
Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10): 61-67.doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0462
Previous Articles Next Articles
TIAN Lingyue1,2(
), FAN Yan3, ZHU Yue2, HUANG Shihang1, LUO Jiafu2, LI Caiqin1(
)
Received:2025-06-12
Revised:2026-04-03
Online:2026-05-25
Published:2026-05-27
CLC Number:
TIAN Lingyue, FAN Yan, ZHU Yue, HUANG Shihang, LUO Jiafu, LI Caiqin. Effects of Different Complex Coconut Coir Substrates on Blueberry Fruit Quality[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(10): 61-67.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.casb.org.cn/EN/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2025-0462
| 品种 | 处理 | 单果重/ g | 横径/ mm | 纵径/ mm | 果形指数 | 果实硬度/ (kg/cm2) | 可溶性固形物含量/ % | 可滴定酸含量/ % | 固酸比 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 优瑞卡 | T1 | 2.77±0.08a | 18.22±0.32a | 14.16±0.22a | 0.78±0.01a | 0.64±0.03b | 10.95±0.25b | 0.70±0.03c | 15.96±2.21a |
| T2 | 2.99±0.10a | 18.70±0.28a | 14.13±0.34a | 0.76±0.02a | 0.38±0.02ef | 8.99±0.14cd | 0.56±0.04c | 17.55±1.09ab | |
| T3 | 2.97±0.06a | 17.06±0.26b | 12.72±0.19b | 0.75±0.01a | 0.44±0.03de | 8.33±0.17d | 0.98±0.08a | 9.48±0.75d | |
| T4 | 2.98±0.08a | 18.09±0.39a | 12.66±0.26b | 0.70±0.01b | 0.35±0.01f | 9.27±0.14c | 0.68±0.02c | 14.52±0.36c | |
| 薄雾 | T1 | 1.42±0.04d | 15.64±0.37c | 12.05±0.25b | 0.77±0.01a | 0.79±0.03a | 12.86±0.30a | 0.95±0.11a | 15.42±1.30bc |
| T2 | 2.26±0.16b | 16.37±0.37bc | 12.22±0.22b | 0.75±0.01a | 0.47±0.03d | 10.35±0.64b | 0.85±0.04ab | 13.21±0.66c | |
| T3 | 1.99±0.08c | 16.01±0.38bc | 12.24±0.25b | 0.77±0.01a | 0.56±0.02c | 10.42±0.22b | 0.71±0.04bc | 15.66±0.71bc | |
| T4 | 1.74±0.10c | 16.41±0.43bc | 12.25±0.12b | 0.77±0.01a | 0.50±0.02cd | 10.19±0.18b | 0.73±0.02bc | 14.66±0.32c |
| 品种 | 处理 | 单果重/ g | 横径/ mm | 纵径/ mm | 果形指数 | 果实硬度/ (kg/cm2) | 可溶性固形物含量/ % | 可滴定酸含量/ % | 固酸比 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 优瑞卡 | T1 | 2.77±0.08a | 18.22±0.32a | 14.16±0.22a | 0.78±0.01a | 0.64±0.03b | 10.95±0.25b | 0.70±0.03c | 15.96±2.21a |
| T2 | 2.99±0.10a | 18.70±0.28a | 14.13±0.34a | 0.76±0.02a | 0.38±0.02ef | 8.99±0.14cd | 0.56±0.04c | 17.55±1.09ab | |
| T3 | 2.97±0.06a | 17.06±0.26b | 12.72±0.19b | 0.75±0.01a | 0.44±0.03de | 8.33±0.17d | 0.98±0.08a | 9.48±0.75d | |
| T4 | 2.98±0.08a | 18.09±0.39a | 12.66±0.26b | 0.70±0.01b | 0.35±0.01f | 9.27±0.14c | 0.68±0.02c | 14.52±0.36c | |
| 薄雾 | T1 | 1.42±0.04d | 15.64±0.37c | 12.05±0.25b | 0.77±0.01a | 0.79±0.03a | 12.86±0.30a | 0.95±0.11a | 15.42±1.30bc |
| T2 | 2.26±0.16b | 16.37±0.37bc | 12.22±0.22b | 0.75±0.01a | 0.47±0.03d | 10.35±0.64b | 0.85±0.04ab | 13.21±0.66c | |
| T3 | 1.99±0.08c | 16.01±0.38bc | 12.24±0.25b | 0.77±0.01a | 0.56±0.02c | 10.42±0.22b | 0.71±0.04bc | 15.66±0.71bc | |
| T4 | 1.74±0.10c | 16.41±0.43bc | 12.25±0.12b | 0.77±0.01a | 0.50±0.02cd | 10.19±0.18b | 0.73±0.02bc | 14.66±0.32c |
| 品种 | 处理 | L | a | b | C | Hab/° |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 优瑞卡 | T1 | 24.53±0.47 d | 0.49±0.07b | -1.44±0.18a | 1.58±0.17d | 294.10±4.06a |
| T2 | 25.94±0.40cd | 0.53±0.15b | -1.47±0.28a | 1.62±0.30d | 292.34±3.84ab | |
