |
| A因素间 多重分析 | A1中各组合间 多重分析 | A2中各组合间 多重分析 | A3中各组合间 多重分析 | B因素间 多重分析 | B1中各组合间 多重分析 | B2中各组合间 多重分析 | B3中各组合间 多重分析 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 处理 | 小区 均值/kg | 处理 | 小区 均值/kg | 处理 | 小区 均值/kg | 处理 | 小区 均值/kg | 处理 | 小区 均值/kg | 处理 | 小区 均值/kg | 处理 | 小区 均值/kg | 处理 | 小区 均值/kg |
| A3 | 46.56Aa | B2 | 45.55Aa | B2 | 48.23Aa | B2 | 48.83Aa | B2 | 47.54Aa | A3 | 43.1Aa | A3 | 48.83Aa | A3 | 47.43Aa |
| A2 | 46.09Aa | B3 | 42.78ABb | B3 | 47.42Aa | B3 | 47.43Aa | B3 | 45.88Ab | A2 | 42.62Aab | A2 | 48.23Aa | A2 | 47.42Aa |
| A1 | 42.85Bb | B1 | 40.22Bc | B1 | 42.62Bb | B1 | 43.1Bb | B1 | 41.98Bc | A1 | 40.22Ab | A1 | 45.55Ab | A1 | 42.78Bb |
| 处理 | 基本苗/ (万株/hm2) | 茎蘖总数/ (万株/hm2) | 有效茎数/ (万株/hm2) | 成茎率/% | 有效绿 叶数/片 | 株高/cm | 穗长/cm | 穗粒 数/粒 | 千粒重/g | 乳熟期单 茎鲜重/g | 白粉病 | 条纹病 | 倒伏 面积/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1B1 | 271.5 | 1326.0 | 523.5 | 39.5 | 4.2 | 80.0 | 7.7 | 27.8 | 48.7 | 7.72 | 1 | 1 | / |
| A1B2 | 270.0 | 1306.5 | 541.5 | 41.4 | 3.6 | 77.5 | 6.3 | 24.4 | 47.5 | 6.13 | 1 | 1 | / |
| A1B3 | 271.5 | 1314.0 | 501.0 | 38.1 | 3.4 | 70.5 | 6.0 | 22.5 | 45.7 | 5.21 | 1 | 1 | / |
| A2B1 | 301.5 | 1425.0 | 567.0 | 39.8 | 4.3 | 82.0 | 7.5 | 26.0 | 48.4 | 7.53 | 1 | 1 | / |
| A2B2 | 300.0 | 1417.5 | 601.5 | 42.4 | 3.7 | 79.0 | 6.4 | 23.8 | 47.2 | 5.84 | 1 | 1 | / |
| A2B3 | 300.0 | 1423.5 | 547.5 | 38.5 | 3.4 | 71.0 | 6.1 | 22.3 | 45.2 | 5.29 | 1 | 1 | / |
| A3B1 | 300.0 | 1557.0 | 601.5 | 38.6 | 4.2 | 85.0 | 7.6 | 25.9 | 48.0 | 7.21 | 1 | 1 | / |
| A3B2 | 333.0 | 1537.5 | 612.0 | 39.8 | 3.5 | 81.5 | 6.5 | 23.3 | 46.8 | 5.73 | 1 | 1 | / |
| A3B3 | 331.5 | 1528.5 | 552.0 | 36.1 | 3.4 | 72.5 | 6.0 | 21.6 | 44.6 | 5.11 | 1 | 1 | / |
| 处理 | 基本苗/ (万株/hm2) | 茎蘖总数/ (万株/hm2) | 有效茎数/ (万株/hm2) | 成茎率/% | 有效绿 叶数/片 | 株高/cm | 穗长/cm | 穗粒 数/粒 | 千粒重/g | 乳熟期单 茎鲜重/g | 白粉病 | 条纹病 | 倒伏 面积/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1B1 | 271.5 | 1326.0 | 523.5 | 39.5 | 4.2 | 80.0 | 7.7 | 27.8 | 48.7 | 7.72 | 1 | 1 | / |
| A1B2 | 270.0 | 1306.5 | 541.5 | 41.4 | 3.6 | 77.5 | 6.3 | 24.4 | 47.5 | 6.13 | 1 | 1 | / |
| A1B3 | 271.5 | 1314.0 | 501.0 | 38.1 | 3.4 | 70.5 | 6.0 | 22.5 | 45.7 | 5.21 | 1 | 1 | / |
| A2B1 | 301.5 | 1425.0 | 567.0 | 39.8 | 4.3 | 82.0 | 7.5 | 26.0 | 48.4 | 7.53 | 1 | 1 | / |