| T3 | 25.63±0.29cd | 0.73±0.21ab | -1.66±0.32ab | 1.88±0.36d | 294.18±4.20a | |
| T4 | 27.34±0.61c | 0.39±0.08b | -2.74±0.41b | 2.83±0.40c | 285.14±3.92abc | |
| 薄雾 | T1 | 31.06±0.84b | 0.38±0.11b | -4.40±0.29c | 4.44±0.30b | 275.15±1.40c |
| T2 | 33.72±1.15a | 1.52±0.62a | -3.94±0.92c | 5.67±0.36a | 287.57±6.15ab | |
| T3 | 34.27±0.91a | 0.92±0.32ab | -5.11±0.33c | 5.33±0.32ab | 280.31±3.60bc | |
| T4 | 32.95±0.72ab | 1.53±0.38a | -4.67±0.30c | 5.09±0.29ab | 288.07±4.10ab |
| 品种 | 处理 | L | a | b | C | Hab/° |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 优瑞卡 | T1 | 24.53±0.47 d | 0.49±0.07b | -1.44±0.18a | 1.58±0.17d | 294.10±4.06a |
| T2 | 25.94±0.40cd | 0.53±0.15b | -1.47±0.28a | 1.62±0.30d | 292.34±3.84ab | |
| T3 | 25.63±0.29cd | 0.73±0.21ab | -1.66±0.32ab | 1.88±0.36d | 294.18±4.20a | |
| T4 | 27.34±0.61c | 0.39±0.08b | -2.74±0.41b | 2.83±0.40c | 285.14±3.92abc | |
| 薄雾 | T1 | 31.06±0.84b | 0.38±0.11b | -4.40±0.29c | 4.44±0.30b | 275.15±1.40c |
| T2 | 33.72±1.15a | 1.52±0.62a | -3.94±0.92c | 5.67±0.36a | 287.57±6.15ab | |
| T3 | 34.27±0.91a | 0.92±0.32ab | -5.11±0.33c | 5.33±0.32ab | 280.31±3.60bc | |
| T4 | 32.95±0.72ab | 1.53±0.38a | -4.67±0.30c | 5.09±0.29ab | 288.07±4.10ab |
| 品种 | 处理 | 花青素/ (mg/kg) | 总酚/ (mg/kg) | 总黄酮/ (mg/kg) | MDA/ (nmol/g) | SOD活性/ (U/g) | POD活性/ [U/(g·min)] | DPPH/ % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 优瑞卡 | T1 | 3.06±0.02ab | 8.74±0.21d | 11.46±0.48d | 23.44±0.61b | 620.33±30.37ab | 466.67±68.37bc | 61.13±4.31b |
| T2 | 3.05±0.03ab | 6.52±0.15e | 7.93±0.29e | 15.82±0.08e | 579.55±10.43b | 642.22±56.67abc | 58.64±0.00b | |
| T3 | 2.96±0.02b | 8.70±0.16d | 9.62±0.25d | 21.19±0.21c | 681.51±40.16a | 325.33±26.79c | 81.13±8.10a | |
| T4 | 3.06±0.01ab | 8.60±0.11d | 9.76±0.19d | 19.37±0.23d | 590.64±15.54b | 284.00±22.85c | 56.93±3.64b | |
| 薄雾 | T1 | 3.32±0.03ab | 11.02±0.22c | 15.86±0.56b | 24.71±0.59a | 411.82±28.21c | 946.56±323.82a | 34.35±0.37c |
| T2 | 3.39±0.02a | 11.58±0.08b | 10.38±0.07d | 21.48±0.49c | 101.03±17.36e | 855.81±110.33ab | 51.47±3.90b | |
| T3 | 2.22±0.34c | 11.14±0.18bc | 11.92±0.16c | 21.19±0.21c | 348.00±25.46c | 435.77±100.36c | 59.05±1.35b | |
| T4 | 3.22±0.04ab | 12.23±0.15a | 17.17±0.17a | 13.94±0.17f | 245.33±23.48d | 226.47±27.78c | 24.90±1.12c |
| 品种 | 处理 | 花青素/ (mg/kg) | 总酚/ (mg/kg) | 总黄酮/ (mg/kg) | MDA/ (nmol/g) | SOD活性/ (U/g) | POD活性/ [U/(g·min)] | DPPH/ % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 优瑞卡 | T1 | 3.06±0.02ab | 8.74±0.21d | 11.46±0.48d | 23.44±0.61b | 620.33±30.37ab | 466.67±68.37bc | 61.13±4.31b |
| T2 | 3.05±0.03ab | 6.52±0.15e | 7.93±0.29e | 15.82±0.08e | 579.55±10.43b | 642.22±56.67abc | 58.64±0.00b | |
| T3 | 2.96±0.02b | 8.70±0.16d | 9.62±0.25d | 21.19±0.21c | 681.51±40.16a | 325.33±26.79c | 81.13±8.10a | |
| T4 | 3.06±0.01ab | 8.60±0.11d | 9.76±0.19d | 19.37±0.23d | 590.64±15.54b | 284.00±22.85c | 56.93±3.64b | |
| 薄雾 | T1 | 3.32±0.03ab | 11.02±0.22c | 15.86±0.56b | 24.71±0.59a | 411.82±28.21c | 946.56±323.82a | 34.35±0.37c |
| T2 | 3.39±0.02a | 11.58±0.08b | 10.38±0.07d | 21.48±0.49c | 101.03±17.36e | 855.81±110.33ab | 51.47±3.90b | |
| T3 | 2.22±0.34c | 11.14±0.18bc | 11.92±0.16c | 21.19±0.21c | 348.00±25.46c | 435.77±100.36c | 59.05±1.35b | |
| T4 | 3.22±0.04ab | 12.23±0.15a | 17.17±0.17a | 13.94±0.17f | 245.33±23.48d | 226.47±27.78c | 24.90±1.12c |
| 处理 | 单果重 | 横径 | 纵径 | 果形 指数 | 硬度 | 可溶性固形物 含量 | 可滴定酸 含量 | 固酸比 | 花青素 | 总酚 | 总黄酮 | MDA | SOD | POD | DPPH | 隶属 函数 | 排名 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 0.00 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.80 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.17 | 0.40 | 0.51 | 1.00 | 0.17 | 0.66 | 1 |
| T2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.10 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.59 | 2 |
| T3 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.29 | 0.48 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.12 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.37 | 4 |
| T4 | 0.96 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.36 | 0.72 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.46 | 3 |
| 处理 | 单果重 | 横径 | 纵径 | 果形 指数 | 硬度 | 可溶性固形物 含量 | 可滴定酸 含量 | 固酸比 | 花青素 | 总酚 | 总黄酮 | MDA | SOD | POD | DPPH | 隶属 函数 | 排名 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 0.00 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.80 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.17 | 0.40 | 0.51 | 1.00 | 0.17 | 0.66 | 1 |
| T2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.10 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.59 | 2 |
| T3 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.29 | 0.48 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.12 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.37 | 4 |
| T4 | 0.96 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.36 | 0.72 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.46 | 3 |
| 处理 | 单果重 | 横径 | 纵径 | 果形 指数 | 硬度 | 可溶性固形物 含量 | 可滴定酸 含量 | 固酸比 | 花青素 | 总酚 | 总黄酮 | MDA | SOD | POD | DPPH | 隶属 函数 | 排名 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.28 | 0.49 | 2 |
| T2 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 0.30 | 0.00 | 0.87 | 0.78 | 0.44 | 4 |
| T3 | 0.68 | 0.49 | 0.44 | 0.29 | 0.08 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 0.10 | 0.23 | 0.33 | 0.79 | 0.29 | 1.00 | 0.48 | 3 |
| T4 | 0.38 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.91 | 0.59 | 0.86 | 0.38 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.59 | 1 |
| 处理 | 单果重 | 横径 | 纵径 | 果形 指数 | 硬度 | 可溶性固形物 含量 | 可滴定酸 含量 | 固酸比 | 花青素 | 总酚 | 总黄酮 | MDA | SOD | POD | DPPH | 隶属 函数 | 排名 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.28 | 0.49 | 2 |
| T2 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 0.30 | 0.00 | 0.87 | 0.78 | 0.44 | 4 |
| T3 | 0.68 | 0.49 | 0.44 | 0.29 | 0.08 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 0.10 | 0.23 | 0.33 | 0.79 | 0.29 | 1.00 | 0.48 | 3 |
| T4 | 0.38 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.91 | 0.59 | 0.86 | 0.38 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.59 | 1 |
| [1] |
杨夫臣, 秦仲麒, 李先明, 等. 高丛蓝莓和兔眼蓝莓在湖北的引种试验[J]. 中国南方果树, 2015, 44(1):59-62.