| A2B2 | 300.0 | 1417.5 | 601.5 | 42.4 | 3.7 | 79.0 | 6.4 | 23.8 | 47.2 | 5.84 | 1 | 1 | / |
| A2B3 | 300.0 | 1423.5 | 547.5 | 38.5 | 3.4 | 71.0 | 6.1 | 22.3 | 45.2 | 5.29 | 1 | 1 | / |
| A3B1 | 300.0 | 1557.0 | 601.5 | 38.6 | 4.2 | 85.0 | 7.6 | 25.9 | 48.0 | 7.21 | 1 | 1 | / |
| A3B2 | 333.0 | 1537.5 | 612.0 | 39.8 | 3.5 | 81.5 | 6.5 | 23.3 | 46.8 | 5.73 | 1 | 1 | / |
| A3B3 | 331.5 | 1528.5 | 552.0 | 36.1 | 3.4 | 72.5 | 6.0 | 21.6 | 44.6 | 5.11 | 1 | 1 | / |
| 处理 | 干鲜比 | 水分/% | 粗蛋白质/% | 中性洗涤纤维/% | 酸性洗涤纤维/% | 粗纤维/% | 粗脂肪/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1(分蘖盛期刈割) | 0.15 | 84.9 | 33.02 | 25.66 | 20.46 | 14.07 | 1.44 |
| A1(拔节初期刈割) | 0.16 | 83.9 | 22.29 | 30.50 | 23.45 | 20.05 | 1.29 |
| A1(乳熟期刈割) | 0.32 | 67.9 | 8.07 | 54.25 | 32.34 | 26.01 | 1.23 |
| A2(分蘖盛期刈割) | 0.15 | 84.8 | 31.61 | 26.14 | 21.72 | 16.51 | 1.33 |
| A2(拔节初期刈割) | 0.16 | 83.7 | 21.95 | 32.79 | 24 | 21.19 | 1.24 |
| A2(乳熟期刈割) | 0.32 | 67.8 | 7.25 | 54.35 | 35.17 | 31.74 | 1.17 |
| A3(分蘖盛期刈割) | 0.15 | 85.0 | 22.46 | 27.62 | 21.9 | 16.67 | 1.51 |
| A3(拔节初期刈割) | 0.17 | 82.8 | 17.94 | 34.01 | 24.11 | 21.27 | 1.46 |
| A3(乳熟期刈割) | 0.31 | 68.9 | 6.82 | 54.9 | 37.71 | 31.83 | 1.20 |
| 处理 | 干鲜比 | 水分/% | 粗蛋白质/% | 中性洗涤纤维/% | 酸性洗涤纤维/% | 粗纤维/% | 粗脂肪/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1(分蘖盛期刈割) | 0.15 | 84.9 | 33.02 | 25.66 | 20.46 | 14.07 | 1.44 |
| A1(拔节初期刈割) | 0.16 | 83.9 | 22.29 | 30.50 | 23.45 | 20.05 | 1.29 |
| A1(乳熟期刈割) | 0.32 | 67.9 | 8.07 | 54.25 | 32.34 | 26.01 | 1.23 |
| A2(分蘖盛期刈割) | 0.15 | 84.8 | 31.61 | 26.14 | 21.72 | 16.51 | 1.33 |
| A2(拔节初期刈割) | 0.16 | 83.7 | 21.95 | 32.79 | 24 | 21.19 | 1.24 |
| A2(乳熟期刈割) | 0.32 | 67.8 | 7.25 | 54.35 | 35.17 | 31.74 | 1.17 |
| A3(分蘖盛期刈割) | 0.15 | 85.0 | 22.46 | 27.62 | 21.9 | 16.67 | 1.51 |
| A3(拔节初期刈割) | 0.17 | 82.8 | 17.94 | 34.01 | 24.11 | 21.27 | 1.46 |
| A3(乳熟期刈割) | 0.31 | 68.9 | 6.82 | 54.9 | 37.71 | 31.83 | 1.20 |
| [1] |
王勇生, 王博, 雷恒. 大麦的营养价值与提高其畜禽利用率的措施[J]. 中国饲料, 2014(4):18-22.
|
| [2] |
赵准. 四种栽培措施对青贮大麦产量和品质的影响[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2020.
|
| [3] |
周智林, 李玲. 解决湖南饲用旱粮短缺问题研究[J]. 作物研究, 1988, 2(3):19-20.
|
| [4] |
许如根, 郭三红, 吕超, 等. 不同冬割方式对大麦主要性状的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2007(3):157-160.
|
| [5] |
赵加涛, 杨向红, 付正波, 等. 不同大麦品种饲草产量及品质研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(27):27-31.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0746 |
| [6] |
谭大明, 谭海运, 高雪, 等. 不同施肥方式和播量对冬青稞复种饲草生长的影响[J]. 大麦与谷类科学, 2018, 35(5):5-13,23.
|
| [7] |
李喜焕, 常文锁, 张彩英, 等. 引进秋播啤酒大麦不同播期、密度与产量的关系研究[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2008(1):6-11.
|
| [8] |
张黛静, 马雪, 王晓东, 等. 品种与密度对豫中地区小麦光合生理特性及光能利用率的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2014, 34(3):388-394.
|
| [9] |
徐广祥, 刘琳, 吕二锁, 等. 氮肥施用量、种植密度、刈割期及其互作对蒙啤麦5号饲草产量及营养品质的影响[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2023, 44(2):92-97.
|
| [10] |
李晶, 杨猛, 庄文峰, 等. 刈割对不同密度小黑麦东农5305产量及再生营养的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2009(1):73-77.
|
| [11] |
石秀兰, 陈平, 韩瑞宏, 等. 杂交狼尾草新品系1号对种植密度和刈割高度调控的响应[J]. 仲恺农业工程学院学报, 2013, 26(2):6-11.
|
| [12] |
章家恩, 刘文高, 陈景青, 等. 不同刈割强度对牧草地上部和地下部生长性状的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(9):1740-1744.
|
| [13] |
郭智慧, 董树亭, 王空军, 等. 刈割对不同类型玉米再生分蘖及产量和品质的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2008, 16(3):104-108.
|
| [14] |
朱珏, 张彬, 谭支良, 等. 刈割对牧草生物量和品质影响的研究进展[J]. 草业科学, 2009, 26(2):80-85.
|
| [15] |
钟秀琼, 钟声. 刈割对牧草影响的研究概况[J]. 草业与畜牧, 2007(5):22-25.
|
| [16] |
丁成龙, 顾洪如, 许能祥, 等. 不同刈割期对多花黑麦草饲草产量及品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(6):186-194.
|
| [17] |
田新会, 杜文华, 曹致中. 猫尾巴草不同品种的最佳刈割时期[J]. 草业科学, 2003, 20(9):12-15.
|
| [18] |
姜华, 毕玉芬, 何承刚. 不同时期刈割对黑麦草生产性能、蛋白质含量及光合效率的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报, 2003, 18(2):149-152.
|
| [19] |
邢虎成, 谭松林, 张英, 等. 刈割时期和留茬高度对大麦鲜草产量及饲用品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(31):1-4.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17070107 |
| [20] |
李焰焰, 方彭华, 张晓涛, 等. 刈割方式对皖北地区大麦饲用品质的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2010, 1(1):76-78.
|
| [21] |
赵加涛, 刘猛道, 付正波, 等. 大麦新品种保啤麦28号的选育[J]. 中国种业, 2024(3):125-127,130.
|
| [22] |
赵斌, 陈晓东, 季昌好, 等. 不同刈割时期与干燥方式对大麦饲草品质的影响[J]. 草原与草坪, 2020, 40(5):98-101.
|
| [23] |
巴图, 李建波, 徐广祥, 等. 不同刈割期对蒙啤麦5号饲草产量及品质的影响[J]. 内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 36(2):128-131.
|
| [24] |
陈晓东, 赵斌, 季昌好, 等. 大麦、小麦饲草产量与品质差异及适宜刈割次数研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2017(3):81-84.
|
| [25] |
陈晓东, 赵斌, 季昌好, 等. 刈割期对多棱饲料大麦饲草及籽粒产量与品质的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2017, 37(3):409-413.
|
| [26] |
赵准, 齐军仓, 李剑, 等. 新疆不同刈割期对春性大麦干草产量和青贮品质影响的研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2019(5):180-185.
|
| [27] |
王静, 张蕴薇, 杨富裕, 等. 不同种植密度及刈割次数对杂交狼尾草营养价值的影响[J]. 草原与草坪, 2011, 31(5):42-45.
|
| [28] |
王静, 沈文彤, 张蕴薇, 等. 种植密度和刈割频率对杂交狼尾草产量和品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2010, 18(4):589-593.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2010.04.019 |
| [29] |
张璐, 李登明, 翟晓宇, 等. 燕麦刈割期农艺与品质性状差异及其与再生性能的关系[J]. 作物杂志, 2024(1):220-228.
|
| [30] |
李春喜, 叶润荣, 周玉碧, 等. 高寒牧区不同燕麦品种饲草产量及品质的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(4):882-888.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.04.032 |
| [31] |
柴华, 杨曌, 申忠宝, 等. 9个燕麦品种在齐齐哈尔地区的农艺性状及饲草品质评价[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2023, 43(11):1426-1433.