|
| [2] |
潘美华, 程哲灏. 蓝莓的营养成分及其保健功能的研究进展[J]. 食品安全导刊, 2022(22):107-109.
|
| [3] |
谢兆森, 吴晓春. 蓝莓栽培中土壤改良的研究进展[J]. 北方果树, 2006(1):1-4.
|
| [4] |
刘绍金, 卢炜乐. 我国蓝莓产业现状和发展趋势[J]. 现代园艺, 2018(22):18.
|
| [5] |
孙锦, 李谦盛, 岳冬, 等. 国内外无土栽培技术研究现状与应用前景[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2022, 45(5):898-915.
|
| [6] |
晏琼, 刘晓宇, 虞昊安, 等. 植物无土栽培技术研究进展[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2022, 27(5):1-11.
|
| [7] |
李智琪, 李晴, 董相洁, 等. 以醋糟为主要成分的无土栽培基质筛选及其对甜瓜生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2023, 55(9):72-78.
|
| [8] |
曹红星. 黄瓜无土栽培有机基质配方和肥料筛选研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2005.
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
张新宇. 不同复配基质对草莓植株生长和果实品质的影响[D]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2021.
|
| [11] |
严云, 房巍慧, 周哲丹. 不同基质对温室蓝莓生长发育的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2019, 60(9):1544-1546.
doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20190918 |
| [12] |
苗相伟. 不同基质栽培对蓝莓生长发育的影响[J]. 中国果菜, 2023, 43(6):68-71.
|
| [13] |
彭杨, 马晓燕, 冯天乐, 等. 基于株高、产量、品质联合分析筛选砂糖橘优良砧木[J]. 果树学报, 2024, 41(6):1078-1093.
|
| [14] |
张清航, 张永涛. 植物体内丙二醛(MDA)含量对干旱的响应[J]. 林业勘查设计, 2019(1):110-112.
|
| [15] |
李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.
|
| [16] |
曹建康, 姜微波, 赵玉梅. 果蔬采后生理生化实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国轻工业出版社, 2007.
|
| [17] |
姚会敏, 翟赛亚, 雷昌贵, 等. 基于主要功能成分的不同品种蓝莓品质分析评价[J]. 中国食品添加剂, 2022, 33(11):163-170.
|
| [18] |
张真真, 邱立军, 郭卫东. 不同栽培基质对蓝莓果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2022, 63(2):310-317.
doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20212360 |
| [19] |
贾莹, 胡志和. 蓝莓饮料花青素稳定性研究[J]. 核农学报, 2016, 30(5):941-948.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2016.05.0941 |
| [20] |
杨浩, 吴文龙, 闾连飞, 等. 土壤pH值对蓝莓生长和生理特性的影响及其调节方法综述[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(6):1-8.
|
| [21] |
肖守华, 赵西, 肖真真, 等. 以椰糠为基质的设施甜瓜无土栽培基质配方筛选[J]. 山东农业科学, 2019, 51(1):61-64.
|
| [22] |
张鹏程, 崔世茂, 杨志刚, 等. 椰糠复合基质对黄瓜生长、品质和产量的影响[J]. 蔬菜, 2024(10):42-49.
|
| [23] |
史云峰, 安长卿, 王刚, 等. 椰糠作为甜瓜栽培基质的初步研究[J]. 琼州学院学报, 2013, 20(5):59-63.
|
| [24] |
周秀利. 日光温室番茄椰糠基质栽培模式研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2017.
|
| [25] |
代惠洁, 纪祥龙, 杜迎刚. 椰糠替代草炭作番茄穴盘育苗基质的研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2015(9):46-48.