|
| [1] | PENG Zicheng, LI Shuaihao, XIE Shirui, YANG Haichang, ZHANG Fenghua, LIU Feng, ZHOU Zhongkai, XU Yunjun. Synergistic Regulatory Effects of Planting Density and Nitrogen Fertilizer Interaction on Soybean Growth and Soil Nutrients in Saline-alkali Soil [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 109-118. |
| [2] | CUI Ling, JIANG Chenyang, NIU Shiduo, ZHOU Ping, GUO Jian, LU Dalei, LI Guanghao. Quality Difference Analysis of Fresh Waxy and Sweet-waxy Maize with Different Colors [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 20-27. |
| [3] | YAN Suyun, ZHANG Birong, DUAN Minxian, SHI Wenbin, LIU Chenglang, PAN Li, LI Xuejia, ZHOU Xianyan. Effect of BC Coating on Quality of Stored Lemon Fruits with Different Maturities [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 65-72. |
| [4] | LIU Yu, ZHANG Mengjia, WANG Rui, ZHANG Xuelian, JIN Qiang, YAN Shi, WANG Weirui. Effects of Different Amounts of Biochar-based Fertilizer on Soil Properties and Yield and Quality of Celery [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(2): 141-145. |
| [5] | TANG Jianpeng, CHEN Jingdu, LIU Shaogui, HONG Ye, ZHANG Yan, XIN Haibin, LU Peiling, ZHANG Mingwei. Impact of Reduced and Simplified Side Deep Fertilization on Rice Biomass Production and Quality [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(2): 16-24. |
| [6] | ZHAO Yueji, JIANG Huyuan, ZHANG Yanbo, LI Dan, XIA Zeyu. Evaluation and Prediction of Habitat Quality in Inner Mongolia Based on CA-Markov Model and Improved Remote Sensing Ecological Index [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(2): 171-183. |
| [7] | ZHANG Dongmin, HUANG Wanli, CHEN Xinyi, ZHANG Chaokun, XIAO Shiwei. Effect of Intercropping Model of Ziziphus mauritiana-Soybeans on Soil Nutrients and Fruit Quality of Z. mauritiana [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(1): 153-158. |
| [8] | WANG Chunfeng, CHENG Jiabao, XIONG Qing, QIN Fei, ZHANG Feng. Effect of Grass on Microenvironment Temperature and Humidity of Korla Fragrant Pear Orchard and Fruit Quality [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(1): 167-175. |
| [9] | QI Yongjie, XU Wenbing, ZHAO Dongjie, ZHANG Xiaolong, ZHAO Jinchao, NONG Zhengbin, LYU Rennan, LU Xiaogai, PAN Wuning, XU Maohua, PENG Bo. Effect of Temperature on Chemical Composition of Tobacco Leaves During Threshing and Redrying [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(1): 200-205. |
| [10] | QI Shuokun, ZHANG Yiyang, MA Yu, LIU Haolin, SHI Juncong, WU Longguo. Effect of Brackish Water on Growth and Quality of Cherry Tomatoes [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(1): 56-69. |
| [11] | XU Cunfa, SUN Yiwen, WANG Ning, WANG Jialei, YANG Chenye, CHEN Liyang, SHAN Chengjun. Quality Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Different Varieties of Small Fruit Watermelon [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(1): 70-76. |
| [12] | ZHOU Chunyan, TAO Ning, FAN Meina, WANG Lirong. Effects of Foliar Application of Microbial Agents on Fruit Coloration and Quality [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(1): 77-83. |
| [13] | YANG Shibo, ZHU Yifan, WU Huiping, YU Dawen, TENG Shihua, HE Wangwei, WAN Jing, DUAN Hengxi, ZU Chaolong, DONG Qing, SHEN Jia, WANG Jitao. Influence of Exogenous Plant Regulators on Expansion and Quality of Upper Leaves of Flue-cured Tobacco in Yunnan Province [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(1): 12-19. |
| [14] | REN Qingguo, WU Guangjun, LIN Ping, ZHANG Jiyu, ZHANG Xin, ZHANG Yongshan, HAI Tao. Study of Yield and Quality Traits of New Wheat Cultivar ‘Hemai 26’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 32-37. |
| [15] | JIANG Yongqiang, WU Yao, FANG Zhongjian, YE Guangying, HUI Jun’ai, ZHOU Rong, WANG Zaihua. Influence of LED Light Quality on Growth and Quality of Tissue Culture Plantets of Dendrobium officinale and D. nobile [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 65-72. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||