|
| [26] |
彭丹丹, 陈大刚, 徐开未, 等. 椰糠复合基质对猕猴桃砧木幼苗生长及根系特征的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2023, 35(10):2364-2377.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20221324 |
| [27] |
于志民, 孙磊. 酸性配方基质在设施地栽培蓝莓中的应用研究[J]. 腐植酸, 2013(1):13-21.
|
| [1] | LI Zihan, MA Yangmin, MA Siyue, SHANG Menghua, WANG Kai, ZHANG Shanshan, WANG Heda, ZHANG Yanhui. Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Essential Oils from Five Different Artemisia Species [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(9): 155-162. |
| [2] | WU Hailing, SUN Mengyan, SUO Haicui, REN Hailong, ZHANG Wenting, SUN Mingyang, SHEN Yingbin, YUAN Qinghua. Research Progress on Anti-aging Active Ingredients of Soybean [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(8): 198-210. |
| [3] | BI Yanliang, QI Shihan, LI Qiongwei, ZOU Xiaoxia, SI Tong. Physiological Mechanism of Seed Coating Agent in Promoting Peanut Seed Germination and Seedling Growth Under Low Temperature [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(8): 44-52. |
| [4] | CHENG Fanyi, ZHOU Qixuan, LAN Lingkai, ZHANG Ruoxi, YIN Yidi, HOU Bohan, DUO Liangyu, GU Jiageng, YAO Yiduo, ZHANG Zishuo, LANG Xuping. Effects of Potassium Deficiency Stress on Growth and Antioxidant Characteristics in Lycium barbarum Seedlings [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(7): 92-96. |
| [5] | ZHENG Xiaoyuan, CHEN Jingyu, WANG Huicong, WANG Zhenjiang, WANG Dan. Fruit Quality Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of 38 Mulberry Germplasm Resources [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(6): 72-84. |
| [6] | LU Xingyu, WEN Zhuang, WU Liting, CUI Lingyan, LIU Yalan, YANG Qin. Effect of Topping on Flowering and Fruit Setting in Lower Nodes of Blueberry Shoots [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(5): 69-76. |
| [7] | GUAN Jiyuan, CHEN Zhe, ZHANG Qunying. Effect of Pollination Varieties on Fecundity and Fruit Quality of Blackberries ‘Freedom’ [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(5): 77-82. |
| [8] | LIU Guimin, SU Lei, ZHENG Xiaoning, CHEN Di, LIU Binghua, SUN Mingjie, LIU Xinghong, XU Yingmei. Effects of Inoculating Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria on Physiological Characteristics of Maize Leaves in Medium- and Low-yield Soils [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(3): 119-124. |
| [9] | ZHANG Dongmin, HUANG Wanli, CHEN Xinyi, ZHANG Chaokun, XIAO Shiwei. Effect of Intercropping Model of Ziziphus mauritiana-Soybeans on Soil Nutrients and Fruit Quality of Z. mauritiana [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(1): 153-158. |
| [10] | WANG Chunfeng, CHENG Jiabao, XIONG Qing, QIN Fei, ZHANG Feng. Effect of Grass on Microenvironment Temperature and Humidity of Korla Fragrant Pear Orchard and Fruit Quality [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(1): 167-175. |
| [11] | QI Shuokun, ZHANG Yiyang, MA Yu, LIU Haolin, SHI Juncong, WU Longguo. Effect of Brackish Water on Growth and Quality of Cherry Tomatoes [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(1): 56-69. |
| [12] | ZHOU Chunyan, TAO Ning, FAN Meina, WANG Lirong. Effects of Foliar Application of Microbial Agents on Fruit Coloration and Quality [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(1): 77-83. |
| [13] | ZHAO Qi, DAI Yu, MA Chunyan, ZHU Yumeng, JIA Kejie. Effects and Mechanism of Hydrogen-rich Water on Cold Hardiness of Bougainvillea spectabilis During Overwintering [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2026, 42(1): 103-109. |
| [14] | JIANG Zijian, YANG Maolin, YANG Xiaoxu, LIU Chang, LIU Dajun, FENG Guojun. Effects of Abscisic Acid on Growth and Cold Resistance of Phaseolus vulgaris Seedlings Under Low Temperature Stress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 38-46. |
| [15] | SU Zechun, YANG Wenhong, YANG Yanlin, YANG Zhengsong, HE Jianping, MU Yongqing, YU Ying, HE Jiawei. Evaluation of Drought Tolerance of Introduced Blueberry Varieties in Northwest Yunnan [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(9): 56-64. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||